On Friday, 17 November 2017 at 14:57:52 UTC, Stas wrote:
I use and highly recommend Codelobster:
http://www.codelobster.com
But I would hope you don't recommend it for D language
development.
"Details of Codelobster:
Our goal is to create product which would simplify and speed up
to the ma
On Friday, 17 November 2017 at 14:57:52 UTC, Stas wrote:
I use and highly recommend Codelobster:
http://www.codelobster.com
https://s3.amazonaws.com/EarthwatchMedia/GalleryImages/unearthing-ancient-history-in-tuscany-c.-archeodig-h1_2196.jpg
On Wednesday, 13 October 2010 at 01:58:19 UTC, Michael Stover
wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low
and is still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and
DDT doesn't have a release yet. What do actual D programmers
use?
-Mike
vim
On 11/17/17 1:30 PM, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 October 2010 at 01:58:19 UTC, Michael Stover wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
On Wednesday, 13 October 2010 at 01:58:19 UTC, Michael Stover
wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low
and is still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and
DDT doesn't have a release yet. What do actual D programmers
use?
-Mike
I use Atom, so not reall
I keep jumping between VSCode and SublimeText3
atm using ST3. (but they are not IDEs ;P)
I use and highly recommend Codelobster: http://www.codelobster.com
On 29/10/2010 21:29, dolive wrote:
Bruno Medeiros дµ½:
On 13/10/2010 03:20, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for
me. P
== Quote from bioinfornatics (bioinfornat...@fedoraproject.org)'s article
> yes,
> is not against you work, it is as a packager point of view.
> while gdc will be not a gcc project, gdc can not be go in fedora.
That's not how I understand it. Fedora ships GCC-4.5 (not 4.4), and will shortly
switch
yes,
is not against you work, it is as a packager point of view.
while gdc will be not a gcc project, gdc can not be go in fedora.
and gdc do not follow gcc stable version because is not a gcc project
Same as said et start of this thread is not against your nice job.
I know for gdc becomme a g
== Quote from bioinfornatics (bioinfornat...@fedoraproject.org)'s article
> about compiler, for me:
> - gdc is not a gcc project
How is that a valid excuse?
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 16/10/2010 10:50, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
>> Same here, no IDE I've seen is able to format code and comments as
>> well as (X)Emacs.
>>
>> Jerome
>
> Interesting. For anyone else who shares that opinion, what are the IDE's
> that you have seen? In particula
about compiler, for me:
- dmd is not full open source
- gdc is not a gcc project
- ldc is godd compiler but they are some unfixed bug left since a long time ei
gtkd build
so i choose ldc
About ide i use codeblocks and for build my project i use my own makefile system
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:35:38 -0400, dolive wrote:
> Bruno Medeiros ÐŽµœ:
>
>> On 13/10/2010 03:20, Eric Poggel wrote:
>> > On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
>> >> Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a
>> >> release. Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at wor
Bruno Medeiros дµ½:
> On 13/10/2010 03:20, Eric Poggel wrote:
> > On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
> >> Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
> >> Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for
> >> me. Poseidon is also Win
Bruno Medeiros дµ½:
> On 13/10/2010 03:20, Eric Poggel wrote:
> > On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
> >> Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
> >> Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for
> >> me. Poseidon is also Win
On 16/10/2010 10:50, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:24 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[ . . . ]
Proper code completion, correctly jumping to function definitions, and various
other features that IDEs generally do well tend to be quite poor in vim. It can
On 13/10/2010 04:15, so wrote:
I guess it is wording.
Hmm say...
Does Java come with a standard gui library? Yes.
Does C come with a standard gui library? No.
C didn't need a gui library to be successful, and didn't come with one.
On the other hand Java/C# have to have one, packed, and they do
On 13/10/2010 08:07, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 13/10/10 4:15 AM, so wrote:
Does Java come with a standard gui library? Yes.
Does C come with a standard gui library? No.
C didn't need a gui library to be successful, and didn't come with one.
On the other hand Java/C# have to have one, packed, an
On 13/10/2010 03:20, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for
me. Poseidon is also Windows-only.
Descent is dead? The change
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:59:10 -0500
>> "Andrei" == Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei> Yah. Emacs' formatting abilities are like real estate prices in
Andrei> Houston: once you got calibrated to them, it's hard to move
Andrei> away.
It looks there is no perfect IDE for D available (yet) - Qt is
On 2010-10-12 21:57:44 -0400, Michael Stover said:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
I'm using Xcode, with the D plugin for Xcode I mad
Am 14.10.2010 11:46, schrieb Anders F Björklund:
Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Code::Blocks:
Works quite well for Windows and Linux, except for some occasional
dependency problems because of single-file compilation. Unusable on
Mac because of keyboard shortcut issues. Project and build option
configurati
On 10/16/10 4:50 CDT, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Same here, no IDE I've seen is able to format code and comments as
well as (X)Emacs.
Yah. Emacs' formatting abilities are like real estate prices in Houston:
once you got calibrated to them, it's hard to move away.
Andrei
Russel Winder wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:24 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> Proper code completion, correctly jumping to function definitions, and
>> various
>> other features that IDEs generally do well tend to be quite poor in vim. It
>> can
>> do many of them on some lev
Gary Whatmore wrote:
> Paulo Pinto Wrote:
>
>> Haskell, F#, Ada, just to name a few.
>
> Ivory tower bu***it.
>
Haskell, probably, F#, a bit young to say, Ada has been used in
large real-world projects (mostly where high reliability is required
like in the aerospace industry).
>> , C#,
Paulo Pinto:
> Are you also aware of Habit?
> http://www.galois.com/blog/2010/05/12/tech-talk-developing-good-habits-for-bare-metal-programming/
I saw the video about Habit, but I was not so impressed, it's a bit simplified
Haskell variant fitter for low-level code. I haven't seen many new ideas
Thanks for the hint.
Are you also aware of Habit?
http://www.galois.com/blog/2010/05/12/tech-talk-developing-good-habits-for-bare-metal-programming/
Am 13.10.2010 13:22, schrieb bearophile:
--
Paulo Pinto:
if you want to invent some kind of high level assembler, the res
On 15/10/2010 12:16 AM, so wrote:
It looks to me that you are the one without a point here, why do you
reply a line but ignore the part that matters? :)
Maybe you are right and, even though I reread your OP, I missed your
salient point. Can your please rephrase so that I can sync on your
chann
It looks to me that you are the one without a point here, why do you reply
a line but ignore the part that matters? :)
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:00:26 +0300, Justin Johansson wrote:
On 14/10/2010 11:32 PM, so wrote:
A language should not limit you, some people might like it, i don't.
Render
On 14/10/2010 11:32 PM, so wrote:
A language should not limit you, some people might like it, i don't.
Render your programming opus in Assembler then. There are no
limitations in what you can do in Assembly Language and, to a lesser
degree, in slightly higher level languages/run-time engines s
A language should not limit you, some people might like it, i don't.
No need to waste time on this, if you believe those languages can do
things that you say, write a simple but competitive ray/pathtracer. No
need to use sse or any fancy stuff, just bare compiler with its standard
library,
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 07:58 -0400, bearophile wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I agree, for some people 'high performance' means the automatic
> slicing and tiling of loops as done by advanced Fortran compilers,
> something that C/C++ compiler have just started to do a bit, and are
> far from doing well still.
retard:
> 'High performance' and 'system language' are both badly defined.
I agree, for some people 'high performance' means the automatic slicing and
tiling of loops as done by advanced Fortran compilers, something that C/C++
compiler have just started to do a bit, and are far from doing well
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:28:27 +0300, so wrote:
>> What's your definition of a "system language"? Being able to write
>> operating systems, OS drivers, kernel mode applications, embedded small
>> footprint applications, server applications, games, simulations, HPC?
>> If you only need one of these doma
When it comes to programming languages, the C/C++ audience isn't the
sharpest knife in the drawer. In fact they most likely reject any other
language if the syntax and semantics aren't 95% the same.
I don't give a damn about syntax being C like or not, if it is good at
expressing things, that
Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Code::Blocks:
Works quite well for Windows and Linux, except for some occasional
dependency problems because of single-file compilation. Unusable on Mac
because of keyboard shortcut issues. Project and build option
configuration is a bit complicated and the toolchain-s
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:01:11 +0300, so wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:24:00 +0300, Paulo Pinto
> wrote:
>
>> Haskell, F#, C#, Scala, Ada, just to name a few.
> All these languages you named are useless for C/C++ audience. They might
> be (i like Haskell) good for expressing certain kind of tasks.
All these languages you named are useless for C/C++ audience.
They might be (i like Haskell) good for expressing certain kind of tasks.
Go write the next big OS/game/RT simulation/any performance related
project in any of those.
None of them are "system language".
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:24:0
Code::Blocks:
Works quite well for Windows and Linux, except for some occasional
dependency problems because of single-file compilation. Unusable on Mac
because of keyboard shortcut issues. Project and build option
configuration is a bit complicated and the toolchain-settings need to be
twea
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:24 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Proper code completion, correctly jumping to function definitions, and
> various
> other features that IDEs generally do well tend to be quite poor in vim. It
> can
> do many of them on some level, but for instance, while ct
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 18:01 -0400, Gary Whatmore wrote:
> Paulo Pinto Wrote:
>
> > Haskell, F#, Ada, just to name a few.
>
> Ivory tower bu***it.
>
> >, C#, F#, Scala
>
> Run in a VM > SLOW == impractical
This is either a simple intentional troll and therefore of zero value,
or you are sho
On 10/13/2010 07:43 PM, retard wrote:
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:24:12 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 16:06:18 sybrandy wrote:
On 10/12/2010 09:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. L
Seems to be mainly for Java development.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:43 PM, retard wrote:
> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:24:12 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 16:06:18 sybrandy wrote:
> >> On 10/12/2010 09:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
> >> > Elephant appears dead. Posei
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:24:12 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 16:06:18 sybrandy wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 09:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
>> > Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
>> > still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 16:06:18 sybrandy wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 09:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
> > Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
> > alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
> > release yet. What do actual D programm
That's kind of useless flame.
Personally, I find Haskell to be a very beautiful (and useful) language.
Just because it isn't meant for all tasks doesn't mean its "ivory tower
bullshit". C#, F#, and Scala are all JITed, and JIT compilation has been
known to perform quite well in recent benchmarks.
On 10/12/2010 09:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
I stick with Vim. Who needs anything else? :P
Ca
Paulo Pinto Wrote:
> Haskell, F#, Ada, just to name a few.
Ivory tower bu***it.
>, C#, F#, Scala
Run in a VM > SLOW == impractical
- G.W.
Haskell, F#, C#, Scala, Ada, just to name a few.
"so" wrote in message news:op.vkihiohj7dt...@so-pc...
> Name one?
>
>> If it wasn't for C++, there are plenty of other powerfull languages out
>> there.
>>
>> --
>> Paulo
>>
>> "so" wrote in message news:op.vkh2s0mg7dt...@so-pc...
>>> Well, same g
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:02:04 -0400, Eric Poggel wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:22 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
>> Why would I laugh?
>
> A lot of people say eclipse is slow and bloated. Maybe it is, but it
> has a lot of killer features.
We already discussed this a week or two ago. Eclipse *with useless
On 2010-10-13 18:02, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:22 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Why would I laugh?
A lot of people say eclipse is slow and bloated. Maybe it is, but it has
a lot of killer features.
The start up time for Eclipse 3.6 has approved a lot compared to 3.5.
--
/Jacob Carlbor
On 10/12/2010 10:22 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Why would I laugh?
A lot of people say eclipse is slow and bloated. Maybe it is, but it
has a lot of killer features.
On 10/12/2010 10:22 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Why would I laugh? I've been using Eclipse for nearly 10 years.
Descent claims to be a dead project, so I'm curious that you say you
use it - what version of Eclipse are you using with it? DDT is it's
replacement and it has no release.
On Tue, Oc
== Quote from Daniel Gibson (metalcae...@gmail.com)'s article
> Michael Stover schrieb:
> > Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
> > still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
> > have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
> >
> >
Jimmy Cao:
> I agree with you very much here. GUI libraries and IDE support are very low
> priority items for D.
Yet, here we have discussed few times features that help the creation of GUI
toolkit (see as example the changes over C++ language done by QT).
--
Paulo Pinto:
Name one?
If it wasn't for C++, there are plenty of other powerfull languages out
there.
--
Paulo
"so" wrote in message news:op.vkh2s0mg7dt...@so-pc...
Well, same goes for C++, year 2010 and we are not getting a standard gui
library (not saying it is necessary)
For the second part, C might
"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.vkiag4zbo7c...@korden-pc...
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:20:12 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> "Michael Stover" wrote in message
>> news:mailman.563.1286935070.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>>> Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's a
On 2010-10-13 10:05, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 08:07 +0100, Peter Alexander wrote:
[ . . . ]
Like it or not, in this day and age, people expect GUI libraries and
IDEs. In fact, most programmers have no idea how to compile code without
an IDE. Moreover, most people think that th
That is only because the standard comitee does not want to favour a
vendor over the other. And usually the standards comitee for C and
C++ only make part of the standard existing practices.
C is the responsible for many of the security exploits we have to endure
nowadays.
The last time I used pr
On 2010-10-13 03:57, Michael Stover wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
Still using Eclipse with Descent as the IDE and TextM
Robert Jacques wrote:
Do you use a plugin for Code::Blocks specific for D?
Code::blocks supports D out of the box. No plugin required.
The Code::Blocks 8.02 and 10.05 releases support DMD and GDC...
LDC support has been added too, in the latest "Nightly builds".
--anders
Michael Stover Wrote:
> Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
> alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a release
> yet. What do actual D programmers use?-Mike
I don't want to sound like one of those Unix condescending users
(htt
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:57:44 -0400, Michael Stover wrote:
> Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
> still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
> have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
My "IDE" is rather ad-hoc: I use Termin
I've used Crimson Editor for a very long time (Aldacron too) because it's very
easy to configure and create custom syntax files. Now Visual D got me.
Le 13/10/2010 03:57, Michael Stover a écrit :
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
I use Visual D and JEdit.
Olivier.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:20:12 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Michael Stover" wrote in message
news:mailman.563.1286935070.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still
alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn'
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:57:44 +0400, Michael Stover
wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
I mostly use Notepad++ (Windows) f
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 08:07 +0100, Peter Alexander wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Like it or not, in this day and age, people expect GUI libraries and
> IDEs. In fact, most programmers have no idea how to compile code without
> an IDE. Moreover, most people think that the IDE and the language are
> the *sa
"torhu" wrote in message
news:i93h03$24f...@digitalmars.com...
> On 13.10.2010 06:20, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Michael Stover" wrote in message
>> news:mailman.563.1286935070.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>>> Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
>>> still
On 13/10/10 4:15 AM, so wrote:
Does Java come with a standard gui library? Yes.
Does C come with a standard gui library? No.
C didn't need a gui library to be successful, and didn't come with one.
On the other hand Java/C# have to have one, packed, and they do come
with (at least)one.
If your l
Well, same goes for C++, year 2010 and we are not getting a standard gui
library (not saying it is necessary)
For the second part, C might owe its fame to Unix, i don't know it is true
or not. But you have to admit it is a great language. Still there are many
C programmers out there and i a
Am 13.10.2010 03:57, schrieb Michael Stover:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
win32 -> VisualD
linux -> CodeBlocks
On 13.10.2010 06:20, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Michael Stover" wrote in message
news:mailman.563.1286935070.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
release
Of course it did not require one.
On those days GUIs were rare, and if you want to develop for Unix, C was
the only option.
C got famous because of Unix. C on its own would never had survived as a
language.
"so" wrote in message news:op.vkhvb01i7dt...@so-pc...
>I guess it is wording.
> Hmm sa
"Michael Stover" wrote in message
news:mailman.563.1286935070.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
> alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
> release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
>
I agree with you very much here. GUI libraries and IDE support are very low
priority items for D.
It would be a sad day for everyone if the people working on the dmd and
Phobos dropped their current work and started working on an IDE.
So, low priority doesn't mean it can't be done until the higher
Editors are designed for specific people, editors :)
All IDE's out there i have seen based on these editors.
You ask what actual programmers use, they mostly use these editors, i was
one of those, and i curse those times. I am not an editor but a code
writer, two different things, and the dif
I guess it is wording.
Hmm say...
Does Java come with a standard gui library? Yes.
Does C come with a standard gui library? No.
C didn't need a gui library to be successful, and didn't come with one.
On the other hand Java/C# have to have one, packed, and they do come with
(at least)one.
If
Michael Stover wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
microEmacs
2010/10/12 so
> Don't take it personal but this is one of those :
> "if D really wants to compete, a is essential."
>
> C doesn't have one, neither C++, nor assembly. There are IDE's for them yes
> but again, these languages don't have an actual IDE, IDE's are useful mostly
> for form based or c
On 10/12/2010 9:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
From: p...@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti)
Sub
Don't take it personal but this is one of those :
"if D really wants to compete, a is essential."
C doesn't have one, neither C++, nor assembly. There are IDE's for them
yes but again, these languages don't have an actual IDE, IDE's are useful
mostly for form based or corporate languages, yo
Michael Stover Wrote:
> Seems to me if D really wants to compete, a modern IDE is essential.
You have no idea how many "essential" things are required to "compete" ;-)
But language design, std library and compiler come first. If you compiler has
too many bugs, an IDE will not save you.
Bye,
bea
Read it's home page. In bold letters, it says *This project is dead. Please
use http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/ddt/*
*
*
*I take them at the word since I don't know any better :-)
*
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
>
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 18:57:44 Michael Stover wrote:
> Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
> alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
> release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
>
> -Mike
I use vim (well, gvim technical
Perhaps it's just like D 1.0 and it's only in maintenance mode, until DDT
officially releases.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
>
>> Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
>> Also, I'm running Li
On 10/12/2010 10:11 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for
me. Poseidon is also Windows-only.
Descent is dead? The change log shows recent activity
(http://dso
Hello Michael,
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
Real life has gotten in the way for a while but if, make that when, I go
back I expec
Why would I laugh? I've been using Eclipse for nearly 10 years. Descent
claims to be a dead project, so I'm curious that you say you use it - what
version of Eclipse are you using with it? DDT is it's replacement and it
has no release.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
> On
On 10/12/2010 9:57 PM, Michael Stover wrote:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
As an Eclipse fan (don't laugh!) I've been using Desc
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:11:33 -0400, Michael Stover
wrote:
Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for
me.
Poseidon is also Windows-only.
Do you use a plugin for Code::Blocks specific for
Seems to me if D really wants to compete, a modern IDE is essential.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Clark Gaebel wrote:
> Doesn't really count as an IDE, but I use vim for all development, and
> the d-syntax package from the d overlay in gentoo portage was all I
> really needed to get started
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Michael Stover
wrote:
> Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
> Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for
> me. Poseidon is also Windows-only.
>
> Do you use a plugin for Code::Blocks specific for D
Michael Stover schrieb:
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is
still alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't
have a release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
For Windows http://d-ide.sourceforge.net/ is probably great.
I use Gea
Doesn't really count as an IDE, but I use vim for all development, and
the d-syntax package from the d overlay in gentoo portage was all I
really needed to get started.
Kudos to the maintainer of the d portage overlay by the way. Your work
is appreciated!
On 10/12/10 22:01, Jimmy Cao wrote:
> I'
Descent is a dead project, replaced by DDT which doesn't have a release.
Also, I'm running Linux at home and Mac at work, so VisualD won't do for me.
Poseidon is also Windows-only.
Do you use a plugin for Code::Blocks specific for D?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jimmy Cao wrote:
> I'm by
I use vim.
I'm by no means an "actual D programmer" but I like to use Code::Blocks.
I've heard VisualD and Descent are also very nice.
There's also a guy working on D.dev (
http://d-dev-ide.blogspot.com/2010/07/ddev-progress-july-2010.html).
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Michael Stover
wrote:
> Elephant
Elephant appears dead. Poseidon's activity is extremely low and is still
alpha after 5 years. LEDS is even less active, and DDT doesn't have a
release yet. What do actual D programmers use?
-Mike
100 matches
Mail list logo
