Well, I haven't figured out how to reply from the digest with
Thunderbird yet, so this is a copy/paste.
5. Context menus in tables should offer many (all) table-specific
operations. This could be fine-tuned to adjust to how the table is
selected (cell, row,...)
They do. Which ones are you
On 6/1/05, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not true. The *sender* of the mail specifies the line length. If
you wrap your lines at 72 characters every receiving client will display
them in lines with 72 characters.
Not if you get *descent* mail client. Every mail client I've
Chad Smith wrote:
On 6/1/05, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not true. The *sender* of the mail specifies the line length. If
you wrap your lines at 72 characters every receiving client will display
them in lines with 72 characters.
Not if you get *descent* mail client.
Hi Chad,
Chad Smith wrote:
On 6/1/05, Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not true. The *sender* of the mail specifies the line length. If
you wrap your lines at 72 characters every receiving client will display
them in lines with 72 characters.
Not if you get *descent* mail
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Mozilla/TB and others indeed wrap long lines (as you said correctly),
but at least TB doesn't do that in the editor when you reply, thus
the question (you might call it a complaint) from Peter.
In TB:
Edit--rewrap
This will re-wrap to lines in the editor, keeping
Peter Reaper wrote:
Peter Kupfer OOo on 01.06.2005 4:29 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Joseph Roth on 31.05.2005 15:54 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Some things that still bug me about OpenOffice:
1. The page ZOOM toolbar button needs to be a dropdown selection,
instead of the more cumbersome
Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Mozilla/TB and others indeed wrap long lines (as you said correctly),
but at least TB doesn't do that in the editor when you reply, thus
the question (you might call it a complaint) from Peter.
In TB:
Edit--rewrap
This will re-wrap to lines
Peter Kupfer OOo on 01.06.2005 4:29 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Joseph Roth on 31.05.2005 15:54 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Some things that still bug me about OpenOffice:
1. The page ZOOM toolbar button needs to be a dropdown selection,
instead of the more cumbersome separate dialog
Mathias Bauer on 01.06.2005 9:50 wrote:
Morgan Olsson wrote:
Peter Reaper 18:22 2005-05-31:
PS. Why wasn't your text wrapped while I was composing my reply?
Because i have no way of telling everybodys mail readers line lengths
and character widths and make everyone special mails cut
Peter Reaper wrote:
If all news readers used format=flowed (like Thunderbird does) then this
problem would vanish, and everybody could view their news at their
desired width.
The same argument is given from OE (l)users. ;-)
FF *could* be a nice option, but unfortunately the implementation
Mathias Bauer on 01.06.2005 13:21 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
The same argument is given from OE (l)users. ;-)
So OE users are requesting f=f too? :-P
FF *could* be a nice option, but unfortunately the implementation in
Mozilla/TB sucks.
It doesn't suck nearly as much as reading posts
Peter Reaper on 01.06.2005 14:03 wrote:
http://lairo.com/files/Bad-Text-Wrapping.jpg
I moved the file: http://lairo.com/files/temp/Bad-Text-Wrapping.jpg
Sorry. :-[
--
Regards,
Peter Reaper
The browser you can trust: http://www.GetFirefox.com
Reclaim Your Inbox:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Mathias Bauer on 01.06.2005 13:21 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
The same argument is given from OE (l)users. ;-)
So OE users are requesting f=f too? :-P
FF *could* be a nice option, but unfortunately the implementation in
Mozilla/TB sucks.
It doesn't suck nearly as
Jonathon Coombes on 31.05.2005 22:40 wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 15:19 +0200, Peter Reaper wrote:
Some things that still bug me about OpenOffice:
1. The page ZOOM toolbar button needs to be a dropdown selection,
instead of the more cumbersome separate dialog window.
There is a method for
I hope this time my post comes through without broken quotes... :-\
Jonathon Coombes on 31.05.2005 22:40 wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 15:19 +0200, Peter Reaper wrote:
Some things that still bug me about OpenOffice:
1. The page ZOOM toolbar button needs to be a dropdown selection,
instead of
Peter Reaper wrote:
3. It is too cumbersome to add toolbar buttons that are not in the
standard set. The user should be able to just select a category on the
left (which BTW should mirror the MENU items) and then on the right have
a list of ALL functions in that category which he can drag
Mathias Bauer on 01.06.2005 15:58 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
3. It is too cumbersome to add toolbar buttons that are not in the
standard set. The user should be able to just select a category on the
left (which BTW should mirror the MENU items) and then on the right have
a list of ALL
Peter Reaper wrote:
[Customize toolbar TabPage]
I still think the Add button creates an unneeded layer. Why should the
toolbar buttons be split up into two windows: one that shows me the
buttons I already see on my toolbar, and another (hidden behind Add)
with the buttons the user is likely
Mathias Bauer wrote:
FF *could* be a nice option, but unfortunately the implementation in
Mozilla/TB sucks.
FF is what?
thanks,
Cor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 15:14 +0200, Peter Reaper wrote:
Jonathon Coombes on 31.05.2005 22:40 wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 15:19 +0200, Peter Reaper wrote:
Some things that still bug me about OpenOffice:
1. The page ZOOM toolbar button needs to be a dropdown selection,
instead of the
Joseph Roth on 31.05.2005 15:54 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Some things that still bug me about OpenOffice:
1. The page ZOOM toolbar button needs to be a dropdown selection,
instead of the more cumbersome separate dialog window.
Some things are different but to zoom quickly I just hold the
Sam Hiser on 31.05.2005 15:41 wrote:
These are good and sincere objections. Perhaps we'd benefit if someone
would assist you in submitting them in an RFE?
I don't need help filing bugs; I've filed dozens for Mozilla already. I
just don't have the time to file more bugs that will likely end
Peter Reaper wrote:
***Snipped***
3. It is too cumbersome to add toolbar buttons that are not in the
standard set. The user should be able to just select a category on
the left (which BTW should mirror the MENU items) and then on the
right have a list of ALL functions in that category which
Please don't set follow-ups to newsgroups the OP doesn't subscribe to
without giving a reason and without telling the OP *beforehand*. Thanks.
G. Roderick Singleton on 31.05.2005 16:25 wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 15:19 +0200, Peter Reaper wrote:
Some things that still bug me about
Morgan Olsson on 31.05.2005 16:00 wrote:
Just a couple quick comments
Peter Reaper 15:19 2005-05-31:
Some things that still bug me about OpenOffice:
1. The page ZOOM toolbar button needs to be a dropdown selection, instead of
the more cumbersome separate dialog window.
I agree, but
Joseph Roth on 31.05.2005 17:54 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
***Snipped***
3. It is too cumbersome to add toolbar buttons that are not in the
standard set. The user should be able to just select a category on
the left (which BTW should mirror the MENU items) and then on the
right have a list
Peter Reaper 18:22 2005-05-31:
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: [discuss] Re: Ten Things That Still Bug Me About OpenOffice
Morgan Olsson on 31.05.2005 16:00 wrote:
Quy can quickly type the command; for me on Swedish version it is
Alt+s,k,b,[Enter] for zoom to page width
That's *more
Peter Reaper wrote:
Joseph Roth on 31.05.2005 17:54 wrote:
Peter Reaper wrote:
***Snipped***
3. It is too cumbersome to add toolbar buttons that are not in the
standard set. The user should be able to just select a category on
the left (which BTW should mirror the MENU items) and then on
28 matches
Mail list logo
