Just what we need is spark-gap radios on 6 and 2 meters. We just got through
fighting this a few years back.
Since 223 is little used and it's legal whats the problem with going up there ?
Chuck is right why is it that SS users feel they need to go on widely used
bands ? Even if legal the chanc
I AGREE !
However not all contesters are a PAIN IN THE *## just the few that push others
out of the way and interfer with daly QSO and nets ..
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, Dan Hensley wrote:
From: Dan Hensley
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] VHF Contesting
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Satu
There are lots of people on PSK31 here on 6 meters and some on 2 meters
too ... it works for them .
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, GregCT wrote:
From: GregCT
Subject: [digitalradio] VHF Contesting
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 10, 2010, 7:38 AM
Hello and Good mo
I forwarded this to the Leo's here at the jail I myself are a civilian not a
cert LEO.
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote:
From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Feld Hell "LEO" Sprint this Saturday 2000z - 2200z
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, Jun
I beleve about 50.300 I know there is some psk-31 around there
--- On Sat, 5/8/10, Russell Blair wrote:
From: Russell Blair
Subject: [digitalradio] Digital Band for 6M
To: "Digital Radio"
Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010, 4:03 PM
Where does the Digital band start on 6M. ? I just put the be
John
i have been there too Remember wide band digital on 6 and 2 meters ?
The problem with that group Of digihams is they don't care what what what they
want will do to all the other users after all we are legacy users a bunch
of old phooeys who are holding back the new ham rad
What's the problem you have 222MHZ and up
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 3:40:42 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anecdotes about FCC inadvertent hostility toward
ham radio digital modes?
Generally spea
" But the situation where existing users of the bands suddenly have their
activities disrupted when people start going mad with some flavour of the month
new mode is unacceptable, and the controls the FCC exercise over amateurs in
the USA do at least go some way to prevent this. "
This is why
From: jhaynesatalumni
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Digital modes band plans.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 2:44 PM
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wrote:
>
> I remember several spredsprectum people commenting that they didn't
9:45 AM
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, bruce mallon wrote:
>
>
>
> SO what you are saying is lets ctush the other modes so we can play with our
> new toy ?
> We just went through this with wideband/spredsprec trum on 6 and 2 meters
> .
> I dont care what m
SO what you are saying is lets ctush the other modes so we can play with our
new toy ?
We just went through this with wideband/spredsprectrum on 6 and 2 meters .
I dont care what mode anyone uses as long as it does not cause problems for
others.
SHOW THE FCC IT WILL NOT CAUSE PROBLEMS and go
We have a group on SSB here
--- On Sat, 1/2/10, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote:
From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] VHF Digital?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, January 2, 2010, 5:53 PM
May be workable in a large city but for those of us
that live in the
I ONLY SEND REAL CARDS TRY ME TOO ..
--- On Wed, 12/16/09, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote:
From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 12:08 PM
At 10:41 PM 12/15/2009, you wrote in part:
LOGIC TELLS YOU . 100 watts SSB is 25 watts FM/PSK and other 100% modes
Unless you like changing finals...
--- On Tue, 7/14/09, David wrote:
From: David
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digital modes and old husband's tales
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 6
signallink USB
--- On Wed, 6/17/09, lsumners wrote:
From: lsumners
Subject: [digitalradio] Sound Cards
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 9:58 AM
I am looking at upgrading my Dell on board sound card. Any suggestions for
digital radio?
I thought it was the original Digital mode
--- On Mon, 6/1/09, S.J. wrote:
From: S.J.
Subject: [digitalradio] " . . . the other digital mode"
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 1, 2009, 11:15 AM
CW is an Analog Mode . . .
73,
Sherm KB9Q
AVOID FT-100 or 100D
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, kh6ty wrote:
From: kh6ty
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] How do I get started with digital radio?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 7:36 AM
For about $500 you can get a secondhand IC-706MKIIG and be able to work
SSB, C
Corperation it's a wonderfull thing Nice to see people working to prevent
problems ... !
--- On Wed, 4/8/09, David Kruh wrote:
From: David Kruh
Subject: [digitalradio] NEW 20 METER HELL CALLING FREQUENCY
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 7:40 AM
After
IT IS ABOUT TIME ..
I was beginning to understand some of them .
--- On Wed, 4/1/09, "John Becker, WØJAB" wrote:
From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
Subject: [digitalradio] PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 10:41 PM
NOTI
ly .
Let reason prevail
Bruce
--- On Thu, 3/26/09, David Little wrote:
From: David Little
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] No FCC data bandwidth limit on HF Re: USA ham rules
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 7:22 AM
I know some thought went into
Things go round and around
Back 70 years ago the FCC band SPARK GAP because it was wide
and interfered with other stations. CLEAN NARROW signals became the standard.
With bands like 220 MHz sitting there dead one would think wide band on 20
meters
would be the last thing we see. .
Anything below 50.200 is not wise When open 6 will be packed with SSB up to at
least 50.250 mhz Now here ( TAMPA ) where I'm from we use PSK-31 and stations
are around 50.290 usb it has not caused any problems with SSB users. Also avoid
50.400 thats the AM hangout and you should be good to go
we don't go back to that
Enough said
Back to DX ...
Bruce
Your response above does not clarify your original post; if anything, it
increases the ambiguity
NO IT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION .
Same old stuff its digital or the highway .
Have a nice day
Bruce
Bernstein
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:25 PM
>>>AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wrote:
> I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of &quo
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of "everyone should
operate the way I do". While you are free to espouse this philosophy, we are
free to ignore it.
Hummm
Then you oppose using LEGACY mode users when talking about CW and SSB ham's ?
ppreciated!
tnx
Bruce
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave 'Doc' Corio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wonder if anyone has encountered this type of noise. It's a raspy,
> pulsating sound. It lasts 10 seconds, is silent for 5, then starts
again
> The puls
other ham in the neighborhood and he's ~100 fett closer and hears it
as well.
Hope this helps. Let me know what it ends up being.
tnx es 73
Bruce - W3NJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave 'Doc' Corio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wonder if anyone has encoun
> Bruce,
>
> Looking at the frequency list at the bottom of the wsprnet.org page, do
> users on 160, 80 and 40 really use USB?
>
Yes, all WSPR activity (and most other DSP modes I know of) has been on
USB. The vast majority of WSPR activity is on 30m, the default band for
most e
with others).
I would be happy to join you on 10m this upcoming week!
--bruce w1bw
"We all must keep in mind that the digital modes are in a constant
state of evolution"
Are you saying there is no standard ? If so how can you set calling
frequencies ?
NOTE .
SSB, AM, CW and FM can be coped by 50 year old as well as 50 hour old radios.
routing?
>
> 4. If so, what is the purpose of the SMTP vs the WL2K if both go through
> the same eventual pipeline?
>
> 5. Have any new methods been found to properly use the Multipsk program
> to send multiline messages?
>
> 6. Are there any other group members trying this out?
>
> Thanks,
>
> 73,
>
> Rick, KV9U
>
>
please remove Bruce from your mailing list as he has passed away
I thought that was WHAT the hell LOL
--- On Mon, 6/2/08, S.J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: S.J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [digitalradio] Re:Update: Digital Modes in 2008
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008, 11:54 AM
Hell is an Analog Mode . . .
73, KB9
how about 11 ? LOL
It's only 35 miles north of me but my wife would KILL
me if I came home with THAT .
--- Robert Chudek - K0RC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if it covers the 30-meter band?
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Becker, W
abase site, possible
changes to spot upload procedures, etc., and it would be nice to reach
the WSPR community without having to cross-post to many lists with
different charters.
Thank you,
--bruce W1BW
encies. I don't
believe there is a common area which both US and Europe can use for
automated digital...same goes for 160m.
On 17m, we've been using 18.103 dial. Best to announce intentions on
the MEPT tab of http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/index.html and round
up some others
experience any problems.
--bruce W1BW
introduced. Sorry in advance for any inconvenience!
--bruce W1BW
0s by showing it is a better way even the hard
core AM users YES AM IS ALIVE ! had to admit that it
was better BUT still while AM has declined from 90% of
all HF users the modes lived side by side quite well.
Work on it .
Elaine
You really know how to make Friends with comments like
" STONE AGE ".
Seems to me that the ones dragging there knuckles on
the ground are those who fail to accept the fact that
there are other things but using the ham bands for
E-MAIL
When you start to act like others exist and they
usage
repeaters what little ATV died 20 years ago.
70 cm again large band no users not even P-25 or
D-Star.
If you want space you need to look there those band
need more users not 28 or 50 MHz when open they have
enough. You will find little opposition.
Bruce
--- "John B. Stephensen"
The spectrum between 50 and 450 MHz is useful because
path losses are low FOR SSB AND CW ..
THAT'S RIGHT FOR SSB, CW how many 200 kHz wide
stations can you fit on 220 or 440 ? how much more
path loss ? The 300 khz is a joke every time that has
been tried it has failed so nwhat you say for yo
on digital users have right too and no where do
I see any protections for existing users only placing
non compatible mods on already well used bands while
UNUSED bands sit empty.
Bruce
Like D-Star ( DEATH-STAR ) demanding repeater pairs
here in Florida with ZERO usage of the 3 here in
tampabay ho
Yep you shure had that right !
--- "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It is amazing that the "developists" in highly
> developed places forgets
> that the world is far from being equally developed
> and connected, with
> high speed digital repeater networks, easily
> accessible In
"But, it won't happen; the FCC Will take spectrum
back, long before we ever evolve to the point of
becoming better operators and having constructive
discussion for the common good."
Ham radio an't broke if the digicrats would wake up
and smell the interferance coffie and work to be just
another mo
Scott
There is some here and APRS too but not a lot
--- "Scott L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahhh, the old days300 baud HF packet. I remember
> when it was all
> the rage in the early 1990s. Now, VHF packet (1200
> baud) was much more
> interesting and I even had a packet BBS. That
"I just move to another frequency and move on. There
are plenty channels to use out there!!. "
The problem will be you will run out of places to go.
I AGREE ! we do need to solve these problems however
as long as 1% of all hams feel they Are entitled to
50% of the bands or more its not going to h
"I see no reason why each band allocated to the ARS
could not be split 50/50 between Digital and Voice"
And you can show 300,000 digital users in ham radio?
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> From your reply I can see that my statement really
> it home, sorry if
> the the hurts!
>
> /s/ Steve, N2CKH
>
> At 07:07 PM 12/26/2007, you wrote:
> >You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is,
&g
You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is, the
entire thrust of RM-11392 in my opinion is an effort
at protectionism ( its an old story that dates back
ages ) of obsolete technology and practices by
an attempt to limit the advancement of new
technologies and practices, this is just the oppos
Mike
NONE of us wants to stop any mode just see it does not
distroy things for others.
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
cholink
only not allowing uncontrolled stations or ones so
wide that they obliterate whole bands.
Many of us realy dont care what others run if they are
not causing problems for the rest of us.
Bruce
on 6 since 66
__
using these modes feel they have the right to
interfere with analog users AND HAVE SAID SO. in
the name of progress analog needs to go.
The bands are not broke and don't need digital fixing
. Now if you can come up with a plan that does not
cause a problem I'm willing to lis
Bonnie ..
You forgot one .
They they wanted to put digital wide band below 219
Mhz ...
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First FCC Came for the PACTOR3,
> and I did not speak out
> because I was not a PACTOR operator.
>
> Then FCC came for RTTY,
> and I did not speak
Hum . I dont see any move to kill digital.
Digital stiil can do what they want above 219 mhz and
thats where it BELONGS ...
When 219 and up is full worry about HF .
--- W2XJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the CW portion of our bands nothing that is more
than 500 hertz bandwidth sh
opped even further. Still have a bit to go to
get to <6Kbps though :-)
www.lifesize.com
Bruce - W3NJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "cesco12342000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> oops .. those numbers are wrong. I did mix up kbyte and kbit.
>
> The video may be limited to less than 1 frame / sec.
>
And WHY would you go digital on a car radio? How many
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of radios would have to be
replaced? The shift to the new TV format in Feb. 2009
is only going to work because so many are on CABLE
--- Barry Garratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IBOC is a method whereby both analog
e
> times last weekend.
> > I woldl hazard a guess that they will also allow
> other digital modes
> > like Olivia, DominoEX, MFSK16.
> >
> > Info courtesy of Bruce Horn's website...
> >
> > (c) 1998-2005 Bruce Horn, WA7BNM, All Rights
> Reserved
> >
Hi Bonnie,
I've gone through the link below and unfortunately, haven't seen any
details on how to send SMS messages. Is there a step-by-step link I'm
missing?
tnx es 73
Bruce- W3NJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
w that he has cleared the frequency off He does
the same on 2 SSB.
Bruce
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Please detail all the HF frequencies and modes
your people will be manually monitoring 24/7.
(This will make big news in the ham community)"
27.185 AM here in Tampabay ...
This is the only active non SSB frequency here ..
_
THAT WAS GOOD ! LOL
--- r_lwesterfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is excellent . . . just what this group needs .
> . . and I deeply and
> truly mean that . . .sheesh . . .
>
>
>
> Rick - KH2DF
>
>
>
> _
>
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the ARRL is that many of us DO NOT
TRUST the them this goes back to the 60's when they
came up with incentive licensing many older hams never
rejoined the league SO here we are 40 years later and
WE are the older hams and many aga
Great list Andy
Here's a few that didn't make their list (unless there are different
names for them):
AMTOR
Clover
MT63
MFSK16
All the PSK variants (63, 125etc) - Guess it's best to say PSKnnn :-)
PactorIII
BTW, when was the last time anyone had a QSL on DTMF??? :-)
--- In digitalradio@ya
wide ANYTHING .. on any band.
Bruce
--- Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Necessity of Regulating the Ham Bands by
> Bandwidth by Rich Moseson, W2VU at Dayton Hamvention
>
>
>
http://www.therainreport.com/rainreport_archi
ll see it really start to
grow Right now we have almost ZIP in tampabay
. for now .
--- Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I agree that Bonnie has made some very unfortunate
> and some would say,
> extreme comments in the past and some of us look
&
gital SHE is the reason the
wideband digital bunch is being watched ..
THEY DON'T CARE WHO THEY HURT IT;S THEIR BANDS TO
DISTROY THEY WANT ALL BANDS Just ask them
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the problem, Bruce?
> Under current F
If the ARRL wants to start another fire storm push
that 100 khz wide on 6 and 2 meters stuff again
There is lots of unused space starting at 219mhz I
have been on 220 since 1974 and it sits empty EVEN on
FM there are only 7 stations in tampabay.
DIGITAL would be a asset to us if they can fil
INTERESTING Mark good link..It did explane about
digital's place clearly and well.
SADLY it dosn't cover the ( here we go again ) report
on regulation by bandwidth. Hard to beleve that is
still around ...
--- Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A Beginner's Look at Ham Radio's Di
BETTER CHECK THIS
--- Tony Heatwole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TARA's "Grid Dip PSK-RTTY" contest is Saturday,
> August 5, 2006,
>
> from 00:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC. See:
>
>
>
> http://www.n2ty.org/seasons/tara_grid_rules.html
>
>
>
> for the full contest information. I hope that you
WHAT A QRP CONTEST THAT BANDS CW ?? AM I READING
THIS RIGHT ??
--- "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Any authorized "band" may be used.
> > CW , SSB- Voice, FM-Voice, AM-Voice, modes are
> NOT permitted
> > modes.(WinDRM IS permitted).
>
> This is interesting.
e call, since I heard ALE signals and my
"aux function" window automatically opened upis that normal
2)assuming #1, where does the stations callsign show up? It was weak
so it may not have decoded.
3) On the exchange, I assume it's my call (not the other stations on
the AMD mes
he only "OUT OF BANDERS " we hear here is on 28.085
AM.
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering the number of true "Outbanders" on 10
> metres,
> this hardly seems like more than a minor infraction
> :)
>
> Bonnie KQ6XA
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown
LSB ILLEGAL ON 10 meters ? Or they just out of band ?
--- Robert Chudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry... I should have spelled out Pennsylvania
> [PA]. In the US 28.300 is the low limit for 10m
> phone, so when using LSB, they're out of the band.
> Not that it will draw much attention on 10m
nice try on both our parts but they are still butting
heads . ill e-mail you later
Bruce
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search
Ok it's useless ot me but thanks for the link...
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
--- Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's nothing wrong with the current ALE...I'm
just dreaming and thinking what could happen in the
future.
OK what is ALE ? somewhere i got lost ???
G
Whats wrong with it?
Spam problems ?
--- "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Careful with the free version...
>
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/05/microsoft_mvp_threats/
> Leigh/WA5ZNU
Bore
meters too.
It seems dead and lets hope it stays that way.
Bruce
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir
.
With 54-216 mhz being up for sale there will bew lots
of space for use in the south west far more that 4
megs we have now.
Bruce
--- Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bruce mallon wrote:
> >
> >
> > Bonnie
> >
> > NO ONE IS AFTER 6 METERS
>
in the center with lots of radars you would
think we would have a problem . No rumors here
. none ..
I listen on 12 meters and in the last year I have
heard NO ONE ZERO maby we need to work on saving it
too .. Same on 10 less on 10 than 6.
Bruce
On 6 since 1966
Your comment
Bonnie
NO ONE IS AFTER 6 METERS
100 khz wide is now legal abovee 219 so you have lots
of room. You have never been on 6 or you have a junk
station since this is the bottom of the cycle and 10
is not open either so lets take it too lets not
forget 15, 12 and CB on one on them either
EVEN if y
with incentive licensing many older hams never
rejoined the league SO here we are 40 years later and
WE are the older hams and many again can't TRUST the
league..
Now let me talk to others without comments.
Bruce
___
Roger all he cares about is making 6 meters into a
DIGIVIDEO band for his elete 1%
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=39
59.3 to 54.000 is 90% and if it was used by 17
stations is't usless to all others ...
IM DONE
--- John Champa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You better work on your math, Bruce!
>
> A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
>
> Original
NO you better get real 1% of all hams do not need 90%
of a band ANY BAND .
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.co
HU well looks like all stations must have a common
RECEIVE mode of how can they ?
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > kd4e wrote:
> > It is now a closed issue at the FCC - *every*
> station
> > *must* prevent QRM of other stations. Period. No
> exceptions.
>
> I gues
--- Skip Teller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
> design is 144.2 MHz, as it is specifically intended
> for SSB operation.
INTERESTING I could not remember the name it's
been too long but the antenna worked as good as
stac
27;ll be looking to see how you are using
the very good skeketon-slot antenna !
Bruce
--- Skip KH6TY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First, let me say thanks to all who were
> interested enough in the protocol issue to offer
> suggestions
>
> >Usable on SSB ... ?
th stacked ku4ab squailos.
Bruce
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
would only get going.
Bruce
Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware
protection.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php
m I wonder if PODUNK Fl has its own grid square ?
Bruce
SEMINOLE Fl.
Grid square EL-87
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://
Ill give it a shot ..
--- Dave Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> One thing to do, if you are using a varient of MS
> Windows is to set the
> default soundcard back to the soundblaster. For XP
> go into the 'Classic'
> Control Panel and select &q
in some 6 and 2 meter
week signal work using NARROW bandwidth digital modes.
If someone is looking for a $99 route to getting on
digital this is the way to go conflict problems
included.
One neat little box .
And a excuse to build a computer for digital modes
only ...... L
OK so what we have here is a failure to communicate ?
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please click here to read the HFLINK recommendation
> comments:
> http://www.hflink.com/arrl/
>
> Background
> On 22 Feb 2007, the ARRL announced that it seeks
> comments from
> amateurs conc
Then DO IT and let the FCC rule .
Just remember for your long distance digipeaters to
work the band must be open .
unless your going to use ECHOLINK and if so whats the
point ?
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like many kinds of interesting digital
> communications, it s
Now I'm not a big 12 meter guy but from what i
remember it gets packed when open. On 10 meters 29.000
- 29.200 has classic AM, 29.2 - 29.5 used to have
some satellite users ...
IF you could show under OPEN band conditions it might
work you might have something HOWEVER E-Skip can come
and go witho
AND if this is true why are they not legal now?
--- expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would you like to show us those frequency's?
> > And would you like to show them when the MUF gets
> that
> &
>
> Currently, there are vast areas of HF spectrum that
> currently have absolutely zero ham radio signals. We
don't need to use very narrow bandwidth signals when
these conditions exist.
>
> It is "good amateur radio practice" to develop
> digital voice modes, at any bandwidth, and to
explore
50.250
--- Dave Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone using JT65a on 6 meters (or higher) for
> terrestrial (non-EME) Work? If so, what is the best
> frequency to try?
>
> --
> Dave
> AF6AS
>
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
