Just what we need is spark-gap radios on 6 and 2 meters. We just got through
fighting this a few years back.
Since 223 is little used and it's legal whats the problem with going up there ?
Chuck is right why is it that SS users feel they need to go on widely used
bands ? Even if legal the
There are lots of people on PSK31 here on 6 meters and some on 2 meters
too ... it works for them .
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, GregCT n1...@comcast.net wrote:
From: GregCT n1...@comcast.net
Subject: [digitalradio] VHF Contesting
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 10,
I AGREE !
However not all contesters are a PAIN IN THE *## just the few that push others
out of the way and interfer with daly QSO and nets ..
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, Dan Hensley kc9...@att.net wrote:
From: Dan Hensley kc9...@att.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] VHF Contesting
To:
I forwarded this to the Leo's here at the jail I myself are a civilian not a
cert LEO.
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Feld Hell LEO Sprint this Saturday 2000z - 2200z
To:
I beleve about 50.300 I know there is some psk-31 around there
--- On Sat, 5/8/10, Russell Blair russell_blai...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Russell Blair russell_blai...@yahoo.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Digital Band for 6M
To: Digital Radio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010,
John
i have been there too Remember wide band digital on 6 and 2 meters ?
The problem with that group Of digihams is they don't care what what what they
want will do to all the other users after all we are legacy users a bunch
of old phooeys who are holding back the new ham
What's the problem you have 222MHZ and up
From: expeditionradio expeditionra...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 3:40:42 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anecdotes about FCC inadvertent hostility toward
ham radio digital
But the situation where existing users of the bands suddenly have their
activities disrupted when people start going mad with some flavour of the month
new mode is unacceptable, and the controls the FCC exercise over amateurs in
the USA do at least go some way to prevent this.
This is why
: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 9:45 AM
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, bruce mallon wa4...@yahoo. com wrote:
SO what you are saying is lets ctush the other modes so we can play with our
new toy ?
We just went through this with wideband/spredsprec trum on 6 and 2 meters
.
I dont
wrote:
From: jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.net
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Digital modes band plans.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 2:44 PM
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wa4...@... wrote:
I remember several spredsprectum
We have a group on SSB here
--- On Sat, 1/2/10, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] VHF Digital?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, January 2, 2010, 5:53 PM
May be workable in a large city
I ONLY SEND REAL CARDS TRY ME TOO ..
--- On Wed, 12/16/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 12:08 PM
At
signallink USB
--- On Wed, 6/17/09, lsumners lsumn...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: lsumners lsumn...@yahoo.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Sound Cards
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 9:58 AM
I am looking at upgrading my Dell on board sound card. Any
I thought it was the original Digital mode
--- On Mon, 6/1/09, S.J. felineveterinar...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: S.J. felineveterinar...@yahoo.com
Subject: [digitalradio] . . . the other digital mode
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 1, 2009, 11:15 AM
CW
AVOID FT-100 or 100D
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, kh6ty kh...@comcast.net wrote:
From: kh6ty kh...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] How do I get started with digital radio?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 7:36 AM
For about $500 you can get a secondhand
Corperation it's a wonderfull thing Nice to see people working to prevent
problems ... !
--- On Wed, 4/8/09, David Kruh wb2...@comcast.net wrote:
From: David Kruh wb2...@comcast.net
Subject: [digitalradio] NEW 20 METER HELL CALLING FREQUENCY
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date:
IT IS ABOUT TIME ..
I was beginning to understand some of them .
--- On Wed, 4/1/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: [digitalradio] PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday,
Things go round and around
Back 70 years ago the FCC band SPARK GAP because it was wide
and interfered with other stations. CLEAN NARROW signals became the standard.
With bands like 220 MHz sitting there dead one would think wide band on 20
meters
would be the last thing we see. .
reason prevail
Bruce
--- On Thu, 3/26/09, David Little dalit...@bellsouth.net wrote:
From: David Little dalit...@bellsouth.net
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] No FCC data bandwidth limit on HF Re: USA ham rules
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 7:22 AM
I
Anything below 50.200 is not wise When open 6 will be packed with SSB up to at
least 50.250 mhz Now here ( TAMPA ) where I'm from we use PSK-31 and stations
are around 50.290 usb it has not caused any problems with SSB users. Also avoid
50.400 thats the AM hangout and you should be good to go
:
From: Dave Bernstein aa...@ambersoft.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:25 PM
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wa4...@... wrote:
I strongly disagree. Your post is just
Your response above does not clarify your original post; if anything, it
increases the ambiguity
NO IT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION .
Same old stuff its digital or the highway .
Have a nice day
Bruce
to that
Enough said
Back to DX ...
Bruce
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of everyone should
operate the way I do. While you are free to espouse this philosophy, we are
free to ignore it.
Hummm
Then you oppose using LEGACY mode users when talking about CW and SSB ham's ?
know what it ends up being.
tnx es 73
Bruce - W3NJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave 'Doc' Corio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonder if anyone has encountered this type of noise. It's a raspy,
pulsating sound. It lasts 10 seconds, is silent for 5, then starts
again
The pulses
Bruce
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave 'Doc' Corio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonder if anyone has encountered this type of noise. It's a raspy,
pulsating sound. It lasts 10 seconds, is silent for 5, then starts
again
The pulses are about 5 per second.
It's showing up on a lot
with others).
I would be happy to join you on 10m this upcoming week!
--bruce w1bw
Bruce,
Looking at the frequency list at the bottom of the wsprnet.org page, do
users on 160, 80 and 40 really use USB?
Yes, all WSPR activity (and most other DSP modes I know of) has been on
USB. The vast majority of WSPR activity is on 30m, the default band for
most everyone; groups wll
We all must keep in mind that the digital modes are in a constant
state of evolution
Are you saying there is no standard ? If so how can you set calling
frequencies ?
NOTE .
SSB, AM, CW and FM can be coped by 50 year old as well as 50 hour old radios.
I thought that was WHAT the hell LOL
--- On Mon, 6/2/08, S.J. lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: S.J. lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: [digitalradio] Re:Update: Digital Modes in 2008
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008, 11:54 AM
Hell is an Analog Mode . . .
how about 11 ? LOL
It's only 35 miles north of me but my wife would KILL
me if I came home with THAT .
--- Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if it covers the 30-meter band?
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
, possible
changes to spot upload procedures, etc., and it would be nice to reach
the WSPR community without having to cross-post to many lists with
different charters.
Thank you,
--bruce W1BW
don't
believe there is a common area which both US and Europe can use for
automated digital...same goes for 160m.
On 17m, we've been using 18.103 dial. Best to announce intentions on
the MEPT tab of http://www.electroblog.com/drsked/index.html and round
up some others to join in.
--bruce
inconvenience!
--bruce W1BW
experience any problems.
--bruce W1BW
by showing it is a better way even the hard
core AM users YES AM IS ALIVE ! had to admit that it
was better BUT still while AM has declined from 90% of
all HF users the modes lived side by side quite well.
Work on it .
Bruce
Elaine
You really know how to make Friends with comments like
STONE AGE .
Seems to me that the ones dragging there knuckles on
the ground are those who fail to accept the fact that
there are other things but using the ham bands for
E-MAIL
When you start to act like others exist and they
what little ATV died 20 years ago.
70 cm again large band no users not even P-25 or
D-Star.
If you want space you need to look there those band
need more users not 28 or 50 MHz when open they have
enough. You will find little opposition.
Bruce
--- John B. Stephensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
and no where do
I see any protections for existing users only placing
non compatible mods on already well used bands while
UNUSED bands sit empty.
Bruce
Like D-Star ( DEATH-STAR ) demanding repeater pairs
here in Florida with ZERO usage of the 3 here in
tampabay how crowed is 223 and 440 MHz are you out
The spectrum between 50 and 450 MHz is useful because
path losses are low FOR SSB AND CW ..
THAT'S RIGHT FOR SSB, CW how many 200 kHz wide
stations can you fit on 220 or 440 ? how much more
path loss ? The 300 khz is a joke every time that has
been tried it has failed so nwhat you say for
Yep you shure had that right !
--- Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is amazing that the developists in highly
developed places forgets
that the world is far from being equally developed
and connected, with
high speed digital repeater networks, easily
accessible Internet, etc,
I just move to another frequency and move on. There
are plenty channels to use out there!!.
The problem will be you will run out of places to go.
I AGREE ! we do need to solve these problems however
as long as 1% of all hams feel they Are entitled to
50% of the bands or more its not going to
Scott
There is some here and APRS too but not a lot
--- Scott L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh, the old days300 baud HF packet. I remember
when it was all
the rage in the early 1990s. Now, VHF packet (1200
baud) was much more
interesting and I even had a packet BBS. That was in
But, it won't happen; the FCC Will take spectrum
back, long before we ever evolve to the point of
becoming better operators and having constructive
discussion for the common good.
Ham radio an't broke if the digicrats would wake up
and smell the interferance coffie and work to be just
another
Hum . I dont see any move to kill digital.
Digital stiil can do what they want above 219 mhz and
thats where it BELONGS ...
When 219 and up is full worry about HF .
--- W2XJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the CW portion of our bands nothing that is more
than 500 hertz bandwidth
Bonnie ..
You forgot one .
They they wanted to put digital wide band below 219
Mhz ...
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First FCC Came for the PACTOR3,
and I did not speak out
because I was not a PACTOR operator.
Then FCC came for RTTY,
and I did not speak out
You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is, the
entire thrust of RM-11392 in my opinion is an effort
at protectionism ( its an old story that dates back
ages ) of obsolete technology and practices by
an attempt to limit the advancement of new
technologies and practices, this is just the
:
Hi Bruce,
From your reply I can see that my statement really
it home, sorry if
the the hurts!
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 07:07 PM 12/26/2007, you wrote:
You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is,
the
entire thrust of RM-11392 in my opinion is an
effort
at protectionism ( its
even further. Still have a bit to go to
get to 6Kbps though :-)
www.lifesize.com
Bruce - W3NJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, cesco12342000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops .. those numbers are wrong. I did mix up kbyte and kbit.
The video may be limited to less than 1 frame / sec.
And WHY would you go digital on a car radio? How many
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of radios would have to be
replaced? The shift to the new TV format in Feb. 2009
is only going to work because so many are on CABLE
--- Barry Garratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBOC is a method whereby both analog
that they will also allow
other digital modes
like Olivia, DominoEX, MFSK16.
Info courtesy of Bruce Horn's website...
(c) 1998-2005 Bruce Horn, WA7BNM, All Rights
Reserved
DARC 10-Meter Digital Contest: 1100Z-1700Z, Nov 4
Mode: RTTY, Amtor, Clover, PSK31, Pactor
Bands: 10m Only
Classes
Hi Bonnie,
I've gone through the link below and unfortunately, haven't seen any
details on how to send SMS messages. Is there a step-by-step link I'm
missing?
tnx es 73
Bruce- W3NJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cell Phone texting, also known
on 2 SSB.
Bruce
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
THAT WAS GOOD ! LOL
--- r_lwesterfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is excellent . . . just what this group needs .
. . and I deeply and
truly mean that . . .sheesh . . .
Rick - KH2DF
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please detail all the HF frequencies and modes
your people will be manually monitoring 24/7.
(This will make big news in the ham community)
27.185 AM here in Tampabay ...
This is the only active non SSB frequency here ..
NOT
TRUST the them this goes back to the 60's when they
came up with incentive licensing many older hams never
rejoined the league SO here we are 40 years later and
WE are the older hams and many again can't TRUST the
league..
Bruce
Great list Andy
Here's a few that didn't make their list (unless there are different
names for them):
AMTOR
Clover
MT63
MFSK16
All the PSK variants (63, 125etc) - Guess it's best to say PSKnnn :-)
PactorIII
BTW, when was the last time anyone had a QSL on DTMF??? :-)
--- In
SHE is the reason the
wideband digital bunch is being watched ..
THEY DON'T CARE WHO THEY HURT IT;S THEIR BANDS TO
DISTROY THEY WANT ALL BANDS Just ask them
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the problem, Bruce?
Under current FCC rules, we can run 100kHz
to
grow Right now we have almost ZIP in tampabay
. for now .
--- Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
I agree that Bonnie has made some very unfortunate
and some would say,
extreme comments in the past and some of us look
upon her claims of what
is legal with some suspicion
INTERESTING Mark good link..It did explane about
digital's place clearly and well.
SADLY it dosn't cover the ( here we go again ) report
on regulation by bandwidth. Hard to beleve that is
still around ...
--- Mark Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Beginner's Look at Ham Radio's
BETTER CHECK THIS
--- Tony Heatwole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TARA's Grid Dip PSK-RTTY contest is Saturday,
August 5, 2006,
from 00:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC. See:
http://www.n2ty.org/seasons/tara_grid_rules.html
for the full contest information. I hope that you
can join us!
heard ALE signals and my
aux function window automatically opened upis that normal
2)assuming #1, where does the stations callsign show up? It was weak
so it may not have decoded.
3) On the exchange, I assume it's my call (not the other stations on
the AMD message:
MULTIPSK W3NJ BRUCE 599
LSB ILLEGAL ON 10 meters ? Or they just out of band ?
--- Robert Chudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry... I should have spelled out Pennsylvania
[PA]. In the US 28.300 is the low limit for 10m
phone, so when using LSB, they're out of the band.
Not that it will draw much attention on 10m
he only OUT OF BANDERS we hear here is on 28.085
AM.
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering the number of true Outbanders on 10
metres,
this hardly seems like more than a minor infraction
:)
Bonnie KQ6XA
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown
[EMAIL
Whats wrong with it?
Spam problems ?
--- Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful with the free version...
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/05/microsoft_mvp_threats/
Leigh/WA5ZNU
Bored
meters too.
It seems dead and lets hope it stays that way.
Bruce
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir
in the center with lots of radars you would
think we would have a problem . No rumors here
. none ..
I listen on 12 meters and in the last year I have
heard NO ONE ZERO maby we need to work on saving it
too .. Same on 10 less on 10 than 6.
Bruce
On 6 since 1966
Your comment
.
With 54-216 mhz being up for sale there will bew lots
of space for use in the south west far more that 4
megs we have now.
Bruce
--- Walt DuBose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bruce mallon wrote:
Bonnie
NO ONE IS AFTER 6 METERS
Seriously...you think not? Open it to
commercial
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
design is 144.2 MHz, as it is specifically intended
for SSB operation.
INTERESTING I could not remember the name it's
been too long but the antenna worked as good as
stacked 7 elm cushcrafts back
NO you better get real 1% of all hams do not need 90%
of a band ANY BAND .
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
59.3 to 54.000 is 90% and if it was used by 17
stations is't usless to all others ...
IM DONE
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You better work on your math, Bruce!
A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
Original Message Follows
From: bruce
never
rejoined the league SO here we are 40 years later and
WE are the older hams and many again can't TRUST the
league..
Now let me talk to others without comments.
Bruce
Moody friends. Drama queens
Bonnie
NO ONE IS AFTER 6 METERS
100 khz wide is now legal abovee 219 so you have lots
of room. You have never been on 6 or you have a junk
station since this is the bottom of the cycle and 10
is not open either so lets take it too lets not
forget 15, 12 and CB on one on them either
EVEN if
are using
the very good skeketon-slot antenna !
Bruce
--- Skip KH6TY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, let me say thanks to all who were
interested enough in the protocol issue to offer
suggestions
Usable on SSB ... ?? I have worked New York
state from tampabay on USB with stacked ku4ab
grid square ?
Bruce
SEMINOLE Fl.
Grid square EL-87
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid
.
Bruce
Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware
protection.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php
.
Bruce
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
and 2 meter
week signal work using NARROW bandwidth digital modes.
If someone is looking for a $99 route to getting on
digital this is the way to go conflict problems
included.
One neat little box .
And a excuse to build a computer for digital modes
only .. LOL.
Bruce
Ill give it a shot ..
--- Dave Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
One thing to do, if you are using a varient of MS
Windows is to set the
default soundcard back to the soundblaster. For XP
go into the 'Classic'
Control Panel and select Sound and Audio Devices,
then go to the 'Audio
OK so what we have here is a failure to communicate ?
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please click here to read the HFLINK recommendation
comments:
http://www.hflink.com/arrl/
Background
On 22 Feb 2007, the ARRL announced that it seeks
comments from
amateurs concerning
Then DO IT and let the FCC rule .
Just remember for your long distance digipeaters to
work the band must be open .
unless your going to use ECHOLINK and if so whats the
point ?
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like many kinds of interesting digital
communications, it
Currently, there are vast areas of HF spectrum that
currently have absolutely zero ham radio signals. We
don't need to use very narrow bandwidth signals when
these conditions exist.
It is good amateur radio practice to develop
digital voice modes, at any bandwidth, and to
explore the
AND if this is true why are they not legal now?
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you like to show us those frequency's?
And would you like to show them when the MUF gets
that
high.
Hi Bruce,
Digital Voice repeaters, using
Now I'm not a big 12 meter guy but from what i
remember it gets packed when open. On 10 meters 29.000
- 29.200 has classic AM, 29.2 - 29.5 used to have
some satellite users ...
IF you could show under OPEN band conditions it might
work you might have something HOWEVER E-Skip can come
and go
50.250
--- Dave Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using JT65a on 6 meters (or higher) for
terrestrial (non-EME) Work? If so, what is the best
frequency to try?
--
Dave
AF6AS
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
Thanks Andy, guess I missed that in the docs
Is there a way to change the HF templates (for example, with tough
condx, I'd like to change one of the messages to the shorthand
equivalent, to make sure it gets through). I didn't see where these
are captured in the .ini file.
tnx es 73
Bruce -W3NJ
, and not type everything in for each QSO!! :-)
tnx es 73
Bruce - W3NJ
card digimoder.
Bruce
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
That is excellent! Sounds as if you are really
HOLDING DOWN THE
FORT for the 6M and 2M bands (and 1.25M and 10M FM
too!) in your area.
That's really good to see.
I do the same thing for 70cm...in a much smaller
alone
is 1,400,000 not a back woods town there is
ZERO in lowband vhf and no intrest in it and little
intrest in HIGH band either. UHF is lightly populated
with small companys.
Bruce
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
Yes! From a strictly commercial perspective our 440
then how do you expect to know if you are interfering
with someone if they cant id you ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
which allows me to run it on 6 psk-31 when its on or
14.070.
Give a listen one day you might hear me ... on
just about any mode..
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
We call it LISTEN FIRST before transmitting...
You really need to get on the air more, OM! (HI
I'm trying to keep the bands populated It gets
lonely on 432 SSB ..LOL
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
That's impressive! Good for you...
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
I think this is a good idea Bonnie.
Get on 20 meters with a few hundered of your wide band
digital users on field day and demand they not
interfere with your group ...
It will make for a interesting test case.
your comment
I will be happy to provide a examples of how the
rules allow
Go for it but make shore all of you ID in CW so your
calles can be noted by the stations who will complain
...
--- bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is a good idea Bonnie.
Get on 20 meters with a few hundered of your wide
band
digital users on field day and demand
are not up to something And the ARRL came
over as tring to do just that with 90% of 2 major
bands being opened for 1% of all hams.
Now back to radio ..
Bruce
On 6 since 66
--- John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger:
I'm far from being anti US... but I have
absolutely
--- Bill Vodall WA7NWP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one wants to crush the older modes -- but they
can't block moving to new modes and that's what's
happening now.
Explane ? What modes are blocking who ? on 145.900 ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired
EXACTLY MY PROBLEM WITH THE ARRL ..
( and the 6 meter give away )
NO PROTECTION FOR EXISTING STATIONS OR MODES .
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but there was nothing I could find in RM-11306 that
made it impossible to use a new technology ,1500 watt
signal, modulated at
John Im seting up for scatter ... so many of us do run
digital .
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
1) Who are you talking to ? No one by the name BRFUCE
here must be a lost digital bit at 100 khz wide
2.4 ghz digi .
2) THEY are the ARRL
3)THEY are supose to do the will of the members
4)THEY don't seem intrested in doing THAT.
5) THEY should be asking for the members not the
I dont have a problem with MICROWAVE . NOR realy
on 75 meters however how do you control who gets on
and uses the band . how many unlicensed persons on
75 / 80 meters would it take for the FCC to shut all
digital encription down
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
