Don't forget to SHOUT LOUDLY when that day of work is complete ;)
Luke
Klaus Hartl wrote:
>
> Joel Birch schrieb:
>> Anything we can do to lighten the load? I'm sure many of us will
>> agree that this is one of the most exciting and important plugin
>> projects at the moment.
>>
>> Good l
Joel Birch schrieb:
> Anything we can do to lighten the load? I'm sure many of us will
> agree that this is one of the most exciting and important plugin
> projects at the moment.
>
> Good luck with everything Klaus.
>
> Joel.
Thanks for your kind offer, Joel! I think I'll be needing just an
On 14/03/2007, at 3:03 AM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Mark schrieb:
>> hows the development going?
>
> I'm sorry, I'm pretty busy at the moment and I'm stuck, but I gathered
> all the feedback and hope to get things further on the weekend... I
> have
> already started to fix a few bugs in IE.
>
>
> --
Mark schrieb:
> hows the development going?
I'm sorry, I'm pretty busy at the moment and I'm stuck, but I gathered
all the feedback and hope to get things further on the weekend... I have
already started to fix a few bugs in IE.
-- Klaus
___
jQuery
hows the development going?
2007/3/2, [-Stash-] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Just tried this in IE7 (WinXPSP2) and the overlay is solid black. Some of
the CSS positioning is also a little out of kilter, but everything works!
Looking forward to this one Klaus :)
Luke
Klaus Hartl wrote:
>
> Sean O
Just tried this in IE7 (WinXPSP2) and the overlay is solid black. Some of
the CSS positioning is also a little out of kilter, but everything works!
Looking forward to this one Klaus :)
Luke
Klaus Hartl wrote:
>
> Sean O schrieb:
>> Klaus,
>>
>> Nice job, everything looks great in Firefox 2
Can you not just overlay the loading animation over the top of the currently
shown image/content? Just not clear the content? Would that really add
that much code?
Luke
Klaus Hartl wrote:
>
> agent2026 schrieb:
>> I agree, but what bothers me about the loading more is that the entire
>> Thic
agent2026 schrieb:
> I agree, but what bothers me about the loading more is that the entire
> Thickbox (other than the overlay) disappears while this is happening. It
> would be less disturbing if the 'ui' stayed - the border, margin/background,
> links/txt, etc. - and just the image changed.
>
>
[-Stash-] schrieb:
>
> Klaus Hartl wrote:
>> [-Stash-] schrieb:
>>> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential
>>> addition!
>> clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not
>> working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient?
>
> OK, I just t
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> [-Stash-] schrieb:
>> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential
>> addition!
>
> clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not
> working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient?
OK, I just tested with own hacked about
I agree, but what bothers me about the loading more is that the entire
Thickbox (other than the overlay) disappears while this is happening. It
would be less disturbing if the 'ui' stayed - the border, margin/background,
links/txt, etc. - and just the image changed.
I like your idea for the load
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> [-Stash-] schrieb:
>> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential
>> addition!
>
> clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not
> working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient?
>
>
> -- Klaus
Parhaps, Thickbox handles
. Those with small screens probably
have a portable device, which thickbox won't work in anyway.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
> Sent: mercredi 28 février 2007 14:49
> To: jQuery Discussion.
>
[-Stash-] schrieb:
> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential
> addition!
clicking on the overlay while loading will abort loading... that its not
working is a bug on my side. is that sufficient?
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mail
[-Stash-] schrieb:
> I like this idea a lot. Added to this, it would be nice if progressive
> images (JPEG and PNG) could start to display as soon as you have the image
> size.
The display of the Box is bound to the load event of the image. I don't
think that there is another way to do it except
Currently the "Close" link doesn't appear until the content is loaded - if
the content takes a long time to load, you can't get rid of the TB. I'd
like a nice juicy "Cancel" button just beneath (or wherever) the loading
animation s I can change my mind and not wait for the content to be loaded.
> One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my
> modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first
> image, and vice versa
+1
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Shouldn't this just be tied to the close link?
[-Stash-] wrote:
>
> A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential
> addition!
>
>
> Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
>> I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it.
>> Also, a hook when Imagebox close
A simple "Cancel" link would be superb - I think this is an essential
addition!
Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
> I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it.
> Also, a hook when Imagebox closes down would have been very handy.
>
> Perhaps Thickbox3 can remedy this?
--
V
I like this idea a lot. Added to this, it would be nice if progressive
images (JPEG and PNG) could start to display as soon as you have the image
size.
deadguy wrote:
> When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very
> intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the load
I'm sure we will ;)
And thank you Klaus for taking this over.
Adam
Klaus Hartl wrote:
>
>
> Thank you for feedback. And all the others! I hope we can build a
> Thickbox everybody (ok, hopefully most of us) is satisfied with!
>
> And while I'm at it, thanks to cody for letting us do this!
user has. That is why
width=90% is better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: mercredi 28 février 2007 14:49
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb:
> I
On 2/28/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb:
> > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no sense
> > fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen sizes...
>
> What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image
Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb:
> If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely need
> to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the same page, or
> even Application.
>
> I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how my app
> will use
ect: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Sam Collett schrieb:
> On 28/02/07, agent2026 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified
>> Thickbox is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top
>&g
Sam Collett schrieb:
> On 28/02/07, agent2026 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified Thickbox
>> is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top reasons Cody made
>> Thickbox in the first place, and it's definately a very important
If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely need
to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the same page, or
even Application.
I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how my app
will use TB (ajax/iframe) to display interfaces. I
On 28/02/07, agent2026 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified Thickbox
> is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top reasons Cody made
> Thickbox in the first place, and it's definately a very important factor for
> me.
>
> Ada
Well for one, it's 17k packed standalone whereas my heavily modified Thickbox
is just 6k packed. Small file size was one of the top reasons Cody made
Thickbox in the first place, and it's definately a very important factor for
me.
Adam
Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
>
>
> Some other things:
>
>
I like the idea of the zoom feature a lot for larger images. You have some
window resize issues with the overlay though (common issue), as well as if
an image has been zoomed.
The slideshow link is and excellent feature - user configurable.
I agree with the feedback. I started in the middle, an
Some other things:
I've been using Imagebox and are missing a way of Stopping/Unloading it.
Also, a hook when Imagebox closes down would have been very handy.
Perhaps Thickbox3 can remedy this?
Btw: what is the plan here, Thickbox looks very much alike as Imagebox.
It could/is a bit confusing w
Hi,
Klaus Hartl a écrit :
>agent2026 schrieb:
>
>
>>Very nice Klaus.
>>
>>One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my
>>modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first
>>image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a
The mockup looks very similar to the Lightbox functionality, and I think
their implementation would do what you want. Nothing is visible to start,
but when you roll over the left or right half of the image the previous or
next text respectively fades in over the image. Clicking anywhere on the
l
2007 10:46 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Ah, I see! Cool!
What do the others think? I'm no designer, so I didn't (want to) change
much compared to the initial Thickbox anyway. I'd like having a little
bit more text ("Imag
When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very
intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the loading spinner
on top of the current image until the next image is loaded (rather
than making the current image disappear completely). The downside is
IE's poor handling of
perhaps you could do it with positioned divs? without any images.. than you
could use the round corners trick in javascript (which also works on IE) or
you could just leave them with the default edges.. and perhaps you could use
it in combination of this: http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/fisheye.h
Ah, I see! Cool!
What do the others think? I'm no designer, so I didn't (want to) change
much compared to the initial Thickbox anyway. I'd like having a little
bit more text ("Image 2 of 5") in the control, but I like the idea of
having a control thats only there if needed. The control could sl
hmm.. i guess the attatchment didn`t get through and therefore the entire
message didn`t get on the list (i can see it here in my gmail) here is the
suggestion again with the image posted on imageshack.
full message was:
---
i like this alot :)
Mark schrieb:
> @Klaus Hartl
>
> don`t you like my mockup suggestion?
???
Mark, I'm all ear, but I haven't got a mail of yours. Did you write me
an email or to the list?
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discus
@Klaus Hartl
don`t you like my mockup suggestion?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Whoa! :)
What I would really like to see is thickbox gracefully changing its size
to accommodate the loaded content.
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Hi jQuerians,
>
> I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
> may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
>
> Here'
totally agree with all of the below.
agent2026 wrote:
> I feel similarly about the slideshow - I wouldn't expect it, and would like
> to view the image I clicked for as long or short a time as I want to. But,
> it's a sensible option.
>
> And I agree, click=next is not something you'd necessarily
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sam Collett
Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 15:28
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
On 27/02/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb:
> > Question: will the next version of TB s
This wasn't possible before, although it would be kinda nice.
HighSlide (http://vikjavev.no/highslide/) does this pretty well, from an end
user point of view. I have no idea if it's well coded etc.
I would put this outside the scope for TB3 and move it into 4, or as an
optional addon. Most of
On 27/02/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb:
> > Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes (one on
> > top of the other) ?
>
> Ugh. No, at least not yet. To make it most efficient, the window gets
> created once and is then reused. That
Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb:
> Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes (one on
> top of the other) ?
Ugh. No, at least not yet. To make it most efficient, the window gets
created once and is then reused. That said, currently Thickbox 3 is not
designed to do that. Was
Question: will the next version of TB support multiple thickboxes (one on
top of the other) ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 13:39
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox
Torbjorn Tornkvist schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if it also supported Internationalization
> of the Previous/Next strings etc.
>
> Perhaps, it already does? I'll have to check the source.
>
> Cheers, Tobbe
I've stripped out all the strings, i18n is done via settings defaults or
even in o
On 26/02/07, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/02/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi jQuerians,
> >
> > I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
> > may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
> >
> > Here's what's new:
> >
> >
I feel similarly about the slideshow - I wouldn't expect it, and would like
to view the image I clicked for as long or short a time as I want to. But,
it's a sensible option.
And I agree, click=next is not something you'd necessarily expect. And if
you don't, you probably wouldn't click on the
David Duymelinck schrieb:
> [-Stash-] schreef:
>> I like the sound of this idea if it can be made to work :)
>>
>> Do you have an example of what you're talking about David?
>>
>> Luke
>>
> I will set up an example this evening.
>
David, I have thought about it a little more. Maybe you can ach
[-Stash-] schreef:
> I like the sound of this idea if it can be made to work :)
>
> Do you have an example of what you're talking about David?
>
> Luke
>
I will set up an example this evening.
--
David Duymelinck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like the sound of this idea if it can be made to work :)
Do you have an example of what you're talking about David?
Luke
DavidIcreate wrote:
>
> Klaus Hartl schreef:
>> David Duymelinck schrieb:
>>
>>> Klaus Hartl schreef:
>>>
* Automatic type detection depending on type of ele
the
> widest range of use.
>
> My 2 centz
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
> Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 10:29
> To: jQuery Discussion.
> Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Klaus Hartl schreef:
> David Duymelinck schrieb:
>
>> Klaus Hartl schreef:
>>
>>> * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
>>> type of link:
>>> image: href is an image
>>> content: href is a hash
>>> ajax: href is internal and not image
>>>
TECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: mardi 27 février 2007 10:29
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
agent2026 schrieb:
> Very nice Klaus.
>
> One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help
> my modded version) i
David Duymelinck schrieb:
> Klaus Hartl schreef:
>> * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
>> type of link:
>> image: href is an image
>> content: href is a hash
>> ajax: href is internal and not image
>> iframe: href is external and not image
agent2026 schrieb:
> Very nice Klaus.
>
> One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my
> modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first
> image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a
> Thickbox.
Is clicking on the ima
Klaus Hartl schreef:
> * Automatic type detection depending on type of element, respectively on
> type of link:
> image: href is an image
> content: href is a hash
> ajax: href is internal and not image
> iframe: href is external and not image
> confirm: element is form
>
Very nice Klaus.
One thing I would really like to see added (which I've done with help my
modded version) is circular browsing - 'next' on last image loads first
image, and vice versa - and 'click=next' when clicking on an image in a
Thickbox.
Great work, and thanks.
Adam
--
View this message
On 27/02/2007, at 1:05 AM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Hi jQuerians,
>
> I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
> may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
>
> Here's what's new:
I'm dumbstruck. Thanks Klaus and Jorn - you have made my day/week/
month. I
ssion.
Subject: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Hi jQuerians,
I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
Here's what's new:
* Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
f
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
> Please note that I haven't tested in other browsers than Firefox yet.
> I just thought I'd like to request some feedback/code review first!
My Feedback:
-Hardcoded Titles: title="Close this window" going to "var defaultValues"
-Inline Content: you have in CSS display none,
Hi,
It would be nice if it also supported Internationalization
of the Previous/Next strings etc.
Perhaps, it already does? I'll have to check the source.
Cheers, Tobbe
Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Hi jQuerians,
>
> I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
> may look th
Klaus Hartl wrote:
>
> Sean, as I said, I haven't done any testing in IE at all so far. I'm
> truly amazed, that it looks great in IE 7 already. :-)
>
Karl,
JFYI
inline examples also work in Safari..
ajax example does not.
Dmitry
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/
Janet Weber schrieb:
> Sounds good
> How about building in thumbails so you only have to refer to the main image.
>
> Janet
Not sure if that's reasonable. Imagine you were using the Thickbox for
an image gallery with lots of huge images. All original images would
have to be loaded, but you'd
The demo page doesn't seem to work for me. Running IE6. After clicking
on one of the Show Thickbox links, the page is so jumbled looking that
it can't possibly be what you intended Klaus. Also, clicking on any
image on the page causes the image to appear *waaay* down the screen
such that I have
Sean O schrieb:
> Klaus,
>
>
> Nice job, everything looks great in Firefox 2 & IE 7 PC.
>
> However, nothing seems to work (for me, anyway) in IE 6 PC.
> Image content gets appended below the body and mangled.
> Inline/External/Ajax content appears, but on top of existing copy with no
> windows,
Klaus,
Nice job, everything looks great in Firefox 2 & IE 7 PC.
However, nothing seems to work (for me, anyway) in IE 6 PC.
Image content gets appended below the body and mangled.
Inline/External/Ajax content appears, but on top of existing copy with no
windows, styling, or overlays.
Note: thi
> You can also have a look here (besides repository):
> http://stilbuero.de/jquery/thickbox_reloaded/
Fantastic, Klaus! This is very "jQuery" now with the simple usage of
$('a').thickbox().
Great, great stuff!
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.co
: Thickbox Reloaded alpha
Hi jQuerians,
I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
Here's what's new:
* Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
for content that gets loaded/create
Hi jQuerians,
I just committed what I would call Thickbox Reloaded alpha version. It
may look the same pretty much, but is a complete rewrite.
Here's what's new:
* Chainable method to bind Thickbox to links and forms (makes it easy
for content that gets loaded/created later on).
* Totally unob
72 matches
Mail list logo
