The KFL3B-FM filter has sold already.
73,
Jim K4AXF
K3 #4936
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted
If buying new, there is NO OPTION!
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On May 19, 2018, at 1:10 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
>
> Frank,
>
> I opted to do a few updates:
> New synth boards for both main and sub receiver
> Mod to general coverage bw filter
>
> I already
Frank,
I opted to do a few updates:
New synth boards for both main and sub receiver
Mod to general coverage bw filter
I already have plenty USB/RS-232 conversion cables and prefer that
line audio go to the computer via external soundcards. USB I/F would
require use of internal soundcard.
A
Don’t forget that rear Mic is not same as Lin In!
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Mar 31, 2018, at 8:14 AM, Richard Ferch wrote:
>
> I suspect that what you most likely need is for Line In to be used during
> digital mode operation (with the microphone muted), and the
I suspect that what you most likely need is for Line In to be used during
digital mode operation (with the microphone muted), and the microphone to
be used during voice mode operation.
The audio input settings for voice modes and digital modes are stored
independently, so this is easy. With the
> I need both at the same time, Mike for voice and Line in for digital.
This is absolutely a terrible idea. I doubt that your shack is silent
while working data modes and any noise - you talking, someone else
yelling at your, a TV/radio/computer running in the background, or even
fan noise
Look at the latest K3/K3S manual on the Elecraft website, page 55. The menu
settings you need are “MIC SEL” and “MIC+LIN”. They interact with each other.
>
>> On Mar 30, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Ralph S. Turk wrote:
>>
>> Does any one know the command for both Mike in Front
LIN IN and LIN OUT are both on the rear panel. No use mic for this.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Mar 30, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Ralph S. Turk wrote:
>
> Does any one know the command for both Mike in Front Panel and Line in rear
> panel?
>
> I need both at the same
Does any one know the command for both Mike in Front Panel and Line in rear
panel?
I need both at the same time, Mike for voice and Line in for digital.
Ralph, W7HSG/AFA9RT
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
Thanks Wayne, the software blanking improvement on CW using FL1 13kHz filter
set to 400Hz is remarkable because not only does it suppress strong electric
fence pulses here for the first time in years but also cleans up the NB
function when FL1 is enabled. I used the 13kHz filter because it was
That answered a question I took off list, will my 12 KHz filter work,
looks like I will be testing this...
--
73's, and thanks,
Dave
For software/hardware reviews see:
http://www.nk7z.net
For MixW support see:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
For SSTV help see:
As follow up to my earlier post, my issue of the VFO A frequency not tracking
properly was due to my CONFIG: CW WGHT setting being wrong. I somehow set the
VFO offset from 'VFO NOR' to 'VFO OFS' which results in the frequency offset
equal to the CW tone/pitch selected.
A big thank you to Mike
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Barry w...@comcast.net wrote:
So how come a $10 watch keeps better time than a $3K xcvr (that has access
to multiple time signals)? :-)
Barry W2UP
Primarily because that is the watch's prime purpose. I would add that the
watch is really poor at RX and TX but
Guy Olinger K2AV wrote
Primarily because that is the watch's prime purpose. I would add that the
watch is really poor at RX and TX but you aren't complaining about that.
The K3 does *not* have continuous background access to time signals
independent of VFO frequencies,
Not its main
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Barry w...@comcast.net wrote:
Not its main purpose, but if it's there, it should be accurate.
Who gets to decide should be and what accurate means? I'll give those
responsibilities to whoever is doing the work and laying out the cash. Too
easy to spend someone
Don Wilhelm-4 wrote
The K3 RTC depends on the crystal and the associated capacitors. It is
not a precision device,
So how come a $10 watch keeps better time than a $3K xcvr (that has access
to multiple time signals)? :-)
Barry W2UP
--
View this message in context:
Because the Elecraft receiver is not designed to sync with those
multiple time signals, it is only capable of receiving them, and you can
use them to sync the time with the Elecraft RTC.
A receiver is not a watch!
The main difference is quantity of the precision crystals required to
maintain
watch.
73, Fred, AE6QL
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don
Wilhelm
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 2:33 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] re K3 timekeeping
Because the Elecraft receiver is not designed to sync
My K3 clock loses about 9 seconds per day. This is not quite as bad as Arlen's
clock, but it is still annoying. I run quite a few skeds and nets and I like to
be spot on time.
Dear Wayne, are you listening? We need your help to write a little routine that
goes like this:-
When the K3 powers
This is beginning to sound like the saying that the man with two
wristwatches never knows what time it is. Pick a 'time standard' that
is appropriate for you - Cellphone time or Atomic clock as your time for
skeds (those are quite accurate) as well as the time standard from WWV.
The K3 clock
To continue dreaming: Since the K3 is a wide band receiver, it
could also automatically update itself from WWV/CHU/etc.
73 Bill AE6JV
On 11/27/14 at 3:01 PM, ro...@monitorsensors.com (Roger Crofts) wrote:
Dear Wayne, are you listening? We need your help to write a little routine that
goes
My watch is a Casio Pathfinder (barometer,
altimeter, compass, and even keeps time!). It gets
updated every night via Colo WWV station -- unless
I turn on my TV converter from Time-Warner; then
it does not update, even if the converter is 10 ft
away.
Phil W7OX
On 11/26/14 3:54 PM, Don
Hi Bill, AE6JV
Checked with vox on and off. No joy.
Just to clarify, I do get one dit or one dash but no more when I hit the
key.
Thanks,
Bill - W0BBI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
OK. I just did some additional checking and it appears the my problem is not
with the K3, but with the interface. My Navigator USB is not allowing the for
transmit in SSB mode. I was able to confirm this by bypassing the Navigator and
using the K3 internal keyer. All is well when operated in
An interface can not generate PTT during CW if you are going to use
CW in SSB with the K3. As soon as the external PTT is closed, the
K3 switches into SSB mode (e.g., at most one dit or dah).
microHAM microKEYER II handles this condition correctly by suppressing
PTT during CW if CW in SSB
In a effort to close the loop on this thread, the Navigator required the PTT to
be off in the Configuration menu to allow cross mode operation.
Thanks to all here as well as Clint KK7UG Greg AB7R on the Navigator
Reflector for their help.
Best 73,
Bill - W0BBI
Glad to hear you got the Navigator working.
When I was operating SSB on 80M in the California QSO Party, I
was using a Little Tarheel antenna. I was always having to tune
the antenna since it has a SWR bandwidth of about 10KHz on 80M.
I could easily tune it while transmitting the club call
Ed wrote
Lying to your K3 may be cute to say, but it detracts from what is really
going on. That filter parameter simply sets the DSP bandwidth at which the
crystal filter engages, and for all narrower bandwidths until the next
crystal filter engages. The crystal filter and the DSP filter can
Mike,
You could actually do that with macros. Too bad there are only 2
programmable buttons on the K3, and in my case they are already spoken for
- but if you have a computer connected it could be done relatively easily.
73, Thomas M0TRN
On 30 March 2012 09:19, Mike Rodgers
...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Thomas Horsten
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 5:45 AM
To: Mike Rodgers
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re K3 filters
Mike,
You could actually do that with macros. Too bad there are only 2
programmable
On 3/29/2012 1:27 AM, Ed Muns wrote:
Lying to your K3 may be cute to say, but it detracts from what is
really going on.
Lying to your K3 is the correct term in one case ... telling the K3
that the 13 KHz FM filter is a 6 KHz AM filter so one can transmit AM
and/or ESSB. I still don't
Don, I thought the comment rather tongue in cheek. Some consider all caps
akin to cursing.
As to lying to the k3 as to the filter you have put in it's slot which I think
more than a few do.
If you have told the k3 that it's a 2.1 but it's actually 1.8 and you have dsp
set to 2.1, isn't it
Lying to your K3 may be cute to say, but it detracts from what is really
going on. That filter parameter simply sets the DSP bandwidth at which the
crystal filter engages, and for all narrower bandwidths until the next
crystal filter engages. The crystal filter and the DSP filter can have
three
While a 20a supply will get you by for the 100w radio, a 30a will provide
insurance. As Adrian pointed out adjustable voltage is a plus.
Power distribution strips should be avoided as some have found too much voltage
drop with them. Run the k3 power direct.
73
Mike R
Play me some fiddle,
On 3/27/2012 6:22 AM, Mike Rodgers wrote:
While a 20a supply will get you by for the 100w radio,
20A might get by but the IMD will suffer badly when the supply drops
out of regulation on voice peaks. If the K3's current display is
showing 16 - 17A steady state at 100W CW, one can be sure the
Like a Samlex 1235!
matt W6NIA
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:56:56 -0400, you wrote:
On 3/27/2012 6:22 AM, Mike Rodgers wrote:
While a 20a supply will get you by for the 100w radio,
20A might get by but the IMD will suffer badly when the supply drops
out of regulation on voice peaks. If the K3's
Like a Samlex 1235!
Another noisy, failure prone switcher. Give me the heavy iron *ANALOG*
supply any day.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 3/27/2012 12:23 PM, Matt Zilmer wrote:
Like a Samlex 1235!
matt W6NIA
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:56:56 -0400, you wrote:
On 3/27/2012 6:22 AM, Mike
Great supply, especially the 1235M with the meters. Very quite and
small. Radio Dan W7RF had the best price and was quick delivery when I
got it a couple of months ago.
73 Dwight NS9I
On 3/27/2012 11:23 AM, Matt Zilmer wrote:
Like a Samlex 1235!
matt W6NIA
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:56:56
I agree, but I have heard nothing but good comments about the small
PowerWerx supply.
On 3/27/12, Joe Subich, W4TV li...@subich.com wrote:
Like a Samlex 1235!
Another noisy, failure prone switcher. Give me the heavy iron *ANALOG*
supply any day.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 3/27/2012
I have two Walt Williams (local Texas ham) 100 amp heavy iron DC supplies and
when I stop using them will be when they pry them from under my cold, dead
operating console ;o)
Farmers rotate crops to keep their land strong.
Voters can keep THEIR LAND STRONG by rotating
politicians at the ballot
Noisiest thing about my Samlex 1235M is the fan. AD5X did an excellent,
careful review of this supply right after it came out. The data are there.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net,
I've had the 1223 for 6-yrs no problems except the on/off sw went once,
which they shipped me a new one for free. With that batting record, That
is what led me to purchase the 1225m for the K-3. We are talking 1000's
of hrs. of operating time with lots of on/off gestures.
Of course, everyone
As somebody who uses one of the PowerWerx, it's decent. Like the Samlex,
the most noise seems to be the fan more than anything else.
./ben
W6MCM
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:47 PM, DGB ns9i2...@bayland.net wrote:
Of course, everyone has their own experiences indeed. YMMV! In addition,
the
I also got my Samlex 1235M from Radio Dan. Have had it a couple of years.
Works great.
Phil - AD5X
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:
I recieved the Elecraft K3 Design, Configuration, and Operation book
written by Fred Cady - KE7X, and it is wonderful. I found several things
I did not know the K3 would do after glancing through the book.
I have worn ragged several ARRL Handbooks and Antenna books in
my 57 year ham career. I bet
Mine does the same in # 5047. 12/2010. Sometimes it doesn't require power
off/on at first but eventually it does.
73
Mike R
Sent from my spy ring
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
Are you guys actually getting 106 watts out and is that blessed by elecraft?
I was thinking it was supposed to be around 80 watts? Do tell.
73
Mike R
Sent from my spy ring
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
This is in response mostly to Guy,K2AV's post. I am ashamed to say that I
really didn't know better . Not having much experience with HF equipment I
just assumed that it was meant to be really noisy and just lived with it. :)
Of course this really annoys those around me so it tended to limit
Yes, it certainly IS that simple.
I remember the old radios well. They never had the problem. They
didn't have enough gain to have the problem. Nor was it possible to
have the AGC recover in such a short interval that the noise sounded
as if it were the same level as the desired signal, even
Guy,
Again your ability to write down what is REAL and what is NOT is again
'right on the money'.
This last post of yours should be REQUIRED reading by all new owners of the
K3 to help them better understand the radio, the design and the
capabilities.
Maybe even a version of your explanation
Guy's analysis seems to identify the key point. You can definitely get
better reception under noisy conditions by going into SX-101 mode, turning
the AF gain all the way up and riding the RF gain with your left hand. This
reduces the AGC effect, possibly defeating it altogether, depending on where
Tony,
Why would we want manufacturers to give us a fully auto-magical, panacea
radio that simply becomes a proverbial Black Box that we simply turn on
and speak or operate in other modes?
Elecraft are leading the way I feel in giving us some serious weaponry to
fight widely varying conditions.
Tony Estep wrote:
turn AGC off altogether; this gives good results, but
requires even more constant cranking of the RF gain.
Not necessarily - if you have a low ambient audio noise floor (isolating
headphones, quiet room, etc) then you can have a wide audio dynamic range
without constant
... constant cranking of the RF gain.
Not necessarily - if you have a low ambient audio noise floor (isolating
headphones, quiet room, etc) then you can have a wide audio dynamic range
without constant cranking of the RF gain.
Several of us have been evangelists for this for quite some
First of all, thanks for all the helpful replies.
Second, it is possible to get someone to see the light.
Early indications are I like the method of using hi/lo cut for ssb. I just
didn't want to give up using shift and width.
I see how much better this works and also for maximizing the
I have adjusted RX EQ for 'Tone' using my headset. I don't hear the lows
well anymore so I have been able to compensate for that with the EQ settings
and I use Hi/Lo cut for ssb and shift/width for CW.
Audio sounds great for me.
Gary
On 13 April 2011 03:08, Mike Rodgers
Recently Don Wilhelm posted a K3 fix for noisy audio, I tried it and it
works very well. This fix solved a noisy audio problem I have had for over a
year. I'm an old timer, 88, and the K3 is a young transceiver took a while
getting together. I don't do digital modes or contests just sideband
Bob,w5pvr wrote:
The noise between transmissions was like Niagara Falls but not
any more.
Turn down the RF Gain. It really is that simple.
73, Barry N1EU
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Re-k3-receive-audio-tp6259940p6267043.html
Sent from the
Mike,
Don W3FPR has a great article about setting your AGC. Another website
I have found very helpfull is this one:
http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/elecraft_k2_and_k3_transceivers.htm
I had the same problems you have but now I'm very pleased with my K3 ;-)
Best 73,
Maarten
PD2R
2011/4/11,
I set both of my K3s up based on Don's recommendations and found them to be very
helpful.
Tom
N5GE
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:40:41 +0200, Maarten van Rossum pd2r.maar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mike,
Don W3FPR has a great article about setting your AGC. Another website
I have found very helpfull is
I've got a 3month old k3. I was impressed with how full bodied or maybe even hi
fidelity some of the audio sounded but I eventually grew tired of how the
background band noise sounded in my rural QTH. The best I can describe is it
had a high edge to it. I eventually went to a vacant frequency
Mike,
It might be the default AGC settings that you are struggling with. If
your K3 sounds noisy between stations, or between pauses in the other
station's transmissions, then I suggest that the AGC Threshold and Slope
settings may not be right for your situation.
Please review the Noisy
Stan, did you find out anything about your funky swr readings?
Mike R
Sent from my spy ring
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:
Congrats on ordering the new rig.
You'll want to download the k3 utility from the Elecraft website. If your
computer has a rs-233 port, that is the best way to communicate to the k3.
You'll need a straight thru cable.
If you only have a USB port, I highly recommend getting the KUSB cable from
Hello Lu,
First of all, thanks a lot for your informative message which I read with great
interest.
I would like to further experiment with the audio settings in K3. While I
understand voice characterists are different for different individuals, would
you mind sharing with us the settings in
Hello Dan,
I share the same observation for NR of my IC7600. If K3 had the same 'manual
notch within AGC loop' as that in IC7600, I would rate my K3 even higher in the
rank.
cheers,
Johnny VR2XMC
- 郵件原件
寄件人﹕ Dan Atchison n...@aol.com
收件人﹕ elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕
Nate Bargmann wrote:
The FT-920 as it was made was a nice step up from older/less featured
radios. Had Yaesu opted to incorporate IF DSP in it, the cost may have
approached that of the FT-1000MP and I think they were looking at a
middle point between that and the FT-840. The AF DSP
* On 2010 23 Nov 06:47 -0600, Barry N1EU wrote:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
The FT-920 as it was made was a nice step up from older/less featured
radios. Had Yaesu opted to incorporate IF DSP in it, the cost may have
approached that of the FT-1000MP and I think they were looking at a
The audio DSP on the MP was a nice implementation for it's time. The
one big drawback was that the front-end and VHF IF's crushed easily.
Going from the MP to the K3, at NY4A, a whole new layer of DX emerged
that was hidden in the crunch-crud. The selectivity, with matched
INRAD filters at 8 MHz
Hate to pile on to our once beloved FT-1000MP, but I owned two MP's and both
over time developed REALLY poor/slow AGC recovery during fast action in cw
contests. Several years back, I tried to get an up-close snapshot of
exactly how the MP AGC was behaving and was shocked at what I was seeing:
I found that certain capacitors were changing value over time and had
to be replaced to restore proper AGC operation. Some of the
capacitors had what turned out to be critical values, but did not have
precision components. Some were more than double or one half their
schematic values. It was
Hello Nate,
Glad that you chosed K3. I am afraid that FT920 is a different kind of
animal and not in the class of K3. You are now having a Rolls Royce whereas
previously a Toyota.
No offense to any Toyota and FT920 owners!!
cheers,
Johnny VR2XMC
- 郵件原件
寄件人﹕ Nate Bargmann
* On 2010 22 Nov 16:30 -0600, Johnny Siu wrote:
Hello Nate,
Hi Johnny.
Glad that you chosed K3. I am afraid that FT920 is a different kind of
animal and not in the class of K3. You are now having a Rolls Royce whereas
previously a Toyota.
Or, perhaps a Ferrari at a Lexus price?
No
Hello Doug,
I concur with you and it is no harm to voice out our wishes here.
In fact, what Elecraft promoting is 'respond to customer's needs', this
is the reason why we regularly have beta version firmware.
In our K3 or K2, we have paid for good support service and response from
Elecraft
Thanks for all your replies. Apparently, I have to make my own cables and
there
are ready made cables from SCS.
73
Johnny VR2XMC
寄件人﹕ ussv dharma ussvdha...@yahoo.com
收件人﹕ Johnny Siu vr2...@yahoo.com.hk
傳送日期﹕ 2010/10/17 (日) 2:04:18 AM
主題: Re: [Elecraft] K3
Found the problem: Seems the key out line to the linear was causing
it. Don't use the linear anyway so I just unplugged that line.
Thanks for the help.
As a note, the radio room is upstairs so I do not use a ground since
it causes all kinds of ugly things to happen with tuning. From up
Found the problem: Seems the key out line to the linear was causing
it. Don't use the linear anyway so I just unplugged that line.
Thanks for the help.
As a note, the radio room is upstairs so I do not use a ground since
it causes all kinds of ugly things to happen with tuning. From up
After working lots of low band and 6 meter weak DX I fully concur with the
latest reviews covering the NR feature and its ability to reach into wide
varieties of QRN and pull out the signals. I will add that when using this
feature for weak signal DXing, increasing the bandpass filtering
Yes, it is an attractive selling point to overseas user like myself.
73
Johnny VR2XMC
- 郵件原件
寄件人﹕ Peter Connors monotr...@ntlworld.com
收件人﹕ Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕ 2010/7/5 (一) 4:57:05 PM
主題: [Elecraft] K3 repair - a view from Europe
One of the advantages of the Elecraft/user
Hello Hector,
I think it is Elecraft's competitive edge to accept replacement of damaged
boards. For other brands, I have to send the whole rig back for repair no
matter how minor the repair work is.
Under very special circumstance and arrangement in the past, I once sent the PA
module of my
Johny don't forget that for Elecraft their main goal is customer satisfaction
and they made it with me and many others who have the skills to swap boards,its
the best alternative that also expedite the radio repair.I am sure that any
other foreign company do that.I wonder if TT would do it,73
On 2010-07-02 17:28, Hector Padron wrote:
Johny don't forget that for Elecraft their main goal is customer satisfaction
AD4C
I´m sure this is the goal for all manufacturers however everyone doesn´t
succeed.
Jim SM2EKM
__
Elecraft
I recently sent my K3 in to have it repaired after I broke a toroid
connection accidentally while installing the 2nd RX option. The queue time
was longer than I would have liked. When I got the radio back and continued
my installation efforts I required further support. I emailed the tech who
Hello Jim,
I was a Pro 3 user as well in the old days. K3 belongs to another class and is
aimed at standing along the top liners. Therefore, I would say that K3 will
certainly out perform Pro 3 especially in CW.
However, K3 is not in the same price range of Pro3 so that it is not quite a
Hello Alan,
I agree with you that K2 is a keeper. K2 is by far the best portable field day
radio. With standy current as low as 180mA, it can be run all day long
especially nowadays, high capability Li-Po cells are cheaply available.
A pack of 3300mAH 12.6v Li-Po cells can keep the K2 happy
Johnny,
I can't say that I've done much portable with K2 or K3 ... that 35
amp-hour gel-cell that I use is too heavy to lug around, even with the
handle that's build onto it. It's my emergency backup, and it can keep
either radio going for quite awhile (at least until I fire up the
generator!)
Ron wrote:
I have a K3 and MH2 as well as a Quiet Phone Plus. The Quiet Phone Plus
only works from the rear but not the front. I have Heil Kenwood
adaptor. The MH2 does not work either. Both cases not TX audio from front
connector. No Sub receiver installed. Serial number in the 2700's.
Hello Chuck,
From my past experience with K3, the stock 2.7Khz was quite good. How about
try it first ?
cheers,
Johnny VR2XMC
- 郵件原件
寄件人﹕ Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com
收件人﹕ Charles Teeter c.tee...@att.net
副本(CC) elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕ 2010/3/6 (六) 7:48:28 AM
主題: Re:
Last month some might remember that I posted a plea for help in fault
finding my K3 RS232 connection.
The fault was traced to an open RFC L3 on the KIO3 digital I/O board.
Bridging this RFC with a piece of resistor wire brought the RS232
connection back to life. A replacement L3 is on its way.
Hello Phil,
I think this kind of ATU should have already been there. Before K3 came out,
Elecraft showed a proto type of KPA800 or KPA 1500. This kind of ATU should
form part of these linears.
73
Johnny Siu VR2XMC
- 郵件原件
寄件人﹕ Phil Hystad k7...@comcast.net
收件人﹕ Elecraft
Hello Ralph,
Yes, good question.
In fact, I really want to know:
1. Will there be any differences in the key RX specifications (i.e. BDR and
MDS, survival among strong big guns) if DSP Rev D is installed?
2. From the bit and piece of information scattered among the emails in this
forum
Subject: [Elecraft] Re: K3 DIY DSP Rev D - please elaborate
To: Ralph Parker ve...@dccnet.com, Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Friday, January 1, 2010, 1:38 AM
Hello Ralph,
Yes, good question.
In fact, I really want to know:
1. Will there be any differences in the key RX
I believe the firmware release notes reveal everything that has been
improved/changed with each release. I see no need for Elecraft to
document the algorithms.
73,
Don W3FPR
juergen wrote:
Hi Johnny
I have seen many subtle improvements in the K3's receiver with the many
successive
I hate to expose my ignorance, but don't use alcohol. I've ordered a new
bezel already.
I was using it to clean the knobs and faceplate and some soaked behind the
bezel and left a white crusty look that will not remove.
Wayne WA9VEE
__
Hello Phil,
Apart from technicial specifications, it will also depend on whether you will
use the transverter with other rigs. If your answer is yes, you then need the
XV144.
One more thing, XV144 is supposed to work at 10 watt if under full duty cycle
i.e. FM mode. In fact, when XV144
Hello Giulio,
The XV144 is not cheap. It is a great waste if it only uses for SSB/CW.
However, it is really hot even run at 10W FM.
Yes, I do the same and add a small CPU fan. Where do you take the 12T point?
cheers,
Johnny VR2XMC
- 郵件原件
寄件人﹕ Giulio Pico - IW3HVB
Hello Julian,
Also K3 is not popular in Hong Kong and Asia pacific region when compared with
the big brands.
73
Johnny VR2XMC
寄件人﹕ Julian, G4ILO julian.g4...@gmail.com
收件人﹕ elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕ 2009/11月/23 (一) 5:42:39 PM
主題: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and
During my visit to Osaka earlier this year I was thoroughly asked about the
design principles and my user report of K3. Japanese manufacturers do give a
close eye on K3.
Competition among manufacturers are good to the end users.
73
Johnny VR2XMC
寄件人﹕
LP100 is calibrated with NIST traceable reference.
I have no question about the accuracy with LP100. I caliberate my W1 by
using LP100.
73
Johnny Siu VR2XMC
寄件人﹕ Robert Naumann w...@w5ov.com
收件人﹕ Stewart stew...@baker.nildram.co.uk; Elecraft Reflector
No because the TCXO you bought is what provides you with the higher
accuracy. Its just that additional firmware correction isn't needed to
meet 0.5PPM because the TCXO is that good out of the box.
~BTH
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 09:09 +0800, Johnny Siu wrote:
Hello Joe,
Fine, correct, you are
1 - 100 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo