On 29.08.2011 14:03 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On 28/08/2011, at 11:21 PM, Craig Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
Cells are not just physical and chemical. They are biological too.
That's what you're not seeing. There is a difference. There's
nothing magic about it, it's
On 22.08.2011 09:14 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
In my view, any experiment is based on some assumptions (a world
view). To this end, it would be nice to understand what a world
view would be necessary to state
%20Cognition%20.pdf
It happened that they talk not about the Loeb theorem but rather about
the biologist Jacques Loeb.
Do you know why robotics people do not use the Löb theorem in practice?
Evgenii
On 20.08.2011 16:22 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 19 Aug 2011, at 20:18, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote
On 20.08.2011 00:38 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/19/2011 11:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
It seems that at present there is only one candidate for a zombie -
Dennet, who defending his theory seems to refuse his own
consciousness (I do not remember now where I have seen this nice
statement
Trying to remember where I have seen the statement about Dennett, I have
made search on Google.
Two findings (both are not my source though):
1) Is Daniel Dennett a zombie?
Discussion on ephilosopher.com where the question, I believe is close to
the statement that I have seen.
This is not
On 18.08.2011 16:24 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 17 Aug 2011, at 20:07, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/17/2011 10:36 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 16.08.2011 20:47 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/16/2011 11:03 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Yes, this is why in my first post, I said consider
On 19.08.2011 05:12 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
I'm not saying we shouldn't do science, just that we can't be
*sure* that something which behaves as if it's conscious is
actually conscious. A thermostat may have
On 16.08.2011 20:47 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/16/2011 11:03 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Yes, this is why in my first post, I said consider God's Turing
machine (free from our limitations). Then it is obvious that
with the appropriate tape, a physical system can be approximated
to any
On 17.08.2011 02:01 Jason Resch said the following:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
On 15.08.2011 23:42 Jason Resch said the following:
...
But all of this is an aside from point that I was making
regarding the power and versatility of Turing
On 17.08.2011 03:42 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
But the scientists could be studying zombies. There is no way of
knowing. What we can know is that IF the original brain is
conscious and is modified with a
On 15.08.2011 23:42 Jason Resch said the following:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
On 15.08.2011 07:56 Jason Resch said the following:
...
Can we accurately simulate physical laws or can't we? Before you
answer, take a few minutes to watch this
On 16.08.2011 02:28 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
On 15.08.2011 19:18 Bruno Marchal said the following:
Hi Evgenii,
On 14 Aug 2011, at 21:25, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Bruno,
Let me put it this way. I guess
On 16.08.2011 16:08 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Craig
Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
If the brain does something not predictable by modelling its
biochemistry that means it works by magic.
Then you are saying that whether you accept what
On 16.08.2011 16:18 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 15 Aug 2011, at 19:53, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 15.08.2011 19:18 Bruno Marchal said the following:
Hi Evgenii,
On 14 Aug 2011, at 21:25, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Bruno,
Let me put it this way. I guess that a Lobian machine could
On 15.08.2011 17:22 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/15/2011 12:30 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:20 PM, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
This example is not specific to brain replacement with
artificial parts. It could be that a biological brain contains
On 15.08.2011 19:18 Bruno Marchal said the following:
Hi Evgenii,
On 14 Aug 2011, at 21:25, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Bruno,
Let me put it this way. I guess that a Lobian machine could be
implemented, or it has been already implemented. So let us then
take some Lobian machine and then you
On 15.08.2011 07:56 Jason Resch said the following:
...
Can we accurately simulate physical laws or can't we? Before you
answer, take a few minutes to watch this amazing video, which
simulates the distribution of mass throughout the universe on the
largest scales:
On 14.08.2011 02:00 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
How could the rest of your brain possibly respond differently if
it receives exactly the same stimulation? Perhaps you mean that
it would be able to tell that
, to spread your knowledge it would be good to write a book.
Evgenii
On 14.08.2011 14:55 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 13 Aug 2011, at 16:47, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.08.2011 14:08 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Evgenii
Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote
.
Evgenii
On 14.08.2011 19:08 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 14 Aug 2011, at 15:14, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Bruno,
It well may be that you are right. The problem from my side is that
my knowledge of mathematics is not enough to understand you.
Mathematics is not well taught, and the case
On 12.08.2011 22:05 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 12, 3:41 pm, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
It would be interesting to see how do you know this. Some
revelation or something else?
I don't know it, I just think that it could be the case. If you can
fully and finally
On 12.08.2011 22:20 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/12/2011 12:37 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 12.08.2011 20:40 meekerdb said the following:
You robot do. It gets tagged with some notes, timestamped, and
stuck in the database for further reference and adjustment of
learning algorithms
If your visual cortex is replaced by an electronic device that
produces the appropriate outputs at its borders, the rest of your
brain will respond normally.
This is just an assumption. I guess that at present one cannot prove or
disprove it. Let me quote an opposite assumption from Jeffrey
On 13.08.2011 14:08 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
If your visual cortex is replaced by an electronic device that
produces the appropriate outputs at its borders, the rest of
your brain will respond normally.
This
On 11.08.2011 22:46 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/11/2011 1:04 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
I would say now that consciousness is conscious perception. The
main problem in my view though is who follows the narrative. Does
your theory answer such a question?
I'd say You do, there's
On 12.08.2011 00:00 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 11, 4:04 pm, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
I would say now that consciousness is conscious perception. The
main problem in my view though is who follows the narrative. Does
your theory answer such a question?
Just as an
On 12.08.2011 20:40 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/12/2011 11:00 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 11.08.2011 22:46 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/11/2011 1:04 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
I would say now that consciousness is conscious perception.
The main problem in my view though
On 12.08.2011 20:47 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 12, 2:00 pm, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
This the point that I do not understand. The question is here more
what exactly is the observer in my body. Presumably it is the
brain. Then it first constructs the world that I
On 11.08.2011 09:25 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Stephen P.
Kingstephe...@charter.net wrote:
...
The specific question I'm asking is whether it is possible to
separate consciousness from behaviour. Is it possible to make a brain
component that
On 11.08.2011 21:25 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 11, 3:13 pm, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think consciousness of perception is a narrative story the brain
makes up for the purpose of memory and future cogitation. That's
why we have few conscious memories prior to
Craig,
Now I agree that my example was not good. I have searched some more.
What about phantom pain, that is, pain in a limb that has been removed
by amputation? What your theory says about such a thing?
Evgenii
On 07.08.2011 22:28 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following:
On 07.08.2011 21:26
On 08.08.2011 00:03 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/7/2011 11:07 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.08.2011 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/6/2011 11:44 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Please note that according to experimental results (see the
book mentioned in my previous message
On 07.08.2011 01:24 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
Let us forget for a moment machines and take for example some
other biological creatures, for example even insects. How would you
characterize the behaviour of
On 07.08.2011 05:12 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 6, 9:35 pm, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/6/2011 4:59 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The language doesn't matter. You can see that a person is in pain
by their response to being burned, even if they have not
developed
On 07.08.2011 14:51 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 7, 2:44 am, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
On 07.08.2011 05:12 Craig Weinberg said the following:
We can always infer qualia. It doesn't mean our inference is
correct. In this case I'm pointing out that the inference
On 07.08.2011 14:14 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 07 Aug 2011, at 01:24, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
Let us forget for a moment machines and take for example some
other biological creatures, for example even
On 07.08.2011 17:12 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 7, 10:31 am, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
On 07.08.2011 14:51 Craig Weinberg said the following:
The pain comes to 'us' after the event. That's not to say that
the cells of your burned finger are not in pain already.
On 07.08.2011 19:23 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 07 Aug 2011, at 17:25, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
The question here what it could mean, limited consciousness in
the case of a spider.
Why limited consciousness? For me the big departure is between RA
consciousness and PA
On 07.08.2011 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/6/2011 11:44 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Please note that according to experimental results (see the book
mentioned in my previous message), pain comes after the event. For
example when you touch a hotplate, you take your hand back
there
would be no pain.
Evgenii
On 07.08.2011 20:07 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following:
On 07.08.2011 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/6/2011 11:44 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Please note that according to experimental results (see the book
mentioned in my previous message), pain
On 07.08.2011 20:54 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 07 Aug 2011, at 20:02, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
My question was more about what kind of consciousness experiences a
spider has. Let us start with a vision. Does a spider experience a
3D world like we? (well even without colors, say
On 07.08.2011 21:26 Craig Weinberg said the following:
On Aug 7, 11:47 am, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
On 07.08.2011 17:12 Craig Weinberg said the following:
It seems that pain is some brain function, see for example
On 06.08.2011 12:27 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Craig
Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Consciousness isn't provided. It's not a service. It's like saying
that mass is being provided to an object.
My position is that consciousness
On 06.08.2011 16:15 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
How do you define intelligent behaviour? For example in the book
Dario Floreano and Claudio Mattiussi, Bio-Inspired Artificial
Intelligence: Theories, Methods, and
On 06.08.2011 20:10 meekerdb said the following:
On 8/6/2011 3:48 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.08.2011 12:27 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Craig
Weinbergwhatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Consciousness isn't provided. It's not a service. It's
On 31.07.2011 19:12 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 7/31/2011 1:19 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
...
Your ice fire makes no heat, consumes no fuel.
Not externally, but it would internally.
I understand why that makes sense, but it's incorrect. Heat cannot
be simulated and it cannot be
On 23.07.2011 18:05 Craig Weinberg said the following:
I was thinking about how a sperm resembles a brain and spinal cord
but that the egg is more like a microcosm of a world. Conception
plays out metaphorically as a miniature sensorimotive self entering a
single life as a sphere which
On 18.07.2011 14:21 ronaldheld said the following:
Bruno:
I do not know LISP. Any UD code written in Fortran?
Ronald
Very good book to learn LISP is
http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book.html
Just click Next page, read and so on. By the way, List is much
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128205.200-dvd-alloys-help-make-computers-that-think-like-us.html
A brain-like computer is one that can learn and adapt without external
programming. Such an ability would allow machines to become far better
at tasks like face and speech recognition.
Bruno,
Why don't you make a course for dummies about this? (For example in
Second Life)
Evgenii
On 11.07.2011 16:01 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 11 Jul 2011, at 14:33, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 10.07.2011 17:32 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 10 Jul 2011, at 15:20, Craig
On 10.07.2011 17:32 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 10 Jul 2011, at 15:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
...
Let's take the color yellow for example. If you build a brain out
of ideal ping pong balls, or digital molecular emulations, does it
perceive yellow from 580nm oscillations of
, see for example
http://worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility8.html
You may want to compare Schroedinger with him.
Evgenii
http://blog.rudnyi.ru
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:36 PM, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 7/6/2011 12:22 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 06.07.2011 05
On 06.07.2011 05:14 Constantine Pseudonymous said the following:
Bruno assumes that consciousness preceded matter
then why do we only find consciousness as a terrestrial phenomena
(suns and stars aren't conscious).. and as a later stage terrestrial
phenomena for that matter i.e. water,
On 26.06.2011 22:33 meekerdb said the following:
On 6/26/2011 12:58 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be
...
The idea that our theories are approaching some metaphysical truth is
essentially just the same as assuming there is some more
On 20.06.2011 21:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 6/20/2011 11:05 AM, selva wrote:
it is proved in noetic science that our thoughts(only thoughts and
not the actions due to those thoughts)affect our physical
environment.
Where are these proofs published?
I was trying to understand what
includes the need to create a liar). It's all quite convoluted, but
nevertheless sufficient to help an engineer like me make a design
choice... which I have done.
I hope over time these ideas will not grate on the mind quite so
much.
cheers colin
Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Colin,
Thanks
Colin,
Thanks for the paper. I have just browsed it. Two small notes.
I like [Turing et al., 2008]. It seems that he has passed his test
successfully.
I find term Natural Computation (NC) a bit confusing. I guess that I
understand what you means but the term Computation sounds ambiguously,
In Die Zeit there was a paper about a new project of Henry Markram
The Human Brain Project
http://www.humanbrainproject.eu/
He suggests to develop a full computer model of a human brain. The
project is under the EU initiative FET Flagship Initiatives where the
goal is to choose two project
Thanks for the link. I have enjoyed the talk.
On 12.05.2011 22:20 thermo said the following:
Hi, I recently read the Theory of Nothing book by Russell Standish.
I wanted to share this talk I watched by Damian Conway...
Damian Conway, Thoughtstream: Temporally Quaquaversal Virtual
Nanomachine
Recently there was discussion on this list about this question
Love and free will
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/t/8ab31552cd18561c
Some citations you will find in my blog
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2011/04/love-and-free-will.html
You might be interested in Rex's
Intelligence and
Could you please tell me if this paper will help me for example to earn
more money? Or, according to this paper, does it make sense even try to
earn more money?
On 17.05.2011 08:15 scerir said the following:
Are There Quantum Effects Coming from Outside Space-time?
Nonlocality, free will and
I have found the interview with Stuart Hameroff by googling
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2911199841702354668
Do you mean something like this?
I am not sure that I find Hameroff's ideas impressive. I am personally
closer to Mike's agnosticism:
What the WORLD is, if it exists (what
Recently I have seen interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of
quantum decoherence, for example Decoherence and the Transition from
Quantum to Classical by Wojciech H. Zurek. What is an attitude in
general to this? Is this good? Is there a good text for a layman about
such an approach?
On 15.04.2011 21:44 meekerdb said the following:
Entropy and information are related. In classical thermodynamics the
relation is between what constraint you impose on the substance and
dQ/T. You note that it is calculated assuming constant pressure -
that is a constraint; another is assuming
Colin,
I used to work in chemical thermodynamics for awhile and I give you the
answer from such a viewpoint. As this is the area that I know, then my
message will be a bit long and I guess it differs from the viewpoint of
people in information theory.
CLASSICAL THERMODYNAMICS
First entropy
wrote:
On 14 Apr 2011, at 22:25, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
This week in Die Zeit there were two papers about love and
fidelity. One more scientific, another more philosophic. In the
latter there is a couple of paragraphs related to Goethe’s
“Elective Affinities” that are 100% in agreement with Rex
This week in Die Zeit there were two papers about love and fidelity. One
more scientific, another more philosophic. In the latter there is a
couple of paragraphs related to Goethe’s “Elective Affinities” that are
100% in agreement with Rex:
Die Utopie der Liebe
on 20.03.2011 15:03 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 19 Mar 2011, at 21:27, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 19.03.2011 20:16 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 19 Mar 2011, at 18:04, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
As I have written, I rather follow my intuition rather than logic.
So I cannot
on 19.03.2011 08:32 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 18 Mar 2011, at 21:09, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Not at all. I said exactly that. See the quote above. It is *because*
they have the same right, that we have to listen to both copies, and
can define the indeterminacy from what
on 19.03.2011 20:16 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 19 Mar 2011, at 18:04, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
At this point I am not sure that I agree with oneness of the mind.
I have no certainty about this, *even* in the comp frame. The only
quasi-certainty is that physics is a projection
on 17.03.2011 16:38 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 17 Mar 2011, at 15:33, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 16.03.2011 17:14 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 15 Mar 2011, at 22:59, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I do not follow the relationship between replication and the
movie, sorry.
OK
on 16.03.2011 17:14 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 15 Mar 2011, at 22:59, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I do not follow the relationship between replication and the movie,
sorry.
OK.
My naive viewpoint is that after duplicating there are two
different first person views
I do not follow the relationship between replication and the movie,
sorry. My naive viewpoint is that after duplicating there are two
different first person views that are not related to each other any
more, well they have the same diary before duplicating but that's it. So
if someone
on 13.03.2011 08:29 Jason Resch said the following:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Stathis
Papaioannoustath...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Andrew
Soltauandrewsol...@gmail.com wrote:
So, 'first person indeterminacy' simply means that I don't know
what observation I will
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wdDRnmgzqo
In the movie it went quite well.
(*) Which I have already illustrated with the experience where you
Sorry, I was not able to follow your example.
On 13.03.2011 16:00 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 13 Mar 2011, at 13:24, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote
on 12.03.2011 04:43 Brent Meeker said the following:
On 3/11/2011 7:24 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Andrew, The answer to the simple question that you see that all
of this detail leads to is that at its core, Existence is Change
itself. Becoming is the fundamental ontological primitive.,
on 12.03.2011 18:59 Brent Meeker said the following:
On 3/12/2011 1:40 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 12.03.2011 04:43 Brent Meeker said the following:
On 3/11/2011 7:24 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Andrew, The answer to the simple question that you see that
all of this detail leads
John,
I am probably not that far from agnosticism but the question is how to
make it useful for practitioners like me who have to earn money. I mean
that it is still necessary to take decisions and then the question would
be how.
Although this could be just illusion somehow made by numbers
On 10.03.2011 01:29 1Z said the following:
On Mar 9, 7:22 pm, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
When you compare heat and molecular motion, first it would be good
to define what molecular motion is.
At the beginning, the molecules and atoms were considered as hard
spheres. At this
When you compare heat and molecular motion, first it would be good to
define what molecular motion is.
At the beginning, the molecules and atoms were considered as hard
spheres. At this state, there was the problem as follows. We bring a
glass of hot water in the room and leave it there.
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for answers. As usual, they are very enjoyable.
From my side I can offer nothing more. I guess that at the moment my
point of view is some eclectic mixture, basically I am just collecting
different ideas and theories.
I should say that some long time ago I used to have
I understand how the hypothetico-deductive way is working and I am
amazed by expressions in mathematical logic. Yet, sometimes it is not
bad to start from the end, this might also help. Say I do not understand
how many first persons views are allowed in your theory and if this
number is more
it looks like in French).
Best wishes,
Evgenii
http://blog.rudnyi.ru
on 23.02.2011 19:06 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 22 Feb 2011, at 19:53, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Thank you for your answers. I have still a coupled of questions.
But with computer science, intuition can be misleading
has appeared a record about the birth
of my daughter?
You see, my goal is just to translate some typical statements of my
first person view to your language.
On 22.02.2011 10:39 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 21 Feb 2011, at 21:16, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Thank you for your answer. I am
person view if we compare my current
first person view with that before conceiving the daughter?
Thank you,
Evgenii
On 20.02.2011 22:16 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 20 Feb 2011, at 19:46, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Embryogenesis concerns a multicellular organism
by sperm from my
father. Then the question is how my first person view has been developed
and what happens with it after my death?
Best wishes,
Evgenii
on 20.02.2011 18:21 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 19 Feb 2011, at 22:14, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
A bit off topic question. How
A bit off topic question. How embryogenesis fits comp, digital physics,
ALG, and other diverse points of view expressed here? What mind-body
research says about the development of mind from a single cell and then
its death?
Evgenii
P.S. By the way, in Second Life there is course where Prof
I am on travel this weak. While reading and enjoying the current
discussion in hotel, I have mentioned a book on the table. It happened to be
Ellen Schreiber, Kosmische Weisheiten (Cosmic Wisdom)
I have randomly opened the book and I have landed by
Ein einziger Mensch (A single man)
The
on 05.02.2011 02:27 Colin Hales said the following:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Colin Hales
c.ha...@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
...
I understand that this is your position but I would like you to
consider a poor, dumb engineer who neither knows nor cares
on 02.02.2011 11:00 Stathis Papaioannou said the following:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Brent Meekermeeke...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
I think it very likely that the brain can be so modeled. But the
meaning that simulated brain, as expressed in it's output decisions
relative to inputs is
on 17.01.2011 14:00 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 16 Jan 2011, at 22:27, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Have you meant that the Universal Dovetailer will act for such a
situation according to Poincaré recurrence?
The UD will do that an infinity of times, given that the Poincaré
-perturbation
(or to convince others to do the work, or that such a work has to be
done to get both the qualia and the quanta). Interesting but hard
question.
Bruno
On 15 Jan 2011, at 18:22, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I am trying to understand what the hypothesis comp is about. It
would be interesting
I am trying to understand what the hypothesis comp is about. It would be
interesting to understand whether the Maxwell demon could be simulated
or not. Any idea?
Evgenii
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group,
say that I enjoy reading discussions on this list.
Thanks to everybody.
Evgenii
http://blog.rudnyi.ru
on 06.01.2011 12:43 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 05 Jan 2011, at 20:02, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 04.01.2011 11:43 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 03 Jan 2011, at 19:33
on 04.01.2011 11:43 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 03 Jan 2011, at 19:33, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Do you mean that some time ago the times were less obscurantist? If
yes, could you please tell me when?
From -500 to +500. Roughly speaking. From Pythagorus to the closure
of Plato
on 03.01.2011 10:26 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 17:58, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 02.01.2011 17:29 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 02 Jan 2011, at 13:09, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Remember that with comp, we can never know that we are awake. But
we can
on 02.01.2011 08:47 silky said the following:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Brian Tennesontenn...@gmail.com
wrote:
We're talking about a mathematical theory about E.
What relevance does this comment have?
I would say that a model and reality are different things. Do you mean
that they
?
Evgenii
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2010/08/computable-universes.html
on 02.01.2011 10:31 Brian Tenneson said the following:
In the case of a TOE, the model IS reality.
Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 02.01.2011 08:47 silky said the following:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Brian
Tennesontenn
on 02.01.2011 12:07 Brian Tenneson said the following:
Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Some time ago, I have read
David Chalmers, The Matrix as Metaphysics
http://consc.net/papers/matrix.pdf
Let me make one citation
Importantly, nothing about this Metaphysical Hypothesis is
skeptical
on 02.01.2011 12:54 Brian Tenneson said the following:
Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
on 02.01.2011 12:07 Brian Tenneson said the following:
Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Thank you for your answers. We could say that the Universe is made
of superstrings or we could say that the Universe is made
501 - 600 of 619 matches
Mail list logo
