On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 23:13 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hello to all of you,
>
> and thanks to all the people joining the voting.
>
> From 16 Marketing Project members only one voted for Label D, all
> the others preferred Label B (four of them named Label A as second
> choice).
>
>
Hello to all of you,
and thanks to all the people joining the voting.
From 16 Marketing Project members only one voted for Label D, all
the others preferred Label B (four of them named Label A as second
choice).
| So *Label
Hi Bernhard, *,
thanks a lot for this work!
Bernhard Dippold schrieb:
Hi list members,
in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffice.org.
To come to an "officially approved" label I'd like to ask you to
vote on these
Okay, guys. Stop flooding my e-mails with your failed flamewar...
Yes, Open Source Software *theoretically* operates on the "Bazaar"
model, and that works fine when dealing within the community. But when
six different people independently come up with something (like a logo
:0), if that community
+1 for Label B.
Thanks guys for your work!
Best,
Charles.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Lynch schreef:
[...]
John... Take your co-leads responsability to actually lead.
We can only lead by the excellence of what we do. If we provide world
class artwork, why would anyone choose *not* to use it?
Because someone else produces some different but worldclass a
Nicu,
You do not have a clue where my experience comes from and therefore can
not judge nor label it but you are right :) it is a bazaar :) thank you
for putting it so nicely for me :)
One thing you should know about a bazaar: It has NO style model or
structure whatsoever :)
You only help
Steven Pauwels wrote:
John McCreesh schreef:
It's not intended to be. We're an open-source project, not a monopoly
supplier - we can't say "You must put this 'Fred Computers Inc
recommends OpenOffice.org' logo on every advert or we'll cut you off our
preferred price plan"
I really think you
I am not looking for a personal war here Nicu...
Thank You,
Steven P.
Nicu Buculei schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
You do not have a clue where my experience comes from and therefore
can not judge nor label it but you are right :) it is a bazaar :)
thank you for putting it so nicely for m
Steven Pauwels schreef:
I am not looking for a personal war here Nicu...
Thank You,
Steven P.
Nicu Buculei schreef:
Steven Pauwels wrote:
You do not have a clue where my experience comes from and therefore
can not judge nor label it but you are right :) it is a bazaar :)
thank you for
Steven Pauwels wrote:
You do not have a clue where my experience comes from and therefore can
not judge nor label it but you are right :) it is a bazaar :) thank you
for putting it so nicely for me :)
One thing you should know about a bazaar: It has NO style model or
structure whatsoever :)
John McCreesh schreef:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:19 +0100, Steven Pauwels wrote:
[snip]
I think that if someone has a violent objection to the label that the
community chooses by vote, he should start his own OOo distribution. It
is completely respectless to the efforts put in by the art pro
Hi all,
The i or I issue: please consider that the OEM label will not have the
size it has on your screen, and that it will be printed, which uses a
higher LPI then the 72 DPI on your screen, so any dot on screen could be
divided into minimum 5 upto 50 lines per dot. This changes the
scharpne
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 22:36 +, John McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:19 +0100, Steven Pauwels wrote:
> [snip]
> > I think that if someone has a violent objection to the label that the
> > community chooses by vote, he should start his own OOo distribution. It
> > is completely respe
Hi Bernard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Cor Nouws schrieb:
[...]
+ I Agree with Steven on the 'i'.
In the font I used (Bitstream Vera Sans - condensed to 78% to fit
best to the logo font) the capitalized "I" is nearly the same as the
small "l", so people not speaking English very well could re
Hi Bernhard,
Bernhard Dippold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi list members,
>
> in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
> that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffice.org.
>
> To come to an "officially approved" label I'd like to ask you to
> vote on the
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:19 +0100, Steven Pauwels wrote:
[snip]
> I think that if someone has a violent objection to the label that the
> community chooses by vote, he should start his own OOo distribution. It
> is completely respectless to the efforts put in by the art project, and
> the deciss
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
+ I Agree with Steven on the 'i'.
In the font I used (Bitstream Vera Sans - condensed to 78% to fit
best to the logo font) the capitalized "I" is nearly the same as the
small "l", so people not speaking English very well could read
"lncluded" :-(
How about "OpenOffice.
Hi Cor, all,
Cor Nouws schrieb:
[...]
+ I Agree with Steven on the 'i'.
In the font I used (Bitstream Vera Sans - condensed to 78% to fit
best to the logo font) the capitalized "I" is nearly the same as the
small "l", so people not speaking English very well could read
"lncluded" :-(
But mo
John,
There is a consensus about which logo to use. I had no doubts that this
would be the case. B is a good design, with no 'flaws' in it. Take this
tip: Succesfull marketing is done by creating a uniform message and
look. You just posted against that. This makes me question the Marketin
PL.
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffice.org.
To come to an "officially approved" label I'd like to ask you to
vote on these labels (otherwise the 4 or 5 active people at the art
project woul
Hi Bernhard,
Thanks for this outstanding work. As always, what you do here is simply
great!!
+1 for B
;-)
Best wishes,
Cristian
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi list members,
in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffi
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 21:01 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
> that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffice.org.
>
> To come to an "officially approved" label I'd like to ask you to
> vote on these l
+1 for B. I'd support B with capslock for "Included." I support it
because it doesn't have the flaws of the others:
- A is too much like 1.x, and gives the impression that 2.0 isn't much
different.
- C and D's curvy lines are too dark, whereas in B the white lines add contrast
- C's "Included" i
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I didn't think, that it would be necessary, but if you want to, you may
do so.
Your vote will be split into partial votes, so your vote stays as
important as the voting of everybody else.
Uhmm... no, that's not "approval voting". If you are going to use "fist
past th
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Next time I strongly suggest "approval voting". That is, people get to
give a +1 to as many choices as they want. This is, arguably, the best
voting system invented. It is very "fair" and mostly devoid of strategy.
+1 to approval voting in future.
I never realised that v
Thanks, Bernard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
so I ask you to have a look at this website and vote with "+1" for
the label you like most.
+ 1 for B.
+ I Agree with Steven on the 'i'.
+ Idea for possible improvement: could the backgroud be from blue to
white to blue (top>bottom) with the white p
Hi Steven,
As discussed no more than two weeks ago, please start a new thread to
debate this problem. The current thread was for voting and small
adjutments in the process. Therefore, I kindly ask you, please follow
the basic nettiquette rules and start a new thread as the subject is
already some
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 21:49 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hi Jeff, all,
>
> Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA schrieb:
>
> > +1 for Label B (except I think "Included" needs to be capitalized like all
> > the
> > others).
> >
> No problem - do you want me to upload the modified version?
Yes please and
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffice.org.
[snip]
http://www.familie-dippold.de/OEM_label_vote.html
Could we use approval voting?
Approval voting means that you can say +1 to more tha
+1 on B and I do not request any changes.
Why included should not be capitalized:
For native english, Included reads as easy as included.
For any other native language that has another word for included
(spelled differently) it makes readablility drop by 90 %.
Steven P.
Bernhard Dippold schr
> > Label B: Logo on blue gradient with white wire gulls.
>
B is my first choice.
In order: B, A, D, C
--
J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
Hi John,
John McCreesh schrieb:
[...]
However, I would recommend that we display the winner as the
'recommended' or 'official' label, but also leave the others as
alternatives. We have no power to enforce a label - if someone takes a
violent objection to the 'recommended' label, I'd prefer the
John McCreesh schreef:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 21:01 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi list members,
in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
that should be sticked on PCs delivered with OpenOffice.org.
To come to an "officially approved" label I'd like to ask you to
+1 for Label B (except I think "Included" needs to be capitalized like all the
others).
Jeff Causey
On Monday February 20 2006 15:01, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> in the art project we designed different proposals for OEM labels
> that should be sticked on PCs delivered with Op
Hi all,
I just forgot to tell you that I think, the voting should be
finished in 5 day - on Saturday, 25th. So people doing their
OpenOffice.org work on the weekend will be able to join too.
Bernhard Dippold schrieb:
[... full quoite removed - please answer to the previous posting...]
Bes
36 matches
Mail list logo