Hi all,
The slack channel https://apachebookkeeper.slack.com is live now. If you
have emails (@apache.org), you can signup with
https://apachebookkeeper.slack.com/signup.
If you don't have apache emails, you can auto-invite yourself in
https://apachebookkeeper.herokuapp.com/
If you were already
Closed the vote. 4 binding +1 votes, 5 non-binding +1 votes. The vote is
passed. I will proceed with the next steps to hand over the channel to BK
PMC.
Binding votes:
- Ivan Kelly
- JV
- Matteo Merli
- Sijie Guo
Non binding votes:
- atracymartin
- Enrico Olivelli
- Francesco Caliumi
- Jia
1:06 AM, Enrico Olivelli > <mailto:eolive...@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il gio 27 lug 2017, 20:02 Sijie Guo mailto:guo
> > si...@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
> >
>
Start a vote thread for transferring the DL slack channel to BK.
The propose is:
- transfer the dl slack channel apachedistributedlog.slack.com to
apachebookkeeper.slack.com
- the owner will be BookKeeper PMC (priv...@bookkeeper.apache.org)
One note:
- the slack channel is for informal/immediat
As we discussed in today's community meeting
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-07-27+Meeting+Notes>,
I will start a vote thread for that.
- Sijie
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you guys all think about havi
Hi sijie,
> I am inserested to be the release manager for 0.5.0, but there will be some
> instruction and help needed from you guys. :)
>
> Thanks.
> -Jia
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > +1. Jia, thank you for raising this up.
> >
> &
gt;
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
> ---- Original message From: Sijie Guo
> Date: 7/25/17 8:22 PM (GMT-05:00) To: d...@bookkeeper.apache.org Cc:
> dev@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Slack
> Channel for BookKeeper
> Currently BK doesn't has one
+1. Jia, thank you for raising this up.
I have a few questions:
- Release Manager:
Any volunteers on driving this release?
- Pending changes:
What are the pending changes that are blocking DL upgrade BK to 4.5.0
(both BK and DL side)?
Any thoughts?
- Sijie
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:17 P
t; wrote:
> > >
> > > đź‘Ť It is great to have a slack channel. It make things more effective
> and
> > > smooth.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > What
Hi all,
What do you guys all think about having a dedicated slack channel for
informal discussion for the community? There are a handful of Apache
projects are doing that already, there are also ways to have a bot that
sends daily digest of the conversation to the mailing lists (to keep the
record
+1. Since we are moving DL as the subproject of BookKeeper, it aligns our
goal for making the procedures between BK and DL consistent.
- Sijie
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Jia Zhai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently, Apache BookKeeper community discussed and decided to have a try
> on "github is
/cc (d...@bookkeeper.apache.org and d...@pulsar.incubator.apache.org)
Closed the vote. The vote passed with 10 +1 and no -1.
The 10 +1 includes 3 +1 (binding) and 7 +1 (non-binding)
3 +1 (binding):
- Franck Cuny
- Leigh Stewart
- Sijie Guo
7 +1 (non-binding)
- Edward Ribeiro
- Gerrit
t? :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Now I see on apache git repo this sha
> > 07852d35856dca232450135913090bac27b29abe and on github the same
> > 07852d35856dca232450135913090bac27b29abe
> >
> > Thank you Sijie
> > -
It seems that the recent merged changes are not propagated into the github
mirror. it seems something is broken in INFRA. try to asking INFRA team.
on-binding)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Jia Zhai wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Stevo Slavić
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > &
(dropping general@)
- Sijie
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> ( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness )
>
> Hi all,
>
> There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog
> PPMC about moving the development of Distrib
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Sure.
> >
> > The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog
> PPMC:
> >
> > https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private
for the first step. Let me know if I missed
anything.
- Sijie
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:37 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Sije,
>
> Can you provide links to the PPMC and PMC votes going on for this move?
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
>
( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness )
Hi all,
There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC
about moving the development of DistributedLog as part of Apache
BookKeeper. The reasons behind it are:
First, DistributedLog is born as an extension t
I updated the wiki page.
Mentors, can you guys check the wiki page?
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2017
- Sijie
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Thank you folks.
>
> I will update the wiki page then.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:0
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, all,
> > > >
> > > > Here is the draft of podling report for May 2017. Please help review
> > it.
> > > >
>
Hi Henry, I already started an email about that.
- Sijie
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Anyone would like to volunteer to write up the report for DistLog podling?
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:12 PM, wrote:
>
> > Dear podling,
> >
> > This email was sent by
Hi, all,
Here is the draft of podling report for May 2017. Please help review it.
=
DistributedLog
DistributedLog is a high-performance replicated log service. It offers
durability, replication and strong consistency, which provides a
fundamental building blo
FYI.
I have closed the release of 0.4.0. The development should be on 0.5.0 now.
Announcement emails are sent to dev@ user@ gene...@incubator.apache.org and
annou...@apache.org. The website is updated with release 0.4.0 and the
announcement blog post is alive also.
https://distributedlog.incubato
The Apache DistributedLog team would like to announce the release of Apache
DistributedLog 0.4.0-incubating.
Apache DistributedLog (incubating) is a high performance replicated log
store. It provides replicated-log as the storage primitive for building
real-time services. Its serves as a fundament
everyone!
- Sijie
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the Apache
> DistributedLog version 0.4.0-incubating, as follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (pl
> double check your binding votes.
>
> http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?ctte=incubator
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > There are 3 binding approving votes, all of which are following:
> >
> > - Ivam Firestone
There are 3 binding approving votes, all of which are following:
- Ivam Firestone
- John D. Ament
- Henry Saputra
There are no disapproving votes.
We will proceed with this release as staged.
Thanks everyone!
- Sijie
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
&g
ense headers look good.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:36 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > +1 to release
> >
> > - NOTICE file looks fine
> > - Source headers look correct
> > - DISCLAIMER present.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:55 AM S
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Leigh Stewart
> wrote:
>
>> + Dan
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I created a proposal for supporting symlinks in Dlog, in order to
>>> migrate a namespace fro
Hi all,
I created a proposal for supporting symlinks in Dlog, in order to migrate a
namespace from flat namespace to a hierarchical namespace.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/DP-8+-+Symlinked+Log
Please take a look and let me know your thoughts.
- Sijie
Hi all,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the Apache
DistributedLog version 0.4.0-incubating, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
I am happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 6 +1 votes and no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the version 0.4.0,
>
Due to some license header issue, the IPMC rejected the RC #3. We just
fixed the license header issue. RC#4 is out. Please take your time to check
it out and vote.
- Sijie
Hi all,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the version 0.4.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-198 for combining those
asf files.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/128 is out for
review.
Can mentors take a look to make sure I am doing the right thing for asf
files?
- Sijie
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Sijie
I think this is doable - we can change the binary package assembly
configuration (src/assemble/bin/xml) to include NOTICE/DISCLAIMER/LICENSE
from root directly.
Let me file one JIRA and send out a pull request for it.
- Sijie
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
Awesome. I learned a lot from this discussion. We will address these
comments and call another vote.
- Sijie
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
> > The question is whether we need to keep this section:
> >
> > Porti
things from different places.
- Sijie
>
> * sigs/xsums OK
> * Can build source releases
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c8694114552717fa4776b54
> 1406c2e294a4c654721647bac86340f3a@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>
>
> Sijie Guo wrot
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the Apache
DistributedLog version 0.4.0-incubating, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, whi
I am happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 8 +1 votes and no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
- Sijie
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 0.
Can any mentors take a look at this release? If it looks good, I will try
voting in incubator mail list.
- Sijie
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Jay Juma wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
>
Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > FYI.
> >
> > This is the slides of the bookkeeper talk JV and me gave at #lfvault. You
> > can check it out if you are interested in.
> >
> > https://vault2017.sched.com/event/A4wM/apache-bookkeeper-
>
I think apache-rat:check will fail because of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-195. But I don't think it is a
blocker for the release.
- Sijie
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the versi
Hi all,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 0.4.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
FYI.
This is the slides of the bookkeeper talk JV and me gave at #lfvault. You
can check it out if you are interested in.
https://vault2017.sched.com/event/A4wM/apache-bookkeeper-a-high-performance-and-low-latency-cloud-storage-service-sijie-guo-twitter
http://www.slideshare.net/hustlmsp/apache
Got back on the release. Will cut a new release RC on the weekend.
- Sijie
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> It seems that we already got all the issues addressed in the pull
> requests. I will try to cut a new release candidate soon. (I am traveling
> these days, s
It seems that we already got all the issues addressed in the pull requests.
I will try to cut a new release candidate soon. (I am traveling these days,
so my time is not very guaranteed. I will try to do my best to cut an RC).
- Sijie
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
I updated this to the incubator wiki page -
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
Please take a look and let me know if you have any questions.
Can mentors take a look and sign off?
- Sijie
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> If there is no objection here, I wo
ote:
>
> > lgtm. +1
> >
> > it might be good to mention the slack channel for community development.
> >
> > - Xi
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, all,
> >
Hi, all,
Here is the draft of podling report for Feb 2017. Please help review it.
=
DistributedLog
DistributedLog is a high-performance replicated log service. It offers
durability, replication and strong consistency, which provides a
fundamental building blo
under the
> License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR
> CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for
> the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the
> License. */
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at
The release is rejected by IPMC. There are 3 issues:
- missing disclaimer file :
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/120
- notice file year is wrong:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/119
- copyright year is wrong:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distr
Gotcha. Cancelling the vote. Will address the concerns in new RC.
Thanks John!
- Sijie
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:46 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:06 AM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
&g
king
a similar code change. And there is a JIRA to follow up after this release.
Do you see a major concern here? If so, we will address it in the new RC.
Thanks,
Sijie
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:36 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please rev
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the Apache
DistributedLog version 0.4.0-incubating, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your
the release with my
> organization?
>
> Asko Kauppi
> Zalando Tech Helsinki
>
> For Zalando internal messages, I prefer HipChat
>
> > On 25 Jan 2017, at 8.24, Sijie Guo wrote:
> >
> > I am happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
> &
I am happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 8 +1 votes and no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
- Sijie
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.
gt; that we can revisit before graduation? They should not block this release,
> but we need to do some due diligence there.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> >> On 24 Jan 2017, at 02:52, Sijie Guo wrote:
> >>
> >> Ping?
> >>
> >> If there is
Ping?
If there is no other strong objections here, I'd like to conclude the votes
and proceed the remaining steps for the release.
- Sijie
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
>>
>&g
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
> > On 19 Jan 2017, at 18:42, Sijie Guo wrote:
> >
> > Flavio,
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Sijie Guo si...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
>
+ dev@
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:18 PM, liang xie wrote:
> Yes, that's the case i hit before.
>
> +1 for current RC. IMHO, this issue is not a blocker for 0.4 release.
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > I think what Liang points out is there
Flavio,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2017 10:37 AM, "Sijie Guo" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 17, 2017 2:58 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote:
>
> +1, I have checked the following:
>
> - Built both 2.10 a
; SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
> > SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for
> > further details.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
On Jan 18, 2017 10:37 AM, "Sijie Guo" wrote:
On Jan 17, 2017 2:58 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote:
+1, I have checked the following:
- Built both 2.10 and 2.11 from source (skipped tests)
- Checksums and signatures
- NOTICE and LICENSE
- Rat
Questions:
1- I'm wo
he license files look
>> good.
>>
>> - jd
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
0.4.0,
>>> as follows:
>>>
&g
On Jan 12, 2017 6:59 PM, "liang xie" wrote:
I am not good at here, per my knowledge, we should add the bindings
into benchmark package, at least in next release.
Agree. Do you mind creating a Jira for this?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> I think we tur
4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for
further details.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.4.0,
> a
test cases showing errors:
>
> TestBKDistributedLogManager.testNumberOfTransactionsWithIn
> progressAtEnd:325
> TestAsyncReaderLock.testReaderLockDlmClosed » Cancellation
>
> They don't seem to fail consistently for me, though.
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 10 Jan 2017, at 1
Hi all,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.4.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
o create assembly: Error
>> adding file to archive:
>> /tmp/distributedlog-0.4.0-incubating/distributedlog-service/../README.md
>> isn't a file. -> [Help 1]
>>
>
> I also saw this issue.
>
>
>>
>> And none of you saw this : DL-181, it can
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion, Khurrum. Comment inline. I'd like to
> collect more feedbacks and then cut another RC.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Khurrum Nasim
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sijie for worki
your change to both master and
release-0.4.0-incubating branch. so it should be okay now.
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0,
> > as follows:
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM, liang xie wrote:
>
>> Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :)
>> I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released
>> as well, please correct me if i am w
mp/distributedlog-0.4.0-incubating/distributedlog-
> service/../README.md
> >> isn't a file. -> [Help 1]
> >>
> >> And none of you saw this : DL-181, it can be reproduced on my local
> >> box always w/o patched, weird...
> >>
> >> On
l can easily navigate
> to the source code.
>
It is a good suggestion. We don't have source maven plugin configured. We
need to configure that.
>
> - KN
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please review and
Hi all,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
> entries). One shouldn’t be able to read a state, even temporarily, that
> has
> > new host but old port.
> >
> > I can do this in the application level - it does not need to be part of
> > the DL protocol.
> >
> >
> > Asko Kauppi
> > Zala
Have you attempted to upgrade thrift to thrift 9?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Gerrit Sundaram
wrote:
> Khurrum,
>
> As far as I know, the protobuf package was shaded in bookkeeper. there will
> no backward compatible. At this point, I am not interested in bumping bc's
> protobuf, especially
currently both netty and protobuf are shaded in bookkeeper. yahoo is
driving an upgrade of netty3 to netty4. there is no effects on upgrading
the protobuf version in bk.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Khurrum Nasim
wrote:
> one question - bk is using protobuf 2.x while gRPC is using 3.x. IMO,
Yes. it is part of the plan.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Xi Liu wrote:
> It would be great to include any performance numbers.
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Cool to see you here, Enrico. And thank you for your suggestion.
> >
> >
d/accepted unless a -1 vote is received. That's probably the best
> for now. what do you think?
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Ping?
> >
> > Xi, Jon, any updates about this? Do any of you want to drive this?
> >
> > -
s solution. If these start dropping down, there
> needs
> > to be more (technical) reason than just another vendor opening their
> chest.
> > :)
> >
> > Other than that, the structure seemed nice but it can be slightly
> shorter.
> >
> > Just my 2c
> &
be more (technical) reason than just another vendor opening their chest.
> :)
>
> Other than that, the structure seemed nice but it can be slightly shorter.
>
> Just my 2c
> - asko
>
>
> On 4 January 2017 at 10:38, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > I drafted a blog post f
Xi, I added more comments. We are looking forward to your reply and seeing
this happen.
- Sijie
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Sorry for late response. I think Leigh and you already had some very
> valuable discussions in the doc. I will try to add some of my questi
ite. That is good enough for
most of the log use cases.
Having a separated TC (transaction coordinator) is cool. but it can be an
opt-in solution.
>
>
> Asko Kauppi
> Zalando Tech Helsinki
>
> > On 4 Jan 2017, at 9.18, Sijie Guo wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for late respo
cool! Thank you so much for rebasing this.
- Sijie
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:20 PM, liang xie wrote:
> The conflicted DL-167 change has been rebased, please help to review :)
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackag
Chris,
This is very informative and useful. Thank you so much for sharing this. I
will try this out.
Yeah I think most of the issues come from path and symlinks. I think Tracy
already figured the problems out. Looking forward to the contribution.
- Sijie
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Chris N
FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackage the namespace under
org.apache.distributedlog. All the changes for 0.4.0 are merged (except one
test case change - waiting for Liang's response). Ready to cut the first
release candidate.
- Sijie
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sijie Guo
Ping?
Xi, Jon, any updates about this? Do any of you want to drive this?
- Sijie
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Sijie Guo
wrote:
> Xi, Jon, are any of you interested in making a draft about about the
> proposal workflow?
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Jon Derrick
>
I drafted a blog post for announcing the first apache release. Here is the
draft. Please help review it :D
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IXVmP2cHkf4ydeUHUJN9p5ZWTpA1auwBhfqMnYBu4A0/edit
- Sijie
We definitely want to support running distributedlog in other environments.
And in theory, it is a Java system, it should be able to run on different
platforms. But as what Franck mentioned, the major problem is most of us
don't have a windows environment :/ I tried to have a Jenkins job or Travis
Hello all,
Happy New Year!
I'd happy to announce that we have a Slack channel for distributedlog
community now.
Slack Channel : https://apachedistributedlog.slack.com
You can get an invitation to join the slack channel via this url -
https://getdl-slack.herokuapp.com/
Let me know if you have q
ght be easier for people to comment on a google doc to
> > gather the initial feedback. I will put the content back to wiki page
> once
> > addressing the comments. Does that sound good to you?
> >
> > And thank you in advance.
> >
> > - Xi
> >
> >
Welcome, Wenson! Look forward to your contributions.
- Sijie
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Leigh Stewart
wrote:
> Hey Wenson - welcome!
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Wenson Li wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wanted to introduce myself and say Hi to the community. I am currently
> > wor
Xi,
(Sorry for late response)
+1 for this proposal. Are you coordinating with Cameron with this change?
- Sijie
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Xi Liu wrote:
> I'd like to start voting on DP-2:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/DP-2+-+Epoch+Write+Support
>
> The discussion
20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to latest
master). So I can merge them.
Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days.
- Sijie
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Asko Kauppi
wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> > One comment about "a REST / websockets proxy", are you thinking of
> running
> > a separate service or part of current proxy (e.g. listening on a separate
> > port to handle REST/websockets request)?
>
>
> I was thinking of a se
Done.
- Sijie
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Jay Juma wrote:
> Sijie,
>
> My wiki handle is jayk.juma.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/~jayk.juma
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> - Jay
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Sijie Guo
> wrote:
Re "client id and name"
Client Id is the identifier used by finagle-thrift to identify "who" is
sending the request. The client id can then be used by the thrift proxy
server to reject unknown clients optionally. (
http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/finagle-thrift/1.4.1/FinagleThrift/ClientId)
The name
1 - 100 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
