On 9/2/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am unable to point the codebehind plugin to pages underneath WEB-INF/jsp.
> None of the pages are found, however, I noticed if I moved the directories
> underneath the webroot, they are found. I am setting the Struts property
> too.
>
>
>
>
he same that in any other
> struts action.
>
> Best regards,
> JP
>
JP in big terms I agree with you. But as long as your stuff is using
request parameters this means that it exposes the app to external
exploits. The other risk you are mentioning is just internal to you
app and you
If I'm reading it correctly there is a risk of infinite recursion in
there (if the parameter is the same as the current action).
bests,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 8/28/07, jpedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have written this Action for a project. It uses the parameter of a m
On 7/28/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/28, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > While I suppose consulting the PMC would have been appropriate, I disagree
> > all votes, no matter what, should be open for 72 hours. In this case, a
> > severe security fix release, we should
On 7/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/7/16, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> What do you define as "a user should not be allowed to execute such OGNL
> code!"? There are times that I want to call a static method and use the
> results. The problem to me (and as Don po
On 7/2/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was asking about that on IRC the other day, where is the download for 2.7?
I can't find it on the OGNL website. (maven repo?)
I heard it is available in the maven repo, but under a different name:
ognl/ognl (unfortunately I don't have the
On 6/22/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all!
In a previous post in Struts User mailing list, a user (Andrea
Vettori) found a possible large memory leak in FreeMarker.
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--App-generate-lot-%282GB%29-of-garbage%21-tf3936635.html
Since Struts 2 appears to
On 5/27/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In Struts 2.1 (and XWork 2.1), I'm thinking about reworking how we process
urls and convert them to actions. Specifically, I want to make it possible
for the Struts 2 dispatcher filter to potentially examine every request, and
if no action is foun
On 4/27/07, Alexander Snaps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Since ApacheCon just came up... I wondered if anyone has submitted
something for JavaZone this year.
Alexandru was there last year, where I actually met him for the first
time, and I thought it was a great event.
I have myself submitted a
On 4/27/07, Philip Luppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would be useful, but limited to those who know/use WW, and I don't
think any of those three guys can make it to ApacheCon US.
A Struts 1 to Struts 2 topic, now thát's something entirely different
(damn, there goes my proposal).
Anyway, while
On 2/26/07, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
> I'd like to say that I'm codeveloper of
> pico/nanocontainer.
I've used Pico and Nano. Nano uses my AOP framework. You should try Guice.
> What's important is that you don't
y open for new features and whatever? IMO this would be the perfect
> way to go, you get a big +1 from me on this :)
>
> - Rene
+1
I totally agree with this.
Full +1 for this.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
>
> Craig McClanahan schrieb:
> > On 2/6/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL P
On 2/7/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/6/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, two comments here. First, how many beta releases do we need
> before it is time for a GA? I think we've been at beta quality since
> 2.0.1 and, yes, it has been helpful to weed out i
I fully agree with Ted's explanation of vote meanings so
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ x] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 2/7/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We might have to agree to disagree. I believe a beta vote is warranted
when
First of all Happy New Year to everyone! and then a bit of a
philosophical email - something related to previous post by Rainer and
something that bothered me for the last couple of months.
Before the merge, I was spending a lot of my spare time contributing
to WW and on the XWork side along
On 11/21/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/21/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The people working on Tiles2 are gearing up for some sort of release,
> > maybe even this weekend. But, since we distribute Tiles as a plugin,
> > so w
Are you behind a firewall? In case you do then you need a special setup.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 11/21/06, Tarek Nabil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Tm, but it's giving me the same error message :(
Does any one know the cause of such a problem?
-Original Message-
From
Don, I agree with you that a release should be scheduled sometime very
soon. However, at this moment due to the latest changes I would
suggest the following process:
1/ tag all dependencies (XWork2, Tiles2, Guice, CodeBehind etc.)
2/ make a release of the external dependencies (XWork2, Tiles2, Gu
On 11/21/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/21/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don, I agree with you that a release should be scheduled sometime very
> soon. However, at this moment due to the latest changes I would
> suggest the following pr
On 11/15/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,
Guice doesn't seem to have a mailing list or forum. Does anyone know how to
follow up with development / news of Guice?
It doesn't seem to have a documentation page as well, too bad for such a superb
project. :P Anyone knows about the pl
That sounds exactly like the piece I was working one the last week, so
it seems you guys got more time. Gonna check it soon!
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 11/13/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No kidding...I've been working on this damn thing every spare minute for
the last two we
On 11/6/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vitor Souza wrote:
>> I'd love to have proper generics support in OGNL. If
>> you create an OGNL
>> patch, be sure to let the Struts dev list know so we
>> can ensure it gets in.
>> Don
>>
>
> Don,
>
> I hacked OnglRuntime until it worked, but I d
AFAIK, other projects have moved from OGNL usage. I am not gonna
discuss if it is a good or bad decision, but in case we are gonna move
away from it the old apps with heavy usage of OGNL will become more
complex to be migrated. Unfortunately, I am not sure how we can find
out what WW users have us
Konstantin, I was always curious if you have an example (not quite
basic) about how Pico container is used.
TIA,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 10/31/06, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the Pico stuff had to be pulled
On 10/30/06, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/28/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, my original purpose is to find a way to best
> handle the case where
> > we want to generate multiple types of output
> without t
On 10/28/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys, comments inline
Don Brown wrote:
> Hmm...I don't see any of my replies in those two threads, but maybe
> there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
> pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too muc
se when
the result depends on 2 (or more conditions)?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Don
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> At the first glance the idea looks interesting, but I am wondering if
> this is not just a matter of having a custom result type; because I
> cannot image a way to cover any
On 10/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A result selector is a mechanism to select a result with a given result
code through some external means. This is a great feature stxx [1] has,
which I miss in Struts 2.
There are two main problems that this helps to solve:
1. You want do retur
On 10/26/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/26/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/26/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/25/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
spin off into
another thread: Result Selectors.
Don
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> On 10/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah, those discussions after JavaOne:
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg22396.html
>> http://www.mail-arch
On 10/26/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/25/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi.
> I raised the question today on Don Browns blog about being able to have
> integration between Struts2 and DWR, to get a full MVC model if you only
> want to re-render a snippet of a
ely minimal.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Don
On 10/25/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/26/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm...probably because I didn't know about it :)
>
> perhaps :-)
> > Should we move the code back
/alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Don
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> Wille, I have contributed a long time ago some (similar?) code to DWR.
> You can find it in the DWR trunk (a webwork package) . This
> integration code is based on some work I initially done for InfoQ.com.
>
> Sure, if you find pl
Wille, I have contributed a long time ago some (similar?) code to DWR.
You can find it in the DWR trunk (a webwork package) . This
integration code is based on some work I initially done for InfoQ.com.
Sure, if you find places where your ideas look better then my approach
I would be happy to hear
On 10/16/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we are injecting Action classes via Spring,
should that work when we call an Action from an action tag using
executeResult=true.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] name="StoryTypeIdList" executeResult="true"/]
I'm getting the (wildcard) re
On 10/15/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/14/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I guess everybody knows the reasons ;-).
> >
> > Hmm... let me guess, infoq uses Spring 1.
On 10/15/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/14/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other than a shiny new version number, what will this buy us? I don't have
> any objections per se, but we should have good reasons for changing our
> dependencies.
Whether Struts 2 works w
lex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/14/06, Mark Menard wrote:
> On 10/13/06 5:36 PM, "Ted Husted" wrote:
>
> > Since the reports are that Spring 2 works just fine with Struts 2, why
> > don't we bite the bullet an
On 10/14/06, Mark Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/13/06 5:36 PM, "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the reports are that Spring 2 works just fine with Struts 2, why
> don't we bite the bullet and update our dependencies?
Not that I'm a s2 developer, and my vote doesn't matt
expression parser, because
that would basically defeat the purpose. In the case of switching to a
JSR EL, but not using its native syntax, we lose the benefits an IDE can
give us by providing autocompletion and other assistance with expressions.
Don
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> On 9/29/06,
he_mindstorm )p.
rgds
- Original Message
From: Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Friday, 29 September, 2006 3:13:19 AM
Subject: Re: Struts plugins
On 9/29/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I appreciate the idea, I don'
he
value manipulation which is not so performant (though I haven't looked
so deep to suggest some optimizations)
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
rgds
- Original Message ----
From: Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Friday, 29 Septem
On 9/29/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I appreciate the idea, I don't particularly think that plugins
should be deterministic. Perhaps plugin is the wrong word as it brings
to mind descriptors, versioning, dependencies, etc. for some people. In
this case, I see it as simply a wa
On 9/29/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been toying with this idea of severing XWork and Struts 2's strict
dependency to OGNL. The goal is not necessary to remove OGNL outright,
but to make it possible to replace it with another expression language.
I'm happy with OGNL right now, h
On 9/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/9/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only thing you could be doing is defining these repositories in
> > ~/.m2/settings.xml . If
On 9/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/9/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [WARNING] repository metadata for: 'snapshot
> org.apache.struts.tiles:tiles-core:0.2-SNAPSHOT' could not be
> retrieved fro
> m repository: apache d
t any
dependency that is tried against:
http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/ is failing. What can
I do about this?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Frank
(I have no idea if it will help, but like the oft-repeated "have you
tried rebooting?" advice, it seems to sometimes work)
Hi!
Being myself one of those that are having a special relation with
Maven (being it 1 or 2), I am having some hard times to get Struts2
compiled on my machine.
I have updated the sourcecode from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk.
I have maven-2.0.4 on my machine and when t
Oke... stupid me... it was obvious.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 7/27/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is SWF? I might have missed this acro :-[.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 7/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Molito
What is SWF? I might have missed this acro :-[.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 7/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Molitor wrote:
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=14251&tstart=15A
> At "The Spring Experience" in Miami Keith Donald,
> Myself, and Matthew
I am not sure I understand this proposal. As far as I know this is
already supported by WW and quite nicely. So, why would we want to add
just another dependency?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
---
(http://themindstorms.blogspot.com)
On 6/30/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If Struts
e:
On 6/21/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you think this can be done with the big-package-solves-everything
> approach, than I am oke with it.
Hmmm, you can have both. If people are interested in RoR simplicity,
then why not create an Action-on-Rails distribut
.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
---
(http://themindstorms.blogspot.com)
On 6/21/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First of all I am not sure why so many thread forked from the initial
discussion. This will make a lot more difficult to figure out what was
already said, and t
agree which approach is simpler?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 6/21/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WebWork has tried to adapt to this new approach proposed by RoR. And
> it was nice to see it. We may h
Hi everybody!
I've read this thread a couple of times, because I was having a
somehow weird sentiment while doing it. Now, I think I have figured it
out :-). So, please bear with me for the short following paragraphs (I
am not a good writer yet):
1. even if I don't know too many details about St
On 6/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, June 19, 2006 2:57 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with
> Pattrick).
>
> 1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core should provide the means to
&g
I have tried to follow this whole thread (but probably I have missed
some aspects, so sorry if I re-sayin something already said or
bringing an arguement already demolished).
My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with Pattrick).
1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core s
Isn't possible to be an issue with XWork dependency? I don't think 2
different versions of XWork can co-exist on the same webapp but I
may be wrong.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 6/13/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it would have made Atlassian's life easier.
> J
This looks weird, because as far as I knew contributions submitted
through JIRA are already granting the copyright if not otherwise
expressed.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 6/5/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since this donation includes standalone classes, we should ask Frank
t
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 12:21 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> Frank you are absolutely correct about the description of how DWR
> works today. What I have done is exactly what you are thinking of:
> made DWR work through the
On 5/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote:
> > Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused
>> about why someone would want to "integrate" DWR with Struts?
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:22 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In my case I couldn't see a real benefit of having 2 different ways to
> "call" server-side functionality. For me it makes a lot of sense, that
> ev
through the WebWork normal chain.
In this case there will be no security issue: you have the exact same
options as for a normal request.
hth,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:10 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
>
In my case I couldn't see a real benefit of having 2 different ways to
"call" server-side functionality. For me it makes a lot of sense, that
everything exposed by the server must be an action. This allows me to
re-use almost everything and maybe later on to redesign my site by
mixing AJAX with no
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 10:32 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> In the DWR-WW action invocation toy I have used when building
> InfoQ.com, the action invocation passes through exactly the same
> process as a normal request, so I h
On 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 9:46 am, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> I am somehow a little confused by some of the comments... pls see inlined
What, me confusing?!?!? NNNOOO...
;)
> On 5/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PR
I am somehow a little confused by some of the comments... pls see inlined
On 5/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 2:57 pm, Ian Roughley wrote:
> Joe thought that a Struts2
> creator that read could read existing Struts2 configuration files, and
> expose a pa
+1
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
ps: I second the question about any votes for remaining in the incubation :-).
On 4/29/06, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
- Original Message
From: tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 9:37:53 AM
S
When you say: "when you use a new method by mistake", are you refering
to using API available only on 1.5? If so, this is a known problem,
and indeed it is difficult to trap it.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 4/26/06, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have used retroweaver... and it does
On 4/25/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... is that a +1? :)
>
> As for annotations, I'd imagine we'd keep the XML as override so most
> anything you can do with annotations, you could
> also do in XML. This would give Java 1.4 users mostly the same ca
approach
> taken by the "Tiger Extensions" to Shale[1]. And, the first two features of
> these extensions (use annotations instead of configuration files, and use
> annotations instead of implementing interfaces) are *very* similar to the
> sorts of things that wo
This looks quite nice. I cannot figure out what means support for
annotations. Even if they are left inside the classbytecode, you will
not have access to the API to use them (except the case they are
weaving the Class.class, but I really don't think so).
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 4/24/
Hi guys!
I keep receiving notifications from the JIRA. But once I try the links in the emails, I am
redirected to https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW which display a Service Temporary Unavailable.
What's going on?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
---
For all - 1 releases, WebWork was distributed as a single jar. On the
2.2series, we have replaced the way WW should be plugged in the webapp
from a
servlet dispatcher to a filter dispatcher, and in time we have noticed there
were some problems serving static content. We have tried to split the dist
Joe, I mostly agree with you. What I've been trying to say is that most of
the user will not like to have a big dependency on Dojo for simple
functionality like a calendar component. And I agree, this is my case too. I
would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have even
been
Great! I will ping Theodor to take a look at the current thread and I will
have a chat with him. However, IMO, JasperSoft should be contacted too.
BR,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 3/28/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/27/06, Alexandru Popescu <[
pls see inlined
On 3/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> STATUS update
>
>
> DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS - LICENSING
>
> JSCalendar for the DatePicker tag
> * Rene will contact author about license change
> * There may also be a Dojo equivalent
>
> FCKEditor for the Richtexteditor ta
I know Theodor, he is a good friend of mine. Though, I think this decission
is more now on JaspectSoft than on Theodor. I will try to ping him and ask
about this. Are these threads available directly from the web, so that I can
point him to this discussion?
cheers,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
g)
> >> +1 Frank Zammetti (non-binding)
> >>
> >> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2
> >> - WebWork* classes -> Struts*
> >> - WebWork in comments, docume
IMO we should keep the names as consistent as possible so my vote would go
for:
- com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2
- WebWork* classes -> Struts*
- WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2
- webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts.
- ww:
Good work Don!
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 3/17/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the status of the WebWork 2 Incubation:
>
> 1. We have an official Incubator status page at
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html
> 2. March 22 is the scheduled date for
Hi everybody!
My name is Alexandru Popescu and I am confirming my interest and will to
continue to help.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=15292
82 matches
Mail list logo
