[freenet-dev] Windows installer "Did not respond to signal" errors

On Tuesday 09 March 2010 10:11:24 Christian Funder Sommerlund wrote: > Hi all > > It seems like there is a bit of confusion about the Windows Installer's > "Did not respond to signal" errors, so I'd like to explain what it > means, and hopefully clear up any misunderstandings. > > --- What

[freenet-dev] Windows installer "Did not respond to signal" errors

So, the wrapper works correctly on 64bit? I was under the impression 64bit wasn't supported? On Mar 9, 2010 5:11 AM, "Christian Funder Sommerlund" wrote: Hi all It seems like there is a bit of confusion about the Windows Installer's "Did not respond to signal" errors, so I'd like to explain

[freenet-dev] Windows installer "Did not respond to signal" errors

Hi all It seems like there is a bit of confusion about the Windows Installer's "Did not respond to signal" errors, so I'd like to explain what it means, and hopefully clear up any misunderstandings. --- What happens? --- The error is thrown in a messagebox to the user when the Freenet Starter

[freenet-dev] Windows installer Did not respond to signal errors

Hi all It seems like there is a bit of confusion about the Windows Installer's Did not respond to signal errors, so I'd like to explain what it means, and hopefully clear up any misunderstandings. --- What happens? --- The error is thrown in a messagebox to the user when the Freenet Starter

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer Did not respond to signal errors

So, the wrapper works correctly on 64bit? I was under the impression 64bit wasn't supported? On Mar 9, 2010 5:11 AM, Christian Funder Sommerlund li...@zero3.dk wrote: Hi all It seems like there is a bit of confusion about the Windows Installer's Did not respond to signal errors, so I'd like to

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer Did not respond to signal errors

On Tuesday 09 March 2010 10:11:24 Christian Funder Sommerlund wrote: Hi all It seems like there is a bit of confusion about the Windows Installer's Did not respond to signal errors, so I'd like to explain what it means, and hopefully clear up any misunderstandings. --- What happens? ---

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Friday 12 June 2009 22:44:46 Juiceman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:57:05 Juiceman wrote: > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> > Matthew, please update the Windows update scripts on the website. > >> > update-new.cmd needs to be

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Friday 12 June 2009 22:44:46 Juiceman wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:57:05 Juiceman wrote: Matthew, please update the Windows update scripts on the website. update-new.cmd needs to be the

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:57:05 Juiceman wrote: > > >> > > > > > Matthew, please update the Windows update scripts on the website. > > update-new.cmd needs to be the version from May 16th. > > > > Also replace update.cmd with a copy of update-new.cmd so that it > > doesn't break backwards

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:57:05 Juiceman wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Matthew, please update the Windows update scripts on the website. >> > update-new.cmd needs to be the version from May 16th. >> > >> > Also replace update.cmd with a

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:57:05 Juiceman wrote: Matthew, please update the Windows update scripts on the website. update-new.cmd needs to be the version from May 16th. Also replace update.cmd with a copy of update-new.cmd so that it doesn't break backwards compatibility and

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:57:05 Juiceman wrote: Matthew, please update the Windows update scripts on the website. update-new.cmd needs to be the version from May 16th. Also replace update.cmd with a

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:31:34 Zero3 wrote: > Luke771 skrev: > > Zero3 wrote: > >> Matthew Toseland skrev: > >> > >>> Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of > >>> the untranslated strings in your various languages. > >>> > >> Ditto for the Windows

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.5) iEYEARECAAYFAkowOkIACgkQ4esu1mlKOs9+bQCeIrP/NlAhQO2lUOhHDC09fF9z XOkAn0Ohkcrbo67qPve/Nj4913sUdRo5 =XChe

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:31:34 Zero3 wrote: >> Luke771 skrev: >> > Zero3 wrote: >> >> Matthew Toseland skrev: >> >> >> >>> Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:31:34 Zero3 wrote: Luke771 skrev: Zero3 wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the untranslated strings in your various languages. Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

Luke771 skrev: > Zero3 wrote: >> Matthew Toseland skrev: >> >>> Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the >>> untranslated strings in your various languages. >>> >> Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be more or less frozen >> by now. >> >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

Luke771 skrev: Zero3 wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the untranslated strings in your various languages. Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be more or less frozen by now. Everyone is welcome to

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > >> Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the >> untranslated strings in your various languages. >> > > Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be more or less frozen > by now. > > Everyone is welcome to

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

Matthew Toseland skrev: > Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the > untranslated strings in your various languages. Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be more or less frozen by now. Everyone is welcome to translate or proofread the existing

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

Zero3 wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the untranslated strings in your various languages. Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be more or less frozen by now. Everyone is welcome to translate or

[freenet-dev] Windows installer translations welcome

Matthew Toseland skrev: Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the untranslated strings in your various languages. Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be more or less frozen by now. Everyone is welcome to translate or proofread the existing

[freenet-dev] Windows installer category on the bug tracker

On Friday 08 May 2009 19:50:45 Zero3 wrote: > Hey > > Now that bugs regarding my installer are being submitted to the bug > tracker, it would be really nice with a "Windows Installer" category > with me being assigned/monitored/something to all bugs by default, so I > get notified when

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer category on the bug tracker

On Friday 08 May 2009 19:50:45 Zero3 wrote: Hey Now that bugs regarding my installer are being submitted to the bug tracker, it would be really nice with a Windows Installer category with me being assigned/monitored/something to all bugs by default, so I get notified when something is

[freenet-dev] Windows installer category on the bug tracker

Hey Now that bugs regarding my installer are being submitted to the bug tracker, it would be really nice with a "Windows Installer" category with me being assigned/monitored/something to all bugs by default, so I get notified when something is posted - especially in these months I'm in the

[freenet-dev] Windows installer category on the bug tracker

Hey Now that bugs regarding my installer are being submitted to the bug tracker, it would be really nice with a Windows Installer category with me being assigned/monitored/something to all bugs by default, so I get notified when something is posted - especially in these months I'm in the

[freenet-dev] Windows installer still setting 256M store!

I am positive. My one and only harddrive has 16Gig free. freenet-webinstall.exe sets my datastore to be 256M!!! If the installer can't do it correctly, can we have freenet-webinstall.exe call nodeconfig.exe (which correctly sizes store for ~10% free space.) when it exits? Running Windows XP Pro

[freenet-dev] Windows installer

If it would help, I can get Denova to contribute a free copy of JExpress to anyone who wants to set up Freenet installers. Freenet will instantly get professional quality native installers for Windows, Mac, Linux, etc., both with and without the JVM automatically included. Plus a pure Java

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:05:43AM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: Um, no, I want confirmation from Sun that *what we are doing* is ok. As you say, she said to get the jre... the user also always gets the Freenet software. Carla Schroer is the Total Readiness Manager for J2SE and the answers she

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:49:12PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:05:43AM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: Um, no, I want confirmation from Sun that *what we are doing* is ok. As you say, she said to get the jre... the user also always gets the Freenet software. Carla

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:06AM +0100, Toad wrote: A location that is not advertised? I have a problem with calling the snapshots dir a location that is not advertised. However if you take personal responsibility, the low probability of any problems means we can do whatever you want. So we

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:18:05PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:06AM +0100, Toad wrote: A location that is not advertised? I have a problem with calling the snapshots dir a location that is not advertised. However if you take personal responsibility, the low

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:21:46AM +0100, Toad wrote: It is amuzing how there is a periodic tendancy here to willingly allow abstract and vague legal concepts to bog down the entire development effort. We have done more than enough to demonstrate that we didn't want to violate the JRE

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:23:35PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:21:46AM +0100, Toad wrote: It is amuzing how there is a periodic tendancy here to willingly allow abstract and vague legal concepts to bog down the entire development effort. We have done more than

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

: Sunday, August 31, 2003 7:40 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows installer We still have two versions of the windows installer despite my getting confirmation from Sun that our previous approach is ok. Can we please fix this as it is unnecessarily complicating deployment on Windows. Ian

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

This is getting rediculous - I have described the issue to Sun - along with the exact way we are deploying the JRE, and we have confirmation (from someone to whom I was referred by Bill Joy, Sun's co-founder) that it is ok. She said I don't think we care about what server the bits come from

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

HTTP-AUTH on where the JRE resides? (maybe move it away from snapshots/ to achieve this) the webinstaller client might ba able to do http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Right, that's more like what I had in mind. But I can't do this on my own... (or can I? - what some.url could/should I use?) d

[freenet-dev] Windows installer

We still have two versions of the windows installer despite my getting confirmation from Sun that our previous approach is ok. Can we please fix this as it is unnecessarily complicating deployment on Windows. Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

- From: Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 7:40 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows installer We still have two versions of the windows installer despite my getting confirmation from Sun that our previous approach is ok. Can we please fix

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Welll... The bundle is the snapshots directory, or rather a subset of it. It doesn't specify the distribution mechanism. Er, what? I'm guessing you use a mail client that does proper threading. Mine doesn't, so I have no idea what this email is in reference to. Could you try quoting

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

I've sent him a private email about it; no response. I guess he doesn't care. Great job dismantling the AOL stereotype! On Monday 14 July 2003 04:42 am, Dave Hooper wrote: Welll... The bundle is the snapshots directory, or rather a subset of it. It doesn't specify the distribution

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Argh. I'm still using my fucking AOHELL comp,..sorry,, ill sign up with my good email and use Theunderbird like normal.

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Welll... The bundle is the snapshots directory, or rather a subset of it. It doesn't specify the distribution mechanism.

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer and Java versions

I just tried to install Freenet on Windows and got the following error in the Logfile: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java/nio/channels/spi/AbstractInterruptibleChannel at freenet.node.Node.init(Node.java:1801) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:314) Turns out that the

[freenet-dev] Windows installer

Ok, I am getting download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed errors, if I wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but since I am can someone look into it? Also, the modal dialogs which ask about whether to download seednodes among other things should really be replaced by

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer and Java versions

That'll be me then Your commentary pretty much agrees what I said in this morning's email... java detection in the installer is rubbish and has been for a very, very long time. The fix is to have the wininstaller only look for 1.4(.x) keys, which I can do as soon as I have access (tomorrow

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer and Java versions

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: That'll be me then Where are the scripts used to build the installer - are they in CVS? Using wine it may even be possible to automatically rebuild the installer on hawk (which is running Linux). Ian. -- Ian Clarke

RE: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer and Java versions

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Clarke Sent: den 11 juli 2003 12:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer and Java versions I just tried to install Freenet on Windows and got the following error in the Logfile: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Ok, I am getting download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed errors, if I wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but since I am can someone look into it? Oh, shit. Looks like the symbolic link is pointing to nowhere for some reason. Could someone with access to sftp go in

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Yarr...Don't we need the installer script files so we can rebuild it? I thought we used the...nullsoft one. Right? Haven't used that in so long, but it's not hard to use.

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer and Java versions

Where are the scripts used to build the installer - are they in CVS? Contrib/wininstall/ somewhere The installer is called freenet-modern.nsi, you'll need the *.ico files too. It requires NSIS (free download from www.nullsoft.com), and also required the native Win32 build of upx being in PATH.

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Done. Thanks Ian. Perhaps if you provided a quick introduction to Windows installer hacking it would make it easier for someone to pick it up (ie. what files need changing, how do you build a new installer, useful reference urls etc). Ian. Sure. Are there not how to build docs in cvs?

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of making an installer for an unstable version.

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Perhaps you should be coordinating with Dave to avoid duplicated effort? On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:37:35AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of making an installer for an unstable version. -- Ian Clarke

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Well, I'd do that, but I'd rather make sure I can still get a working build of of this thing. We'll know in about 20 minutes, though. After that, I'll agree.

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of making an installer for an unstable version. That's a good idea, as in introduction to building installers, and useful in the short term as it provides an easy way for Windows users to try out unstable versions. In the long

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

Well, I know how the NSIS system works already, so that's a bonus. I'm just having a mite of trouble with the Modern UI code, be fixed in a jiffy. As for making the version selection available, yes, that would be extra infrastructure, but maybe not too much. Depends on how it's done. Yarr, this

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Friday 11 July 2003 09:07 am, Dave Hooper wrote: There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of making an installer for an unstable version. That's a good idea, as in introduction to building installers, and useful in the short term as it provides an easy way for

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: Ok, I am getting download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed errors, if I wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but since I am can someone look into it? Oh, shit. Looks like the symbolic link is pointing

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows installer

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: Ok, I am getting download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed errors, if I wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but since I am can someone look into it? Oh, shit. Looks like the symbolic link is pointing

[freenet-dev] Windows installer, bandwidth settings - ideas

We need to do something about bandwidth limits, or users will make their nodes transient if they ever get some query load. How is this currently handled in the Windows installer? We need it to ask the user what type of connection it has: * Modem - no limits, but set transient=true * Broadband:

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

> I take it back! It seems that the new installer is > not being linked to. Thanks to whoever fixed it. replace "not" with "now" and it makes sense. sorry bout that. --Reuben __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

?) > > > > > > d > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Reuben Balik" > > > To: "Freenet Devl List" > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:12 AM > > > Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Insta

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

d > installer is the latest > > one?) > > > > d > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Reuben Balik" > > To: "Freenet Devl List" > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:12 AM > > Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer > >

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

; <cybrguy...@yahoo.com> To: "Freenet Devl List" Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:12 AM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer > Is the installer linked to on the website actually the > latest one or do I have to get it from somewhere else? > It seems that the freenet.e

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

e same (am I supposed to be in charge of that? > If so, what do I need to do to ensure the linked installer is the latest > one?) > > d > > - Original Message - > From: "Reuben Balik" > To: "Freenet Devl List" > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 20

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

] To: Freenet Devl List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:12 AM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer Is the installer linked to on the website actually the latest one or do I have to get it from somewhere else? It seems that the freenet.exe that comes with that installer

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

(am I supposed to be in charge of that? If so, what do I need to do to ensure the linked installer is the latest one?) d - Original Message - From: Reuben Balik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Freenet Devl List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:12 AM Subject: [freenet-dev

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

- From: Reuben Balik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Freenet Devl List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:12 AM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer Is the installer linked to on the website actually the latest one or do I have to get it from somewhere else

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

06, 2003 4:12 AM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer Is the installer linked to on the website actually the latest one or do I have to get it from somewhere else? It seems that the freenet.exe that comes with that installer is the same old one, but I'm

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

Is the installer linked to on the website actually the latest one or do I have to get it from somewhere else? It seems that the freenet.exe that comes with that installer is the same old one, but I'm not sure. --Reuben __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

Is the installer linked to on the website actually the latest one or do I have to get it from somewhere else? It seems that the freenet.exe that comes with that installer is the same old one, but I'm not sure. --Reuben __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer auto-IP detection

I notice that the Windows installer doesn't seem to take advantage of the new auto-IP-address detection. Can anyone fix this? It is probably creating a-lot of unnecessarily transient nodes. Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer auto-IP detection

On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: I notice that the Windows installer doesn't seem to take advantage of the new auto-IP-address detection. Can anyone fix this? It is probably creating a-lot of unnecessarily transient nodes. Please make nodes permanent by default,

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer auto-IP detection

Is it just a case of *not* putting an ipAddress= entry in freenet.conf/.ini? d ___ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:54:10AM -0500, SiliconZealot wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Greg Wooledge" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:36 AM > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer > SiliconZealot (siliconzealot at attbi.com) wro

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer Problem

- Original Message - From: "Reuben Balik" > Whenever i try to run freenet-0.5.0.1.exe that I > download off the sourceforge server i get an error > that says that installer verification has failed. > Does anyone else get this? I tried downloading it > again from a

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer Problem

Whenever i try to run freenet-0.5.0.1.exe that I download off the sourceforge server i get an error that says that installer verification has failed. Does anyone else get this? I tried downloading it again from a different mirror and I got the same message. --Reuben

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

- Original Message - From: "Greg Wooledge" <g...@wooledge.org> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer SiliconZealot (siliconzealot at attbi.com) wrote: >> Maybe explain where to find what >> their IP is? How

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

SiliconZealot (siliconzealot at attbi.com) wrote: > Maybe explain where to find what > their IP is? How about suggesting they click here: > http://www.whatismyip.com/ That will detect their ISP's transparent web proxy. They need to run "WINIPCFG" (at least in the DOS-based Windows releases; I

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

SiliconZealot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maybe explain where to find what their IP is? How about suggesting they click here: http://www.whatismyip.com/ That will detect their ISP's transparent web proxy. They need to run WINIPCFG (at least in the DOS-based Windows releases; I don't know

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer Problem

Whenever i try to run freenet-0.5.0.1.exe that I download off the sourceforge server i get an error that says that installer verification has failed. Does anyone else get this? I tried downloading it again from a different mirror and I got the same message. --Reuben

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:54:10AM -0500, SiliconZealot wrote: - Original Message - From: Greg Wooledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer SiliconZealot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maybe

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

Message - From: "SiliconZealot" <siliconzea...@attbi.com> To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:04 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer > Can we have the windows installer give the user a warning when they don't > change their IP address from localhost? Maybe expl

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

Even better, can we have hawk provide this sort of service? - Original Message - From: "SiliconZealot" <siliconzea...@attbi.com> To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:04 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer > Can we have the windows installer give the

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

Can we have the windows installer give the user a warning when they don't change their IP address from localhost? Maybe explain where to find what their IP is? How about suggesting they click here: http://www.whatismyip.com/ ___ devl mailing list

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

Even better, can we have hawk provide this sort of service? - Original Message - From: SiliconZealot [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:04 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer Can we have the windows installer give the user a warning when

Re: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer

Message - From: SiliconZealot [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:04 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Windows Installer Can we have the windows installer give the user a warning when they don't change their IP address from localhost? Maybe explain where to find

[freenet-dev] Windows installer

Today, first time since months, my weekly attempt to blind-install a transient freenet node on my win98se natted pc was succesfully (and incredibly non-intrusive & smooth). This is a normal situiation for general public. I'll try on newer win edition asap. Cheers to people that fix it.

[freenet-dev] Windows installer

Today, first time since months, my weekly attempt to blind-install a transient freenet node on my win98se natted pc was succesfully (and incredibly non-intrusive smooth). This is a normal situiation for general public. I'll try on newer win edition asap. Cheers to people that fix it.

[freenet-dev] Windows Installer

I got the new windows installer and experienced the same problem with it not creating the flaunch.ini correctly. However, in the log, it says the file size is 1075 which is the correct size. So, somewhere along the way the flaunch.ini is getting overwritten. Here is an excerpt from the