Re: The UD as a knotted string

2016-09-25 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Bruno, All of Lou's ideas have a common thread, but I wonder which one's you have in mind. On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 25 Sep 2016, at 16:32, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any reason why the UD string is *

The UD as a knotted string

2016-09-25 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi, Is there any reason why the UD string is *not* a 1d topological object? If it is a 1d topological string, can it be knotted? If it can be knotted, can the reflexivity ideas of Lou Kauffman be applied? For example: https://youtu.be/f_8eCnaxPzc?t=35m32s -- You received this message because

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-16 Thread Stephen Paul King
I apologize but it seems that none of us has time to explain other people's ideas to each other or to read their papers for ourselves. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 16 Sep 2016, at 03:27, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > The idea is to think o

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-16 Thread Stephen Paul King
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 16 Sep 2016, at 01:29, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote: > >> >> >> On 9/15/2016 11:03 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote: >> >> I

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
That's a good example, actually! On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: > Can you give an example? What I'm led to think of is something like: > % Add two and two > print "4" > halt > > Brent > > > > On 9/15/2016 6:27 PM,

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
The idea is to think of computations as discrete, they do one thing: process one algorithm and halt. Obviously I am not talking about Turing machines... On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 9/15/2016 4:29 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > > On Thu,

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 9/15/2016 11:03 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > I get that and buy it too, Brent. Platonia is the "flat" Complete version, > I am looking for the infinite tower of incomplete yet consistent theories >

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
e TauChain. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: > According to Bruno it's in Platonia. It's timeless and doesn't "go", it > just IS, like 2+2 IS 4. > > Brent > > On 9/15/2016 10:13 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > OK, but where is th

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
44, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > > > On 15 September 2016 at 05:25, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > >> Hi Stathis, >> >>I really like this explanation of supervenience. I only worry that we >> need a lot more detail, of how

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
execution of the UD), but there is no inherent relative > order of the threads. > > Brent > > On 9/15/2016 9:15 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > There is "time is a measure of change" concept, which lines up with what > you're saying: "... 'time' i

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
Could it be that the concrete is the subjective reflection of the abstract? On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 9/15/2016 4:44 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > > > On 15 September 2016 at 05:25, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@prove

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
oup. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/everything-list/FnHZFBf-Acw/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-14 Thread Stephen Paul King
ic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/everything-list/FnHZFBf-Acw/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > V

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-14 Thread Stephen Paul King
re subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/everything-list/FnHZFBf-Acw/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > every

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-13 Thread Stephen Paul King
topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/everything-list/FnHZFBf-Acw/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit t

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-13 Thread Stephen Paul King
Not to rehash an old chestnut, but can a bit dance on an infinitesimal? On Sep 13, 2016 10:22 AM, "Stathis Papaioannou" wrote: > > > On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker wrote: > >> In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is emergent. The >> "execution" of the program is ti

Re: A question for Bruno

2016-09-10 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi, Is there any consideration of the duration of the period of time of the moment? Are they assumed to have vanishingly small durations? On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 7:44:16 PM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Charles Goodwin > wrote: > > Hi everyone and

Re: Reversing time = local reversal of thermodynamic arrows?

2014-11-09 Thread Stephen Paul King
n AFAIK > > 2014-11-09 2:25 GMT+01:00 Stephen Paul King : > >> Hi Alberto, >> >>Is there really a global thermodynamic arrow of time? We can only >> infer its existence based on theoretical organizations of data that we >> collect. AFAIK, all "arr

Re: Reversing time = local reversal of thermodynamic arrows?

2014-11-09 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi LizR, Interesting! On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 3:11 AM, LizR wrote: > On 9 November 2014 14:25, Stephen Paul King wrote: > >> Hi Alberto, >> >>Is there really a global thermodynamic arrow of time? We can only >> infer its existence based on theoretical

Re: Reversing time = local reversal of thermodynamic arrows?

2014-11-08 Thread Stephen Paul King
dict > the first assumption!!! > > > > 2014-10-15 2:14 GMT+02:00 Stephen Paul King >: > >> Hi, >> >>I re-read S. Mitra's paper <http://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.3825v2.pdf> >> again and it made more sense than before if I assumed that the reversible >

Re: Reversing time = local reversal of thermodynamic arrows?

2014-11-06 Thread Stephen Paul King
ry would simply > deliver. Something mind boggling before, like emergence, suddenly > understood as something very simple and invariant that doesn't explain > emergence or talk about levels or scales, because all of that is about to > be > > > On Wednesday, October 15, 20

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-27 Thread Stephen Paul King
unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Rese

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-17 Thread Stephen Paul King
view and tracing out all distinctions of computations (modulo complexity class) and hardware (modulo resource availability), otherwise I thing we agree. On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 16 Oct 2014, at 16:48, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-16 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Telmo, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > >> Hi Telmo, >> >>You wrote: "If I understand the ideas in Mitra's paper correc

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-16 Thread Stephen Paul King
is> of adjoint categories <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functor_category>. I can't find a good mathematical description of the concept yet... On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe.

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
his group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visi

Reversing time = local reversal of thermodynamic arrows?

2014-10-14 Thread Stephen Paul King
structure that would modulate decoherence. This "decoherence" thing, IMHO, needs to be looked at carefully. In deference to Bruno, I should ask a question relevant to the ongoing discussions. Is a finite universe with locally reversible time consistent as a 1p world? -- Kindest Regards

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-14 Thread Stephen Paul King
legroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Researcher Mobile: (864) 5

Re: Do today's philosophers even think about the existence of God anymore?

2014-10-14 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Brent, I have had a couple of experiences that proved to me that there exists something like the theist God. Things that I can not explain otherwise are some kind of "divine intervention" that saved my life. Could there be an explanation that is completely secular? I am open to such, but

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-19 Thread Stephen Paul King
look right... On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:22 PM, LizR wrote: > Does this mean evolution is intelligent but (probably) not conscious? > > > > On 20 September 2014 03:01, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Dear Bruno, >> >>I agree, this introduces the possibil

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-19 Thread Stephen Paul King
04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 01 Sep 2014, at 17:57, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Hi Brent, > >Have you seen any studies of the "Ameoba dubia > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polychaos_dubium>" that look into what > their genome is expressing? >

Re: Higgs Boson particle, a.k.a. the "God particle," could end the universe

2014-09-09 Thread Stephen Paul King
://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/N640uTPeGn8/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http:

Re: Higgs Boson particle, a.k.a. the "God particle," could end the universe

2014-09-09 Thread Stephen Paul King
e the results, even in principle. > > > On 9 September 2014 17:46, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Has any one figured out how Hawking for that number and will you >> explain it to us? Do energies of that scale even occur in the formation of >

Re: Higgs Boson particle, a.k.a. the "God particle," could end the universe

2014-09-09 Thread Stephen Paul King
le. > > > On 9 September 2014 17:46, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>Has any one figured out how Hawking for that number and will you >> explain it to us? Do energies of that scale even occur in the formation of >> black holes? >> >&g

Re: Higgs Boson particle, a.k.a. the "God particle," could end the universe

2014-09-09 Thread Stephen Paul King
gt; > > On 9 September 2014 17:46, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>Has any one figured out how Hawking for that number and will you >> explain it to us? Do energies of that scale even occur in the formation of >> black holes? >> >> &g

Re: Higgs Boson particle, a.k.a. the "God particle," could end the universe

2014-09-08 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi, Has any one figured out how Hawking for that number and will you explain it to us? Do energies of that scale even occur in the formation of black holes? On Sunday, September 7, 2014 11:17:19 PM UTC-4, cdemorsella wrote: > > What do the physicists on this list think about Hawkins recen

Fish can communicate and UNDERSTAND each other!

2014-09-08 Thread Stephen Paul King
http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/09/08/when-your-preys-in-a-hole-and-you-dont-have-a-pole-use-a-moray/ -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Researcher Mobile: (864) 567-3099 stephe...@provensecure.com http://www.provensecure.us/ “This message (including any

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-07 Thread Stephen Paul King
aybe I am not giving most people enough credit. > > -Chris > > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > *From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto: > everythin

Re: my "artificial scientist"

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Paul King
Very Nice Telmo! We need to talk! I am working with Marius Muliga and Lou Kauffman and others on a form of 'software computer" that might run on top of your networks! See: http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4333 On Friday, September 5, 2014 8:20:20 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote: > > Hi all, > > Sinc

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Paul King
an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Paul King
y that bears on the potential > realities of AGI. > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > >> Hi Terren, >> >> Ah, nice link. Thank you. Does the assumption of a finite and fixed set >> of resource

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Paul King
AM, Terren Suydam wrote: > http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Paperclip_maximizer > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > >> AFAIK, if the AGI and humanity are not competing for the same resources, >> no confli

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Paul King
com/wiki/Paperclip_maximizer > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > >> AFAIK, if the AGI and humanity are not competing for the same resources, >> no conflict need arise... >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 a

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Paul King
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Paul King
ntionally created by other 'intelligence'. It reminds me of the debates in the 19th century about the origin of life. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:10 AM, LizR wrote: > On 5 September 2014 16:42, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Nah, I get what you mean. Connecting an AGI to

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
Nah, I get what you mean. Connecting an AGI to a body is one way of teaching it to recognize us, but do we really want to do that? On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:18 AM, LizR wrote: > On 5 September 2014 16:08, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> We are freaking AGI ourselves, operatin

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
We learn of each other by interacting this becomes communication once languages emerge... On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:16 AM, LizR wrote: > On 5 September 2014 15:18, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Sure, that would set up synchronization of sensory data input streams, >

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
I agree, but I strongly suspect that one does not "program" an AGI, we would "grow" it and "teach" it On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:15 AM, LizR wrote: > On 5 September 2014 15:13, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> But you seem to assume that it h

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
o reason to > believe for instance that we couldn't carry on a conversation with an AI of > sufficient cognitive ability (and the motivation to do so). > > Terren > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: >

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
it interacts with every > day. In this particular scenario, it seems very unlikely it wouldn't be > aware that other people existed. > > (Excuse me, I have to go AFK for a bit. I need to recharge my batteries...) > > > > On 5 September 2014 13:08, LizR wrote: > >

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
et the machines to interpret the data patterns in ways consistent with how we do. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:08 PM, LizR wrote: > On 5 September 2014 12:58, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi LizR, >> >>I will repeat my question: What makes us think that the

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi LizR, I will repeat my question: What makes us think that the AGI will be aware that we exist? On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:21 PM, LizR wrote: > On 5 September 2014 00:38, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>OTOH, one can control the available re

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
nsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Res

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
nd all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-04 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi, I am looking for any papers on the effects of allowing neural networks to couple to each other On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:16 AM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 17:02, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Are the resources available to the OverLords that would allow th

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
Are the resources available to the OverLords that would allow the sharing to be "cost-free" then it would make no difference, otherwise On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:37 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 14:31, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> But something is amiss

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
But something is amiss! Why would the OverLords wish to share their largess with us? On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 14:06, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> OTOH, becoming capable of exploiting computational resources that are >> "fr

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
​Right! Damping down random fluctuations in one's computer is an optimization move. Oh!, your thinking in more "Borg" terms, re: absorption​ On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 14:06, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> OTOH,

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 13:48, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Zerg <http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Overmind>! ? >> >> Well, quite. I believe the name comes from "Childhood's End" although > obviously Olaf Staple

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
appen. It always goes the opposite direction: minds tend to diverge and become diverse and not merge to an infinite limit. Merging actually destroys information. Witness the Black Hole. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 13:48, Stephen Paul Ki

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
Zerg <http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Overmind>! ? On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:46 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 13:45, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Umm, not really. It is "exploitation". >> >> Only if you aren't absorbed. Otherwise

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
Umm, explain: "Absorbed". I'm not groking it... On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:46 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 13:45, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Umm, not really. It is "exploitation". >> >> Only if you aren't absorbed. Otherwise

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
Humans interacting with each other form very nice (in terms of expressiveness <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expressive_power>) adaptive networks. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Stephen Paul King < stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > Umm, not really. It is "exploitation&q

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
Umm, not really. It is "exploitation". On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:43 PM, LizR wrote: > On 4 September 2014 13:38, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi John, >> >>"why would have want the Zookeepers intelligence from the Earthlings? >> "

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
t of some kind? Or a > 'mental nightpot'? as long as we supply, we last. Then we are out. > (A similarly unfounded fantasy - just as the so called 'scientific' ones). > John M > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Stephen Paul King < > s

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Chris, Could you send me your thoughts about dependency injection to my gmail address so that we can continue? kingstephenp...@gmail.com On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Stephen Paul King < stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > >Could we discuss this further

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-02 Thread Stephen Paul King
Modulo decryption On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:59 PM, LizR wrote: > On 3 September 2014 15:45, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi LizR, >> >> Sequentiable means that the correct sequence of operations occurs. >> Information is sensitive to orderings a

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-02 Thread Stephen Paul King
tion" behaviors associated - See Dawkin's The extended Phenotype <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Extended_Phenotype> - Humans are quite capable of becoming members of a sufficiently expressive language as silicon hardware... On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:57 PM, LizR wrote: > On 3 Septe

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-02 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi LizR, Sequentiable means that the correct sequence of operations occurs. Information is sensitive to orderings after all. 101001010010 is not the same number as 00100110001 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:23 PM, LizR wrote: > On 3 September 2014 15:09, Stephen Paul King > wrote: &

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-02 Thread Stephen Paul King
that distributed computation is an AGI, we would never know it is there and neither would it know we are here. On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:23 PM, LizR wrote: > On 3 September 2014 15:09, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi LizR, >> >> But here is the thing: the

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-02 Thread Stephen Paul King
e required to exist and to be sequentiable properly. On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:48 PM, LizR wrote: > On 3 September 2014 12:43, Stephen Paul King > wrote: > >> Hi LizR, >> >>My point about Aliens being AGI is simple. A sufficiently advanced >> alien civilizatio

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-02 Thread Stephen Paul King
nd an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-02 Thread Stephen Paul King
ttps://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Researcher Mobile: (864) 567-3099 stephe...@provensecure.com http://www.provensecure.us/ “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
st@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King > *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2014 5:38 PM > > *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: AI Dooms Us > > > > Hi Chris, > > > >I agree. What we see in the current development is, literally, &g

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
t; > *From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto: > everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King > *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2014 2:53 PM > > *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: AI Dooms Us > > > > Hi Chris, > >

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
e Morsella' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > > *From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto: > everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King > *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2014 4:03 PM > > *To:* everythi

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
ay, September 01, 2014 10:55 AM > > *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: AI Dooms Us > > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > > > > > Hold it! Where is the information about the phy

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
rything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
014 at 1:03 PM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > > > Hold it! Where is the information about the physical system required >> to run that 750 Meg of information contained? >> > > DNA contains information on how to make stuff but it doesn&

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
ark wrote: > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Stephen Paul King < > stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: > > > Hold it! Where is the information about the physical system required to >> run that 750 Meg of information contained? >> > > DNA contains informatio

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
ng List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to eve

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
opic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googl

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
erything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/e

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-08-30 Thread Stephen Paul King
wrote: > > > > > *From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto: > everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King > > > > Are our fears of AI running amuck and killing random persons based on > unfounded assumptions? > > > > Perhap

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-08-28 Thread Stephen Paul King
to be "sane"? What is sanity anyway? Another question is: Would AI have a view of the universe that can be matched up with ours? If not, how would we expect it to "see the world" that it interacts with? Our worlds and that of AI may be disjoint! On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-08-28 Thread Stephen Paul King
Are our fears of AI running amuck and killing random persons based on unfounded assumptions? On Monday, August 25, 2014 3:20:24 PM UTC-4, cdemorsella wrote: > > AI is being developed and funded primarily by agencies such as DARPA, NSA, > DOD (plus MIC contractors). After all smart drones with in

Re: How can a grown man be an atheist ?

2014-07-03 Thread Stephen Paul King
be from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, vis

Re: Tyson is not atheist (was Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-07-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
arents told so. > 2) because they look inward and get "personal evidence" (mystical > experience) > > And there are many intermediates, where people believes in God because > their parents told so, and they look inward and get evidences that they > interpret as

Re: How can a grown man be an atheist ?

2014-07-01 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Russell, Ah! I don't quite grok it completely, but thank you for this example. We had to assume an already existing measure on the Reals. Where does that come from? On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Russell Standish wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:32:37PM -0400, Stephen Paul Ki

Re: How can a grown man be an atheist ?

2014-06-30 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Russell, I don't get it. How does the constraint of a finite sample overcome the inherent zero measure? On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Russell Standish wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:44:20PM -0400, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Hi Russell, > > > >

Re: How can a grown man be an atheist ?

2014-06-30 Thread Stephen Paul King
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/1NWmK1IeadI/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group

Re: How can a grown man be an atheist ?

2014-06-30 Thread Stephen Paul King
to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest Regards, Step

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread Stephen Paul King
t; whole freaking chromosome is a shame. It's just a case of he's really busy > and thorough for his theory but draws on general knowledge for some of his > argument. But he'll be judged for that similarly. > > -- > You received this message because you are su

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-26 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi, This phrase in the article makes me doubt that the writer thereof did his homework: "for some unknown reason the flashes synchronize over time.”" The synchronization of weakly coupled oscillators is a well known phenomena! It should be pointed out that in the human brain, global synchroni

Re: Climate models

2014-04-16 Thread Stephen Paul King
ps.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Researcher Mobile:

Re: Climate models

2014-04-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
this group and all its topics, send an email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. &

Re: Climate models

2014-04-10 Thread Stephen Paul King
ng very painful that demand a lot of concentrated power >> in a central elite. >> > > We can agree on this one. > > >> >> >> In the same way that 80 years of mass killings demonstrated that an >> economy can not be centrally planified, we are gonna suff

Re: Climate models

2014-04-10 Thread Stephen Paul King
an fight alone and will win inevitably against the ones that > deny it. > > The problem is the price to pay in the process > > > 2014-04-10 18:38 GMT+02:00 Stephen Paul King : > > Alberto, >> >> Don't feed the trolls... >> >> >> On Thu, Apr

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >