The ask had come up by someone, but I can't find the email now.
My thinking at the time was that if you've customized the native code, then
that's a bit going outside of our we promise to not change a thing zone.
And if you were savvy enough to modify your Activity.java, then you'd be
able to
Good idea (I think)!
In my mind there's two main things wrong with our current abstractions:
1. WebView plugins should extend a class instead of implement an interface.
- Reason: You can't make *any* changes to an interface without breaking
the compile for everyone that implements it
2. We need
heh, My bad. Just read the first line and was drawn in! You win this time
Jim Lawrence!
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Ally Ogilvie aogil...@wizcorp.jp wrote:
I knew it! The client is Steve! Take your advertising demands elsewhere
Steve!
Sent from my Windows Phone From: Steven Gill
Sent:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Good idea (I think)!
In my mind there's two main things wrong with our current abstractions:
1. WebView plugins should extend a class instead
Well I'll be darned. :)
The root of what I meant I guess, was that if shrinkwrap doesn't work
without publishing, then let's just publish and don't sweat version numbers
jumping by more than one. If we can get shrinkwrap to work through another
means (private npm repo?), than that's even better.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote
numbers. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7550
Until we have a private registry for release testing, I agree with
Steve
that rc's should not be published to npm, and instead use --usegit.
On Oct 1, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote
There's been a couple bugs come in for Android where our update script has
failed to bring a project in line with what would be created for a new
project: CB-7683, CB-6772
We could put more effort into writing transformations into the update
script, but I think it might be more pragmatic to just
subject, but there's no JIRA item related.
Un-deprecate CordovaActivity.init() - it's needed to tweak prefs in
onCreate, by Andrew Grieve
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-android.git;a=commit;h=a14c7942557fbaea41438bd3fe104b47997d8371
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Martin
=14983eb014f84e08e7a76f1ab6ffe069b81f6ffa
Comments?
On Sep 22, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
I like having it in. For CCA, we actually did get bit in a release
where
we
didn't have a shrinkwrap and a descendant dependency changed and broke
things on us
+1 unbundle. The reason we added it in was that it fixes issues with
Android's built-in networking stack. It was added pre-plugin-breakout, and
was never broken out into its own plugin.
The good news is that I think it'll be quite straight-forward to extract it
out. We don't expose OkHttp
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
+1 unbundle. The reason we added it in was that it fixes issues with
Android's built-in networking stack. It was added pre-plugin-breakout
Sounds good. Apple pushes Xcode updates hard, so it'll just cause pain to
not just go along with it.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not required (yet) by Apple, but presumably it will be, soon. I'd
like this to be the requirement for Cordova iOS going
Woohoo! Welcome Kirk!
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome Kirk!
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Kirk Shoop (MS OPEN TECH)
kirk.sh...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hi!
I work for Microsoft Open Technologies. I have been watching for a while
but
Gradle support on master is still somewhat a work-in-progress, but I think
it's coming along nicely :)
What you want to do hasn't been done before that I know of, but it *might*
just work if you add a build-extras.gradle to your plugin and adding the
extra Dependencies line in there.
More eyes
I do think we should add in this setting, but probably should clarify the
name of it to be more x-platform and clear as to what it does (sets the
default viewport meta to device-width).
If you can have your oauth server serve a page with a viewport meta tag
in it, that would be a more proper way
I see no issues with hardcoding the main activity name.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon)
v-vlk...@microsoft.com wrote:
So do we agree to proceed with hardcoded name for android main activity
here ('CordovaApp' for example), or we still need to implement additional
I like having it in. For CCA, we actually did get bit in a release where we
didn't have a shrinkwrap and a descendant dependency changed and broke
things on us.
It's also really nice that when we sign and vote on a release, that doing
an npm install on it down the line will recreate the exact
:20 AM, Shazron
shaz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Haven't yet - but from what I read - no. Something
about
requests
being
out
of process
On Monday, June 16, 2014, Andrew Grieve
agri...@chromium.org
wrote
I can do it now, what's your npm username?
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve / Anis / Max / Andrew / Jesse / Ian: could one of you add me as an
owner of the core plugins in the plugman repo so I can publish there?
Thanks!
Begin forwarded message:
done
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, forgot to include that: cmarcelk
Thanks!
On Sep 22, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
I can do it now, what's your npm username?
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Marcel
blog post LGTM - but run www/_posts/linkify-bugs.sh before posting please :)
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
I've drafted a blog entry. If you have any suggestions, please either
commit to it or submit a pull request. I'd like to post the blog entry
, especially when the
shrinkwrap command is careful to check that the main module's node_modules
matches its package.json dependencies. It seems to be treating the main
module and the submodules differently.
On Sep 16, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
It shouldn't
You need to install the Android SDK for API level 19. Use the Android SDK
Manager to install it. You can open it by Start-Run android
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Surinaidu Majji pioneer.s...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am developing an app using cordova 3.5.0 by using android-4.4.2 with an
api
You shouldn't be seeing devDependencies show up in cordova. I'd double make
sure that if you:
cd cordova-cli
rm -r node_modules
rm npm-shrinkwrap.json
npm install
npm shrinkwrap
that you end up with an npm-shrinkwrap.json that includes the devDependency.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM,
that and it's still showing up, I don't know why that
is :S
I'm trying to figure out if I'm doing something wrong, or if the
shrinkwrap command is misbehaving.
On Sep 16, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
You shouldn't be seeing devDependencies show up in cordova. I'd
:00 Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org:
I guess I can see the value of providing a safety option for pause my
app in the background, but in general I think it's better practice to
not pause forcefully, and instead have apps listen to the pause
event, and stop battery-draining activity
Sounds awful, but I have no better ideas.
We might in the future consider pinning CLI to download 3.6.x so that
it will automatically pick up point releases for times like this.
Don't think the logic's i there now for that though.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Marcel Kinard
Makes sense that we should do this.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Gao, Chun chun@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I found there are some requirements for InAppBrowser plugin to support HTML5
features
running in the background at all.
This now means that the Javascript is running constantly, regardless of
whether it's an event. This means that setInterval is still running. This
could break people's applications.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote
you put this on its own branch before it lands in 4.0.x? That'd be
awesome!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
For cordova-android 4.0, I'd like to go as far as just deleting the
KeepRunning preference.
Apps get a pause event when they are backgrounded
it if you were to put
this
in your own branch for testing.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
I don't think there'd be much value in that. It'll be a single commit
that almost entirely just deletes lines.
What do you think about the never
Commit description: If multitasking is turned on (keepRunning=true),
then temporarily disable it when starting a new activity that returns
a result - such as camera.
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/commit/26adfb634651196106fb5b66f15eecb535a06d82
Bryce / anyone - clues as to *why* we'd
:(
Hopefully UIWebView will still get some updates though? E.g. IndexedDb?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Tommy Williams to...@devgeeks.org wrote:
That's pretty disappointing.
Especially with not even a comment from apple.
On 10 Sep 2014 05:50, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, bad
on html5test.com, and yes it
supports indexedDB
Full results: http://html5te.st/f16d892273bbe5bd
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
:(
Hopefully UIWebView will still get some updates though? E.g. IndexedDb?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Tommy Williams
PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Commit description: If multitasking is turned on (keepRunning=true),
then temporarily disable it when starting a new activity that returns
a result - such as camera.
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/commit
Updated the release post to trim down the Android section.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
And here is the draft blog post:
https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2014-09-08-cordova-361.md
Please add highlights for your platform.
Thanks - I've re-opened the bug.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Li, Jonathan jonathan...@sap.com wrote:
Hi,
Due to bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3071, the cached response
gets invalidated after each time restarting the iOS cordova app, the
suggested workaround is to use
-studios-llc/id498577828
Books:
http://www.packtpub.com/phonegap-2-mobile-application-hotshot/book
http://www.packtpub.com/phonegap-social-app-development/book
On Aug 21, 2014, at 23:44, Andrew Grieve agri...@google.com wrote:
I'll be back Sept 8th :)
Just spent 2 days in Vancouver, and Cordova St was en route to the aquarium :)
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Why did you go to Strathcona?
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Aaaand, I'm back!
Here's
The npm-based download of platforms is still quite new, as is the need
for platforms to have npm dependencies. Android and iOS have some
checked in node_modules. I believe blackberry solved this using
bundleDependencies when publishing to npm.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Brian LeRoux
Splitting out the docs would be really tough for some things:
- cross-cutting: Platform support, Icons Splashscreens
- Generic in nature: Privacy Guide, Security Guide, etc
Handling translations is also a pain the more we extract things out.
Having CLI create pre-project docs is a neat idea,
I'll be back Sept 8th :)
I think this is a very desired plugin that many end up re-writing, and it's
far better than setting the content src directly to a remote URL.
E.g. just stumbled across this yesterday:
http://docs.appmobi.com/index.php/live-update/
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Michal Mocny
In case this is news to anyone else, Intel's XDK has been morphing
into a Cordova IDE over the past year (from their custom runtime,
which they now call legacy build system).
Here's their overview:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/html5/articles/using-the-cordova-for-android-ios-etc-build-option
. For example, with PhoneGap Developer Apps you don't need the
entire CLI (or any native bits) but just a create command and the
phonegap-connect modules for serving the content to the app (app harness
flow too).
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Could you
Seems bb10 was just never published to npm. Josh want to take a stab at
this? Should be as simple checking out the tag and typing npm publish
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
Steven Gill wrote:
How does everyone feel about me starting the release
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
We don't have to make plugins a package.json thing…we could do that latter.
If we do choose to use package.json highly likely we'll need to reserve a
key for our 'namespace'. Perhaps cordova. That key could have whatever we
Certainly shows some rough spots of the CLI interface e.g.:
- Need to add plugins before platforms
- Need to chdir() before calling functions
And yes - love that this makes cordova fit in more nicely with other parts
of an app's build system.
One thing I wondered when reading it is if Cordova
, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
My guess: Don't wait until onload to register your deviceready
listener.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Leonardo Martínez
leolib2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am new here and I got into this mailing list because of this
strange
behaviour
Subject: Re: Android: add support of min/max/target SDK to
config.xml
+1
Another step towards build-artefact-land.
On 7 July 2014 at 23:29:25, Andrew Grieve (
agri...@chromium.org)
wrote:
I'd
of
the platform/cli release, and its assets are voted on as part of
that?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
app-hello-world is quite a weird one now. There's two parts to it:
1) default icons splashscreens - copied into each
I'm be in favour of adding the polyfill right to cordova.js.
- I'd like to use setImmediate within the Android bridge code, and
setImmediate make up about half of the Promise polyfill code.
- The polyfill is quite small
- Promises are a part of ECMAScript, have been adopted by multiple
browsers,
My guess: Don't wait until onload to register your deviceready listener.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Leonardo Martínez leolib2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am new here and I got into this mailing list because of this strange
behaviour.
The thing is that sometimes the ondeviceready event
describe```
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
That all sounds good to me Steve!
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have started to look into adding cordova.platformVersion
Thanks for pointing this out Paul. I've created an issue for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7292
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Paul Topping pa...@dessci.com wrote:
Just FYI. Here's output from
http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcordova.apache.org%2Frss.xml
New mailinglist that it may be worth joining.
Chrome Axiom is the Chrome Developer Tooling platform. We're building the
well lit path for web developers to succeed.
http://goto/chrome-axiom
-
From: Andrew Grieve [mailto:agri...@google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 8:49 AM
To: dev
Subject: Chrome-axiom
New mailinglist that it may be worth joining.
Chrome Axiom is the Chrome Developer Tooling platform. We're building the
well lit path for web developers to succeed
: Andrew Grieve agri...@google.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:49 AM
To: dev
Subject: Chrome-axiom
New mailinglist that it may be worth joining.
Chrome Axiom is the Chrome Developer Tooling platform. We're building the
well lit path for web developers to succeed.
http://goto/chrome-axiom
A malicious XSS that navigates the page would probably opt to not include
cordova.js :P.
So - I see there being three kinds of things to have whitelists for:
1) Top-level navigations,
2) intents (on supported platforms)
3) resources / CSP-related requests.
According to CSP docs here:
Very cool! Thanks for sharing.
The technique used is the same that JsHybugger uses. Differences though:
- This is x-platform
- This requires a server
- This doesn't integrate with devtools
- This is free to use.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sergey,
Played around with it and it's pretty clear to me that the ability to
record your plugins platforms in config.xml is a big step up.
I do have some specific comments about the current design though:
- Right now the plugin save saves all plugins to config.xml rather than
just explicitly-installed
friends
plugin is nice, but why not just dependency as plugin.xml already
uses?
config.xml and plugin.xml share lots of tags already, why fork here?
-Michal
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@google.com
wrote:
Played around with it and it's pretty clear to me
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Gorkem Ercan gorkem.er...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just returning from PTO, great timing :)
:)
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:06:14PM -0400, Andrew Grieve wrote:
Played around with it and it's pretty clear to me that the ability to
record your plugins platforms
I don't see the harm in it, but would be interested to know what the wins
are, and how much work it would be to accomplish.
e.g. Does the CordovaLib project not currently work within an xcworkspace?
Is the current integration as simple as deleting CordovaLib as a subproject
and adding it as a
I think this is a nice summary of the trade-offs between the two
approaches.
I'm much in favour of ripple as a single platform, mainly because of the
fact that you're not running it on devices. The merges/ problem can be
solved by the user adding a ripple dir to merges, and the per-platform
and package.json file.
My +1 for this.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:25:28PM -0400, Andrew Grieve wrote:
Wanted to start a thread for everyone to share what concrete changes
they'd
like to see happen before we start having platforms being released in
an
unsynchronized fashion
That all sounds good to me Steve!
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have started to look into adding cordova.platformVersion to cordova.js.
Issue [1].
Trying to figure out the best way to implement this.
One potential method.
1) Pass in
+1
* Confirmed sigs hashes with `coho verify-archive`
* Verified sha1s match tags with `coho verify-tags`
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org
wrote:
+1
* Verified all archives
* Verified that the tags are correct, and point to the hashes listed
*
LGTM
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please review and send PRs for changes. I can also add you to the repo if
you want to edit directly on github and not worry about the PR.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Staci Cooper staci@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed some problems I'd like to bring up.
1)
https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/blob/master/www/index.html#L44
This line breaks on windows phone when the query property is used.
Using a fragment
Wanted to start a thread for everyone to share what concrete changes they'd
like to see happen before we start having platforms being released in an
unsynchronized fashion.
I'll start :)
cordova-js:
- cordova.version returns a value computed from the cordova-js git tag.
- Let's deprecate
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
cordova-js:
- cordova.version returns a value computed from the cordova-js git tag.
- Let's deprecate this field
- And create cordova.platformVersion
- And update our release process to have the version set
Hey Chuck, thanks for joining the conversation! Great to have all
stakeholders taking part.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Chuck Lantz cla...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hey folks, I'm on the Visual Studio team. I think my primary concern here
comes more from what we expect developers to
If you're interested in this I think it'd be best to look at the
--experimental plugin save and plugin restore commands and try to
iterate from there.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 on removing the pining
Can we at least record what's get's
I agree that the feature will make installing platforms less predictable...
or at least, just as unpredictable as plugins.
It is a good idea to look at exactly what the benefits are though.
First - the benefits of removing the idea of a cadence version:
- Android 4.0 is on the horizon, maybe iOS
a branching
problem that we should not pass on to end users.
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew
Grieve
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:47 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Proposal: remove platform versions from platfroms.js
I
, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Chuck Lantz
cla...@microsoft.com
wrote:
To me it sounds like we're talking about something bigger than
pinning:
What does a Cordova version actually mean?
When new macro
.
My thinking there was that we'll be able to announce platform updates
without waiting for a tools release to happen.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
How about discussing dropping the CAD-SEM version of CLI, and just have
SEM?
Probably
Hi Walton,
This is definitely a use-case that is not well supported right now, but is
being actively worked on. In fact, in the next version of cordova-android,
there will be a new to programmatically configure each WebView separately.
However, it will take some time for plugins to move away from
I'm definitely in favour of not pinning the version, since I think that
will significantly simplify the release process.
re webworks - not sure I fully understood the things you wanted to think
about there, but I'm sure it would be easy to have downstreams pin
versions. You can already override
installed.
If
its
not optional, you should probably not install the plugin at all if
you don't want to run the hook.
WDYT?
-Michal
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Andrew Grieve
agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Finally got to having a look. Lots of neat stuff
Finally got to having a look. Lots of neat stuff in there! Some specific
feedback:
- Not a fan of script, hook might be better
- context.commonModules is a great idea, but I don't think exposing
requireCordovaModule or elementtree is a good idea.
- E.g. what if we want to drop our dependency on
I was actually looking at this recently and found that the backgroundColor
preference is not being applied to the actual WebView element. Didn't want
to change it because I was changing other things at the time, but likely
this is just a bug that we should fix.
Filed an issue:
to have the
backgroundColor.
Also, I haven't seen this behaviour on any of the tests that we done.
Unless we can reproduce the issue, we can't fix it, and shouldn't just
throw things over the wall.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
I was actually
Thanks Ian! Probably a good idea to discuss the heck of this.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org
wrote:
[Opening this discussion up on the list, as it had previously been the
domain of private conversations and limited-audience discussions]
On the 4.0.x
17, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Try setting opacity:0 on the html tag and you can reproduce white
showing
instead of your backgroundColor.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
The WebView element isn't supposed to have
Swizzling is better than using a category because it will allow multiple
plugins to hook into the method.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:13 AM, julio cesar sanchez jcesarmob...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've just tested and you can just create an AppDelegate category for
the new methods and this should
I know that there's this PR: https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/70
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
v-seg...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hi, does anyone know where we are here? The official repo [1] is empty. -
I'm trying to understand current status to see how our
to compatibility. We should make a spec engine that's just a
clone of AndroidWebView specifically for testing and API
functionality. I'll add that to the JIRA subtask.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Thanks for compiling. Do you think git
Good call here. I should have made JIRAs for a bunch of these. I've now
done so retroactively.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 2014 5:43 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Joe Bowser bows
The super implementation just returns null, so there's not really any value
in calling super here I don't think.
If you want to customize the class, then your custom class should extend it
rather than changing it to extend you class.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
I don't think it's been removed:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/4.0.x/framework/src/org/apache/cordova/CordovaWebView.java#L81
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/4.0.x/framework/src/org/apache/cordova/AndroidWebView.java#L732
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Joe
something.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
I don't think it's been removed:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/4.0.x/framework/src/org/apache/cordova/CordovaWebView.java#L81
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/4.0.x
Let's discuss tonight, but it is actually pretty easy to revert things
without --force. git revert can do it, or git checkout HASH . git
commit --all -a
Also - what's broken? Just did a test compile with 4.0.x
https://github.com/clelland/cordova-crosswalk-engine#plugin_with_arm_binary
and it
. If there was a good tool to check all 30+
commits that happened, that'd help too, but this is extremely
frustrating, since I want to demo something.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Andrew Grieve
agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
I don't think it's been removed
July 3, 2014 and I did not see any discussion of it in dev@
prior to that.
Shaz
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Let's discuss tonight, but it is actually pretty easy to revert things
without --force. git revert can do it, or git checkout HASH
is not pro-community.
I may have missed it (apologies if I did) but the series of patches
started July 3, 2014 and I did not see any discussion of it in dev@
prior to that.
Shaz
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Let's discuss tonight
Makes sense to me! :)
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Andrey Kurdumov kant2...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
I have latest version of Media plugin on Android and have following
behavior when playing sound. When playing sound it does not respect
settings which user set on their phone.
Yeah, plugin docs are already gone from docs.cordova.io. This change is
strictly for guides platform docs. The main motivation here is that it
doesn't make sense to have versioned docs if platform versions diverge
anyways. It actually already makes little sense for the tools guides, since
they
401 - 500 of 2036 matches
Mail list logo
