On Monday 07 April 2014 05:36:49 Peter Blodow did opine:
> Am 04.04.2014 14:46, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> > yeah, and I've been looking for the any key for 30 years. Haven't
> > found a new keyboard with one of them yet. Cheers, Gene
>
> Gene,
> The Any Key is on the PC case outside, right beside t
Am 04.04.2014 14:46, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> yeah, and I've been looking for the any key for 30 years. Haven't
> found a new keyboard with one of them yet. Cheers, Gene
Gene,
The Any Key is on the PC case outside, right beside the small red lamp,
sometimes labelled "R". Pressing will always brin
On 04/04/2014 04:18 AM, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> As a counterbalance to the brickbats flying around, I'd just like to say
> thanks for putting your head over the top and making a decision.
>
> Even if it doesn't have everything people want in it (when would it?),
> the mere fact that there is a new
One functionality I would like to see is an integrated repository manager
within LinuxCNC itself. That way, people could point to repositories for
designs and downloads. Granted, a different use case than for the
application itself, which has to use the software repository manager
provided by the
W dniu 03.04.2014 22:26, Philipp Burch pisze:
>>
>> I understand, 7i80 support requires realtime ethernet, which requires
>> rt-preempt or xenomai.
>>
>> I'm optimistic that the LinuxCNC developer community will continue to
>> work on adding support for these realtime systems, and that when it's
>>
The company i used to work for used to have a cnc with a "plopper" button.
The boss would often come over and say "plop a hole here and plop a slot
there".
But i never found it?:-\
On 04/04/14 13:17, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> - Even if it doesn't have everything people want in it (when would - it
On 4/4/2014 8:59 AM, John Kasunich wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>> I understand that everyone wants things to be easy to use. But if a
>> single click install is the requirement for a CNC application, the user
>> will be woefully disappointing when the CNC cards a
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>
> I understand that everyone wants things to be easy to use. But if a
> single click install is the requirement for a CNC application, the user
> will be woefully disappointing when the CNC cards and components don't
> just "plug and play
> You're right. Following the Mac philosophy, the user needs to be able to go
> to a single, easily found, place, and double click on an icon or filename,
> and the file should download then install itself.
> In fact, if there was a double-click installation of Ubuntu 12 and LinuxCNC
> that wou
IMO, the new 12.04 "software center" has some big usability problems
compared to the Synaptic Mgr.
Synaptic package manager is clearly a different package which can be
loaded via the "software center", then you can ignore the "software
center" and get back to work! :-)
I shuddered when I saw the
On Friday 04 April 2014 09:08:48 Mark Wendt did opine:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 04 April 2014 08:45:04 Stuart Stevenson did opine:
> > > - Even if it doesn't have everything people want in it (when would -
> > > it?)
> > >
> > > NEVER - the more it can
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2014 08:45:04 Stuart Stevenson did opine:
>
> > - Even if it doesn't have everything people want in it (when would -
> > it?)
> >
> > NEVER - the more it can do the more dreams of what it could do
> >
> > - Anything more tha
On Friday 04 April 2014 08:45:04 Stuart Stevenson did opine:
> - Even if it doesn't have everything people want in it (when would -
> it?)
>
> NEVER - the more it can do the more dreams of what it could do
>
> - Anything more than that, and I'm guessing the average
> - non-guru user will pass it
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:14 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> I splurged and bought my first SSD and did a fresh install of 14.04.
>
> sam
>
Ah, okay. I've done upgrades in the past and had issues during the
upgrade. just curious to see if you'd done it and had any.
Thanks,
Mark
-
- Even if it doesn't have everything people want in it (when would - it?)
NEVER - the more it can do the more dreams of what it could do
- Anything more than that, and I'm guessing the average
- non-guru user will pass it by and find some other package
- that says it installs easily.
then gripe
I splurged and bought my first SSD and did a fresh install of 14.04.
sam
On 4/4/2014 7:07 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:56 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>
>> I had mentioned in a previous email - the new 'package manager' in 12.04
>> and newer is 'ubuntu software center' It seems to
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:56 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> I had mentioned in a previous email - the new 'package manager' in 12.04
> and newer is 'ubuntu software center' It seems to have the similar
> functionality as synaptic. (search for stuff, add repositories..)
>
> http://imagebin.org/303764
I had mentioned in a previous email - the new 'package manager' in 12.04
and newer is 'ubuntu software center' It seems to have the similar
functionality as synaptic. (search for stuff, add repositories..)
http://imagebin.org/303764
(atleast it has done everything I have asked)
sam
On 04/
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
>
>
> Andy, I think you are being nice regarding Unity. Someone smoked too
> much of something and then continued to code anyway when they did
> Unity. Synaptic Manager does not come along with 12.04, I had to
> install it. (A glaring ommision
On 4 Apr 2014, at 10:17, andy pugh wrote:
> On 4 April 2014 05:56, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>> I would have put the likes of yourself into the guru class not what I do :)
>
> Well, I have a shared git repository on my Mac exported through NFS /
> avahi and auto-mounted by the several different
Quoth Sebastian Kuzminsky.
>> Who made decision about not including ubc and when?
>
>As release manager, I did. It was a few days before i made the 2.6
>branch announcement.
>
>> Where are the emails that invite developers to irc meeting to vote this?
>
>There were none - as release manager i
On 4 April 2014 05:56, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> I would have put the likes of yourself into the guru class not what I do :)
Well, I have a shared git repository on my Mac exported through NFS /
avahi and auto-mounted by the several different Linux boxes. I WoL the
box I want to update, check ou
I would have put the likes of yourself into the guru class not what I do :)
On 2014-04-03 22:01, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 20:31, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>> Mark
>> Use the git method to install and compile the master branch.
> I do think that falls into the "Linux Guru" category though
Mark
I also only ever run from the master. I dont use the buildbot since I
found it to be unreliable some time ago. It might have bee fixed by now
but it is not my preferred method.
I dont usually install from git unless it is a special case to test.
Hence my request to Seb to get the new stuff
I was not a linux person before I found linuxcnc (emc2 at the time). It
was an unknown. (and I work in computers). After playing with linuxcnc
for a while - I dual-booted my laptop between linuxcnc (ubuntu 6.04
iirc) and XP. Well - I started booting into windows less and less. I
got the ne
For those wanting to install LinuxCNC on Precise 12.04, search the old
messages in the emc-users list for messages with this subject line:
"LinuxCNC on Ubuntu Precise 12.04 with RTAI"
Seb made the announcement of a way to install this months ago and it
worked well except for a couple of issues
On 3 April 2014 21:09, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
> Andy,
> You talking about doing it this way?
> http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/
Yes, though you can add the same info to the package manager in the GUI.
In Lucid you can find Synaptic from the Administration menu.
In Precise this is probably most ea
Hi everyone!
On 04/03/2014 05:15 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 4/2/14 15:56 , Michał Geszkiewicz wrote:
>> Hi Seb,
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> [... some flaming ...]
>
>> Additionally realtime ethernet is what could make linuxcnc project
>> competitive with industrial cnc controllers. and it's onl
Mark,
I sure identify with you on your frustration. The first time to attempt a
download is fraught with horror.
Ask your questions - someone will help with an answer - you will get
there.
Simple questions get simple answers. One subject/question at a time will
get you there a lot quicker tha
Andy,
You talking about doing it this way?
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/
(BTW, I found that by googling "how to get linuxcnc master branch")
Agreed. Doing git and compiling falls under "linux guru". But even I can
follow the above instructions.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:01 PM, andy pugh wrote:
Marius
You have missed the point.
I also run master from the git repository.
But master fom the buildbot does not work correctly for me (wrong keys
when updating).
Which means i had to install from git and as steve said only the linux
adept can get it.
It is a case of "oh load that version from
On 3 April 2014 20:31, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> Mark
> Use the git method to install and compile the master branch.
I do think that falls into the "Linux Guru" category though.
Setting up an alternative software source (which I haven't found any
problems with) is only a small extension of the
Mark
Use the git method to install and compile the master branch. The wiki is
very clear and easy to follow. I turn the auto update stuff off
completely as it screws with my stuff all the time. I do a regular pull
form the branch to stay up to date.
If I installed a machine from master and it ru
Well i tried that.
It now continually tells me there is an update,then will not let me as
there is something wrong with keys.
I have to continually remove and re-install.
A rather large pain.
On 03/04/14 20:08, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 19:50, Steve Blackmore wrote:
>> now as it's been
I have to agree here. The instructions to install is on the wiki and not
hard to do. I have not used production release (2.5.3) for a long time.
I only use and test on master. Once it is set up it is three commands
and you running
On 2014-04-03 21:08, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 19:50,
On 3 April 2014 19:50, Steve Blackmore wrote:
> now as it's been fixed it sits languishing
> in some place only the adept can get at.
It isn't _that_ hard to get the development branch.
Configure the Synaptic Package manager to look at the buildbot then
tell it to update.
--
atp
If you can't fi
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:45:15 +0200, you wrote:
>As much as we all want the big features, not one of us who use and test
>the Master branch on a regular basis has seen any of these for general
>use or testing.
>
>I for one cannot wait to get the new TP but I will not use it in any
>installation
On 4/2/14 15:56 , Michał Geszkiewicz wrote:
> Hi Seb,
Hi Michal,
> Few questions:
>
> Who made decision about not including ubc and when?
As release manager, I did. It was a few days before i made the 2.6
branch announcement.
> Where are the emails that invite developers to irc meeting to vo
As much as we all want the big features, not one of us who use and test
the Master branch on a regular basis has seen any of these for general
use or testing.
I for one cannot wait to get the new TP but I will not use it in any
installation before it has been tested by myself and a lot of other
On 4/3/2014 7:17 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 12:30, Mark Tucker wrote:
>
>> Exactly what is the 2.6 branch bringing to the table at this point??
>> As someone has already stated,why can it not be a case of switch the new
>> TP on/off in the ini.
>> It is the only way it will get tested
On 3 Apr 2014, at 13:17, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 12:30, Mark Tucker wrote:
>
>> Exactly what is the 2.6 branch bringing to the table at this point??
>> As someone has already stated,why can it not be a case of switch the new
>> TP on/off in the ini.
>> It is the only way it will get
On 3 April 2014 12:30, Mark Tucker wrote:
> Exactly what is the 2.6 branch bringing to the table at this point??
> As someone has already stated,why can it not be a case of switch the new
> TP on/off in the ini.
> It is the only way it will get tested properly.
If there was an "inner circle" tha
I am very disheartened to read this.
The fact that the new Trajectory planner/ubc work, will not be included .
Exactly what is the 2.6 branch bringing to the table at this point??
As someone has already stated,why can it not be a case of switch the new
TP on/off in the ini.
It is the only way it w
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:50:06 -0600, you wrote:
>I am pleased to announce the creation of a branch for stabilizing and
>releasing LinuxCNC 2.6. This marks the beginning of the 2.6 release
>process. Look for a 2.6.0~pre1 pre-release in the near future.
>
>The 2.6 branch does not contain either of
Hi Seb,
Few questions:
Who made decision about not including ubc and when?
Where are the emails that invite developers to irc meeting to vote this?
Why voting about need to integrate ubc before 2.6 from irc meeting
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Meeting201306 was ignored?
Why you ignor
With the large number of changes to the architecture, will there be a jump
to 3.0 after 2.7?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:25 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Yay! This is a good decision. Just a stepping stone to 2.7. (which
> won't be as long as 2.6 was)
>
> I have seen all the sausage making - with th
Yay! This is a good decision. Just a stepping stone to 2.7. (which
won't be as long as 2.6 was)
I have seen all the sausage making - with the relatively few people
actively working on linuxcnc - big features/improvements are in the
works. (and this takes time) (but thing are coalescing..)
I am pleased to announce the creation of a branch for stabilizing and
releasing LinuxCNC 2.6. This marks the beginning of the 2.6 release
process. Look for a 2.6.0~pre1 pre-release in the near future.
The 2.6 branch does not contain either of the two big, hotly anticipated
merge candidates, join
48 matches
Mail list logo
