Date: June 30, 2012
Time: 12:30
Place: Tütev, Ankara
Although this conference is in Turkish, I think it is still interesting
to the audience here.
Thanks to Zafer Çelenk for initiating the effort, to Salih Dinçer and
Mert Ataol for volunteering their time as speakers, and Tütev for
On 06/12/2012 12:47 AM, Romain Gérard romain.ger...@erebe.eu wrote:
Hi,
Could we be able to find videos of the conference after ? Or is it not
planned to film it ?
Thanks
I hope so but I am not sure because I haven't heard anything about it
yet and I haven't been to the venue before.
Ali
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 08:06:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/12/2012 12:47 AM, Romain Gérard
romain.ger...@erebe.eu wrote:
Hi,
Could we be able to find videos of the conference after ? Or
is it not
planned to film it ?
Thanks
I hope so but I am not sure because I haven't heard
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:52:43 -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Date: June 30, 2012
Time: 12:30
Place: Tütev, Ankara
Although this conference is in Turkish, I think it is still interesting
to the audience here.
Thanks to Zafer Çelenk for initiating the effort, to Salih Dinçer and
Mert Ataol for
On 6/11/2012 11:52 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Date: June 30, 2012
Time: 12:30
Place: Tütev, Ankara
Although this conference is in Turkish, I think it is still interesting to the
audience here.
Thanks to Zafer Çelenk for initiating the effort, to Salih Dinçer and Mert Ataol
for volunteering their
Le lundi 11 juin 2012 à 12:14 +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
http://blog.lycus.org/2012/06/libffi-d-version-11-released.html
I never actually announced the 1.0 release because I wanted to give the
library some time to mature. I believe that version 1.1 is polished and
battle-tested,
Le lundi 11 juin 2012 à 12:22 +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
http://blog.lycus.org/2012/06/libgc-d-version-11-released.html
As with libffi-d, version 1.0 was never announced here due to letting
the library mature a bit first. It should now be ready for actual use
(we use it in our
This is awesome.
I wonder what is the method used by the compiler to ensure most of the
check at compile time. This is really something we can look at to think
about D's contracts.
Le 08/06/2012 14:57, bearophile a écrit :
The Channel9 videos of the The Verification Corner (Microsoft
On 6/11/2012 7:57 PM, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
On Monday, 11 June 2012 at 17:41:12 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
No. Syntax highlighting is done by the lexer, no (complex) parsing
involved. The only case where the parser is consulted (but not waiting
for an answer, just using cached information)
There seem to be two ways to pass struct type value-parameters to
templates, which according to documentation shouldn't be
possible. What should I make of this? Should the compiler not
allow the following code? (which currently works)
struct StructParam
{
int v;
}
struct
There's a current pull request to improve di file generation
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/945); I'd
like to suggest further ideas.
As far as I understand, di interface files try to achieve these
conflicting goals:
1) speed up compilation by avoiding having to reparse
Am Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:09:26 -0500
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
On 6/11/12 12:32 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 11/06/12 18:15, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Could someone who's familiar with RNGs answer this question? This
seems to be important for st.uuid, we
mixin Instantiate!(foo,int);
Thanks for the syntax tip!
You could use cp instead of dmd -H.
That won't produce the same output (eg large functions tend to be
stripped currently), but I guess the current behavior is
relatively useless so it's fine.
want you are after. Such a thing could
Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:09:26 -0500
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
On 6/11/12 12:32 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 11/06/12 18:15, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Could someone who's familiar with RNGs answer this question? This
seems to
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:48:11 Jens Mueller wrote:
Johannes Pfau wrote:
* As seed is a normal function right now, I can't overload it with a
template. Is it safe to make the original seed a template as well, so
seedRange could be named seed, or would that break the API?
What
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:48:11 Jens Mueller wrote:
Johannes Pfau wrote:
* As seed is a normal function right now, I can't overload it with a
template. Is it safe to make the original seed a template as well, so
seedRange could be named seed, or would
Currently .di-files are compiler independent. If this should hold
for dib-files, too, we'll need a standard ast structure, won't we?
On 12/06/12 11:07, timotheecour wrote:
There's a current pull request to improve di file generation
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/945); I'd like to
suggest further ideas.
As far as I understand, di interface files try to achieve these
conflicting goals:
1) speed up
On 06/12/2012 12:47 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 12-06-2012 12:23, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Currently .di-files are compiler independent. If this should hold for
dib-files, too, we'll need a standard ast structure, won't we?
Which is a Good Thing (TM). It would /require/ formalization of
Am Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:48:11 +0200
schrieb Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de:
* As seed is a normal function right now, I can't overload it with a
template. Is it safe to make the original seed a template as
well, so seedRange could be named seed, or would that break the API?
What do
Am Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:14:23 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com:
Am Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:48:11 +0200
schrieb Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de:
* As seed is a normal function right now, I can't overload it
with a template. Is it safe to make the original seed a template
Am Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:09:26 -0500
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
We should have the same in std.random. Could anyone please initiate a
pull request?
Thanks,
Andrei
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/627
Am Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:12:49 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com:
Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:49:03 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com:
Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:30:57 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com:
Code:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 11:09:04 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
On 12/06/12 11:07, timotheecour wrote:
There's a current pull request to improve di file generation
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/945); I'd
like to
suggest further ideas.
As far as I understand, di interface
On 11/06/12 19:09, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We should have the same in std.random. Could anyone please initiate a pull
request?
I'll see what I can do. Is it OK to pretty much copy the Boost code, bar
D-ifying it a bit? The licence is identical, so this shouldn't be an issue AFAICS.
On 12/06/12 13:15, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I'll see what I can do. Is it OK to pretty much copy the Boost code, bar
D-ifying it a bit? The licence is identical, so this shouldn't be an issue
AFAICS.
... hit Reply before all the other overnight (for me) emails arrived. D'oh. :-\
On 12.06.2012 15:46, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:12:49 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfaunos...@example.com:
Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:49:03 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfaunos...@example.com:
Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:30:57 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshanskydmitry.o...@gmail.com:
Code:
On 11/06/12 22:43, bearophile wrote:
It's not fit for Phobos...
What would make it fit?
On 12.06.2012 16:09, foobar wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 11:09:04 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
On 12/06/12 11:07, timotheecour wrote:
There's a current pull request to improve di file generation
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/945); I'd like to
suggest further ideas.
As
There are some references to a nilUUID left and the intro says,
that UUIDs default to nil. I'd recommend not to use nil at all
and instead talk about an empty UUID or UUID.init. The intro
should state that an UUID is empty iff it eqauls UUID.init and
that UUID.init is an UUID with all bytes
Hello all,
An interesting challenge with the randomSample functionality in random.d.
randomSample takes as input a range, a number of points to sample from that
range, and (optionally) a random number generator. It returns a range
corresponding to a lazily-calculated sample of the desired
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 11:09:04 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
On 12/06/12 11:07, timotheecour wrote:
There's a current pull request to improve di file generation
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/945); I'd
like to
suggest further ideas.
As far as I understand, di interface
Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Hello all,
An interesting challenge with the randomSample functionality in random.d.
randomSample takes as input a range, a number of points to sample
from that range, and (optionally) a random number generator. It
returns a range corresponding to a
deadalnix:
I wonder what is the method used by the compiler to ensure most
of the check at compile time.
It uses Z3 and Boogie:
http://rise4fun.com/
Bye,
bearophile
On 12/06/12 13:46, Jens Mueller wrote:
Probably I'm not seeing the issue
auto sample3 = randomSample(iota(0, 100), 5, Random(unpredictableSeed));
writeln(sample3);
auto sample4 = randomSample(iota(0, 100), 5, Random(unpredictableSeed));
writeln(sample4);
auto sample5 = randomSample(iota(0,
Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/06/12 13:46, Jens Mueller wrote:
Probably I'm not seeing the issue
auto sample3 = randomSample(iota(0, 100), 5, Random(unpredictableSeed));
writeln(sample3);
auto sample4 = randomSample(iota(0, 100), 5, Random(unpredictableSeed));
writeln(sample4);
On 12/06/12 14:28, Jens Mueller wrote:
... and you'll get out each time the same values. (Or instead of a
newly-defined generator you could just use rndGen as in my code
examples.)
Of course. But this behavior is clear from the documentation. Did it
surprise you? Passing a rng by value is
Le 12/06/2012 14:55, bearophile a écrit :
deadalnix:
I wonder what is the method used by the compiler to ensure most of the
check at compile time.
It uses Z3 and Boogie:
http://rise4fun.com/
Bye,
bearophile
OK, but how does that work internally :D Some example are
straightforward, but
On 2012-06-12 14:09, foobar wrote:
This is a solved problem since the 80's (E.g. Pascal units). Per Adam's
post, the issue is tied to DMD's use of OMF/optlink which we all would
like to get rid of anyway. Once we're in proper COFF land, couldn't we
just store the required metadata (binary AST?)
deadalnix:
OK, but how does that work internally :D
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/projects/z3/
In that page there are links to papers too.
Bye,
bearophile
Le 12/06/2012 12:23, Tobias Pankrath a écrit :
Currently .di-files are compiler independent. If this should hold for
dib-files, too, we'll need a standard ast structure, won't we?
We need it anyway at some point. AST macro is another example.
It would also greatly simplify compiler writing
Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/06/12 14:28, Jens Mueller wrote:
... and you'll get out each time the same values. (Or instead of a
newly-defined generator you could just use rndGen as in my code
examples.)
Of course. But this behavior is clear from the documentation. Did it
surprise
Le 12/06/2012 14:39, foobar a écrit :
Another related question - AFAIK the LLVM folks did/are doing work to
make their implementation less platform-depended. Could we leverage this
in ldc to store LLVM bit code as D libs which still retain enough info
for the compiler to replace header files?
Le 12/06/2012 15:52, bearophile a écrit :
deadalnix:
OK, but how does that work internally :D
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/projects/z3/
In that page there are links to papers too.
Bye,
bearophile
Thank you very much. I was turning endlessly in the website without
Thank you very much. I was turning endlessly in the website
without finding that. I now have some stuffs to read.
As far as I can tell, Z3 is an SMT solver (Satisfiability Modulo
Theories), which is a SAT Solver an steroids.
Am Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:24:15 +0200
schrieb Tobias Pankrath tob...@pankrath.net:
There are some references to a nilUUID left and the intro says,
that UUIDs default to nil. I'd recommend not to use nil at all
and instead talk about an empty UUID or UUID.init. The intro
should state that an
Am Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:15:48 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com:
Judging by the swift rate of fixes and keeping in mind that it's only
~1.5 KLOC with abundance of unit tests I'm tempted to suggest the
following.
Let's trim the review time span a bit, so that review ends
Le 08/06/2012 01:51, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
2. shared value types.
2. You can have value type on heap. Or value types that point to shared
data.
On 12/06/12 14:58, Jens Mueller wrote:
Right. These are inconsistent. This should be fixed. Can't we just use a
default argument like
auto randomSample(R, Random)(R r, size_t n, Random gen =
Random(unpredictableSeed));
Currently the documentation does not even state what is difference
between
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:46:44 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-06-12 14:09, foobar wrote:
This is a solved problem since the 80's (E.g. Pascal units). Per Adam's
post, the issue is tied to DMD's use of OMF/optlink which we all would
like to get rid of anyway. Once we're in
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:16:19 -0700, timotheecour
thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote:
mixin Instantiate!(foo,int);
Thanks for the syntax tip!
You could use cp instead of dmd -H.
That won't produce the same output (eg large functions tend to be
stripped currently), but I guess the current
On 06/12/2012 03:54 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 12/06/2012 12:23, Tobias Pankrath a écrit :
Currently .di-files are compiler independent. If this should hold for
dib-files, too, we'll need a standard ast structure, won't we?
We need it anyway at some point.
Plain D code is already a perfectly
On 12.06.2012 18:18, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:15:48 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshanskydmitry.o...@gmail.com:
Judging by the swift rate of fixes and keeping in mind that it's only
~1.5 KLOC with abundance of unit tests I'm tempted to suggest the
following.
Let's trim the review
On 6/12/2012 2:07 AM, timotheecour wrote:
There's a current pull request to improve di file generation
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/945); I'd like to suggest
further ideas.
As far as I understand, di interface files try to achieve these conflicting
goals:
1) speed up
When writing a generic function which takes an unknown type, the
signature is written like so:
void fun(L)(L l) if (isList!L);
While writing a generic interface is written like so:
template isList(L) {
enum bool isList = is(typeof(
(inout int _dummy=0)
{
L l;
if
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:23:16 -0700, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12.06.2012 16:09, foobar wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 11:09:04 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
On 12/06/12 11:07, timotheecour wrote:
There's a current pull request to improve di file generation
Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/06/12 14:58, Jens Mueller wrote:
Right. These are inconsistent. This should be fixed. Can't we just use a
default argument like
auto randomSample(R, Random)(R r, size_t n, Random gen =
Random(unpredictableSeed));
Currently the documentation does not
On 12.06.2012 22:47, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:23:16 -0700, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12.06.2012 16:09, foobar wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 11:09:04 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
On 12/06/12 11:07, timotheecour wrote:
There's a current pull request to
Yes, I'll agree with you. But I don't know about others. It'll
be nice
if others share their opinion such that your efforts won't be
wasted.
That code was mostly written by Andrei and David.
Jens
I, for one, agree that this:
auto randomSample(R, Random)(R r, size_t n, Random gen =
Does a switch statement acting on a template parameter act just
like a chain of static if-else's? That is, does it just generate
the code for the matching case?
enum E { A, B, C }
class Blah(E param) {
void foo() {
switch(param) {
case(E.A) : blah;
case(E.B) :
On 2012-06-12 04:20, Ary Manzana wrote:
I believe no special comment is needed for this. If you override a
method without commenting it it should retain the original comment. If
you do comment it, it should take that new comment.
Sounds like a good idea. I wonder though, if a special comment
On 12-06-2012 08:29, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-06-12 04:20, Ary Manzana wrote:
I believe no special comment is needed for this. If you override a
method without commenting it it should retain the original comment. If
you do comment it, it should take that new comment.
Sounds like a good
Hi!
I'm new to D and trying everything out. Got the basics down which
are very straightforward and similar to other languages. My
professional background is primarily in C/C++-variants and Ruby
if it helps.
I have a problem with how modules, packages and files work. I
don't really know how
Hello. I am trying to make a wrapper to use the DarkGDK 3d game
engine for windows with D and i am doing rather well so far. I
have just gotten it to successfully compile however the resulting
exe instantly crashes and outputs nothing at all even though the
very first command in WinMain is
Am Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:15:38 +0200
schrieb Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org:
On 12-06-2012 04:20, Charles McAnany wrote:
Hi, all. I'm studying Kerrisk's The Linux Programming Interface for
fun. The book is written in C, and I thought it would be fun to do
the exercises in D. My problem
On 12.06.2012 11:17, Nekroze wrote:
Hello. I am trying to make a wrapper to use the DarkGDK 3d game engine
for windows with D and i am doing rather well so far. I have just gotten
it to successfully compile however the resulting exe instantly crashes
and outputs nothing at all even though the
On 12.06.2012 10:13, cal wrote:
Does a switch statement acting on a template parameter act just like a
chain of static if-else's? That is, does it just generate the code for
the matching case?
enum E { A, B, C }
class Blah(E param) {
void foo() {
switch(param) {
case(E.A) : blah;
case(E.B) :
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12.06.2012 11:17, Nekroze wrote:
Hello. I am trying to make a wrapper to use the DarkGDK 3d game engine
for windows with D and i am doing rather well so far. I have just gotten
it to successfully compile however
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Andrew Wiley wiley.andre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12.06.2012 11:17, Nekroze wrote:
Hello. I am trying to make a wrapper to use the DarkGDK 3d game engine
for windows with D and i am
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 09:03:43 UTC, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Andrew Wiley
wiley.andre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12.06.2012 11:17, Nekroze wrote:
Hello. I am trying to make a wrapper
On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 at 00:17:08 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
The documentation for bitfields doesn't go into detail if you
can put any default values into it. Can you?
I think you can't. See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425
Bye,
bearophile
K, I think I have
On 6/12/12, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com wrote:
But for simple macros, gcc -E -dM can be useful.
gcc -E -dM '/usr/include/sys/types.h'
This could be useful for me, thanks. More options:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Preprocessor-Options.html
Perhaps there is already a way to do this. With the UFCS one
tends to make elegant chains of statements, it would be useful to
have writeln and file functions that can easily be dropped in the
middle of such chains without having to alter the lay out of
one's program. Rather than returning
On 12.06.2012 16:12, ixid wrote:
Perhaps there is already a way to do this. With the UFCS one tends to
make elegant chains of statements, it would be useful to have writeln
and file functions that can easily be dropped in the middle of such
chains without having to alter the lay out of one's
Era Scarecrow:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields_D!(
bitfields!( //borrowed from std.bitmanip
bool, b, 1,
uint, i, 3,
short, s, 4),
i=2,
s=5));
}
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields!(
bool, b, 1,
uint, i=2, 3,
cal:
Does a switch statement acting on a template parameter act just
like a chain of static if-else's? That is, does it just
generate the code for the matching case?
See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6921
Bye,
bearophile
OK, another update to the original download link.
I have gotten initDarkGDK to pass and it gets all the way down to
handing the screen over to DarkGDK using the wrapper function
dbOpenScreen but fails after that.
I guess then my problem is in the wrapper function or in the
actual template
On 12.06.2012 17:05, bearophile wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields!(
bool, b, 1,
uint, i=2, 3,
short, s=5, 4));
}
Or iff bitfields is a mixin template:
struct defs {
mixin bitfields!(
bool, b, 1,
uint, i=2, 3,
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 13:05:26 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields_D!(
bitfields!( //borrowed from std.bitmanip
bool, b, 1,
uint, i, 3,
short, s, 4),
i=2,
s=5));
}
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 08:35:44 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
It doesn't. It's easy to check anyway.
Not for me :) I just saw that it worked, and wondered if it
worked statically.
Thanks!
I am working with some financial data that comes in binary files.
It has two fields in particular that I am trying to convert to
human readable formats. The first is a date string like
20060621, which I am able to work with just fine. But then it
has a field called ttim, which is the number of
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 19:28:38 TJB wrote:
I am working with some financial data that comes in binary files.
It has two fields in particular that I am trying to convert to
human readable formats. The first is a date string like
20060621, which I am able to work with just fine. But then it
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 15:51:31 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 13:05:26 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Are you able to support a syntax like:
struct defs {
mixin(bitfields!(
bool, b, 1,
uint, i=2, 3,
short, s=5, 4));
}
That does look cleaner and better IMO.
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 07:04:15 UTC, Henrik Valter Vogelius
Hansson wrote:
Hi!
I'm new to D and trying everything out. Got the basics down
which are very straightforward and similar to other languages.
My professional background is primarily in C/C++-variants and
Ruby if it helps.
I
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 17:40:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 19:28:38 TJB wrote:
I am working with some financial data that comes in binary
files.
It has two fields in particular that I am trying to convert to
human readable formats. The first is a date string
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 18:07:45 UTC, Francois Chabot wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 07:04:15 UTC, Henrik Valter
Vogelius Hansson wrote:
Hi!
I'm new to D and trying everything out. Got the basics down
which are very straightforward and similar to other languages.
My professional
Are there any implementations of this anywhere for D?
I really only care about the windows platform - and have
considered writing this myself with IOCP and std.socket, but I
figure someone else must have already done something similar?
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 07:04:15 UTC, Henrik Valter Vogelius
Hansson wrote:
Hi!
I'm new to D and trying everything out. Got the basics down
which are very straightforward and similar to other languages.
My professional background is primarily in C/C++-variants and
Ruby if it helps.
I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8229
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5082
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-12 09:59:35 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8194
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-12 09:59:43 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8194
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5082
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7585
--- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-12 10:06:25 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8229
--- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-06-12 10:55:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This behaviour is intentional. Pointer operations are strictly checked in
CTFE.
It's the same as doing
int n = 0;
char c = [n];
which
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8232
Summary: Segmentation fault in rt_finalize_gc()
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8198
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-12 11:43:25 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8198
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4364
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-06-12 15:58:47 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
