Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Please excuse my fair assumption about the libs and services in the document Key takeaways from the document We can definitely add support for diff types of services that gets added via provisioner at the moment it’s binded through the Anubis to a single dB , How can we make it more open to

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hey Myrle please refer to this update document This report is not confidential and is open for suggestions Any microservice architecture that is defined and is in practice with the active forces and that comes with solution as reference from link

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

This report is not confidential and is open for suggestions Any microservice architecture that is defined and is in practice with the active forces and that comes with solution as reference from link Forces - There is a team of

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

I will present a report sometime today to conclude some of my study. Bear with me and you will have some new findings. Thanks On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:06 AM Myrle Krantz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:33 PM Saransh Sharma > wrote: > >> To summarise the survey >> >> Monolithic versus

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:33 PM Saransh Sharma wrote: > To summarise the survey > > Monolithic versus Micro-services > > Right now Fineract CN is a monolithic application although services > interact with a set of core libs that are acting as dependencies . These > dependencies need to be

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

To summarise the survey Monolithic versus Micro-services Right now Fineract CN is a monolithic application although services interact with a set of core libs that are acting as dependencies . These dependencies need to be maintained alongside the core service If I want to write a service I am

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

I understand Awasum , but this thread is a survey about the Fineract CN improvement and nothing else. Myrle lets treat this as a survey so that we can learn from the past. Please help me close this issue FINC-352 Thanks On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:46 PM Saransh Sharma wrote: > Hey, I have

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hey, I have opened an JIRA link with suggestion from Ronal https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINCN-352 On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:35 PM Awasum Yannick wrote: > My point was that people who contributed in the past have identified > issues which when solved will make Fineract CN easy to

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

My point was that people who contributed in the past have identified issues which when solved will make Fineract CN easy to develop. Here is one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINCN-25 We should be focused on removing those blockers and still using the current Language (Java), Framework

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

You see that;s what i mean the services consume a lot of memory because you know and I know why? Right Anyway let's work together to pave a path, I am just trying to incentivise people here who can maybe help. On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:22 PM Awasum Yannick wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hey Myrle, Following the fineract CN architecture we can take the fineract-CN-template and perhaps break that template in pieces and through a step b step wizard or command line generate the boilerplate. Like service , api, like test and in fact domain and entity also with supplied set of auth

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:42 PM Saransh Sharma wrote: > Hey Awasum , I am just trying to incentivise the developers and > contributors here. I know that committers are not paid. That's a good > thing, let's keep it that way. > > I am not hiring a developer plus we are on a different thread, I

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hey Awasum , I am just trying to incentivise the developers and contributors here. I know that committers are not paid. That's a good thing, let's keep it that way. I am not hiring a developer plus we are on a different thread, I think we are just discussing the idea of how we can improve the

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

This is not going to be acceptable in any country (or company) that is subject to GDPR. Blockchain and GDPR are effectively counterparts due to the nature of the blockchain in which data is immutable and therefore cannot be deleted, which contradicts with the right to be forgotten in GDPR.

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hi Saransh, The Fineract PMC or Committers do not pay anyone here to do development on the Fineract codebase. The PMC does not manage a budget for developing Fineract. We are all volunteers here and contribute as individuals not companies. If you want to hire a Developer to do work on Fineract,

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

I don't know what this email means. I am not asking you to enter in any kind of business with me? It's a grant Myrle, I mean it's not a typical business transaction. Grant from a non profit that could help developers and contributors to work together nothing else ,I am not going to influence

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

So much wrong here, I'm just gonna skip to the end. On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:09 PM Saransh Sharma wrote: > Ok , understood we can put more fire power once we get this rolling, but > if you look at the work I asked was to develop the Proposal not actual > development, think that's a lot ? >

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 5:06 PM Myrle Krantz wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:23 AM Saransh Sharma > wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 2:54 PM Awasum Yannick wrote: >> >>> Hi Saransh, >>> >>> Right now, the most important things we need to do on Fineract are to: >>> >>> 1.) Upgrade

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hey S Thanks for your thoughts , I would like to start with defining this. Public chains are immutable , that means we cannot delete once recorded that’s true but blockchain dB such as Bitcoin be EtH does not need to store any structured data that is revealed to public , instead it stored the

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:23 AM Saransh Sharma wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 2:54 PM Awasum Yannick wrote: > >> Hi Saransh, >> >> Right now, the most important things we need to do on Fineract are to: >> >> 1.) Upgrade the major project dependencies. >> a.) Upgrade to Spring Boot 2 (

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hi, While not being active on Fineract CN I do have a few thoughts to chip in on the proposal to use a blockchain DB: This is not going to be acceptable in any country (or company) that is subjec to GDPR. Blockchain and GDPR are effectively counterparts due to the nature of the blockchain in

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 2:54 PM Awasum Yannick wrote: > Hi Saransh, > > Right now, the most important things we need to do on Fineract are to: > > 1.) Upgrade the major project dependencies. > a.) Upgrade to Spring Boot 2 ( this is already in progress and needs > testing) . > b.)

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hi Saransh, Intro: Ronald Munjoma here, based in Harare, Zimbabwe. I am not a user of Fineract 1. x or Fineract CN. I am more of a lurker on the forums, learning and observing how Apache projects are run. Hopefully, I will use Fineract 1. x or Fineract CN in one of my projects. As for suggesting

Re: Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

Hi Saransh, Right now, the most important things we need to do on Fineract are to: 1.) Upgrade the major project dependencies. a.) Upgrade to Spring Boot 2 ( this is already in progress and needs testing) . b.) Upgrade from Java 8 to Java 11 (LTS). Java 17 is another LTS version but we

Improving Fineract CN a Community survey

I hope this email finds you well, since Apache Con is over we can resume discussing the potential ideas and maybe fix some level of community established quorum on those ideas. Last year , we proposed several Architectural (this does not mean that we nuke existing work)changes in Fineract CN. We