On 09.03.2012 11:58, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 11:53:51 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
The goal is to make std.algorithm general when it comes to UTF-x ranges,
VLE range seems a best suited abstraction level so far. Other things
like base64 encoded stuff could be there, though
Now, there is interest in having a D parser and lexer in Phobos. I don't
know
if your version will fit the bill (e.g. it must have a range-based API),
but we
need one at some point. The original idea was to more or less directly
port
dmd's lexer and parser with some adjustments to the API
On Sunday, 4 March 2012 at 23:31:41 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 04/03/2012 22:45, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 3/4/12 3:08 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 04/03/2012 21:52, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
Please join me in welcoming Alex Rønne Petersen as a
mentor! We believe
he will bring great
Le 07/03/2012 11:08, Timon Gehr a écrit :
On 03/06/2012 10:30 PM, deadalnix wrote:
auto helps too.
This remark was explicitly about _Java_ code style.
1/ We are not in the java's newsgroup.
2/ In java, the tooling is that awesome that you don't need to type most
of it anyway.
Le 07/03/2012 03:42, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:18:13PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
But, I'm thinking this whole dur vs duration matter is stupid
anyway. Seconds, hours, etc *are* durations. What the hell do we even
need the dur or duration for anyway?
I say fuck
Le 07/03/2012 02:00, F i L a écrit :
I personally find it much easier to remember and use longer, more
sentance-like method names. However, Jonathan and others obviously feel
more comfortable writing with a high level of abbreviation, which they
justify rather well. Still, if D's goal is to gain
Le 07/03/2012 04:05, Bill a écrit :
F i L Wrote:
I personally find it much easier to remember and use longer, more
sentance-like method names. However, Jonathan and others
obviously feel more comfortable writing with a high level of
abbreviation, which they justify rather well. Still, if D's
Le 07/03/2012 04:46, Nick Sabalausky a écrit :
Adam D. Ruppedestructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:bwqkuqhyiygvgqswi...@forum.dlang.org...
On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 03:24:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I don't understand this complaint at all. curr is an incredibly common
Le 07/03/2012 06:54, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:42:50AM +0100, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 03:24:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I don't understand this complaint at all. curr is an incredibly
common abbreviation for current.
Is it your *first*
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:39:23 deadalnix wrote:
Le 07/03/2012 04:46, Nick Sabalausky a écrit :
Adam D. Ruppedestructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:bwqkuqhyiygvgqswi...@forum.dlang.org...
On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 03:24:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I don't
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:33:20 deadalnix wrote:
Le 07/03/2012 02:00, F i L a écrit :
I personally find it much easier to remember and use longer, more
sentance-like method names. However, Jonathan and others obviously feel
more comfortable writing with a high level of abbreviation,
Le 09/03/2012 05:42, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:10:07 H. S. Teoh wrote:
IMO, making all abbreviations in Phobos consistent would be a big
step forward.
You know, people keep saying that the
On 9 March 2012 02:59, Mantis mail.mantis...@gmail.com wrote:
09.03.2012 2:23, Manu пишет:
On 9 March 2012 01:56, Mantis mail.mantis...@gmail.com mailto:
mail.mantis.88@gmail.**com mail.mantis...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Is tuple required to be anonymous struct? I thought it's
On 09/03/12 05:54, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:04PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
Heh one of us should hack up DMD to produce a NihonD, using (or at
least allowing) kanji instead of the kanas wherever appropriate :)
That'd be both fun to make and to use.
[...]
On
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:55:50 deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/03/2012 05:42, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:10:07 H. S. Teoh wrote:
IMO, making all abbreviations in Phobos consistent would be a big
step
On Friday, March 09, 2012 01:07:57 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:55:50 deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/03/2012 05:42, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:10:07 H. S. Teoh wrote:
IMO, making
Le 09/03/2012 10:07, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:55:50 deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/03/2012 05:42, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:10:07 H. S. Teoh wrote:
IMO, making all abbreviations
On 08/03/2012 21:08, Matt Soucy wrote:
American does have the benefit of being more pronounceable, though...I
just tried to pronounce that oohz-ee-an, us-ee-an, etc and they all
sound odd.
I say it as Yu-Essian, it gets a lot of funny looks even after I have
explained ^^
A...
On 09/03/2012 00:07, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But yea, it would be interesting to see a langauge that was based on
something very different. A German-based one would be fun. Or even better,
something that doesn't use the Latin alphabet, like Japanese or Hebrew or
Russian. Or Swahili (which is an
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful compile
time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on occasion.
For instance, I'm serialising some struct/class using reflection to some
text
On Friday, March 09, 2012 10:28:12 deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/03/2012 10:07, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:55:50 deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/03/2012 05:42, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:27:18 -, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
But anyway, to me, rolling Rs seems pretentious
It seems Spanish to me ;) Get your yappy 'perro' off my leg!
LOL :)
R
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
On 09-03-2012 11:56, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
Unfortunately, no.
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on occasion.
Yes. This is a
Le 09/03/2012 11:58, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
This is not alias. This is about accepting template parameters. The
actual isn't very consistent anyway (seconds, but usecs ?).
It amounts to the same thing, and core.time and std.datetime are as consistent
as they're going to get. seconds are
On 2012-03-09 11:56, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
Unfortunately no.
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on occasion.
For instance, I'm
PS: just to be clear, I do agree with most of what you said here :
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/173
On 13-2-2012 15:14, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
void setRandomColorPair( ref ColorPair cp )
{
import std.random;
ubyte u(int a, int b) { return cast(ubyte) uniform(a,b); }
Where possible it's good to add static to nested functions:
Why?
On 09.03.2012 14:56, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
There is a potential for them. At least technically everything with @ in
front of it was supposed to be an annotation (like @property). I think
it's just, sort of, reserved for future.
On 3/9/12 6:17 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 01:07:57 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:55:50 deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/03/2012 05:42, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012
Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but there is no real
resistance, and is tentatively planned?
Sounds good to me.
On 9 March 2012 15:42, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09.03.2012 14:56, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom
Isn't this just as good?
Key[] keys;
keys.reserve(num_keys)
foreach (key; keys_in_aa)
keys ~= key;
On 03/09/2012 01:23 AM, Manu wrote:
I can imagine syntax using parentheses, but I don't think I'm qualified
to propose a robust syntax, I don't know enough about the finer details
of the grammar.
Perhaps if other people agree with me, they could present some creative
solutions to the syntax?
I
On 03/09/2012 02:29 PM, Jos van Uden wrote:
On 13-2-2012 15:14, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
void setRandomColorPair( ref ColorPair cp )
{
import std.random;
ubyte u(int a, int b) { return cast(ubyte) uniform(a,b); }
Where possible it's good to add static to nested functions:
Why?
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:43:34 -0500, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On 08/03/2012 19:38, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
snip
Yes, I couldn't really find that. It does specifically say casting away
const and then
modifying is invalid, but it does not say anything about if you know
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:59:34 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 22:05:57 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:13:13PM -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
So, I'm plodding along with my AA implementation that *hopefully* will
eventually reach the
On 03/08/2012 10:07 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 05:45:47PM -0300, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 3/8/12 7:27 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/08/2012 03:14 AM, Ary Manzana wrote:
Here's something I wrote today:
parent_ids = results.map{|x|
x['_source']['parent_ids']}.flatten.uniq.compact
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:11:43 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:25:32 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:47:48 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll see if I can do a pull
YOn 03/09/2012 09:12 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 07/03/2012 11:08, Timon Gehr a écrit :
On 03/06/2012 10:30 PM, deadalnix wrote:
auto helps too.
This remark was explicitly about _Java_ code style.
1/ We are not in the java's newsgroup.
2/ In java, the tooling is that awesome that you don't
On 03/09/2012 01:43 AM, bearophile wrote:
Adam D. Ruppe:
D rox the web (and has for a while).
(Oh, you are starting to copy Andrei talk style now :-) The birth of community
words, idioms and sub-languages is a very common thing, sociology studies such
things a lot).
But there's always
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:01:21PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 01:45:13 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
That's one great thing about Ohio: A few years back we had a state
law passed here (by public vote! I had been convinced it wouldn't
pass) prohibiting smoking in
Manu:
Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but
there is no real
resistance, and is tentatively planned?
Sounds good to me.
As far as I know there are no concrete ideas yet for the
semantics and precise usage of this feature. And I think there
are different ideas regarding
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:27:14PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:23 AM, Manu wrote:
[...]
int x; ... (x, float y) = func(); // assign to predeclared variable(/s)?
(x, , z) = func(); // ignore the second result value (elimination of the
second result's code path)
Those two
Timon Gehr:
Comparing signed/unsigned is perfectly reasonable.
Right, but only if the numbers don't get implicit
reinterpretations to other intervals, as C/C++/D do.
Bye,
bearophile
On 9 March 2012 16:27, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:23 AM, Manu wrote:
I can imagine syntax using parentheses, but I don't think I'm qualified
to propose a robust syntax, I don't know enough about the finer details
of the grammar.
Perhaps if other people agree with
Jos van Uden:
On 13-2-2012 15:14, bearophile wrote:
Where possible it's good to add static to nested functions:
Why?
For optimization, to be sure there's no closure allocation or a
second pointer. But also for code correctness, because static
functions can't use automatic variables
On 2012-03-09 15:39, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/08/2012 10:07 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 05:45:47PM -0300, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 3/8/12 7:27 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/08/2012 03:14 AM, Ary Manzana wrote:
Here's something I wrote today:
parent_ids = results.map{|x|
On Mar 9, 2012 10:28 AM, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:27:14PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:23 AM, Manu wrote:
[...]
int x; ... (x, float y) = func(); // assign to predeclared
variable(/s)?
(x, , z) = func(); // ignore the second result
On 03/09/2012 04:38 PM, Manu wrote:
On 9 March 2012 16:27, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:23 AM, Manu wrote:
I can imagine syntax using parentheses, but I don't think I'm
qualified
to propose a robust syntax, I don't
On 9 March 2012 17:20, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Manu:
Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but there is no
real
resistance, and is tentatively planned?
Sounds good to me.
As far as I know there are no concrete ideas yet for the semantics and
precise
On 9 March 2012 17:57, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 03/09/2012 04:38 PM, Manu wrote:
On 9 March 2012 16:27, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:23 AM, Manu wrote:
I can imagine syntax using parentheses, but I don't think I'm
On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on occasion.
For instance, I'm serialising some
That's easy to implement and extremely ugly.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to
entities?
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate
On 2012-03-09 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to
entities?
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:33:20 deadalnix wrote:
Le 07/03/2012 02:00, F i L a écrit :
I personally find it much easier to remember and use longer, more
sentance-like method names. However, Jonathan and others
On 9 March 2012 18:15, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.orgwrote:
On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to
entities?
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 20:42:31 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:10:07 H. S. Teoh wrote:
IMO, making all abbreviations in Phobos consistent would be a big
step forward.
On 2012-03-09 16:15:30 +, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
I think a good approach in D would be to define mixins that work in
conjunction with the feature involved, for example:
class A {
int thing;
mixin(DoNotSerialize!thing);
...
}
or together:
On 9 March 2012 19:23, Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2012-03-09 16:15:30 +, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org** said:
I think a good approach in D would be to define mixins that work in
conjunction with the feature involved, for example:
class A {
On 03/09/2012 05:14 PM, Manu wrote:
On 9 March 2012 17:57, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 03/09/2012 04:38 PM, Manu wrote:
On 9 March 2012 16:27, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch
On 03/09/2012 05:14 PM, Manu wrote:
What I mean is this:
retTuple = func();
someStruct.x = retTuple[0];
y = retTuple[1];
// retTuple[2] is ignored, but the intent is not clear in the code as it
was in my prior example, I like how my prior example makes this intent
explicit
int err =
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Isn't this just as good?
Key[] keys;
keys.reserve(num_keys)
foreach (key; keys_in_aa)
keys ~= key;
I suppose that should work.
Although it does open up a new can of worms: reserve is @system and also
impure. I can see
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:16:19PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
[...]
Another issue is that people would complain about auto-flattening all
the time once built-in tuples get more accessible, even though it is
not actually a problem. It would be just due to the fact that it does
not occur in most
Alix Pexton alix.dot.pex...@gmail.dot.com wrote in message
news:jjcn41$2g4g$1...@digitalmars.com...
and I have a theory that poetic languages would be good for programming
in.
http://shakespearelang.sourceforge.net/
Hello World:
Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:jjd21r$6ni$1...@digitalmars.com...
Sample Ruby session:
irb
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :001 [1, 2, 3].count
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :002 [1, 2, 3].length
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :003 [1, 2, 3].size
= 3
I never saw *anyone* complaining about
On Friday, March 09, 2012 10:01:19 Brad Anderson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 09:33:20 deadalnix wrote:
Le 07/03/2012 02:00, F i L a écrit :
I personally find it much easier to remember and use longer, more
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:29:03PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Alix Pexton alix.dot.pex...@gmail.dot.com wrote in message
news:jjcn41$2g4g$1...@digitalmars.com...
and I have a theory that poetic languages would be good for programming
in.
http://shakespearelang.sourceforge.net/
H. S. Teoh:
Perl auto-flattens lists.
Maybe they have fixed this big design mistake in Perl6.
Bye,
bearophile
On Friday, March 09, 2012 16:00:03 Manu wrote:
Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but there is no real
resistance, and is tentatively planned?
Sounds good to me.
I wouldn't really say that it's tentatively planned. I don't recall Walter
ever weighing in on it at all, and
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:34:38PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:jjd21r$6ni$1...@digitalmars.com...
Sample Ruby session:
irb
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :001 [1, 2, 3].count
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :002 [1, 2, 3].length
= 3
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 02:01:34PM -0500, bearophile wrote:
H. S. Teoh:
Perl auto-flattens lists.
Maybe they have fixed this big design mistake in Perl6.
[...]
Whether or not it was a mistake is debatable. It does have its uses...
though forcing everyone to use references to prevent
On 09/03/2012 18:29, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Alix Pextonalix.dot.pex...@gmail.dot.com wrote in message
news:jjcn41$2g4g$1...@digitalmars.com...
and I have a theory that poetic languages would be good for programming
in.
http://shakespearelang.sourceforge.net/
Hello World:
Manu wrote:
By contrast, multiple return values are quite the opposite. They
are explicitly NON-STRUCTURED.
The presumption in this case is that multiple resturn
values would follow the exact same set of rules as passing
multiple args TO a function, but in reverse.
this seams to state a
On 3/9/12 4:09 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:34:38PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ary Manzanaa...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:jjd21r$6ni$1...@digitalmars.com...
Sample Ruby session:
irb
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :001 [1, 2, 3].count
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :002 [1,
On 9 March 2012 22:39, Manfred Nowak svv1...@hotmail.com wrote:
Manu wrote:
By contrast, multiple return values are quite the opposite. They
are explicitly NON-STRUCTURED.
The presumption in this case is that multiple resturn
values would follow the exact same set of rules as passing
I'm finding HEAPS of SIMD functions want to return pairs
(unpacks in
particular): int4 (low, hight) = unpack(someShort8);
Currently I have to duplicate everyting: int4 low =
unpackLow(someShort8); int4 high = unpackHigh(someShort8);
I'm getting really sick of that, it feels so... last
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jjdru9$1rv5$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jj6gjm$2m6a$1...@digitalmars.com...
But, I'm thinking this whole dur vs duration matter is stupid anyway.
Seconds, hours, etc *are* durations. What the hell do we
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jj6gjm$2m6a$1...@digitalmars.com...
But, I'm thinking this whole dur vs duration matter is stupid anyway.
Seconds, hours, etc *are* durations. What the hell do we even need the
dur or duration for anyway?
I say fuck it: Let's just toss this into
Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:jjdqe4$1oeb$1...@digitalmars.com...
Indeed, count can be used to count elements:
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :002 [1, 2, 3, 3, 3].count 3
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :004 [1, 2, 3, 3, 3].count :odd?
= 4
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :005 [1, 2, 3, 3, 3].count {
On 3/9/12 6:21 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ary Manzanaa...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:jjdqe4$1oeb$1...@digitalmars.com...
Indeed, count can be used to count elements:
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :002 [1, 2, 3, 3, 3].count 3
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :004 [1, 2, 3, 3, 3].count:odd?
= 4
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:14:08 -0500, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jj6gjm$2m6a$1...@digitalmars.com...
But, I'm thinking this whole dur vs duration matter is stupid anyway.
Seconds, hours, etc *are* durations. What the hell do we even need the
dur or
On Friday, March 09, 2012 16:36:27 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:14:08 -0500, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jj6gjm$2m6a$1...@digitalmars.com...
But, I'm thinking this whole dur vs duration matter is stupid anyway.
Seconds,
Still chugging away at implementing AA's in druntime proper, I reviewed
the code for methods that can be marked pure but ran into a major road
block: getHash() is not marked pure. That makes a lot of AA methods
impure, that could, and probably should, be marked pure.
Is it possible to make
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.357.1331329638.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Friday, March 09, 2012 16:36:27 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:14:08 -0500, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
On 3/9/2012 1:54 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Still chugging away at implementing AA's in druntime proper, I reviewed
the code for methods that can be marked pure but ran into a major road
block: getHash() is not marked pure. That makes a lot of AA methods
impure, that could, and probably should, be
This statement is from Linus Torvalds about breaking binary compatibility:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
While I don't think we need to worry so much at the moment about breaking binary
compatibility with new D releases, we do have a big problem with breaking source
code compatibility.
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jjdu0j$209o$1...@digitalmars.com...
I can't say I agree with this, as it pollutes the global namespace with
several common terms that could be used for fields.
I'd argue that should not be considered a problem in this case:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:47:01 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 16:36:27 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:14:08 -0500, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jj6gjm$2m6a$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 03/09/2012 11:32 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
This statement is from Linus Torvalds about breaking binary compatibility:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
While I don't think we need to worry so much at the moment about
breaking binary compatibility with new D releases, we do have a big
On 3/9/2012 2:41 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/09/2012 11:32 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
This statement is from Linus Torvalds about breaking binary compatibility:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
While I don't think we need to worry so much at the moment about
breaking binary compatibility with
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:38:08 -0500, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jjdu0j$209o$1...@digitalmars.com...
I can't say I agree with this, as it pollutes the global namespace with
several common terms that could be used for fields.
I'd argue that should
On 09-03-2012 23:32, Walter Bright wrote:
This statement is from Linus Torvalds about breaking binary compatibility:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
While I don't think we need to worry so much at the moment about
breaking binary compatibility with new D releases, we do have a big
problem
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:50:22 -0500, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 9 March 2012 at 21:36:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can't say I agree with this, as it pollutes the global namespace with
several common terms that could be used for fields.
There's no
On Friday, March 09, 2012 17:41:01 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'll say I *don't* agree with the rejection of aliases on principle --
aliases can be extremely useful/helpful, and they cost literally nothing
(the cognitive cost on the docs is a BS argument IMO). I just don't
agree with
On Friday, March 09, 2012 14:44:05 Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/9/2012 2:41 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/09/2012 11:32 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
This statement is from Linus Torvalds about breaking binary
compatibility:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
While I don't think we need to
On Friday, 9 March 2012 at 22:54:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Again, I find this just as descriptive and not terrible to type:
Yeah, that's fine by me (though duration is still better
than dur :-D )
I'm just the name conflict isn't a big deal either
since writing .minutes in some
Manu wrote:
I'm just talking about the ABI for returning multiple values, not
chaining
Does this mean, that you want a special type of function? For example
this would be disallowed statement: `auto result= f( g( parameters));',
if `f' and `g' are functions returning multiple values?
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Friday, March 09, 2012 17:41:01 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'll say I *don't* agree with the rejection of aliases on principle --
aliases can be extremely useful/helpful, and they cost literally nothing
(the
On 3/9/12 5:54 AM, Ary Manzana wrote:
Sample Ruby session:
irb
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :001 [1, 2, 3].count
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :002 [1, 2, 3].length
= 3
ruby-1.8.7-p352 :003 [1, 2, 3].size
= 3
I never saw *anyone* complaining about this. When you write, you choose
whatever is convenient to you
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jje0er$24mb$1...@digitalmars.com...
This statement is from Linus Torvalds about breaking binary compatibility:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
While I don't think we need to worry so much at the moment about breaking
binary
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:46:24PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 09-03-2012 23:32, Walter Bright wrote:
This statement is from Linus Torvalds about breaking binary compatibility:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
While I don't think we need to worry so much at the moment about
1 - 100 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
