Re: starting with the 7.0.5 release steps.

Dropping the example will require to move their tests in the main chain since they are part of our coverage. Also note you probably dont want to use release plugin cause running the test (with -Pall-adapters if you respect the plugin philosophy) is quite long (should be ~3h x2). Just tag and

Fwd: [2/2] tomee git commit: add testng runner files for tests which are under development.

FYI we already have these files in src/test/resources ;) -- Forwarded message - From: Date: mar. 19 juin 2018 21:12 Subject: [2/2] tomee git commit: add testng runner files for tests which are under development. To: add testng runner files for tests which are under

Re: TomEE-7.0.5 work

to test that scale change but don't change the ratio please. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: TomEE-7.0.5 work

;> > >>>>>>>>> The rest seems to work fine. > >>>>>>>>> So I gonna push forward with the Johnzon-1.0.1 release > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Can

Re: TomEE-7.0.5 work

gt;>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yes, working on it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> But I only see 2 bugs reported for this release. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://issues.

Re: Alias file from META-INF/org.apache.openejb.resource.jdbc.PasswordCipher not found

Hi, your SPI file is wrong: META-INF/org.apache.openejb.cipher.PasswordCipher/reverse see https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/test/resources/META-INF/org.apache.openejb.cipher.PasswordCipher/reverse for example Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: broken SubjectServiceTomEETest in fb_tomee8

Hmm, if that's a regression due to openejb.scan.webapp.container change we should fix it otherwise we'll break a lot of users. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: broken SubjectServiceTomEETest in fb_tomee8

What is suspicious is that: 1. was working well for years 2. it is already isolated in tomee since we scan the deployable and not the classpath for that reason maybe the default scanning of the container change? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: broken SubjectServiceTomEETest in fb_tomee8

Can be a classloader change with a recent upgrade. Le sam. 9 juin 2018 13:23, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > I get a duplicate unit exception in > jug.rest.arquillian.SubjectServiceTomEETest which is in polling-web.This > happens in the fb_tomee8 branch. > > 0 = {TreeMap$Entry@5654} >

Re: Linkage Error

if jackson changed something about its lifecycle@classloader usage then it can lead to that if part of the app overlapp between the lib part of the ear and the webapps. In TomEE the webapp tries to load from the parent first. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu

Re: Linkage Error

Hi Dignesh, can you check 7.0.5 out before digging further? Also do you deploy an ear or war? If an ear maybe ensure there is no jackson in the webapps. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: Annotation EJB classes are not recognized if package name does not include "superbiz"

Hi Maybe start in debug mode but superbiz is clearly not hardcoded and we have tests and users relying on a lot of different names. Le sam. 26 mai 2018 14:43, sudhakarvm a écrit : > I have simple JAX-RS service invoking an annotation based EJB. But my TomEE > 7.0.3 never

Re: completely weird unit test failure

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-weaver.git ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: completely weird unit test failure

We are on git: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/bval.git Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: completely weird unit test failure

O] OpenEJB :: Server :: CXF RS ........ FAILURE > [02:17 min] > > > > On 16/05/18 23:15, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > fixed (the message issue, the underlying bval@getter issue + the cxf > > validation issue), you need bval (bval2 branch) snapshot and

Re: Example request

Hi Add a conf/exclusions.list file with this content (assuming tibco- is a common prefix of tibco jars): default-list tibco- Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 02:41, Lakshmikanth W a écrit : > Are there any particular settings to integrate tibco with tomee plus? > I am seeing below error

Re: completely weird unit test failure

fixed (the message issue, the underlying bval@getter issue + the cxf validation issue), you need bval (bval2 branch) snapshot and tomee fb_tomee8 branch snapshot to get it Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>

Re: completely weird unit test failure

seems due to our exclusion changes, will try to fix it now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: completely weird unit test failure

That was the trick with link(), if you have the child in classloader C and the parent in C.parent then you get the parent included. This is why i think something can have been broken. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.met

Re: completely weird unit test failure

Mark Previous test issue can be due to xbean upgrades or scanning changes, did you check that? We tend to link implicitly the finder for these tests but can have been broken at some point. Le mar. 15 mai 2018 23:16, Mark Struberg a écrit : > fb_tomee8 > I've fixed

Re: Status of TomEE 8

It is in since yesterday Le 5 mai 2018 15:53, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> a écrit : > i saw MyFaces 2.3.1 was released. will that get update in 8.0? > > > On 05/05/18 14:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> We didnt upgrade the

Re: Status of TomEE 8

We didnt upgrade the api yet and still uses validation 1.1 Le 5 mai 2018 13:03, "cocorossello" a écrit : > Hi, > > I just noticed that javax.validation.ClockProvider and some methods related > to bean validation api 2.0 are missing in javaee-api-8.0-SNAPSHOT (I'm >

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

guess we can just use the master release note since the last release and drop the spec N+1 items no? +1 to get it merged (I'd appreciate if Mark can give a shot before since it is a big one but looked ok and well working on my side) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: [RESULTS] Merge Pull Request 123 - MicroProfile JWT support

http://tomee.apache.org/community/sources.html side note: github is just a proxy for us until we migrate to gitbox which is ~basically an asf repo on github. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

is clearly "no impact" - we are already in prod with j8 - and last one is pretty much the same technically AFAIK. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

ta EE 8, TomEE 8 -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the thread have > been to work in tomee 8 bra

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the thread have been to work in tomee 8 branch (always better to avoid merges ;))? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.5

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: tomee site slogan

"The swiss knife server"? We should probably avoid "enterprise tomcat" since it means something else in the industry - but we can say "enterprised server" if we want to play on words :). You are right, speaking of embedded/remote/standalone doesnt make much sense here. Le 27 avr. 2018 23:02,

Re: TomEE-7.0.5 work

We are working with Mark on a release train soon, johnzon would be part of it probably. An OWB release is needed too AFAIK and is on its way. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: Issue with local lookups between 2 different ears deployed in same TomEE instance

Hi Dignesh Normally if you dont have a local (or local bean) interface we automatically do a "classloader copy" which means if the same api classes are in both ears it should work. Le 23 avr. 2018 06:44, "Dignesh" a écrit : Hi, I am using 7.0.2 TomEE. I have 2 ears

Re: [RESULTS] Merge Pull Request 123 - MicroProfile JWT support

. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <htt

Re: MP.next()

Le 19 avr. 2018 20:47, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : Heh that was nicely put and I do certainly agree with your finding ;) @Romain, the 7.1 was just 7.0.x + java8 bump and MP. I got that but not its need. Of course I have no clue who will use EE7 with MP, if he can

Re: Status of TomEE 8

+1 for a next week release, no need of M1 or whatever marker in the name, just 8.0.0 is fine IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: MP.next()

Hmm, I don't get the rational of having a 7.x with that. Any reason? Technically TomEE 8 is way more ready to release than TomEE 7.1 ;). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: Status of TomEE 8

lt;david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Apr 17, 2018, at 9:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What is blocking to release tomee 8? Nothing ;) Moving this over as it's probably a good "top level" topic to discuss. This will probably come to d

Re: MP.next()

What is blocking to release tomee 8? Nothing ;) Id keep it simple and avoid another maintenance branch. Le 17 avr. 2018 23:49, "Jonathan Gallimore" a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 22:32 David Blevins, wrote: > > > > On Apr 17, 2018, at

Re: MP.next()

Isnt it fb_tomee8 branch so tomee 8? Otherwise +1 Le 17 avr. 2018 01:11, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" a écrit : > Hi community, > > Most microprofile requires Java 8. > Is everyone ok if we have microprofile implemented on TomEE 7.1 (Java 8)? > > Thanks > > > -- > Jean-Louis

Re: TomEE-7.0.5 work

It is the fix, originally alternative=true was a very secured impl cause even with a poorly setup test it was passing but it was wrong. Maybe it is worth a ticket to have it in the changelog but no doubt we are good now. Le 16 avr. 2018 07:41, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

t; Jon > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Happy to try that. I'll give that a go this evening. I misunderstood your > > proposal, but it makes sense now. > > > > Cheers > > > > Jo &g

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

t; Jon > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Happy to try that. I'll give that a go this evening. I misunderstood your > > proposal, but it makes sense now. > > > > Cheers > > > > Jo &g

Re: TomEE-7.0.5 work

I can probably deploy openjpa snapshot on monday if still needed but not this week end. Le 15 avr. 2018 07:16, "Alex The Rocker" a écrit : > Hello Jon, > > Sounds like very good news! > I'm ready to run our real-life tests with any preview of Johnzon 1.0.1 > if it's

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

Le 12 avr. 2018 23:24, "gilbertoca" a écrit : Guys, just a user here. >From my experience, no one knows the Geronimo project[1] (for me it appears a retired/dead one). Everyone I talk with thinks everything is in TomEE (I thought like this before). Now, after read about

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

why -> for consistency accross our coupled communities why does it matter if it is in G for T? -> it doesn't Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book 2018-04-12 15:56 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > we

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

it I would like to avoid to have to maintain 2 versions of the "same" code, it already proved being a failure promise multiple times so it is more a management reason than a technical one since the spec is pretty trivial. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | Linke

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

> > But I'm fine that the code is maintained at Geronimo, that TomEE code only > contains the integration parts. But it will not be a complete > implementation of MP JWT Auth (The Geronimo project). > > Rudy > > On 10 April 2018 at 06:58, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gma

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Filho Jean-Louis Monteiro Jonathan Gallimore Thiago Veronezi +0 Rudy De Busscher -1s Mark Struberg Romain Manni-Bucau This was intended as a non-technical vote, so I've registered Mark's -1 as he intended it. Thanks, Mark, for the clarification. Matthew, you didn't vote, your participatio

Re: Warnings in Catalina log file

Without the code it is hard to guess bit the exception mapping is not correct it seems. Does TestException match the wsdl? Is it a generated wsdl? Le 6 avr. 2018 08:18, "Dignesh" a écrit : Hi, I am getting regular warning messages in the catalina log file,when i start the

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

What about my proposal? Take johnzon master, copy it over 1.0.x and downgrade apis? It is probably the safest and shouldnt be long to make work. Can help next week if needed. Le 1 avr. 2018 17:06, "Jonathan Gallimore" a écrit : > Agreed. I'll start working on the

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

ins what's missing? LieGrue,strub On Sunday, 1 April 2018, 08:59:03 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: Le 1 avr. 2018 07:47, "Alex The Rocker" <alex.m3...@gmail.com> a écrit : Hello Mark, The point is not to enable EE8 features in TomEE 7.0.

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > If we start adding EE8 features then we will further blur the line.Imo we should remain clean and push for TomEE8 instead... > LieGrue,strub > > > On Saturday, 31 March 2018, 23:00:43 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com&

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

MEE-2153 title to make it more explicit. New title of this JIRA is now "Dependency upgrade to Johnzon 1.1.7" Could this be part of next 7.0.5-snapshot ? Best regards, Alexandre 2018-03-31 18:12 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > Le 31 mars 2018 16:36, "A

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

et all the fixes committed so far. +1 from me too After all ,Java 7 end of public updates was in April 2015, so making Java 8 as the minimum prerequisite for TomEE7 three years later after this date sounds very reasonable. Thanks, Alexandre 2018-03-31 15:44 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

hinking out loud. Jon On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, 12:29 Alex The Rocker, <alex.m3...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I agree with Romain : couldn't TomEE 7.0.5 be based on latest stable > Johnzon 1.1.x ? > > Best regards, > Alexandre > > > 2018-03-31 11:16 GMT+02:00 Ro

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

; > > are in current "to become TomEE 7.0.5" : my view is that this is not > > > the case: > > > * The following JIRA is still opened : > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2153 > > > * According to discussion in same thread

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Le 30 mars 2018 23:46, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Mar 29, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 30 mars 2018 04:30, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : >

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

2018-03-30 7:24 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, 06:06 Romain Manni-Bucau, <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Le 30 mars 2018 04:30, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a > écrit : >

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Le 30 mars 2018 04:30, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:57 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

us" being unite as we have been 7 years ago instead of just going on different paths cause of a fears. Le 29 mars 2018 21:57, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Le 29 mars 2018 20:49, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Mar 28, 2018, at 8:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 28, 2018, at 6:29 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is yo

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

signature (and optionally the date validation range). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Le 29 mars 2018 03:29, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Mar 28, 2018, at 1:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just move the "main" code to the repo created @G and import the new lib in > tomee MP as

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

@Jon: drop some SE style code to move to CDI style and allow apps to override "naturally" impls + droppring jose dep are the main ones. Some optim in the Bean impl should pby be planned too but can need some more investment and are less blocking for a 1.0.0. Romain Manni-Bucau @r

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

a "client" lib and in web.xml you can put "MP-JWT" to ensure the JWT are validated and propagated to the request. (= validation side, not emittion) > > > On 28/03/2018 10:15, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Hi Matthew, >> >> it is an impl o

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

2018-03-28 10:17 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> : > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Roberto PR *is* merged JL. > > He did the work to be able to consume any CDI "co

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Hi Matthew, it is an impl of https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-jwt-auth Normally with a JWT you can drop these things as well - can need some wrapper to handle the representation in a less raw way but nothing crazy. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu

Re: MP-JWT progress

ouis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Used most to be explicit and my meaning but

Re: Propose a Logo for TomEE

You can, probably just use "Logo Contest" thread as the way to do it. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com

Re: [DISCUSS] switching TomEE8 to master

Hi Felipe, your issue is not linked to tomee I think Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: Propose a Logo for TomEE

with that organization. It’s a personal contribution. > Guessed so when I saw the twitter thread ;) > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:15 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Le 26 mars 2018 21:11, "Richard Monson-Haefel" <rmon...@tomitribe.com>

Re: Propose a Logo for TomEE

se no one really cares about that or is there some other reason. Thanks! Some care(d) but gave up after months of discussion with a single logo proposal and an aborted contest with 27 cool logos. On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi

Re: Propose a Logo for TomEE

an you send the logos to this email? I don't see them in your > email. > maybe attach it to jira, generally half of the clients don't get the attached files :( > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Richard, >

Re: Propose a Logo for TomEE

Hi Richard, You can add one on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-574 but the contest is actually dead and there is no discussion to change the logo ATM so don't get too much hope. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: What is this project?

This approach is fine and where I disagree - but as you said one of the beauty of asf is to be allowed to "disagree" - and dislike it a lot is that it is a tomee central vision instead of considering asf as the central point. To try to illustrate it I'll take a car example: you can optimise the

Re: MP-JWT progress

Used most to be explicit and my meaning but your wording is more correct. Le 19 mars 2018 22:46, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > heh yea, just keep it going. But keep the idea of probably having > something tomee independent in the back of your head please! > It's not

Re: MP-JWT progress

Jwt-auth impl doesnt depend on tomee and is reusable so must not be put in tomee codebase. Hope it is clearer this time. Le 19 mars 2018 18:54, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:20 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com&g

Re: Git repos for sandbox and openejb-eclipse-plugin

ought - can be wrong - it was using svn which is now highly not encouraged but anyway if we can make it it would ease the usage (but can be done after a few releases). > > Cheers > > Jon > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> &

Re: Git repos for sandbox and openejb-eclipse-plugin

+1 Side questions: 1. did we already try contributing to wtp? 2. How to expose an update site at asf? Le 19 mars 2018 13:19, "Jonathan Gallimore" a écrit : > Hi > > As discussed here: > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MP-JWT-progress- >

Re: MP-JWT progress

> >> a week of back and forth. The first choice for anything should be TomEE, > >> as that is the community we serve. The first response should be thank > >> you, and we should accept the help offered. Then those that want to > >> worry about extraction and reuse should feel fre

Re: MP-JWT progress

TomEE on the MP board as soon as possible. If >> that initially means TomEE 8, Java 8, and accepting a few PRs then we >> should press ahead with that now. Anything that might need back-porting >> can be addressed later. >> >> Andy. >> >> >> On 19

Re: MP-JWT progress

cxf, activemp, openjpa, openwebbeans, batchee, johnzon, ...) This allows to use the projects in any CDI based application without having the drawback of being tomee dependent which is not required by any MP spec. > > Andy. > > > > On 19/03/18 01:02, David Blevins wrote: > >>

Re: MP-JWT progress

2018-03-19 0:07 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Le 18 mars 2018 21:29, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a >

Re: [VOTE] Merge Pull Request 123 - MicroProfile JWT support

-1 - even against this vote to be honest, you started 2 votes to decide what we do about that code, we discussed it and stated it was an awesome start but needing cleanup to be integrable and releasable, so why another 3rd vote to urge things and get code preventing a release merged? Le 19 mars

Re: [VOTE] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

Hey David, How does this vote relates to the geronimo one you launched? Are they purely concurrent or can they be conditional one for the other? Le 19 mars 2018 01:03, "David Blevins" a écrit : > The vote for merging PR 123 does not address community will on what to

Re: MP-JWT progress

e: > > I don't think its a good idea to move TomEE code into Geronimo. > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 5:50 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If there is no other comment, any objection to move it to > geronimo-jwt-auth? (let say if not we do it on m

Re: MP-JWT progress

@JL: ok I let you do @David: hmm, not sure which part I missed but there is nothing to merge except the TCK part which requires to extract it from the PR. This is what JL will do tmr so we can merge it after. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: MP-JWT progress

quick heads up: if no objection in between I plan to start creating the project tomorrow to let JL importing the code he did. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: Tomee and java 10

with updates each 6 months it must be ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.

Re: Tomee and java 10

Note that Type.getType(String) has been broken in asm 6.1 vs 6.0, you have to pass the descriptor or the type but getType(type.getName()) doesn't work anymore Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: Tomee and java 10

it is uploading (if my signing doesnt fail on that computer) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: Tomee and java 10

FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-302 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: MP-JWT progress

't be too late to fork back at tomee later if desired (but hopefully we'll not self-fork ;)) > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com&g

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

: we reuse eclipse api, it is asf v2 so should be ok just with a notice ref but just asking in case we want to own the api with some hardcoded provider Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

starting to apply it on tomee8 branch (merge + basic verifications on fb_tomee8) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

PR looks good now to me - we need to have the war vs tomee-maven-plugin assembly discussion in another thread so it doesn't block this particula topic. Happy to merge it next week or if anyone else wants to have a look and do it just go :). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

he pr update tmr, thanks for the hard work. Cheers,RobertoOn Wednesday, March 7, 2018, 8:07:04 AM GMT, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: 2018-03-07 6:00 GMT+01:00 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > Hi all>>>>Yep, as mentio

Re: MP-JWT progress

de clear > from > > the beginning for all potential usages. > > > > On 9 March 2018 at 12:20, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I don't think its a good idea to move TomEE code into Geronimo. > > > > > >

Re: MP-JWT progress

roprofile implementations like > geronimo-config. > > Just want to mention this as there are already people (outside of this > community) thinking that such a thing is possible (or should be possible) > > Rudy > > On 9 March 2018 at 11:49, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gm

Re: MP-JWT progress

If there is no other comment, any objection to move it to geronimo-jwt-auth? (let say if not we do it on monday european time) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

mEE Micro with only have MP > nothing else). > Depends, we already have hammock which is a great MP "only" server so tomee WP+MP can be beneficial for end users and avoid duplication @asf. Was just my raw thought on that. > > CheersGurkan > > On Tuesday, March 6, 2

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >