Having written a D2 parser a few month ago in the hope it will be
helpful to Visual D (just finds it way into the plugin right now), I've
noticed quite some inaccuracies in the "official" grammar on the
website. Some of these are probably already in bugzilla, some of them
might be personal ta
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:01 AM, ToNyTeCh wrote:
> It "feels kinda icky". D needs to deal with its characters.
>
It's a community. It has characters.
The fact is that, for any programming language, the community isn't a
bunch of people sitting around waiting to answer your questions, it's
people
ToNyTeCh wrote:
Seriously, I wanna know. How many lines of compiler code does it take for
each (Walt should have the best handle on this, surely)? The LOC is one
parameter, but I don't want just that -- it just came to mind while
typing the overall question. The intricacy of the compiler is muc
dsimcha wrote:
On 3/28/2011 9:54 PM, jasonw wrote:
Listen kid, you're some biology student, right? You're just coding for
fun. And more importantly, you haven't participated in any long term
real world systems programming projects. This kind of work experience
doesn't give you the competence t
Lutger Blijdestijn wrote:
>Slightly, D ranges use the same basic principles as the STL so any
>documentation on that can be used to understand the big picture.
>
>You'll see that no container implements all of std.algorithm, in fact
>containers have a very small interface. Normally algorithms work
On 29/03/11 15:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-03-28 21:38, Long Chang wrote:
The shared lib support for Linux is very important for me . I ask
people is there a schedule or plan once, but not get any responded .
I hope the somebody can tell us some information about this .
There's never
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:20:42 +0100, Caligo wrote:
:) When is "Modern D Design" going to be released ?
C++ first appeared as C With Classes in 1979, and Modern C++ Design was
written 22 years later. D first appeared in 1999, so we should expect
Modern D Design in 2021.
--
Simen
On 2011-03-28 21:38, Long Chang wrote:
> The shared lib support for Linux is very important for me . I ask
> people is there a schedule or plan once, but not get any responded .
>
> I hope the somebody can tell us some information about this .
There's never really a schedule. Things get done whe
It "feels kinda icky". D needs to deal with its characters.
The shared lib support for Linux is very important for me . I ask
people is there a schedule or plan once, but not get any responded .
I hope the somebody can tell us some information about this .
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:53 AM, David Wang wrote:
> Dear,
>
> We would like to know that whats t
On 29.03.2011 2:40, bearophile wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky:
BTW which ones? Now is the time to propose them.
Verbose regular expressions, that allow to put space and comments, to format
REs more like code and less like a cryptic puzzle language.
(?:...) A non-grouping version of regular parenthe
On 03/28/2011 07:59 PM, ToNyTeCh wrote:
> Seriously, I wanna know.
You are asking one of those questions where the answer will be wasted on
the seeker. You've made it clear numerous times on this forum that you
have a very limited understanding of C++.
> How many lines of compiler code does i
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "ToNyTeCh" wrote in message
> news:imri5l$1ahi$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> Seriously, I wanna know. How many lines of compiler code does it
>> take for each (Walt should have the best handle on this, surely)?
>> The LOC is one parameter, but I don't want just that -- it jus
How many? Anyone have a nifty global pinpoint chart? Seriously, I really
wanna know.
Dear,
We would like to know that whats the details of D2's next milstone ("Shared
libraries for Linux") ?
Will be shared with GTK+ 3.0 ? or other libraries ?
As I know, GTK+ 3.0 has formally released (now its version is GTK+ 3.0.4),
and it introduced a "GObject Introspection" which can widely en
Good luck everyone!
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/google/gsoc2011/dprogramminglanguage
Andrei
"ToNyTeCh" wrote in message
news:imri5l$1ahi$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Seriously, I wanna know. How many lines of compiler code does it take for
> each (Walt should have the best handle on this, surely)? The LOC is one
> parameter, but I don't want just that -- it just came to mind while typing
Seriously, I wanna know. How many lines of compiler code does it take for
each (Walt should have the best handle on this, surely)? The LOC is one
parameter, but I don't want just that -- it just came to mind while
typing the overall question. The intricacy of the compiler is much more
important
On Mar 29, 11 06:21, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Another thing to sort out is style: are we sticking with ECMA or
switching to Perl / GNU? Shall we provide also different versions of
syntax?
One RE syntax in a language is more than enough :-) But there are some
features of the Python REs that I'd li
dsimcha Wrote:
> On 3/28/2011 9:54 PM, jasonw wrote:
> > Listen kid, you're some biology student, right? You're just coding for fun.
> > And more importantly, you haven't participated in any long term real world
> > systems programming projects. This kind of work experience doesn't give you
> >
On 3/28/2011 9:54 PM, jasonw wrote:
Listen kid, you're some biology student, right? You're just coding for fun. And
more importantly, you haven't participated in any long term real world systems
programming projects. This kind of work experience doesn't give you the
competence to evaluate the
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> On 3/28/11 5:47 PM, bearophile wrote:
> > Andrei:
> >
> >> To be brutally honest, I'd say that this discussion (and a few
> >> others) could be reduced to zero.
> >
> > I have suggested the Google Summer of Code for D even the past year,
> > and I agree it's important
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
> I don't think discussions like this are productive.
>
> Let's just write some code and prove them wrong.
>
An excellent thought.
On 03/29/2011 12:40 AM, bearophile wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky:
BTW which ones? Now is the time to propose them.
Verbose regular expressions, that allow to put space and comments, to format
REs more like code and less like a cryptic puzzle language.
(?:...) A non-grouping version of regular par
On 3/28/11 5:47 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei:
To be brutally honest, I'd say that this discussion (and a few
others) could be reduced to zero.
I have suggested the Google Summer of Code for D even the past year,
and I agree it's important for D future. But I think Walter has to
know something
On 3/28/11 6:09 PM, spir wrote:
On 03/28/2011 10:13 PM, Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
- The Categorical type sounds like a great idea. I think they could be
passed on as a ValueType to a quantity:
typedef Quantity!(City, BoundedInt!(0,100)) CityID;
And BoundedInt is just a type implicitly-convertibl
On 3/28/2011 7:38 PM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:09:03 +0900, dsimcha wrote:
>
>> On 3/18/2011 2:56 AM, Don wrote:
3. TempAlloc: A memory allocator based on a thread-local segmented
stack,
useful for allocating large temporary buffers in things like numerics
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:09:03 +0900, dsimcha wrote:
On 3/18/2011 2:56 AM, Don wrote:
3. TempAlloc: A memory allocator based on a thread-local segmented
stack,
useful for allocating large temporary buffers in things like numerics
code.
Also comes with a hash table, hash set and AVL tree optimi
Thank you very much, I appreciate a lot your comments
On 3/28/11, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> You've hit on every point I thought important for the ANTLR project, and
> it seems to me you understand the underlying influences of the need of
> it. I'm not a mentor, but I wish you all the best in this p
On 3/28/11 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My fellow engineer John Song has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011 mentors.
John works with me on the larger ads team at Facebook and we've used or
seen each other's code on occasion. He kindly offered to help with a
Thrift-related project, so in c
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:11:01 +0900, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On 3/26/11 12:44 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
Currently, many databases exist.
* SQL based: MySQL, PostgresSQL, SQLite, etc..
* KVS: Cassandra, HBase, Kumofs, Redis, etc...
* Document Oriented: MongoDB, CouchDB, etc...
I think next
On 3/28/11 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My fellow engineer John Song has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011 mentors.
John works with me on the larger ads team at Facebook and we've used or
seen each other's code on occasion. He kindly offered to help with a
Thrift-related project, so in c
On 03/28/2011 10:13 PM, Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
- The Categorical type sounds like a great idea. I think they could be
passed on as a ValueType to a quantity:
typedef Quantity!(City, BoundedInt!(0,100)) CityID;
And BoundedInt is just a type implicitly-convertible to and from int, that
support
On 03/28/2011 11:47 PM, bearophile wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky:
http://dsource.org/projects/dmdscript-2. Note that I haven't touched it
in couple of dmd releases, it may need cosmetic fixes.
I will try it.
http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html, it could be a starting point,
Before fully
You've hit on every point I thought important for the ANTLR project, and
it seems to me you understand the underlying influences of the need of
it. I'm not a mentor, but I wish you all the best in this project -- a
complete ANTLR grammar, with generated code in use, would be a great boon.
I don't think discussions like this are productive.
Let's just write some code and prove them wrong.
Andrei:
> To be brutally honest, I'd say that this discussion (and a few others)
> could be reduced to zero.
I have suggested the Google Summer of Code for D even the past year, and I
agree it's important for D future. But I think Walter has to know something
about modern JITs & dynamic langua
Dmitry Olshansky:
> BTW which ones? Now is the time to propose them.
Verbose regular expressions, that allow to put space and comments, to format
REs more like code and less like a cryptic puzzle language.
(?:...) A non-grouping version of regular parentheses. Matches whatever regular
expressi
Bernard Helyer Wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:29:42 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > Anyway, just like in the case of 'retard', the main annoyance to me is
> > wasted time on such a low signal/noise ratio. Reddit is difficult to
> > browse as is. One of these days I'll spend 15 minutes findi
On 03/28/2011 10:32 PM, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
On 28/03/11 21.19, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/28/2011 12:18 PM, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
A further issue with the review process is that the bulk of people
won't look at
something until it is a
On 03/28/2011 09:32 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
I have thought in the past about putting such modules into another package, call
it "foo" for lack of a better name, and put it in the dmd distribution. If the
package pans out in real life, then move it to std. So, yes, I think your idea
is a g
On 03/28/2011 09:18 PM, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
A further issue with the review process is that the bulk of people won't look at
something until it is actually released. I think the only way to deal with this
is to be willing to correct d
I just revised the proposal and submitted it via Google's official
interface, so don't be confused if you can't find it on my website any
longer.
David
On 29.03.2011 1:47, bearophile wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky:
http://dsource.org/projects/dmdscript-2. Note that I haven't touched it
in couple of dmd releases, it may need cosmetic fixes.
I will try it.
No problem, feel free to report any issues. There should be working
bugtracker if I remember
On 29.03.2011 1:51, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My fellow engineer John Song has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011
mentors.
Congratulations!
Finally, the D crew is getting manpower at rapid pace :)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
On 3/28/2011 2:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My fellow engineer John Song has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011 mentors.
Congratulations and welcome!
On 3/28/11 5:03 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:29:42 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Anyway, just like in the case of 'retard', the main annoyance to me is
wasted time on such a low signal/noise ratio. Reddit is difficult to
browse as is. One of these days I'll spend 15 minut
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:29:42 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Anyway, just like in the case of 'retard', the main annoyance to me is
> wasted time on such a low signal/noise ratio. Reddit is difficult to
> browse as is. One of these days I'll spend 15 minutes finding and
> installing a good kill
My fellow engineer John Song has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011 mentors.
John works with me on the larger ads team at Facebook and we've used or
seen each other's code on occasion. He kindly offered to help with a
Thrift-related project, so in case David Nadlinger's application is
accepted
wm4/iLiekCakes is a smart guy, and decent enough if you're not talking
about D. However, he consistently makes shit up about D if he doesn't
know it, and is a pretty constant troll.
On 03/28/2011 10:29 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
His recent longer rants reveal some quite interesting personality issues
and give insights into his ulterior motives and their origins. Probably
an interesting case for a social psychologist.
Yeah, the next step is to label him a psycho and pu
On 3/28/11 4:31 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
There's a lot of money and manpower behind Python. If this were true, why hasn't
this technology been done for Python?<
It was done, more than one time. One good JIT was Psyco. And more recently PyPy
is about to surpass Psyco in performance:
htt
On 2011-03-28 12:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> * At best the proposal could define and project a relationship with
> std.datetime, which defines a few units itself. Wonder whether it's
> possible to simplify std.datetime by using the future units library.
Well, I can't say what's possible befor
On Mar 29, 11 04:33, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/28/2011 1:12 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
By fundamental technical issue, I mean things like Python's numeric
types
which require runtime testing for every operation, and are very
resistant
to known techniques of optimization.
Life is a bit mor
Dmitry Olshansky:
> http://dsource.org/projects/dmdscript-2. Note that I haven't touched it
> in couple of dmd releases, it may need cosmetic fixes.
I will try it.
> http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html, it could be a starting point,
Before fully embracing the contents of that page, loo
On 28.03.2011 23:32, bearophile wrote:
> Denis Koroskin:
>
>> I always thought FeepingCreature/ILiekCakes/downs are the same person. Am
>> I wrong?
>
> Feep is a bit messy programmer, but he's a good programmer, I have seen many
> things written by him. If they are the same person, then he has
On 28/03/11 8:47 PM, teo wrote:
I tried to find a solution, but since I don't exactly know the anatomy of
the class object it is not an easy task. Is there any info on how the
class object is laid out in memory? Basically I casted the pointer to an
Object and then dumped the first 64 bytes lookin
On Mar 29, 11 04:04, bearophile wrote:
Graham Fawcett:
I don't see the connection. '__future__' in Python isn't for experimental
features, nor is it for introducing stdlib changes. It's a way to 'import'
language features which become standard in later releases.
But the end result is the same
KennyTM~:
> Python's future statement provides features that will certainly be
> enabled. It's a feature to provide smoother code compatibility with
> earlier versions. Every decision is pretty much settled when it is
> available in __future__, and the only step left is to enable it by default.
Denis Koroskin:
> I always thought FeepingCreature/ILiekCakes/downs are the same person. Am
> I wrong?
Feep is a bit messy programmer, but he's a good programmer, I have seen many
things written by him. If they are the same person, then he has a quite complex
psychology ;-)
Bye,
bearophile
On 28.03.2011 20:51, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/28/2011 7:31 AM, FeepingCreature wrote:
>> ILiekCakes actually has some good points once you get past the
>> instinctive
>> fanboy's revulsion for people who are not in awe of D. ;)
>
> Trying to give the impression that I'm responsible for Tango's
Walter:
>There's a lot of money and manpower behind Python. If this were true, why
>hasn't this technology been done for Python?<
It was done, more than one time. One good JIT was Psyco. And more recently PyPy
is about to surpass Psyco in performance:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/
B
Hello,
(this is a long post, you may skip this introduction)
I was sticking around D's NG for about a year and following it's
advancements very closely. I was busy ruthlessly wasting my spare time
for testing this or that of cool features, converting some personal C++
projects. Maybe it's time
Yoohoo, i got eclipse working with it an compiled without errors.
So if i understand it correctly a .h/.di file contains the info abou what's
compiled in the lib so you can use it, sounds logical :)
And about eclipse: when i let him autocomplete when i haven't typed anything it
freezes for 2 m
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:31:54 +0400, FeepingCreature
wrote:
On 28.03.2011 15:19, random lurker wrote:
FeepingCreature Wrote:
On 28.03.2011 03:45, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Hello again
I've stayed quiet for a long time because people started accusing me
of trolling. But now, I REALLY HATE THI
Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
> Again I will have to think some more about the latter point. And I'll do
> some more tests on the performance of doing linear searches. Is there way to
> get the name of a type (as a string) at compile time (not the mangled name
> you get at runtime)? I wasn't able to fin
"David Nadlinger" wrote in message
news:imq92m$1ru0$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 3/28/11 5:17 PM, Kagamin wrote:
>> Trass3r Wrote:
>>
>>> Didn't someone here have a complete D grammar? I vaguely remember that
>>> there is at least a D1 one buried somewhere.
>>
>> huh?
>> http://www.digitalmars.c
On 3/28/2011 1:12 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
By fundamental technical issue, I mean things like Python's numeric types
which require runtime testing for every operation, and are very resistant
to known techniques of optimization.
Life is a bit more complex than that: - The Lua JIT has show
On 28/03/11 21.19, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/28/2011 12:18 PM, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
A further issue with the review process is that the bulk of people
won't look at
something until it is actually released. I think the only way to deal
On 3/28/11, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/28/2011 9:02 AM, Luca Boasso wrote:
>> A complete D grammar is one of the objectives of my GSOC 2011 ANTLR
>> proposal, if I got accepted you will have one :)
>
> The complete grammar should be part of the D spec. Please post any
> errors/fixes
> to the exis
Thanks for your answer!
- I agree that using strings to represent units is not a particularly good
idea. Since many people have noted related things, I seem not to have been
particularly clear about the way I intend to use strings. Let me try to
explain it in detail:
There is a type that determin
Walter:
> By fundamental technical issue, I mean things like Python's numeric types
> which
> require runtime testing for every operation, and are very resistant to known
> techniques of optimization.
Life is a bit more complex than that:
- The Lua JIT has shown once and for all that dynamic t
Graham Fawcett:
> I don't see the connection. '__future__' in Python isn't for experimental
> features, nor is it for introducing stdlib changes. It's a way to 'import'
> language features which become standard in later releases.
But the end result is the same: if they find troubles in a featur
killfile-like? You mean with an option to ignore posts from certain
users? This should do the trick:
http://reddit.honestbleeps.com/
```User Tagger - now with ignore!
Allows you to set a tag and highlight color for any user on reddit
that is applied whenever you see their name. New in v1.1 - also
On 3/28/11 10:43 AM, Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
First, let me apologize for this very late entry, it's the end
of university and it's been a very busy period, I hope you will still
consider it.
Note this email is best read using a fixed font.
PS: I'm really sorry if this is the wrong mailing list
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:32:44 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> Walter:
>
>> I have thought in the past about putting such modules into another
>> package, call it "foo" for lack of a better name, and put it in the dmd
>> distribution. If the package pans out in real life, then move it to
>> std. So, yes
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:48:18 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 06:46:22 -0400, teo wrote:
>
>> Having a delegate d, I can use d.ptr to get a void* pointer to the
>> environment used to construct the delegate. How can I determine from
>> that pointer whether that is a class
- I too was playing around with a units project before GSoC, that is why I
thought doing this project was a good idea. The way I was doing it without
numerical IDs was simply by having more complicated algorithms for equality,
multiplications etc. For example, equality would be implemented as:
temp
On 3/28/11 9:31 AM, FeepingCreature wrote:
On 28.03.2011 15:19, random lurker wrote:
FeepingCreature Wrote:
On 28.03.2011 03:45, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Hello again
I've stayed quiet for a long time because people started
accusing me of trolling. But now, I REALLY HATE THIS IDIOT IN
REDDIT
Walter:
> I have thought in the past about putting such modules into another package,
> call
> it "foo" for lack of a better name, and put it in the dmd distribution. If
> the
> package pans out in real life, then move it to std. So, yes, I think your
> idea
> is a good one.
It's a nice ide
On 3/28/2011 9:02 AM, Luca Boasso wrote:
A complete D grammar is one of the objectives of my GSOC 2011 ANTLR
proposal, if I got accepted you will have one :)
The complete grammar should be part of the D spec. Please post any errors/fixes
to the existing one to bugzilla!
On 3/28/2011 11:49 AM, dsimcha wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think some important optimizations (like
inlining)
are performed in the front end. It's pretty obvious that DMD's inliner needs
improvement, though I agree with Walter's decision to prioritize this below
fixing
major bugs, 64
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> A further issue with the review process is that the bulk of people won't look
> at
> something until it is actually released. I think the only way to deal with
> this
> is to be willing to correct deficiencies found after releas
On 3/28/2011 12:18 PM, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
A further issue with the review process is that the bulk of people won't look at
something until it is actually released. I think the only way to deal with this
is to be willing to correct de
On 3/27/2011 8:53 PM, dsimcha wrote:
From observing the review processes for std.parallelism and std.net.isemail, I
think our review process needs some tweaking. There are two key issues:
1. The pace of reviews is glacial unless there's a vote date near. Only 4 people
have reviewed std.net.isem
On 3/28/11 5:43 PM, Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
First, let me apologize for this very late entry, it's the end
of university and it's been a very busy period, I hope you will still
consider it.
This is by no means a late proposal – the application period has not
even formally opened yet.
I was
On 3/27/2011 10:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I'll be _very_ excited to have both the destructor issues and the const issues
sorted out. They are some of the more annoying quality of implementation
issues at the moment.
Yes, I agree those are the top priority at the moment, now that we have th
On 3/28/2011 7:31 AM, FeepingCreature wrote:
ILiekCakes actually has some good points once you get past the instinctive
fanboy's revulsion for people who are not in awe of D. ;)
Trying to give the impression that I'm responsible for Tango's choice of license
isn't one of them. To reiterate:
Thanks a lot for your quick response, I'm glad somebody actually read
through the whole thing and that I got some feedback. I'll try and do my
best to answer your questions.
On 28 March 2011 19:15, spir wrote:
> On 03/28/2011 05:43 PM, Cristi Cobzarenco wrote:
>
>> Thus, the requirements for the
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> On 3/28/2011 9:09 AM, Caligo wrote:
> > I've been doing a lot of coding in D in the past few weeks, and one
> > thing I've noticed is that performance is not great. Surprisingly,
> > DMD generated binaries perform worse than GDC'
On 3/28/2011 9:09 AM, Caligo wrote:
I've been doing a lot of coding in D in the past few weeks, and one
thing I've noticed is that performance is not great. Surprisingly,
DMD generated binaries perform worse than GDC's, but even GDC is
lagging behind equivalent code written in C++ and compiled w
Mafi wrote:
> PS: Just a thought of mine: You should be theoretically be able
> regenereate function signatures from mangled names. Maybe someone
> could such a tool.
import core.demangle;
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_demangle.html
If you did a mixin(demangle(fname)) you actually shoul
On 3/28/2011 10:24 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My coworker Eitan Frachtenberg has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011 mentors.
Welcome and congrats!
Am 28.03.2011 19:48, schrieb Andrew Wiley:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:34 PM, maarten van damme
wrote:
Thanks to everyone, I got it to compile :D
Still don't get the point of a lib file. I'm used to program java and there
you can compile to a jar-libary, a lib in d is obviously not the same.
On 2011-03-28 04:56, Kagamin wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
> > Whereas I _rarely_ use in contracts. In most cases, I favor exceptions,
> > treating my functions as API functions pretty much as long as they're
> > public. That's not always the best approach, but it's generally what I
> > end up u
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:34 PM, maarten van damme
wrote:
> Thanks to everyone, I got it to compile :D
>
> Still don't get the point of a lib file. I'm used to program java and there
> you can compile to a jar-libary, a lib in d is obviously not the same.
>
In a machine-compiled language, a libr
You can find an ANTLR grammar for D v1 at
http://www.dsource.org/projects/antlrd/browser/toys/v3d/parsed.g (by
Ellery Newcomer)
The syntax is similar to EBNF, check the ANTLR documentation for details.
I hope this might help you.
Luca Boasso
On 3/28/11, Trass3r wrote:
> David Nadlinger Wrote:
Thanks to everyone, I got it to compile :D
Still don't get the point of a lib file. I'm used to program java and there
you can compile to a jar-libary, a lib in d is obviously not the same.
Congratulations Eitan Frachtenberg!
On 3/28/11, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> My coworker Eitan Frachtenberg has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011
> mentors.
>
> Eitan brings tremendous value to our ranks. He is a very strong,
> creative scientist with broad interests and achievements, a prolific
My coworker Eitan Frachtenberg has joined the ranks of our GSoC 2011
mentors.
Eitan brings tremendous value to our ranks. He is a very strong,
creative scientist with broad interests and achievements, a prolific
author (see http://frachtenberg.com/eitan/pubs/index.php for his
impressive publi
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
