snip
Just a note
Richard began a new thread and solved the problem.
Looks like this thread can be put to rest.
--
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Is nothing about lazyness... is about being tired of to do something
that is supossed to work.. and it does not! again and again and again.
When going your lazy path i got the following two messages.
Acercar linea 10 en /usr/shareaxis/images/axis.ngc: bad character x used
RTAPI:: ERROR:
El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dmesg output and any other
relevant logs, then email us the pastebin URL.
HAVE POSTED THE MESSAGES SEVERAL TIMES ¿SHOULD I
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Richard Acosta eyela...@gmail.com wrote:
Is nothing about lazyness... is about being tired of to do something
that is supossed to work.. and it does not! again and again and again.
When going your lazy path i got the following two messages.
Acercar linea 10
Richard Acosta wrote:
El 21/12/2008 06:42 p.m., Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
Richard Acosta wrote:
El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dmesg output and any
El 22/12/2008 12:52 a.m., Rafael Skodlar escribió:
Richard, this kind of response gives open source bad name. You have a
situation where something worked OK for others but not for you. I assume
that when they got it working on some systems they assumed it's OK and
put it on the list. Happens
Hey Richard
How are you starting emc?
_
Keep in touch and up to date with friends and family. Make the connection now.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/
Stuart, i'm sorry, there is a mistake, somewhere on my pastebin posts...
sorry, but will check that before give you an answer.
El 22/12/2008 02:33 a.m., Stuart Stevenson escribió:
Richard,
You do NOT understand! The messages you type do not agree with the
posts you send. You must make
Richard Acosta wrote:
[snip]
No John... i'm not wrong, i think you don't understand me.
I said..
1) when using Ted Hyde's files, i got the dmesg ending with unknown
command line xx always talking about the same line on the same file
every time the same since 2.2.6, then 2.2.7, and... now,
No problem, i'll try 2.2.8 but... was the same about 2.2.7... i was
using 2.2.6 and you told about going to 2.2.7, and i went, so... should
i guess 2.2.7 is not ready...¿?
I mean... if it is supposed to work in a version, why should i always go
next version to make at least a try?. and this
El 20/12/2008 01:46 a.m., Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Richard Acosta wrote:
Did sc7i43P report that the 7I43 had a 400K FPGA?
Yes it says a 400k
Well it should say something like:
Pass: 1 Error Count: 0 loop count:
Richard Acosta wrote:
OK, this is what i meant on my last message. My hardware is suppossed to
be OK, i have made a few tests on DOS and all went fine.
I guess there is something wrong on linux, config files or the driver
itself.
The error now is unknown command when using 2.2.6 lights went
: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample What now?
Richard Acosta wrote:
OK, this is what i meant on my last message. My hardware is suppossed to
be OK, i have made a few tests on DOS and all went fine.
I guess
El 20/12/08 14:17, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribio':
Richard Acosta wrote:
OK, this is what i meant on my last message. My hardware is suppossed to
be OK, i have made a few tests on DOS and all went fine.
I guess there is something wrong on linux, config files or the driver
itself.
The
Richard Acosta wrote:
El 20/12/08 14:17, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribio':
Richard Acosta wrote:
OK, this is what i meant on my last message. My hardware is suppossed to
be OK, i have made a few tests on DOS and all went fine.
I guess there is something wrong on linux, config files or the
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Richard Acosta wrote:
Did sc7i43P report that the 7I43 had a 400K FPGA?
Yes it says a 400k
Well it should say something like:
Pass: 1 Error Count: 0 loop count: 10
Pass: 2 Error Count: 0 loop count: 20
Pass: 3 Error Count: 0 loop count: 30
and i confirm
Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Richard Acosta wrote:
Did sc7i43P report that the 7I43 had a 400K FPGA?
Yes it says a 400k
Well it should say something like:
Pass: 1 Error Count: 0 loop count: 10
Pass: 2 Error Count: 0 loop count: 20
Pass: 3 Error Count: 0 loop
: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample What now?
Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Richard Acosta wrote:
Did sc7i43P report that the 7I43 had a 400K FPGA?
Yes it says a 400k
Well it should say something
OK, this is my hal file again, is the same one that Ted Hyde has posted.
http://pastebin.com/f509e8f08
Greetings, and thanks again
El 16/12/08 14:48, Peter C. Wallace escribió:
How did the DOS testing turn out?
OK... sorry for the delay, but my work is killing me.
Finaly i managed
How did the DOS testing turn out?
OK... sorry for the delay, but my work is killing me.
Finaly i managed (lack of time not brain) to burn a DOS start cd and put
there the files to make the test.
When sc7i43p svst4_4b.bit 378, everything went fine.
Did sc7i43P report that the 7I43 had a
Ok, besides the chip say 400k, when using the prog. it reported 400k chip.
I'll post again tonight.
Greetings.
El 16/12/2008 02:48 p.m., Peter C. Wallace escribió:
How did the DOS testing turn out?
OK... sorry for the delay, but my work is killing me.
Finaly i managed (lack of time not
Ok, besides the chip say 400k, when using the prog. it reported 400k chip.
I'll post again tonight.
Greetings.
OK thats good!
Since the driver wont load (reads wrong FPGA size) my guess is you
have the wrong parallel port address somehow
Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
(\__/)
(='.'=) This
inside linux? (EMC2)
i don't think so... anyway i'll check that later.
Thanks
El 16/12/08 19:11, Peter C. Wallace escribio':
Ok, besides the chip say 400k, when using the prog. it reported 400k chip.
I'll post again tonight.
Greetings.
OK thats good!
Since the driver wont load
El 10/12/2008 09:12 p.m., Peter C. Wallace escribió:
How did the DOS testing turn out?
OK... sorry for the delay, but my work is killing me.
Finaly i managed (lack of time not brain) to burn a DOS start cd and put
there the files to make the test.
When sc7i43p svst4_4b.bit 378,
OK, i'll try DOS, where do i get your utilities?
El 09/12/2008 12:01 a.m., Peter C. Wallace escribió:
OK I tried rev B 7I43s (your card rev) with 2 motherboards using the VIA
VT82C686 (one VT82C686A and one VT82V686B). This is the same South bridge as
your motherboard.
Using a short cable
] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample What now?
OK, i'll try DOS, where do i get your utilities?
Download the latest 7I43 support package from:
http://www.mesanet.com/software/parallel/7i43.zip
Unzip this and copy these three files
Then run this command (assuming your parallel port address is set to 0x378)
Oops I meant:
sc7i43p svst4_4b.bit 378
^^^
Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
()_() signature to help him gain world domination.
I have a 400K version, that line was already been discovered and i
already checked my card chip (it says 400). Also, when i bought it, i
asked for this version specifically. It would be more than a mistake if
i had a 200K instead of a 400K.
El 05/12/2008 12:25 a.m., Stephen Wille Padnos
-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample What now?
I have a 400K version, that line was already been discovered and i
already checked my card chip (it says 400). Also, when i bought it, i
asked for this version specifically
(EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample
What now?
El 05/12/2008 07:35 p.m., Peter C. Wallace
)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample
What now?
El 05/12/2008 07:35 p.m., Peter C. Wallace escribió:
On Fri
Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample
What now?
Computer is a Tualatin Celeron 1300MHz on a Soyo 7VBA-U, 512MB PC133
Kingston VR and ATA133 40Gb Maxtor Hard
] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample What now?
El 05/12/2008 07:35 p.m., Peter C. Wallace escribió:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Richard Acosta wrote:
This may also indicate a inability to communicate with the card.
1. Is the card jumpered
Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample
What now?
El 05/12/2008 07:35 p.m
Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample
What now?
El 05/12/2008 07:35 p.m., Peter C. Wallace
Well.. this is somehting mesa people has to answer, because i asked for
the 400k version when bought. If they send the wrong one i'll have to
talk to them then.
I'll doublecheck my board and it's package again, but i think this can't
be possible.
El 05/12/08 00:25, Stephen Wille Padnos
Padnos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample
-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample What now?
I'm (almost) sure it's the 400k version, because is the one i asked when
i bought it, this night when in home i'll check that again.
This may also indicate a inability
El 05/12/2008 07:35 p.m., Peter C. Wallace escribió:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Richard Acosta wrote:
This may also indicate a inability to communicate with the card.
1. Is the card jumpered for EPP (W4 and W5 both in the 'down' position)
Yes.
2. Is the card powered properly (all three status
http://pastebin.com/m38308b00
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now.
You have the 200k gate version, not the 400k gate version.
I found this out by looking at the error output on line 264 of your pastebin
[ 114.376380] hm2/hm2_7i43.0: board has FPGA '3s200tq144', but the
firmware in hm2/7i43/SVST4_4B.BIT is for FPGA '3s400tq144'
This relatively difficult to
: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
and same error than using EMC 2.2.6 + 7i43 + Ted's sample What now?
You have the 200k gate version, not the 400k gate version.
This error can also be because of a EPP communication error, so Richard: what
type of 7I43 do you have, 200K
42 matches
Mail list logo
