in advance,
Warren - K5WGM
--- On *Fri, 2/26/10, KH6TY /kh...@comcast.net/* wrote:
From: KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 8:11 AM
Jose, my attempted
.
*De:* KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* vie,26 febrero, 2010 14:36
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
jose alberto nieto ros wrote:
I propose to moderator you will be banned if you continue
saying stupid things in this group
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: vie,26 febrero, 2010 15:27
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Hi Warren,
I have already captured a spectrum of Olivia 32-100 (i.e., FSK32) and posted it
in a reply, but glad do it again.. You can see the fixed frequencies at idle
This is rude. Where is the moderator when you need him?
From: jose alberto nieto ros nietoro...@yahoo.es
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 8:59:00 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
KH, are you a Ham
febrero, 2010 15:27
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Hi Warren,
I have already captured a spectrum of Olivia 32-100 (i.e., FSK32) and
posted it in a reply, but glad do it again.. You can see the fixed
frequencies at idle and then the new frequencies added when data
/* wrote:
From: KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 8:11 AM
Jose, my attempted help is to let you understand that the FCC
believed you when you said ROS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 9:48:45 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Jose,
I am a ham radio member in good standing and have been for over 55 years. I
believe I also have some degree of respect and appreciation in the ham
community
jose alberto nieto ros wrote:
KH, are you a Ham Radio or a FCC member?
If you are Ham Radio you should waste your time in help new modes would be
used. Only a fool throws stones at your own roof. So, if you are not a FCC
member, then we know what you are.
Jose,
I should give up on this
Sounds like a bunch of crap to me . . .
From: Toby Burnett ruff...@hebrides.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 9:44:05 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Lol really sorry, must have clicked
know what you are.
*De:* KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* vie,26 febrero, 2010 15:27
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Hi Warren,
I have already captured
if several hams using ROS
that are one top of each other, does it work better than say, Olivia?
Warren - K5WGM
--- On Fri, 2/26/10, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote:
From: KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date
better than say, Olivia?
Warren - K5WGM
--- On *Fri, 2/26/10, KH6TY /kh...@comcast.net/* wrote:
From: KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 8:27 AM
Hi
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:29:23 -0500, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net said:
[snip]
It looks to me that the tone frequencies are clearly being generated
independently from the data and then the data applied to the randomly
generated frequency. There is NO pattern to ROS like there is to FSK
modes,
that know how it work.
Thanks
De: KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: vie,26 febrero, 2010 20:27
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Hi Warren,
I do not know of any way to change bandwidth in ROS. My
--- On Fri, 2/26/10, jose alberto nieto ros nietoro...@yahoo.es wrote:
From: jose alberto nieto ros nietoro...@yahoo.es
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 1:41 PM
Hi
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Hi Jose,
in the latest version that problem is fixed. Now ROS no decode new station
until a first station has finished.Please, use latest version. Old version has
thats problem
You may be directing you statement to Skip.
I have
Warren,
Please allow me put my two cents. I would not expect so if the spreading
code is the same.
The adventage of CDMA is code orthogonality, each user has a different
chipping code that has little correlation with other user's codes., and
so, there is little mutual QRM.
As far as I
things are of sense common
De: José A. Amador ama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: vie,26 febrero, 2010 20:33
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS carrier pattern when idle
Warren,
Please allow me put my two cents. I would
No, I have not, because Olivia is usually found in different frequencies
than those where packet activity is found on this side of planet Earth,
and in general, packet sysops and Olivia users know their way around and
do not step over others toes. Very seldom I have experienced Olivia to
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:05:36 -, obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com said:
In the few ROS 16 and ROS 1 tests that I have dome so far...
ROS 16 seems similar to Olivia 8/1000 , good performance but perhaps a
not quite as good as Olivia under QRM or deep fades.
ROS 1 , not as good as JT65A in
I have had a few more days to test it and watch how it does in QRM. Same
impressions, a good mode but not offering substantially more than the other
well known modes. In a couple of specific tests, Olivia 500-128 did better
than ROS 1.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Stelios Bounanos
Does not believe that even you, Andy.
I know you are a special interest ROS dont was used, i dont know why.
De: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 00:58
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS impressions so
interest ROS dont was used, i dont know why.
--
*De:* Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* jue,25 febrero, 2010 00:58
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS impressions so far
I have had a few more days to test it and watch
: digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 01:35
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS impressions so far
Incorrect Jose. I have used it, and havw made special efforts to get other to
use t on my web page http://www.obriensw eb.com/sked/ sked.php?
page=digitalswitch=1
Example
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
CC: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: mar,23 febrero, 2010 07:40
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
Hi All.
Just a question, and please, be patient if I'm asking this...
I'm a SWL and I
Aside from the legal aspect, does anyone have an opinion as to whether the
limited hopping (within the 3khz that it hops) helps the robustness of the
waveform? If it makes a tremendous difference, maybe we should all work to get
it accepted.
Howard K5HB
Howard,
After monitoring 14.101 continuously for two days, I find the following:
1. CW signals (of narrow width, of course) during this past weekend
contest often disrupted decoding, and it looks like it was not
desensitization due to AGC capture, as the ROS signals on the waterfall
did not
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, February 22, 2010 9:55:11 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
Aside from the legal aspect, does anyone have an opinion as to whether the
limited hopping (within the 3khz that it hops) helps the robustness of the
waveform? If it makes
:31
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
Howard,
After monitoring 14.101 continuously for two days, I find the following:
1. CW signals (of narrow width, of course) during this past weekend contest
often disrupted decoding, and it looks like it was not desensitization due to
AGC capture
KH6TY wrote:
2. Pactor signals of 500 Hz width, outside the ROS signal, that capture
the AGC, do desensitize the receiver and cause loss of decoding, as
expected. Passband tuning takes care of that problem however.
As with many other digital modes, I've been using it with AGC switched
Dave wrote:
The closest you get to a true definition in Part 97 is in section 97.3
Definitions, Para C, line 8:
/(8) SS/. Spread-spectrum emissions using bandwidth-expansion
modulation emissions having designators with A, C, D, F, G, H, J
or R as the first symbol; X as
.
*De:* KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* lun,22 febrero, 2010 18:31
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
Howard,
After monitoring 14.101 continuously for two days, I find the following:
1. CW
That is good, Dave, except for receivers that distort heavily when the
AGC is disabled. If you just use manual gain control, and reduce the
gain for strong signals, the effect is the same, only manual. You will
lose the weak station because you have reduced the gain and the
sensitivity. The
Please, give a frequency alternative to 14.101
De: KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: lun,22 febrero, 2010 22:39
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
That is good, Dave, except for receivers that distort heavily when
Glenn L. Roeser wrote:
I would have to agree with Andy's observation that the 1 baud mode is as good
as using JT65a
With the advantage of being able to send more text in one transmission. It is
a very slow throughput though.
Very 73, Glenn (WB2LMV)
You have to be the patient sort, maybe a
*De:* KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* lun,22 febrero, 2010 22:39
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
That is good, Dave, except for receivers that distort heavily when the
AGC is disabled. If you just use manual gain control
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: lun,22 febrero, 2010 23:23
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
The hflink published ALE frequencies might be a good alternative for others
around the world, since ALE users should not notice the FHSS ROS activity
(according to the ROS documentation
to narrow
band modes.
The problem is if you join two wide modes at the same frequency.
*De:* KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* lun,22 febrero, 2010 23:23
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS
KH6TY wrote:
Jose,
I will be using 432.090 MHz because that is definitely legal for US
hams. I will be testing the effect of severe Doppler-induced fading and
flutter. We badly need a mode for 432 MHz that has good sensitivity and
can survive fast Doppler shifts, and I hope a FHSS mode
It seems unfair, especially because of all the hard work put in to
developing it, but I do not see it as any better than many other modes...
nothing that says gee...this is way better . It is GOOD, and a mode to
add to our bag of tricks, but not a killer app. The software interface is
very
Andy obrien wrote:
It seems unfair, especially because of all the hard work put in to
developing it, but I do not see it as any better than many other modes...
nothing that says gee...this is way better . It is GOOD, and a mode to
add to our bag of tricks, but not a killer app. The software
interference to narrow band modes.
The problem is if you join two wide modes at the same frequency.
De: KH6TY kh...@comcast. net
Para: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Enviado: lun,22 febrero, 2010 23:23
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
The hflink
would the best option?
*De:* KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* lun,22 febrero, 2010 23:46
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
I agree with Andy - try 14.109 USB next. ALE
in the transceiver. You must pass all
bandwith in your receiver because filter are doing by the PC better
than you transceiver.
De: KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: lun,22 febrero, 2010 18:31
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage?
Howard,
After monitoring 14.101
Interesting.
I go to tester.
De: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Para: digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: dom,21 febrero, 2010 13:23
Asunto: [digitalradio] ROS bug
It seems that an invalid procedure error occurs if the the two email
Andy obrien wrote:
It seems that an invalid procedure error occurs if the the two email
addresses that appear in the @ macro for Baud 16 run together and the
ending of the first one, does not get printed. e.g.
emailaddr...@address.comemailaddress@address.com This is happened
at the moment
The closest you get to a true definition in Part 97 is in section 97.3
Definitions, Para C, line 8:
(8) SS. Spread-spectrum emissions using bandwidth-expansion modulation
emissions having designators with A, C, D, F, G, H, J or R as the first symbol;
X as the second symbol; X as the third
I'm a bit of a rebel. What yard do I play in? Confused, I guess ROS can be
found @ 3.600, 7.053, 18.105 or 18.110, 14.080 or
14.101, es 28.300? So guy's/gal's, we fish'n or cutt'n bait?
rgrds
Craig
kq6i
-Original Message-
From: F.R. Ashley [mailto:gda...@clearwire.net]
Sent:
Excellent idea to ask FCC for an opinion.
Dave K3DCW referred to Part 97, but the section he quoted really only describes
emission mode designation codes for SS, and does not technically describe how
FCC defines SS. It's almost as if Part 97 assumes the definition is so well
known that it's
k...@arrl.net wrote:
I'm a bit of a rebel. What yard do I play in? Confused, I guess ROS can be
found @ 3.600, 7.053, 18.105 or 18.110, 14.080 or
14.101, es 28.300? So guy's/gal's, we fish'n or cutt'n bait?
I guess that, when there's only a few people using a mode, it's useful
to have
I will be transmiting in 14.101 20M have good propagation from early morning to
the afternoon,
KP4CB
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@... wrote:
k...@... wrote:
I'm a bit of a rebel. What yard do I play in? Confused, I guess ROS can be
found @ 3.600,
I tried the latest download but it would lock up and freeze..
Removed it from the computer.
Sure are a lot of digital modes hitting the air today, in some ways way too
many
Fred
CIW649/VE3FAL
CFARS Member
SATERN Member
SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
DEC Amethyst District ARES
I will
On 02/21/2010 02:36 PM, athosj wrote:
This is the way that an argument is conducted with real facts.
If ROS is a SS can not be used in HF bands.
Furthermore, if you believe that ROS is spread spectrum,
you should probably also stop using any other modes with
the same technical
On 02/21/2010 11:31 AM, J. Moen wrote:
But right now, I think that since Part 97 does not appear to define what
SS is, it is not possible to definitively say whether ROS is legal or
not legal in FCC jurisdictions. Asking FCC for an opinion is a great idea.
Of course, there is always the
I think I have lost the message. There has been so many, did someone come
up with a ROS mode sked page yesterday.
Please could someone link to it.
PS Monitoring 3.600mhz just now, I see Jose has put 3.60605 on the page.
For 16 baud (is this where everyone is?)
Toby mm0tob
Reply to
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ click on digital
or... if you are greedy..
http://www.obriensweb.com/skedpskr4.html
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Toby Burnett ruff...@hebrides.net wrote:
I think I have lost the message. There has been so many, did someone
come up with a ROS mode
Cheers Andy.
---Original Message---
From: Andy obrien
Date: 22/02/2010 00:14:07
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS sked group
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ click on digital
or... if you are greedy..
http://www.obriensweb.com/skedpskr4.html
/ KP4ARN
Amateur Radio is the best way to know People and Travel around the World, FREE
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, February 20, 2010 3:21:35 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS experiments
Very impressive
IARU Region 1 bandplan indicates 14.080 is for modes using less than 500 Hz
B/W.
Bandwidths up to 2700 Hz are permitted above 14.101 MHz.
http://www.rsgb.org/spectrumforum/bandplans/rsgb_band_plan_2010.htm
73 Trevor M5AKA
Hi Jose
Thanks ! I have only been receiving ROS on 14.101 but it is amazing how
well it is able to decode weak signals.
A question ; I am using the signalink USB with an internal VOX
function as an external sound card, therefor the COM port is not in
use. Is it possible to turn of the com
And a bow, rope and stick to create fire ? HI HI
73 - Bill KA8VIT
I got into RTTY in 1976. Still use a machine for RTTY.
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
DAVID wrote:
WHEN I USE THE CQ MACRO THE OUTPUT HAS THE LETTER M IN FRONT OF MY CALL
SIGN I CAN REMOVE IT BEFORE I TRANSMIT AND IT RUNS
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE M
That doesn't happen here. This is my CQ call
TX 14:44 UTC CQ CQ CQ de G0DJA G0DJA G0DJA pse k
Are you sure that
Good point, I am so used to narrow modes that I forget such things.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
wd4...@suddenlink.net wrote:
if you are gonna be trying new bands, at the minimum,
do use frequencies that are good for SSB or wideband digital.
obrien
Date: 20/02/2010 15:18:16
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS FREQUENCY
Good point, I am so used to narrow modes that I forget such things.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
wd4...@suddenlink.net wrote:
if you
W3NJ wrote:
Seeing lots of interest on the new ROS mode.
Would someone be willing to post a HF capture in a wav file in the files
section or point to one online? I'm tuning around 14.101 and would be good to
know what I'm listening for. Haven't heard anything unique at this point,
just
Dave Ackrill wrote:
W3NJ wrote:
Seeing lots of interest on the new ROS mode.
Would someone be willing to post a HF capture in a wav file in the files
section or point to one online? I'm tuning around 14.101 and would be good
to know what I'm listening for. Haven't heard anything unique at
Be right there.
philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
wd4...@suddenlink.net wrote:
trying 18.110 usb for anyone willing to try.
david/wd4kpd
--
Philw de KA1GMN
Tnx I got it fix tnx any way.
Russell NC5O
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to
take everything you have.
- Thomas Jefferson
IN GOD WE TRUST
Russell Blair (NC5O)
What is the FCC definition of spread spectrum, and where can it be located on
the internet?
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: John B. Stephensen
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 7:58 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS - make it legal in
m5...@blueyonder.co.uk
hello all.
can someone tell me where i go to
download this ros.
many thanks 73 ivor/m5ply
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA
ivor/m5ply
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien mailto:k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA?
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbzY3MjhrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE4NzExODMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYzMTA4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEyNjY1OTc1MzA-?o=6Joe,
N8FQ...
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/d-305.html
Describes Spread Spectrum as
Hi, Glenn.
Could you explain better the over button please. Put an example, please
Thank you
De: Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietr...@yahoo.com
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: vie,19 febrero, 2010 14:41
Asunto: [digitalradio] ROS
I just had my
Andy obrien wrote:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbzY3MjhrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE4NzExODMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYzMTA4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEyNjY1OTc1MzA-?o=6Joe,
N8FQ...
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/d-305.html
Dave Ackrill wrote:
I'd actually say that the term 'spread spectrum' is actually incorrect
as far as RIO is concerned. It's actually no more 'spread' than some of
the other digi-modes and less 'spread' than some versions of Olivia.
Sorry, I meant ROS of course.
Mark it down as my senior
Jose, a button that hands over to the other person in the call
e.g. k3uk de p5dx kn
K3UK would have P5DX in the destination box. I think it would be the
same as the call button though.
Andy K3UK
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, jose alberto nieto ros
nietoro...@yahoo.es wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately, the ROS explanation of Spread Spectrum and Frequency
Hopping in the documentation too closely resembles the definition of
Spread Spectrum as written in the Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_spectrum. Since ROS claims to be
Frequency Hopping and Spread Spectrum by its
Thanks Skip, I agree after doing some more reading and I will not use this
mode on HF. Your UHF idea sounds good.
Andy K3Uk
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:32 PM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote:
Unfortunately, the ROS explanation of Spread Spectrum and Frequency Hopping
in the documentation too
, February 19, 2010 12:58:03 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS
Hi, Glenn.
Could you explain better the over button please. Put an example, please
Thank you
De: Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietrace@ yahoo.com
Para: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Enviado: vie
Ah, OK, thats button exit already:
Is the button: +BYE
De: Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietr...@yahoo.com
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: vie,19 febrero, 2010 19:47
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] ROS
Hello Jose,
It would be similar to one
:
Ah, OK, thats button exit already:
Is the button: +BYE
*De:* Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietr...@yahoo.com
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* vie,19 febrero, 2010 19:47
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS
Hello Jose
:47 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: jose alberto nieto ros
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS
Hi All.
I'm trying to install ROS on my pc running windows 7 ultimate (64 bit) but I'm
not able to install, it seems to be impossible
to do it on this operativ system.
Could someone help me
At 06:58 PM 2/19/2010, you wrote:
even some of the AFSK/RTTY people use USB.
I have seen this too and at times wonder why.
I think maybe because the other modes are USB.
I got into RTTY in 1976. Still use a machine for RTTY.
It will interesting to see if Tony K2MO gets a chance to put this through the
Pathsim tests and compare it to Olivia. My guess is
that it will be close to that of Olivia. Andy K3UK
Andy,
I'd be more than happy to run ROS through the path simulator if I could get the
program running with
I made the experiment over AWGN and ROS is 2 dBs better than OLIVIA 32/1000.
But we are comparing two modes at differents character rate. As you know ROS is
two times faster than OLIVIA 32/1000.
You should compare ROS 16 with OLIVIA 8/1000. Then the different is about 5-6
dBs for the same
Very impressive Jose, again...congratulations.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:25 AM, jose alberto nieto ros
nietoro...@yahoo.es wrote:
I made the experiment over AWGN and ROS is 2 dBs better than OLIVIA
32/1000.
But we are comparing two modes at differents character rate. As you know
ROS is
Andy obrien wrote:
Anyone know if this mode is legal in the USA. ?
Why would it not be Andy?
If it is Audio Phase Shift Keying then it's no different to PSK31, if it
is more like WSJT then as long as JT65A (and all the other WSJT modes)
are legal, then what makes this one any different?
I
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:
Andy obrien wrote:
Anyone know if this mode is legal in the USA. ?
Why would it not be Andy?
I
As long as it is 500 Hz and 300 baud, it's fine.
-Joe, N8FQ
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:04:29 -0500
Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know if this mode is legal in the USA. ?
Andy K3Uk
Andy obrien wrote:
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
How wide is 'wide'?
Not got to grips with this as yet, obviously.
Dave (G0DJA)
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA?
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
