i cant free any more space in file system...
please help me..is there any other solution.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 29/06/2010 18:55, mohammed safeer wrote:
> > sir,
> > it doesn't work. my source directory is located in mounted ntfs file
> system.
> > since i h
On 29/06/2010 18:55, mohammed safeer wrote:
> sir,
> it doesn't work. my source directory is located in mounted ntfs file system.
> since i had no free space in linux file system.
> is it is the problem??
interesting.
i don't know much about ntfs, but maybe it has a different concept of
"permissio
sir,
it doesn't work. my source directory is located in mounted ntfs file system.
since i had no free space in linux file system.
is it is the problem??
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 29/06/2010 15:47, mohammed safeer wrote:
> > hi sir..
> > im sorry for
> > the erro
On 29/06/2010 15:47, mohammed safeer wrote:
> hi sir..
> im sorry for
> the error i got is pasted below...
>
> Building module sysui
[...]
> unxlngx6.pro/bin/getuid.so dpkg-deb --build ../../
> unxlngx6.pro/misc/openoffice.org3.2-debian-menus_3.2-9505_all/media/OS/openoffice/OOO320_m19/sysui/
> un
i have now i extracted "OOo_3.2.1_src_system.tar.bz2" containing libxml2.
if i redo the make,will it work fine?
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 29/06/2010 11:12, mohammed safeer wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > when i tried to build OOO320_m19 i got an error..
> >
> > steps i hv
On 29/06/2010 11:12, mohammed safeer wrote:
> hi,
>
> when i tried to build OOO320_m19 i got an error..
>
> steps i hv done are:
>
> in directory OOO320_m19
>> ./configure
>> ./bootstrap
>> source LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh
>> make
i guess that will use system libxml2, right?
> after a long compil
Hi Pranas,
i'm afraid your stack trace is mostly useless to upstream OOo developers,
because you're not using the upstream build and the addresses in other
builds are all different.
On 29/06/2010 08:26, Pranas Baliuka wrote:
> (XII) fedora release is: Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)
it seems that
> It looks like I forgot to attach the patch.
No problem, using the patch would be prohibited anyway, it seems:
> Any reproduction of this e-mail
> by whatsoever means and any transmission or dissemination thereof to other
> persons is prohibited.
Which to me seems to say that any code distrib
Hi Ramón,
On Monday, 2010-06-28 21:19:12 +0200, Ramón García Fernández wrote:
> It looks like I forgot to attach the patch.
Some attachment types are stripped from the lists. Best to add it as
a plain text diff.
Eike
--
OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositi
It looks like I forgot to attach the patch.
Aviso legal – Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores
Este mensaje y, en su caso, los ficheros que lleve incorporados, está dirigido
exclusivamente a su destinatario y es de carácter confidencial. Si fuere
recibido por error o se tuviere conocimiento
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:03 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 25/06/2010 08:53, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > On 06/24/10 22:51, Terrence Enger wrote:
> >> This is about a sal_Bool rather than a bool, but I shall raise
> >> the question anyway.
> >>
> >> It just happens that I was running OO under gdb,
After many tries at changing the makefile.mk the build still fails. Is there
any other way to go around this?
> From: juanman...@gonzalezmoreno.org
> To: dev@openoffice.org
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:49:27 +
> Subject: RE: [dev] Re: Builld Error code 2
>
>
> This
> To: dev@openoffice.org
> From: michael.st...@sun.com
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:27:36 +0200
> Subject: [dev] Re: Builld Error code 2
>
> On 25/06/2010 06:45, Juan Manuel wrote:
> > Keep getting this error during build on Ubuntu 10.04. Tried changing the
> > permi
On 25/06/2010 06:45, Juan Manuel wrote:
> Keep getting this error during build on Ubuntu 10.04. Tried changing the
> permissions but error still remains. Any ideas?
it seems the makefile there deletes the stuff and re-generates it, so
it'll overwrite any manual change.
> dpkg-deb
> --build ../..
On 25/06/2010 08:53, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 06/24/10 22:51, Terrence Enger wrote:
>> This is about a sal_Bool rather than a bool, but I shall raise
>> the question anyway.
>>
>> It just happens that I was running OO under gdb, and the
>> following output had already caught my attention.
>>
>>
Hi
Here is an excerpt from the C++ standard about the size of fundamental types
(clause 5.3.3) :
sizeof(char), sizeof(signed char) and sizeof(unsigned char) are 1; the result
of sizeof applied to any other fundamental type (3.9.1) is
implementation-defined. [Note: in particular, sizeof(bool)
On 06/24/10 14:24, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
isn't bool ususally (or at least sometimes) 4 bytes in size?
$ cat test.cxx
#include
int main() {
printf("%d\n", sizeof(bool));
}
$ g++ -o lala ./test.cxx
$ ./lala
1
sizeof(bool)
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> isn't bool ususally (or at least sometimes) 4 bytes in size?
$ cat test.cxx
#include
int main() {
printf("%d\n", sizeof(bool));
}
$ g++ -o lala ./test.cxx
$ ./lala
1
Grüße/Regards,
René
-
On 24/06/2010 13:52, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 06/24/10 12:42, Niklas Nebel wrote:
>> On 06/24/10 12:29, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>>> The idea is so good that someone is already working on it. :-)
>>> There is ongoing work to replace a lot of ancient types like BOOL,
>>> USHORT etc. by sal_... type
@openoffice.org
Asunto: Re: [dev] RE: Issue building OpenOffice under Windows
8Hi,
I don't know what "successfully installed" libxml2 means. I would just build it
from the OOo module and deliver it.
The result of this procedure would be a libxml2.dll in solver/.../bin and a
lib
Hi,
I don't know what "successfully installed" libxml2 means. I would just
build it from the OOo module and deliver it.
The result of this procedure would be a libxml2.dll in solver/.../bin
and a libxml2.lib import library in solver/.../lib. There are two other
libraries libxml2_a.lib and li
I thought that it was clear that the error was that the appropiate path to the
libxml2.lib was not given to the linker command line. Unfortunately, there is
no easy way to change the language compiler messages. I am going to install the
English version of Visual C++ Express 2008. Anyway, here is
Hi,
you could have more success if you translated the spanish error
messages. I know something about building on Windows, but nothing about
Spanish. :-)
Regards,
Mathias
On 23.06.2010 00:08, Ramón García Fernández wrote:
I am having exactly the same problem when building libxmlsecurity. I
On 23/06/2010 15:57, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> By now, its probably too late to be able to extract information exactly
> where the tests started to break on the various bots when DEV300_m80
> became available end of May, right? :(
let me pull something out of my fuzzy memory...
some bots faile
Please take me off your email list. I do not want to receive it. TY Monique
Lamarre
> From: ram...@cnmv.es
> To: dev@openoffice.org
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:08:08 +0200
> Subject: [dev] RE: Issue building OpenOffice under Windows
>
>
> I am having exactly the same
I am having exactly the same problem when building libxmlsecurity. I solved by
editing the makefile.mk of this module. I uncommented two lines with the
CONFIGURE_FLAGS, and quoted the arguments of the INC and LIB directories. These
lines are now:
CONFIGURE_FLAGS=crypto=$(CRYPTOLIB) debug=yes
of the correspondent
component. Use its "getArgs()" method to access these properties
(http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/frame/XModel.html#getArgs).
T. Vataire
- Mail Original -
De: "Wei Min Teo"
À: dev@openoffice.org
Envoyé: Mardi 22 Juin 2010 05:
d any documentation as to what strings it accepts.
Thanks again
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:15:09 +
From: tvata...@starxpert.fr
To: dev@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [dev] RE: [api-dev] pdf import programmatically
Hi,
To open you document programmatically, you can do that :
sub main
dim xComp as objec
On 06/22/10 09:31, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Am Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:59:41 +0200
schrieb Ruediger Timm :
AFAIK tcsh shell is not really supported any more (though it might be
on that 3.2 code base - I just do not remember exactly). Could you
just try using bash instead?
If that is truely the ca
Am Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:59:41 +0200
schrieb Ruediger Timm :
> AFAIK tcsh shell is not really supported any more (though it might be
> on that 3.2 code base - I just do not remember exactly). Could you
> just try using bash instead?
If that is truely the case, we should _really_ make
--with-use-she
10 09:15:09 +
> From: tvata...@starxpert.fr
> To: dev@openoffice.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] RE: [api-dev] pdf import programmatically
>
> Hi,
>
> To open you document programmatically, you can do that :
>
> sub main
>
> dim xComp as object
> dim arg
Hello fellow members,
Many thanks to Christoph! Now, I’d like to take the opportunity and
introduce myself to the rest of the community in detail and answer your
questions.
Am 16.06.2010 23:21, schrieb Christoph Noack:
Hi everyone,
I would like to thank both Thorsten and Andreas for their n
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:47:07AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 20/06/2010 14:25, Lê Việt Quang wrote:
> > Dear sir , I try to build OOO320_m12 on window XP , but it fail , and take
> > this error , what is it ?
>
> any reason why you want to build such an outdated milestone?
Because he
On 20/06/2010 14:25, Lê Việt Quang wrote:
> Dear sir , I try to build OOO320_m12 on window XP , but it fail , and take
> this error , what is it ?
any reason why you want to build such an outdated milestone?
iirc latest OOO320 is at m19...
no idea about your error, tough...
--
"...the cost of
On 16.06.2010 10:57, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Am Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:11:25 +0200
schrieb Mathias Bauer:
BTW: I don't remember if any of the two ItemSet implementations
returns an VoidItem in a GetItem call for a disabled item or if NULL
is returned then. IMHO it always should be the latter.
G
On 14.06.2010 23:32, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/14/2010 07:05 AM, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before
On 06/17/10 15:46, Bartosz wrote:
2010/6/16 Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Bartosz,
On Tuesday, 2010-06-15 09:06:19 +0200, Bartosz wrote:
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed boost of
performance.
For example:
for (USHORT i = 0; i < aEntries.size(); ++i)
Please
2010/6/16 Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On Tuesday, 2010-06-15 09:06:19 +0200, Bartosz wrote:
>
>> After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed boost of
>> performance.
>>
>> For example:
>> for (USHORT i = 0; i < aEntries.size(); ++i)
>
> Please ensure to adapt
- Mail Original -
De: "Wei Min Teo"
À: dev@openoffice.org, d...@api.openoffice.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Juin 2010 04:34:36
Objet: [dev] RE: [api-dev] pdf import programmatically
Hi,
Can anyone help me on this? Is there a way to force a document to open with
draw prog
Hi,
Can anyone help me on this? Is there a way to force a document to open with
draw programmatically?
> From: shaun...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@openoffice.org; d...@api.openoffice.org
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:32:58 +0800
> Subject: [api-dev] pdf import programmatically
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
Great success!
I have successfully removed the SvArray of objects macro (SV_DECL_OBJARR and
SV_IMPL_OBJARR macros).
Please feel free to check and test it.
Patch is available at (replace_svarray3.patch):
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112395
2010/6/15 Bjoern Michaelsen:
>> Cha
Thanks, i got it!
2010/6/16 Michael Stahl
> On 16/06/2010 10:22, wangxiang wrote:
> > Thanks,
> >
> > I just want to build some modules like SW with the debug partial build,
> and
> > replace existing libs to get some debugging
> >
> > But I can't find the ".o" or ".so" in the installation fo
Hi Bartosz,
On Tuesday, 2010-06-15 09:06:19 +0200, Bartosz wrote:
> After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed boost of
> performance.
>
> For example:
> for (USHORT i = 0; i < aEntries.size(); ++i)
Please ensure to adapt also all types where necessary, in this c
On 16/06/2010 10:22, wangxiang wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I just want to build some modules like SW with the debug partial build, and
> replace existing libs to get some debugging
>
> But I can't find the ".o" or ".so" in the installation folders. In my
> fedora12, it's "/opt/openoffice.org3/program
Am Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:22:13 +0800
schrieb wangxiang :
> Thanks,
>
> I just want to build some modules like SW with the debug partial
> build, and replace existing libs to get some debugging
>
> But I can't find the ".o" or ".so" in the installation folders. In my
> fedora12, it's "/opt/openo
Am Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:11:25 +0200
schrieb Mathias Bauer :
> BTW: I don't remember if any of the two ItemSet implementations
> returns an VoidItem in a GetItem call for a disabled item or if NULL
> is returned then. IMHO it always should be the latter.
Getting a void item the old implementation re
Thanks,
I just want to build some modules like SW with the debug partial build, and
replace existing libs to get some debugging
But I can't find the ".o" or ".so" in the installation folders. In my
fedora12, it's "/opt/openoffice.org3/program/"
and i follow your suggestions and find the progr
Am Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:32:54 +0800
schrieb wangxiang :
> *But another question comes back : I can't find the ".o" or ".so"
> libs in the folder "/opt/openoffice.org3/program" (There's only an
> "libnpsoplugin.so" in the folder )*
> Is that right ?
Yes, most libs are in /opt/openoffice (the "middl
Am Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
schrieb Matt Wis :
> I have installed Cygwin and the five modules listed at
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows.
> I cannot run configure. When I run "./configure", it says
> "bash: ./configure: No suc
On 06/15/2010 02:55 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 14.06.2010 12:01, Caolán McNamara wrote:
A code replacement like this creates the question what shall be the goal:
- reduce memory footprint
- improve performance
- remove code duplication
- improve code quality
My primary interest is in code
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:13:36 -0400
schrieb Bill Hoffman :
> OK, so you depend on gmake features.
Indeed. Some of the recent gmake features are really nifty and make it
quite powerful.
> This might be an interesting thing to try with CMake some day. To
> generate a makefile that does not have recu
On 2010-06-15 10:44, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:18:45 +0200
schrieb Jan Holst Jensen:
On 2010-06-15 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
By the way.
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed
boost of performance.
For example:
for (USHORT i = 0;
On 14.06.2010 12:01, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
the SvArrays should be replaced by appropriate STL types (mostly vector, i
guess, but probably in some cases stacks or deques or something else).
deques I think was the best option in general th
Am Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:18:45 +0200
schrieb Jan Holst Jensen :
> On 2010-06-15 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
> > By the way.
> > After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed
> > boost of performance.
> >
> > For example:
> > for (USHORT i = 0; i< aEntries.size(); ++i)
> >
On 06/15/10 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
Getting rid of SvArray might not be enough alone to fix this, but it
would be a big step in the right direction. Please also have a look at
the work in cws new_itemsets which tries to get rid of the old
SfxItemSet implementation and replace it with stl container-
On 2010-06-15 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
By the way.
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed boost of
performance.
For example:
for (USHORT i = 0; i< aEntries.size(); ++i)
{
if (aEntries.at(i).aFntFmt == rFntFmt)
{
aRes = aEnt
> Getting rid of SvArray might not be enough alone to fix this, but it
> would be a big step in the right direction. Please also have a look at
> the work in cws new_itemsets which tries to get rid of the old
> SfxItemSet implementation and replace it with stl container-based stuff
> whereever poss
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:32:27 -0400
schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak :
> Changing out SvArray, will fix this long standing bug, which will
> bring great joy and happiness to my life.
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159
Getting rid of SvArray might not be enough alone to fix
On 06/14/2010 07:05 AM, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If
On 6/11/2010 1:14 PM, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg
Germany wrote:
Hi all,
see
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/make/Remaking-Makefiles.html#Remaking-Makefiles
for details:
"To this end, after reading in all makefiles, make will consider each as
a goal target and att
On 14/06/2010 13:05, Bartosz wrote:
>> I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
>> can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
>> because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
>> which was an annoying result.
>
> Great
> I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
> can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
> because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
> which was an annoying result.
Great. If you could find this patch, it will be v
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> the SvArrays should be replaced by appropriate STL types (mostly vector, i
> guess, but probably in some cases stacks or deques or something else).
deques I think was the best option in general the last time I looked at
this. Probably best
On 13/06/2010 22:36, Bartosz Kosiorek wrote:
> Hi.
hi Bartosz,
> In the
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/To-Dos#Replace_code_with_3rd_party
> there is section about "Replace self made containers with STL containers.
> SvPointerArray, BigPointerArray"
> But in higher section there is
Hi all!
This is a little reminder that the Community Council Election
"Nomination Phase" is open till 2010-06-15, 24:00 UTC. So, if you know
someone who might be a good choice to represent the community in terms
of a "Product Development", then please don't hesitate to nominate this
person. It is
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:55:59 +0200
Michael Stahl wrote:
> > We did attempt to create non-recursive makefiles for CMake, and
> > they are "less" recursive than they once were. However, we found
> > it impossible to handle implicit dependencies of generated source
> > files without using recursive
On 10/06/2010 20:19, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 6/1/2010 8:30 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> it took longer than expected, but here we are. I took the CMake build
>> protoype again, that my colleague Martin Hollmichel provided, and gave
>> it another whirl. The results didn't change much.
On 10/06/2010 15:41, sponmonster wrote:
> vnd.sun.star.extension:///path...
>
> does that work for you when you use it in "Setup.xcu" for defining a
> default-template??
> it doens't work for me
>
> with my id from my descritption.xml:
>
>
> vnd.sun.star.extension://openoffice.320.sharedconfig
On 10/06/2010 06:25, David Tardon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:48:03PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> i believe fs wanted to create some new mechanism to refer to extension
>> content that could be used in place of %origin% and would work in this use
>> case.
>>
>> i wonder what is the statu
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:48:03PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 09/06/2010 09:50, sponmonster wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I’m trying to deliver a template within an extension and directly set the
> > template as default-template.
> > The Setup.xcu code:
> >
> > […]
> >
> >
> >
On 09/06/2010 09:50, sponmonster wrote:
> Hi,
> I’m trying to deliver a template within an extension and directly set the
> template as default-template.
> The Setup.xcu code:
>
> […]
>
>
>
>oor:type="xs:string">
>
Hi Björn,
Sorry, but this message has been sent to d...@fr.openoffice.org and
qa-t...@fr.openoffice.org francophone mailing lists. It is intended for
francophone NLC project.
Probably a mistake by gmane.org if you have read it on
gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.general
JBF
Le 06.06.2010 15:20, Björn
On 05/06/2010 21:55, addy1in...@gmail.com wrote:
> dmake: Error: -- `COPYING' not found, and can't be made
>
> ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
> /media/C_DRIVE/OpenOfficeBuild/OOO320_m12/dictionaries/de_AT
sorry, no idea about your problem.
perhaps it is as simple to work around as cre
On 05/06/2010 02:58, xiaofen...@iscas.ac.cn wrote:
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72496: line 55: fg: no job control
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72496 (%install)
it seems your /bin/sh does not support job control?
sorry, no idea what could cause this problem.
is there any shell today that i
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Could you please at least add a short english summary to your mail when
(cross-)posting to an english list? My french is quite rusty and other
might be even worse off (especially given that google translations of
your mail provides "interesting" results). As is, most wont be able
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:14:32PM +0800, xiaofen...@iscas.ac.cn wrote:
> Are you replying to my question?
No, I replied to Michael.
> It seems that what you quoted isn't from mine.
Please read:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
Sorry, Rene, but it is hard for me to understand your reply.
Are you replying to my question?
It seems that what you quoted isn't from mine.
On 星期四, 六月 3, 2010 7:39 pm, Rene Engelhard wrote:
---
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 03, 2
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > ant -version
> Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/lib/tools.jar
> Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on March 5 2010
>
> > JAVA_HOME='/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun' ant -version
> Apache
On 01/06/2010 04:59, xiaofen...@iscas.ac.cn wrote:
> The config.log is lke follows:
> I extract the lines that are related to ant, here it is
> ---
> PATH: /cygdrive/c/ant/bin
> .
>
> configure:28329: checking for jakarta-ant
> configure:28362: result: n
- "Thorsten Behrens" a écrit :
> Camille Moulin wrote:
> > //UNUSED2009-05 void ScDocument::SetPrintRange( SCTAB nTab, const
> > ScRange& rNew )
> > //UNUSED2009-05 {
> > //UNUSED2009-05 if (ValidTab(nTab) && pTab[nTab])
> > //UNUSED2009-05 pTab[nTab]->SetPrintRange( rNew );
> >
On 05/20/10 10:08, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Camille Moulin wrote:
//UNUSED2009-05 void ScDocument::SetPrintRange( SCTAB nTab, const
ScRange& rNew )
//UNUSED2009-05 {
//UNUSED2009-05 if (ValidTab(nTab) && pTab[nTab])
//UNUSED2009-05 pTab[nTab]->SetPrintRange( rNew );
//UNUSED2009-05 }
Camille Moulin wrote:
> //UNUSED2009-05 void ScDocument::SetPrintRange( SCTAB nTab, const
> ScRange& rNew )
> //UNUSED2009-05 {
> //UNUSED2009-05 if (ValidTab(nTab) && pTab[nTab])
> //UNUSED2009-05 pTab[nTab]->SetPrintRange( rNew );
> //UNUSED2009-05 }
>
Ugh. Why are we still doing _th
I really do some search before I asked , but I can't understand it , I am a
chinese , some describtion in Englist is hard to understand !
I am very sorry about that !
I misunderstand this mailst !
I will not do that againt !
My quesiton will switch to other !
Thank you for your notice , a
Am Tue, 18 May 2010 14:46:29 +0800
schrieb Qzi er :
> when compile the sample below , it fail ...
Hi Qzi er,
please try not to spam the dev@ mailing list. It is mostly for
Openoffice.org core development -- only in rare cases, when every other
way of solving a problem has been investigated, it
On 12/05/2010 15:17, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Of course, it turns out that my recent checking was conducted in the
> wrong way (I simply grepped for traces of STLport-exported symbols in
> the mangled C++ symbols exported from the URE API libs). Looking more
> closely, it turns out that the UR
On 05/10/10 09:59, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/26/10 10:43, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the
STLport-requirement
(and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms).
If we continu
Am Wed, 12 May 2010 09:12:38 +
schrieb Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson :
> Has anybody evaluated maybe using Apache Ant as the build tool? It's
> platform independent and easy to extend and script.
Can you tell us a unique selling point for ant? I.e. something that ant
does better than GNU make o
Has anybody evaluated maybe using Apache Ant as the build tool? It's
platform independent and easy to extend and script.
- - - - - - - - - Áframsendur póstur - - - - - - - - - -
> From: Mathias Bauer
> To: dev@openoffice.org
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:20:43 +0200
> Subject: New build system
> Hi
On 11/05/2010 13:29, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> This leads to some "interesting" constructions, for example on OSX
> where the linker needs to know about the runtime locations of libs it
> links against. Assuming this could simply be abstracted away with
> built-in CMake facilities is IMHO quite nai
Am Tue, 11 May 2010 11:54:24 +0400
schrieb Konstantin Tokarev :
> Your conclusion is wrong. See add_custom_target function in manual -
> you can run any external build system from cmake. I even use it as
> configurer which founds OOo binaries and jars for ant :)
That is not a migration in steps b
Hi Thorsten,
Good that you take it positive .. look forward to meet again - and also
to a future where working together in the council is possible too.
Best regards,
Cor
Thorsten Behrens wrote (22-04-10 23:26)
Hi Chris, all,
first off, let me join you in congratulating Eike and Olivier for
On 04/26/10 10:43, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the STLport-requirement
(and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms).
If we continue to build and package into the install sets
Hi,
Our mercurial repositories are available again at
hg.services.openoffice.org.
The (legacy) subversion repository is accessible via svn+ssh (plain svn
is pending).
Please note that the IP addresses have changed and it may take a while
until the new ones have propagated.
Greetings
Stef
Hi,
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
the OpenOffice.org SCM server for the Mercurial and Subversion
repositories is down. Other services (for example the OpenGrok indexer)
hosted on the server are affected as well.
We are working on this.
We will see what news the US business will bring.
Please
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:43:28AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the
> > STLport-requirement
> > (and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms).
(Note that I didn't
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the
> STLport-requirement
> (and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms).
If we continue to build and package into the install sets stlport on
Linux x86, but not actually
[ releases is not the correct list for that, X-posting to dev@ ]
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:24:51PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> So far i686 needed --with-stlport to be able to use 3rd party
> extensions.
>
> DEV300_m77 introduced cppunit requirement and now i686 configure fails:
Not real
enoffice.org<mailto:d...@marketing.openoffice.org> ;
> project_leads<mailto:project_le...@openoffice.org> ;
> discuss<mailto:disc...@openoffice.org> ;
> d...@l10n.openoffice.org<mailto:d...@l10n.openoffice.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:34 AM
Congratulation Olivier & Eike
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Christoph Noack wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the results of the elections held earlier this month are now available.
> Two of the three candidates have been confirmed to represent "you" in
> the Community Council. Unfortunately, one mem
o:d...@l10n.openoffice.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:34 AM
Subject: [dev] Re: [native-lang] Results for the Community Council Elections
(2010-03)
Congratulations Olivier and Thorsten!
Charles-H. Schulz.
Le Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:12:46 -0400,
Christoph Noack mailto:christ...
601 - 700 of 2365 matches
Mail list logo
