[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859228#action_12859228
]
chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702:
---
Hi Scott/Devs,
Instead of storing the text in the
On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
You're missing the point - it's not as easy as that. The command ant
run-install is mentioned in innumerable places in documentation, websites,
books, etc. It's not just a matter of modifying a script - it's a matter of
rewriting
And what is the issue in adding the new command and changing the old one
to give a meaningful help message to use the new one? How would this
break the documentation? Command is still there and user can use it and
they get on screen help to use a something new. I do not see why would
you need
All the images and content that are loaded (or loadable) at runtime should in
my opinion be stored somewhere under the runtime folder by default
(runtime/content ?) instead of framework/images
This would also affect the demo images we are bundling with the system. Ideally
the framework, but
From what I recall, the framework/images folder was intended to contain static
content. That folder could be copied to a static content provider, and the
OFBiz settings (see url.properties) could be updated to point to the static
content provider.
-Adrian
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Jacopo
I don't want to waste to much time on this, but at large we can't stay forever
in some state because it exists, conservative?
Jacques
PS: Arg... I should have refrained on this, crazy I'm :D
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
Jacopo,
You're missing the point - it's not as easy as that.
Yes, this is what the ofbizContentUrl ftl macro is for, for instance. But this
may be changed also of course ;o)
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
From what I recall, the framework/images folder was intended to contain static content. That folder could be copied to a static
+1, because you well explained it's just to make it official (ie archived ans
not promoted)
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an official
ASF release.
OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will
if messages are the answer how about a simple input in the current file
that says your about to load demo data, do you want to.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3633.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks to Deepak Rishi for the contribution and others for
I must have been very tired
I looked again to night and it is normal.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93
Specialtymarket.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859280#action_12859280
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-3633:
-
Thanks Ashish for committing patch.
Thanks Rishi
Runtime to me is volatile.
most files are cleared with a clean-all.
and it some cases, it just me, I clear the complete runtime.
if it is moving the demo out of the frame work then put them in the
specialpurpose in their own folder or expand the URL.properties to put
them in their respective
What about a SAS that will possibly have one for each Tenant?
Though from the tenants point of view they would only see the ones
loaded in their DB.
As long as the themes are not broken they can be effectively depreciated
by not selecting them or not loading them by changing the seed data.
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
What about a SAS that will possibly have one for each Tenant?
Though from the tenants point of view they would only see the ones
loaded in their DB.
As long as the themes are not broken they can be effectively depreciated
I'm afraid that if we no longer
On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:25 PM, Bob Morley wrote:
I had accidentally replied via nabble to the Ofbiz - Commits sub-form; so I
am going to move my response to Ofbiz - Dev. If anyone saw that, I am going
to rework my response here because after some consideration and discussion
in our office,
XHTML validation errors round 2+ (content)
--
Key: OFBIZ-3730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3730
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: content
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3730:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3730_content_xhtml.diff
XHTML validation errors round 2+
XHTML validation errors round 2+ (product)
--
Key: OFBIZ-3731
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3731
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: product
Affects Versions:
XHTML validation errors round 2++ (framework excluding widgets)
---
Key: OFBIZ-3732
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3732
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3732:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3732_framework_xhtml.diff
XHTML validation errors round 2++
XHTML validation errors round 2+ (specialpurpose/ebay)
--
Key: OFBIZ-3733
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3733
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3734:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3734_specommerce_xhtml.diff
XHTML validation errors round 2+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3721:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3721_order_xhtml_v2.diff
XHTML validation errors round 2+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3721:
-
Description:
billsettings.ftl
attributes without values
orderagreements.ftl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3721:
-
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3721_order_xhtml.diff)
XHTML validation errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3701:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3701_order_edititems_v3.diff
Removed orderagreements.ftl from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3701:
-
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3701_order_edititems_v2.diff)
Errors (with visible
Added defaultSequenceNum field for sort order in makeCategoryFeatureLists
method for ParametricSearch.
--
Key: OFBIZ-3735
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-3735:
Attachment: OFBIZ-3735.patch
Here is the patch for this issue.
Added defaultSequenceNum field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3735:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Added defaultSequenceNum field for sort order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3735.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Deepak Rishi for the contribution - Committed at r936296.
I've sometimes thought that it would be nice if all the ofbiz components ran
under some distinct top level path like /ofbiz. Path names like /images and
/content can commonly be in use for some existing site. That would be a major
change and makes the URLs even less user friendly so I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859353#action_12859353
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-3735:
-
Thanks Ashish for committing patch.
Added
Adrian Crum-2 wrote:
In the meantime, I'm working on a date/time library that includes an
ElapsedTime class (an improved TimeDuration class) that follows Martin
Fowler's Quantity pattern.
I am certainly not interested in re-inventing the wheel here. I know in our
solution we are going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3731:
-
Description:
advancedsearch.ftl
Line 30: input can't be directly inside table.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3731:
-
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3731_product_xhtml.diff)
XHTML validation errors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3731:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3731_product_xhtml_v2.diff
XHTML validation errors round 2+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3730:
-
Description:
addSubSite.ftl
script without type attribute
CMSContentEdit.ftl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3730:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3730_content_xhtml_v2.diff
XHTML validation errors round 2+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3730:
-
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3730_content_xhtml.diff)
XHTML validation errors
Joda Time claims to fix the problems with the Java date/time API, while
it duplicates the problems in the Java date/time API. The only real
advantage to Joda Time is the additional calendars - which OFBiz already
has in the ICU4J library.
The author of JSR-310 complains about Joda in the spec
multi-tenant function do not work if switch from one app to another by click
the menu
--
Key: OFBIZ-3736
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3736
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
WeizhanGuo updated OFBIZ-3736:
--
Summary: multi-tenant function do not work correctly if switch from one
app to another by click the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
WeizhanGuo updated OFBIZ-3736:
--
Attachment: MultiTenantExternalLoginKeyCheckError20100421.patch
multi-tenant function do not work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza closed OFBIZ-3716.
Resolution: Later
There is a more general issue with fields, about vertical
Do we finally have plan for What all stuff we want to complete before release
branch 10.04 is created?
From what I understand community will like to get following done
1) Merge security redesign work into trunk.
2) Layered lookup work finished, This looks be to complete, is that true?
Do we
Here's the latest update from Infra at the ASF:
1. They will be happy to migrate the ofbiz.org domain.
2. They have recommended that we not transfer it to them right away
- But instead either reup it where it is or migrate it to someone who can
manage it
3. The reason is that it will take a
As much as I'd like to take your word on all of this Tim, I know that at least
the part related to me isn't correct. Could you forward some of the emails
you've received about this? Aside from an email that just came through, I
haven't even seen anything on the private mailing list... and that
I think David should keep ofbiz.org as his own. Community is not
communist.
Please stop this discussion.
在 2010-04-21三的 11:46 -0600，Tim Ruppert写道：
Here's the latest update from Infra at the ASF:
1. They will be happy to migrate the ofbiz.org domain.
2. They have recommended that we not
Shi,
I'm the one who started this discussion. My intention so far has been to try to
encourage some action on this issue. So far, that has failed (lots of talk, no
action).
If I kept ofbiz.org I'm not sure what I'd even do with it, and I'd rather have
the ASF take it over.
Still, after the
XHTML Validation - Form Widget with type= list|multi and inner form renders bad
markup with visible effects
---
Key: OFBIZ-3737
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3732_before.jpg
OFBIZ-3732_after.jpg
XHTML
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Do we finally have plan for What all stuff we want to complete before release
branch 10.04 is created?
From what I understand community will like to get following done
1) Merge security redesign work into trunk.
2) Layered lookup work finished,
+1 for parking it.
your right it would force action.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3737_widgetmulti_xhtml.diff
XHTML Validation - Form Widget
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3737_before.jpg
OFBIZ-3737_after.jpg
XHTML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737:
-
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3732_after.jpg)
XHTML Validation - Form Widget with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737:
-
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3732_before.jpg)
XHTML Validation - Form Widget
Here's the information from a thread between Shane, Upayavira, Jacopo and
myself. Jacques and I also voted to make sure that it's setup before we
switch, but this should give you ample reason to believe what I wrote before.
They are basically saying that we should keep it going before it gets
Sorry - this was supposed to be part of my message and somehow got lumped in
with Shane's latest response. My apologies.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
No worries man - but
Thanks for the update Tim.
It sounds like no matter what we're not going to see any quick action on this.
-David
On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Here's the information from a thread between Shane, Upayavira, Jacopo and
myself. Jacques and I also voted to make sure that
Bob Morley wrote:
Adam Heath-2 wrote:
introductionDate is when the store actually added the product to their
catalog, and started making it available, which may be completely
different then when it was first published.
What struck me about this is that products in all sorts of enterprise
David E Jones wrote:
I just want to make one thing clear related to this: if _I_ make changes that
are not backward compatible then it's because they are really important and
no one should question them; if anyone else makes (or proposes) a change that
I don't like and I can raise the
It does seem that way for sure - so as I said, the only decision we have left
is whether or not you should reup at NetSol or if you want to get out of it -
sending it to Jacopo so that he can ensure it migrates smoothly. Whatever
works on your end is fine - I'll be happy to support the
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
I just want to make one thing clear related to this: if _I_ make changes
that are not backward compatible then it's because they are really important
and no one should question them; if anyone else makes (or proposes) a
David E Jones wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
I just want to make one thing clear related to this: if _I_ make changes
that are not backward compatible then it's because they are really
important and no one should question them; if anyone else
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
I just want to make one thing clear related to this: if _I_ make changes
that are not backward compatible then it's because they are really
important
David E Jones wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
I just want to make one thing clear related to this: if _I_ make changes
that are not backward compatible then it's because they
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
David E Jones wrote:
I just want to make one thing clear related to this: if _I_ make changes that are not backward compatible then it's because they
are really important and no one should question them; if anyone else makes (or proposes) a change that I
the other option I just thought about is to transfer ownership to ASF
but keep the technical as you(david). That gets it over to ASF but you
still have control. you can transfer the Technical once ASF if ready.
look at other domains ASF has to see how they list the ownership.
BTW you can export
I see a thread(1) about ContactMech being related to another
ContactMech, from back in October. I don't however see any
implementation of using ContactMechLink(or a new ContactMechAssoc).
My suggestion would be to not create a new entity, as then we would
not be following the data model books.
just off the top of my head we have links by partyID
https://trunk-demo.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?portalPageId=PartyProfilepartyId=CompanyeditPartyRel=Y
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
BJ Freeman wrote:
just off the top of my head we have links by partyID
https://trunk-demo.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?portalPageId=PartyProfilepartyId=CompanyeditPartyRel=Y
That doesn't solve the problem.
Shipments and OrderItemShipGroup have a link to a ContactMech.
On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
ps: I think the 'run-' prefix is superfluous. ant install, ant
install-demo seems better to me.
Adam,
I completely agree with you here... sometimes simplicity is in front of our
eyes and we don't see it: install-demo, install-seed (and, if we
75 matches
Mail list logo
