Hi tia,
Can you just rename the bootID file?
Best wishes,
Arne
Am Dienstag, 14. August 2012, 09:05:45 schrieb Maurizio Boriani:
> Hi,
> I got this in log file, how to fix?
?
--
Konstruktive Kritik:
- http://draketo.de/licht/krude-ideen/konstruktive-kritik
-- next part
Am Dienstag, 7. August 2012, 11:42:12 schrieb Fabio Gonzalez:
> Because Freenet does not ask the person to move the mouse, or write
> something on the keyboard?
Oh yes, it does?
On my new homeserver my /dev/random gets emptied out very quickly, so freenet
takes ages to get its startup random
Am Sonntag, 12. August 2012, 18:49:33 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> I like the overall look but I'm just not sure about the toggle switches, I
> think they create unnecessary potential for confusion. You just don't see
> them used in web pages very often.
Same for me. They suggest to me, that I can
Am Dienstag, 7. August 2012, 11:42:12 schrieb Fabio Gonzalez:
Because Freenet does not ask the person to move the mouse, or write
something on the keyboard?
Oh yes, it does…
On my new homeserver my /dev/random gets emptied out very quickly, so freenet
takes ages to get its startup random seed
Am Sonntag, 5. August 2012, 06:26:59 schrieb Luke R.:
> Here's two test images I am proposing -
> http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/7980/path4551.png <-- Colorful Box (used
> for NewYears?) http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/6945/path4552.png <--
> Regular Box
I like the second one, but both look
Hi Pouyan,
Thanks for getting us up to date!
I just updated the plugin, and it looks partially functional, now.
- A nice idea would be to get the patch for jar loader included in freenet as
soon as possible!
Currently the list of bookmarks looks very hectic and the cathegories are
missing.
Hi Pouyan,
Thanks for getting us up to date!
I just updated the plugin, and it looks partially functional, now.
- A nice idea would be to get the patch for jar loader included in freenet as
soon as possible!
Currently the list of bookmarks looks very hectic and the cathegories are
missing.
Hi Chetan,
Your changes sound good!
At Wed, 23 May 2012 22:30:40 +0530,
> The official coding period has started. So after a few more additions
> I will merge them to "Transports" branch and begin working on a new
> branch "PacketTransports".
> Also awaiting some code review, after nextgens
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 13:22:57 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
> On 05/13/2012 12:29 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Lantern is a great example of how good a Java desktop app *can*
> > look, to try it:
> >
> > $ git clone git://github.com/getlantern/lantern.git $ cd lantern $
> > ./run.bash
> >
> >
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 17:38:45 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Sunday 13 May 2012 05:29:14 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Lantern is a great example of how good a Java desktop app can look, to
> >
> > try it:
> >
> >
> > $ git clone git://github.com/getlantern/lantern.git
> > $ cd lantern
> > $
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 17:38:45 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Sunday 13 May 2012 05:29:14 Ian Clarke wrote:
Lantern is a great example of how good a Java desktop app can look, to
try it:
$ git clone git://github.com/getlantern/lantern.git
$ cd lantern
$ ./run.bash
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 13:22:57 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
On 05/13/2012 12:29 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
Lantern is a great example of how good a Java desktop app *can*
look, to try it:
$ git clone git://github.com/getlantern/lantern.git $ cd lantern $
./run.bash
Imagine if Freenet
Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012, 14:48:08 schrieb Nicolas Hernandez:
> Yes i know. But we are working about accessibility for
> developpers too !
>
>
>- Velocity for templating
>- html+jsp for site rendering
>- gwt+nonjs for components and components rendering
How does
Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012, 14:48:08 schrieb Nicolas Hernandez:
Yes i know. But we are working about accessibility for
developpers too !
- Velocity for templating
- html+jsp for site rendering
- gwt+nonjs for components and components rendering
How does having to
Am Dienstag, 3. April 2012, 18:43:51 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> From
> http://127.0.0.1:8889/USK at
> X1LyFuoMhnKY7KLK5-RBQ3IHtNJLAUSV~IjzRuxi6Kw,x9otzn
> rH7Y8R42TzfAqDHv5Fda2ojIhqJw7iPRzimz8,AQACAAE/Volodya/28/
>
>
> Old friends coming back, freenet is moving
>
> Some friends that i've
Am Dienstag, 3. April 2012, 18:43:51 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
From
http://127.0.0.1:8889/USK@X1LyFuoMhnKY7KLK5-RBQ3IHtNJLAUSV~IjzRuxi6Kw,x9otzn
rH7Y8R42TzfAqDHv5Fda2ojIhqJw7iPRzimz8,AQACAAE/Volodya/28/
Old friends coming back, freenet is moving
Some friends that i've known from back in
Am Donnerstag, 15. M?rz 2012, 13:15:26 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Sunday 11 Mar 2012 12:53:11 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 9. M?rz 2012, 21:52:22 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
> > > Should we get rid of more of the steps in the first-run setup?
> >
>
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012, 13:15:26 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Sunday 11 Mar 2012 12:53:11 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Freitag, 9. März 2012, 21:52:22 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
Should we get rid of more of the steps in the first-run setup?
I think yes - if people choose
Hi Kieran,
Firstoff: Welcome to Freenet!
Am Mittwoch, 14. M?rz 2012, 01:58:31 schrieb Kieran Donegan:
> I'm a second year BSc Computer Science student in University College Cork,
> Ireland. Freenet's development goals really resonate with me and I'd love
> to help enhance Freenet for GSoC this
Hi Kieran,
Firstoff: Welcome to Freenet!
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2012, 01:58:31 schrieb Kieran Donegan:
I'm a second year BSc Computer Science student in University College Cork,
Ireland. Freenet's development goals really resonate with me and I'd love
to help enhance Freenet for GSoC this
Am Freitag, 9. M?rz 2012, 21:52:22 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
> Should we get rid of more of the steps in the first-run setup?
I think yes - if people choose the default installation, they should not be
forced to take additional decisions.
Maybe it would even be possible to just show a pane
Am Freitag, 9. März 2012, 21:52:22 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
Should we get rid of more of the steps in the first-run setup?
I think yes - if people choose the default installation, they should not be
forced to take additional decisions.
Maybe it would even be possible to just show a pane “Basic
Am Freitag, 9. M?rz 2012, 23:59:30 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 15:29:45 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> > > So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
> > > shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe br
Am Freitag, 9. M?rz 2012, 23:14:04 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Friday 09 Mar 2012 23:02:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 22:14:39 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
> > > So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
> > >
Am Freitag, 9. M?rz 2012, 23:25:17 schrieb Nicolas Hernandez:
> Https can be forbidden in some countries. It is important to have the
> possibility to disable it.
It could also be broken in some users systems. I had a few weeks last year in
which I could not access any https site (library
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 22:14:39 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
> So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
> shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some
> sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or
> there is no
Am Freitag, 9. März 2012, 23:59:30 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2012, 15:29:45 schrieb Ian Clarke:
So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some
sites and uninstall
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 15:29:45 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> > So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
> > shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some
> > sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or
> > there is no
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 13:40:56 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> Yes, the vast number of people that refuse to use anything but Lynx? There
> is RMS, who are the other ones? So far as I know RMS doesn't use Freenet
> so we don't have to worry about him.
I regularly browse freenet with a raw text
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2012, 13:40:56 schrieb Ian Clarke:
Yes, the vast number of people that refuse to use anything but Lynx? There
is RMS, who are the other ones? So far as I know RMS doesn't use Freenet
so we don't have to worry about him.
I regularly browse freenet with a raw text
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2012, 15:29:45 schrieb Ian Clarke:
So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some
sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or
there is no content.
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2012, 22:14:39 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some
sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or
there is no content.
Am Freitag, 9. März 2012, 23:25:17 schrieb Nicolas Hernandez:
Https can be forbidden in some countries. It is important to have the
possibility to disable it.
It could also be broken in some users systems. I had a few weeks last year in
which I could not access any https site (library broken, I
Am Freitag, 9. März 2012, 23:14:04 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Friday 09 Mar 2012 23:02:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2012, 22:14:39 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see
Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:41:33 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within
> > freenet, so taking down github will not stop freenet.
> Yes but does it w
Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:41:33 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within
freenet, so taking down github will not stop freenet.
Yes but does it work? How much work, how
Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:09:21 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> What actually happens is it looks up the index for both of the identities,
> and intersects them. Technically this is O(n) but it is only really slow
> when one of them (the in-set for an identity and the out-set for another
>
Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2012, 12:32:14 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> I'm not sure whether people would object to this, but I would quite like to
> mentor a student to work on Tahrir under the umbrella of the Freenet
> project.
>
> Thoughts? Opinions? Insults?
I personally think it would only be
Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2012, 12:32:14 schrieb Ian Clarke:
I'm not sure whether people would object to this, but I would quite like to
mentor a student to work on Tahrir under the umbrella of the Freenet
project.
Thoughts? Opinions? Insults?
I personally think it would only be
Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:09:21 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
What actually happens is it looks up the index for both of the identities,
and intersects them. Technically this is O(n) but it is only really slow
when one of them (the in-set for an identity and the out-set for another
Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 14:34:57 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100,
>
> Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> > On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past wee
At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600,
Robert Hailey wrote:
On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
And then we should push
At Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:08 -0500,
Juiceman wrote:
Could we at least get an update on the front page that is newer than 13th
April 2011 please? If I didn't know better I would think this project was
abandoned...
Maybe a link to somewhere advising folks to read up on SOPA or other
Internet
At Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:08 -0500,
Juiceman wrote:
> Could we at least get an update on the front page that is newer than 13th
> April 2011 please? If I didn't know better I would think this project was
> abandoned...
> Maybe a link to somewhere advising folks to read up on SOPA or other
>
At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600,
Robert Hailey wrote:
>
>
> On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
>
> > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that.
> > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-)
>
> And then we should push
At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100,
Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
> > ...
> > Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
> >
> > Ian.
>
> well, i see the
Well, my take is that with SOPA/PIPA coming today and Megaupload busted and
Wikipedia taking a stand for the open web and against censorship, our
relentless promotion of freenet over the last few months seems to have taken
hold. People are realizing that freenet still exists and has already
Well, my take is that with SOPA/PIPA coming today and Megaupload busted and
Wikipedia taking a stand for the open web and against censorship, our
relentless promotion of freenet over the last few months seems to have taken
hold. People are realizing that freenet still exists and has already
At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100,
Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote:
Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week:
...
Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA?
Ian.
well, i see the
Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012, 16:14:46 schrieb Michael Grube:
> Somewhat related, myself and some people at the local hackerspace are
> getting involved in evaluating what Freenet has vs what we'd like to see,
> then going out and implementing it.
Very cool!
Please keep us posted!
Best wishes,
Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012, 16:14:46 schrieb Michael Grube:
Somewhat related, myself and some people at the local hackerspace are
getting involved in evaluating what Freenet has vs what we'd like to see,
then going out and implementing it.
Very cool!
Please keep us posted!
Best wishes,
Arne
Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012, 10:08:18 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> Anyone familiar with this (if you don't speak French you'll need Google
> Translate):
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/freenetrevivaltaskforce/home
No, but it sounds good.
And I think we can help them with information.
Best wishes,
Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012, 10:08:18 schrieb Ian Clarke:
Anyone familiar with this (if you don't speak French you'll need Google
Translate):
https://sites.google.com/site/freenetrevivaltaskforce/home
No, but it sounds good.
And I think we can help them with information.
Best wishes,
Arne
Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012, 10:08:18 schrieb Ian Clarke:
https://sites.google.com/site/freenetrevivaltaskforce/home
They have a link to a real gem here:
http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:USK@MI2FcpiYEajvRJYBYTih7n7kGgJfOTHdU9sdjbgRKKw,QOqWlWeh7LBgSvWlv58I0rnKlfkJFTz-
Am Sonntag, 18. Dezember 2011, 12:38:56 schrieb Luke R.:
> No one added TIME Magazine article cited source? For shame...
> Don't worry I fixed it. :) I also found this guys blog:
> http://onemansblog.com/2007/05/15/privacy-equals-freedom-support-the-freenet
> -project/
Great!
Did you link to it?
Am Samstag, 17. Dezember 2011, 17:36:48 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Friday 16 Dec 2011 05:44:06 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > There are some issues raised at the top of Freenet's wikipedia page:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet
> >
> > It would be good if we could address some of these
Am Samstag, 17. Dezember 2011, 17:36:48 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 05:44:06 Ian Clarke wrote:
There are some issues raised at the top of Freenet's wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet
It would be good if we could address some of these shortcomings,
Am Sonntag, 18. Dezember 2011, 12:38:56 schrieb Luke R.:
No one added TIME Magazine article cited source? For shame...
Don't worry I fixed it. :) I also found this guys blog:
http://onemansblog.com/2007/05/15/privacy-equals-freedom-support-the-freenet
-project/
Great!
Did you link to it?
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> > I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO
> > INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what ?make a test build? actually entails.
> > Do we have a build
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
I’m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO
INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what “make a test build” actually entails.
Do we have a build
Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2011, 22:21:17 schrieb Jeff Rivett:
> Greetings. According to the wiki
> (http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Status): "Windows installer -
> We could do with a more active maintainer, and we definitely need more
> testers (with different windows versions) for it."
>
> If
Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2011, 22:21:17 schrieb Jeff Rivett:
Greetings. According to the wiki
(http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Status): Windows installer -
We could do with a more active maintainer, and we definitely need more
testers (with different windows versions) for it.
If that's
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 22:47:47 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > - I think that trust system of FMS is better than WoT. You have the
> > opportunity to divide trust to person and his opinion to other persons
> > (I
> > think it's really important to divide this things). And what changes are
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 22:47:47 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
- I think that trust system of FMS is better than WoT. You have the
opportunity to divide trust to person and his opinion to other persons
(I
think it's really important to divide this things). And what changes are
Sounds great!
Many Thanks!
Am Dienstag, 15. November 2011, 20:03:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405 is now available. Please upgrade. There are many
> changes, mostly client layer or FCP or filtering stuff from FMS.
> Highlights: - Allow plugins to exempt themselves from
Sounds great!
Many Thanks!
Am Dienstag, 15. November 2011, 20:03:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405 is now available. Please upgrade. There are many
changes, mostly client layer or FCP or filtering stuff from FMS.
Highlights: - Allow plugins to exempt themselves from the
Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 23:58:13 schrieb Tanya Pyatigorskaya:
> Now I am back, and I am happy to be able to continue my work
> on my Freenet task.
Welcome back!
> Since I was out of the day-to-day work in the community for quite a long
> period of time, what I need now is to become up to
Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 23:58:13 schrieb Tanya Pyatigorskaya:
Now I am back, and I am happy to be able to continue my work
on my Freenet task.
Welcome back!
Since I was out of the day-to-day work in the community for quite a long
period of time, what I need now is to become up to date
Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2011, 20:03:37 schrieb Volodya:
> On 10/09/2011 06:34 PM, Dirk Bruere wrote:
> > What I am looking for is a one click solution ie someone goes to our
> > site, click a link, and then if they approve the installation it all
> > goes ahead with a browser icon on the desktop
Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2011, 20:03:37 schrieb Volodya:
On 10/09/2011 06:34 PM, Dirk Bruere wrote:
What I am looking for is a one click solution ie someone goes to our
site, click a link, and then if they approve the installation it all
goes ahead with a browser icon on the desktop for them
Am Montag, 12. September 2011, 12:38:49 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Thanks for using Freenet, and thanks for not leaving while the bugs get
> sorted out.
Thank you for sorting out the bugs!
And while we?re at it: As I pledged, I just donated 50? of the money I got
back because I cannot go to
Am Montag, 12. September 2011, 12:38:49 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Thanks for using Freenet, and thanks for not leaving while the bugs get
sorted out.
Thank you for sorting out the bugs!
And while we’re at it: As I pledged, I just donated 50€ of the money I got
back because I cannot go to
Hi,
At Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:53:58 +0200,
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a
> > > very simple check to see if my understanding is ri
Hi,
At Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:53:58 +0200,
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a
very simple check to see if my understanding is right.
No, it takes into account
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a
> > very simple check to see if my understanding is right.
> >
> > Since SSKs are mostly unsuccessfull and are about 50% of the requests,
> > the bandwidth
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 12:20:02 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland amphibian.dyndns.org
> > wrote:
> >
> > WE NEED MORE DATA.
>
> Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to
> fix unless we are extremely fortuitous,
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 12:20:02 schrieb Ian Clarke:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
WE NEED MORE DATA.
Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to
fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, however
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a
very simple check to see if my understanding is right.
Since SSKs are mostly unsuccessfull and are about 50% of the requests,
the bandwidth limiter
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011, 17:02:16 schrieb xor:
> On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:05:59 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I believed I had seriously screwed
> > everything up and wasted 6 months' work at the same time;
>
> Don't be that strict with yourself. Even if the code isn't of much use
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011, 17:02:16 schrieb xor:
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:05:59 Matthew Toseland wrote:
I believed I had seriously screwed
everything up and wasted 6 months' work at the same time;
Don't be that strict with yourself. Even if the code isn't of much use you
have
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 13:25:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Tuesday 30 Aug 2011 21:02:54 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > what this means: if a SSK has a mean success rate of 0.16, then using
> > 0.25 as value makes sure that 95% of the possible cases don?t exhaust
> &
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 13:25:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Tuesday 30 Aug 2011 21:02:54 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
what this means: if a SSK has a mean success rate of 0.16, then using
0.25 as value makes sure that 95% of the possible cases don’t exhaust
the bandwidth. We
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 01:08:16 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> 5) solution: count each SSK as only
> average_SSK_success_rate * data_to_transfer_on_success.
Some more data:
chances of having at least this many successful transfers for 40 SSKs with a
mean success rate
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 12:32:17 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> Regardless, even if queueing doesn't use additional bandwidth or CPU
> resources, it also doesn't use any less of these resources - so it doesn't
> actually help to alleviate any load (unless it results in a timeout in which
> case it
t; efficiency cost, and would probably make load management more difficult.
>
> I apologise if you see this as rather a broadside after I encouraged you to
> analyse the problem, but it is not yet a convincing demonstration that
> queueing is a viable strategy and not the spawn of satan! :)
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 12:32:17 schrieb Ian Clarke:
Regardless, even if queueing doesn't use additional bandwidth or CPU
resources, it also doesn't use any less of these resources - so it doesn't
actually help to alleviate any load (unless it results in a timeout in which
case it uses
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 01:08:16 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
5) solution: count each SSK as only
average_SSK_success_rate * data_to_transfer_on_success.
Some more data:
chances of having at least this many successful transfers for 40 SSKs with a
mean success rate of 16%:
for i
Am Montag, 29. August 2011, 14:32:13 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> Yes, small tweaks have worked so well for us for the last decade, leaving us
> pretty-much where we were in 2003. No, we don't understand how the current
> system works, there is no point in trying to fix something when we don't
> even
Am Montag, 29. August 2011, 14:32:13 schrieb Ian Clarke:
Yes, small tweaks have worked so well for us for the last decade, leaving us
pretty-much where we were in 2003. No, we don't understand how the current
system works, there is no point in trying to fix something when we don't
even know
apologise if you see this as rather a broadside after I encouraged you to
analyse the problem, but it is not yet a convincing demonstration that
queueing is a viable strategy and not the spawn of satan! :)
On Monday 29 Aug 2011 21:27:01 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Montag, 29. August 2011, 14
Hi Zurc,
Welcome to Freenet!
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 14:17:22 schrieb Zurc:
> I can imagine it takes quite a bit of processing to figure out which of
> those ten computers had the furry porn because the cache on each of the
> computers is 30ish gig big, so thats 300 gigabytes worth of
Hi Zurc,
Welcome to Freenet!
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 14:17:22 schrieb Zurc:
I can imagine it takes quite a bit of processing to figure out which of
those ten computers had the furry porn because the cache on each of the
computers is 30ish gig big, so thats 300 gigabytes worth of not
Update: We worked a bit on the first time user experience. Reasoning: Only 1
choice at startup: default setting or wizard.
? http://piratepad.net/H3kOp3QXuV
Current version, without the text markup:
3 scenarios:
- With invite. Can stay darknet or enable opennet as well for better
Update: We worked a bit on the first time user experience. Reasoning: Only 1
choice at startup: default setting or wizard.
→ http://piratepad.net/H3kOp3QXuV
Current version, without the text markup:
3 scenarios:
- With invite. Can stay darknet or enable opennet as well for better
On Sunday 29 May 2011 21:29:22 Tom Elovi Spruce wrote:
> 2. Creating a free web publishing platform for everyone. This way, you can
> convince people to be part of the opennet and get more nodes. Maybe this
> will lead to having the opennet "feel" just as responsive as the typical
> client-server
On Sunday 29 May 2011 21:29:22 Tom Elovi Spruce wrote:
2. Creating a free web publishing platform for everyone. This way, you can
convince people to be part of the opennet and get more nodes. Maybe this
will lead to having the opennet feel just as responsive as the typical
client-server
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:22:09 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 18 Apr 2011 15:49:50 xor wrote:
IF we get a decent new web interface done which integrates all of those,
we could make a theme which completely looks like Facebook and then do
a major press release which claims something
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:35:41 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins.
That would be cool!
Then we could add real gateways to WoT, creating a decentral, anonymizing (as
long as you can trust your gateway) social network.
?getting even more
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:22:09 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 18 Apr 2011 15:49:50 xor wrote:
> > IF we get a decent new web interface done which integrates all of those,
> > we could make a theme which completely looks like Facebook and then do
> > a major press release which claims
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:35:41 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins.
That would be cool!
Then we could add real gateways to WoT, creating a decentral, anonymizing (as
long as you can trust your gateway) social network.
…getting even more excited
501 - 600 of 772 matches
Mail list logo
