No
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26,
He feels that having the Bridgeheads receive SMTP mail on the internal
network poses a security problem. Of course the Bridgehead is using a NAT ip
address but he wants to lock it down further.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26,
Let me guess... he/she wants it to be closer to the Internet - improving mail delivery
times ;)
Seriously, there's hardly any reasons why you should do this and lots of reasons why
not. If you're going to stick anything on the perimeter network relating to SMTP, make
it a machine which is
I'd check the Outlook client view (View/Current View, etc.). It may be that
the current view is only for Last Seven Days or something other than
Messages.
Did you empty the Deleted Items folder?
-Juancho
-Original Message-
From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
I am using Exchange 5.5 SP4.
I have a single site and a single server. We have a new remote office. Both
sites are connected via VPN and the remote site is NOT part of the domain
they are using a workgroup.
I need to install an additional Exchange server in the remote office in
order to speed
Exchange will not install into a workgroup.
- Original Message -
From: Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: Exchange Replication: Newbie question
I am using Exchange 5.5 SP4.
I have a single site and a
usually I answer them. ;)
single domain, running in mixed mode
one ex55 server, one ex2k server
ex55's service account is the domain admin account; password verified (yes,
I know. One thing at a time)
ex2K is standard and hit the 16G limit
task: upgrade the ex2K machine to enterprise
I have a user who received an email where the TO: field showed a
'bellatlantic.net' email address (which he claims he doesn't own). However,
the email showed up on our Exchange server in his Exchange mailbox (on his
'aim.org' email address)
How is this possible ?
BCC is one possibility, forged headers is another.
Short answer: a message has two components: the P1, or envelope, and P2, the
body. For SMTP the addressing in the P1 does not have to match the
addressing in P2. P1 gets the message delivered, P2 is what populates the
message fields.
-
But if you've got a DMZ.. you've likely got either a tri-homed or back-to-back
firewall. Pushing the Exchange server out onto the DMZ does not make your internal
network any more secure, but does expose your bridgeheads. Plus... if you're going to
stick your Exchange boxes out on the DMZ,
It's possible to setup SMTP masquerading to mask the true domain to reply to messages.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 February 2002 16:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How is this possible ?
I have a user who received an email where the TO:
So if I put in a domain is what I described possible?
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:43
Subject: Re: Exchange Replication: Newbie question
Exchange will not install into a
Mailboxes do not replicate. They reside on one server or the other.
Directory information and Public Folders replicate. Mailboxes CAN be moved
to the new Exchange server, but not replicated.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From:
Mailboxes are not replicated. You would move their mailboxes to the new
server in their location. Depending on the link speed you may want to set
them up as a new site but this makes moving the mailboxes harder; inside a
site mailboxes can be moved via the admin GUI. Separate site requires
BCC?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How is this possible ?
I have a user who received an email where the TO: field showed a
'bellatlantic.net' email address (which he claims he
The service account for 5.5 is the same as the domain account. Not best
practice but it should not cause the problem your having. I would try
changing the service account since your site only has two mail servers.
usually I answer them. ;)
single domain, running in mixed mode
one ex55
Where are the Archives for this list. I weant to the the link at the bottom
and no luck.
Are they at the mail-archive.com website or something like that?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Use the site search utility for the link at the bottom. Usually helps if you
know what you're after. E.g. subject line.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27
You have right-clicked on Outlook Today - [client name] - Properties and
clicked on the Folder Size... button? This will tell you exactly where the
items exist. Then if you can't find them there, it's a matter of what view
you are using.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: MSExchange
I have ScanMail 3.8 installed on it and it complains that it couldn't
start the Event Services. The error in the event viewer was so vague
that it led me no where in trying to find out what is causing the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I've come to expect that with Windows and Exchange 2000 some of this
replication stuff happens when it happens.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is possible but you would have to write the replication code
yourself.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
I keep telling y'all to read RFCs 821 and 822. This all becomes a lot
clearer when you understand the foundation technology.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From:
There is also an archive at
http://www.mail-archive.com/index.php3?hunt=exchange
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archives
Use the site
Or RFC2821/2822.
I've read them several times and I still don't understand the foundation
technology. Can't we wipe it clean and start over?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
After reading them and (I think) understanding them, I'm amazed that
e-mail flows at all.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Is anyone familiar with how to modify the default Global Address list
filter rule within Exchange 2000?
Currently I have a large number of Active Directory Contacts that show
up in there designated Address List, but I would like to have them
excluded when you are looking at the Global Address
Perzactly...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
In the header, all fields are optional, except that one of the three to
fields (to, cc, and bcc) has to have something in it. It does not matter
which one. Delivery can occur if the correct address is in any of the
three, NOT JUST THE TO FIELD. Of the three, mail readers only display
two.
Actually,
You can skip all the 822 fields and most hosts will allow you to specify the
from as anything. Some may require a valid domain, but it does not need to
be your own. The only giveaway might be the return-path in the header. In
this case the TO will match the 821 rcpt to.
telnet
So I guess this user used the BCC field to send email to this person.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How is this possible ?
In the header, all fields are optional,
You don't have to be in native mode to do the install of E2K but you
will need a native mode domain to host any DLs that are being used to
access public folders.
You state that you will be installing into the same 5.5 org so
presumably you will be using the ADC to populate AD. When you do that
Hi all,
I'm getting the following errors on MSX 5.5 SP4 and the store doesn't
start.
I spent all day on Technet and reading the MSX Disaster Recovery Guide,
but didn't find useful informations on the log version stamp error, so I
decided to make an offline backup of the stores, and then a
Universal Security Groups can be mail enabled correct?
-Original Message-
From: Grant, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Native or not?
You don't have to be in native mode to do the install of E2K but you
yes
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Native or not?
Universal Security Groups can be mail enabled correct?
-Original Message-
From: Grant, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks for the help. Very much needed. This upgrade has a lot of stuff to
think about.
-Original Message-
From: Grant, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Native or not?
yes
-Original Message-
Run performance optimizer.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Troy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: deletion lockups
One cupie doll to the customer in the argyle sweater.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How is this possible ?
So I guess this user used the BCC field to send email to this
Sounds like possibly a SP or hotfix version mismatch. I'd call PSS if it's a
production box as time == money.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So, you don't want contacts to be addressable? How the 'GAL' is created is
covered in the E2K FAQ I believe.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Clarke, Ronald L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hello,
I have been required to raise the message size limit on all connections to
20Mbs. We have already seen it cause problems across one of our links.
I know it is dependent on the bandwidth and hardware. I just wanted to get
some ideas of what size limits other companies are using.
Thanks.
This logic seems faulty to me in two ways:
1) How many users you are willing to have without e-mail when it
fails *is* a valid question. Even if the total person-minutes of
downtimes stays constant (which I don't agree with either--see
next point), having half of your users unable to work at
Thanks Chris,
while I wait for PSS Italy to wake up tomorrow morning, might I try to
re-load SP4 (no hot-fixes were loaded) or better leave it as it is now?
Alberto
Sounds like possibly a SP or hotfix version mismatch. I'd call PSS if it's a
production box as time == money.
Chris
--
OMG. Follow Ed's advice for a proper setup. After you're done, fire your
security manager who doesn't have a clue about security.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yeah, but all American PSTs are manufactured in Taiwan.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 6:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Burning PST files.
Buy American!
-Original Message-
From:
This is a good question. I have personally limited it to 2MB (except the
directors) with a hard ass approach at first. I will be raising it in a bit
once people remember that they need to be reasonable in what they send (IE
the guy in accounting who tried to email a 98MB file to himself at home).
Might try reloading it, don't see how it could hurt.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange
Ours is set to 15mb inbound and outbound.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits
This is a good question. I have personally
What did you base that number on?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits
Ours is set to 15mb inbound and outbound.
Jim Blunt
So if time-to-recovery of a 1000-person
server is 60% of time-to-recovery of a 2000-person server,
scary math equation snipped
Isn't doing something in 60% of the time *twice* equal to 120% or 20% more
total downtime?
_
I limit mine to 500mb. I own stock in Segate.
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
_
List posting FAQ:
It's 1024(k) to 1 (mb) right?
And actually - is there a way to set the size limit globally, and then just
remove or modify the few that require it?
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 27, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
At that size you should also consider ATT or some bandwidth provider.
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
I tend to agree with Ed. Segregating functions will improve your
reliability (or perceived reliability) a lot more than spreading your user
load. When you run dedicated mailbox servers, your downtime should be far
less than it would be if you run multi-purpose servers (unless you use
1. We have a dedicated full T-1 to our ISP.
2. We do environmental cleanup at this location, so we do a lot of work with
CAD / Geologic data files that can become quite large in size.
3. Several of the companies we interact with (labs, subcontractors, etc.)
require these files.
4. Because of the
As far as Exchange is concerned custom forms are no different then regular
e-mail messages, so the custom form theory is not really possible.
Other responders have given good suggestion as to where the big items
could be.
S.
-Original Message-
From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL
If it's a small office, put a domain controller/exchange over there and move
their mailboxes to that server. If it's larger, you may want to use
separate servers.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:37 AM
To:
Yes, that's why you do it from the public library.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How is this possible ?
Actually,
You can skip all the 822 fields and most hosts will
Has anyone ever seen this error (Event ID 951).. Exchange 2000 and 5.5
environment
Steve Gerhart
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
We have an Exchange 2k server SP2
It runs on an Win2k server with Symantec Norton Antivirus Exchange protection.
On these later days we have had several problem with the exchange db beeing corrupted
for no reason.
We have moved the db to another physical harddrive but still same problem.
Now
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits
1. We have a dedicated full T-1 to our ISP.
2. We do environmental cleanup at this location,
HUH? More details would help... if you got SNA 2.x running on any of
the boxes check
Q148596
Regards,
Joe Bauschek - Network Engineer
Medical Information Management Systems LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gerhart, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
FTP?
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
There's more than one way to skin a cat as well as corrupt a DB. The type of
data corruption might lend itself to determining a possible root cause...
What was the reported error? (e.g. -1018 = Hardware)
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't
Here is the actual error message...
When sending mail to following address
*.EDE060DB-CE5F-8D41-B286-EDFA5726C44A, we have found the connector with
target domain *.EDE060DB-CE5F-8D41-B286-EDFA5726C44A matching destination
address exists in DS. However, we have no way of getting there.
SNA is not running on any of the boxes
-Original Message-
From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event ID 951
HUH? More details would help... if you got SNA 2.x running on any of
the boxes
We have 4MB across the board. We were originally looking at 2, 4 and 6MB
limits. To reach that number we logged all of our internet mail for two
weeks, and found out that only 0.08% of the entire message volume was over
4MB (that is about 300 messages a week for us). And, only about 10 of
FTP As an alternative for large messages is what we have done in the past -
New leadership.
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits
FTP?
I've got a question about Exchange 2k. On my lab system where I'm testing
E2k, I initially could not get OWA to work. I then found that in order for
OWA to work, users must have an SMTP address corresponding to the
subdirectory name on the E2k server's M: drive.
After I added an E2K server to
I've got a question about Exchange 2k. On my lab system where I'm testing
E2k, I initially could not get OWA to work. I then found that in order for
OWA to work, users must have an SMTP address corresponding to the
subdirectory name on the E2k server's M: drive.
My MSX5.5 org and site are KIIX
Folks, a quick question which probably has many answers.
With the build of a new Exchange 2000 organisation if I want to
synchronise all the GALS from the MSX 5.5 orgs and add to this the E2k GAL
In order to get one version of the GAL across all orgs (5.5 and E2k).
Is there a tool that can do
The archives will reveal detailed answers to this question. My feeling is
it is sufficient to have something like Antigen or ScanMail running on all
of your servers, along with an SMTP scanner on your DMZ relay host, but
YMMV.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: James Mike
We are trying to use the Code from
www.ExchangeCode.com (Automatic Home Server
Distribution Lists For Exchange Server Scripting
Agent. We did a test in a small test lab environment
and it works great. I like the fact Home Server DL
allow you to put a notes entry to prevent the adding
of special
Looking for a way to pevent adding special mailbox to
the DL. Help!
We are trying to use the Code from
www.ExchangeCode.com (Automatic Home Server
Distribution Lists For Exchange Server Scripting
Agent. We did a test in a small test lab environment
and it works great. I like the fact Home Server
Looking for a way to pevent adding special mailbox to
the DL. Help!
We are trying to use the Code from
www.ExchangeCode.com (Automatic Home Server
Distribution Lists For Exchange Server Scripting
Agent. We did a test in a small test lab environment
and it works great. I like the fact Home Server
We have several domains each with their own Exchange 5.0 organisation(s)
We want to amalgamate all Exchange 5.5 organisations into our new
Win2k/E2k set up.
What is the preferred method of migrating the Exchange 5.5 organisations
to the E2k organisation whilst maintaining connectivity and a
Looking for a way to pevent adding special mailbox to
the DL. Help!
We are trying to use the Code from
www.ExchangeCode.com (Automatic Home Server
Distribution Lists For Exchange Server Scripting
Agent. We did a test in a small test lab environment
and it works great. I like the fact Home Server
Hello,
I've a small problem and I need some experts.
I am trying to access a remote Exchage server anonymously to send email
from within a VB dll. The program executes (sending mail) when I use a
profileName (with the Inbox profile) that is setup on the local machine
(where the dll is running).
If anyone is looking or knows of anyone that is looking for a new
opportunity - Please read below.
3rd Level Messaging/Exchange Engineer (long-term contract in New Jersey)
Day to day responsibilities include Level 3 Messaging support, requiring
advanced troubleshooting skills and techniques.
We are using Exchange 5.5 with SP4. We are planning on setting up
journalling to a custom recipient.
If the custom recipient is available for a time, what happens to the mail
that is suppose to be journalled to that recipient? Will it sit on our
server in a special directory or will it sit
If anyone is looking or knows of anyone looking for a new opportunity -
please read below.
3rd Level Messaging/Exchange Engineer (New Jersey)
Day to day responsibilities include Level 3 Messaging support, requiring
advanced troubleshooting skills and techniques. Migration engineering,
project
test
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for a way to pevent adding special mailbox to the DL. Help! We are
trying to use the Code from www.ExchangeCode.com (Automatic Home Server
Distribution Lists For Exchange Server Scripting Agent. We did a test in a
small test lab environment and it works great. I like the fact Home Server
Looking for a way to prevent adding special mailbox to the DL. Help! We
are trying to use the Code from www.ExchangeCode.com (Automatic Home
Server Distribution Lists For Exchange Server Scripting Agent. We did a
test in a small test lab environment and it works great. I like the fact
Home Server
I've tried everything to get rid of that annoying feature
that seems to take a OLXP client offline all the time. I tried
to disable offline use, tried disabling AV email scanning, I am
at a loss how I can get rid of this stupid message from the OLXP
client Requesting data from MS Exchange
Got any openings for an expert fdisker?
-Original Message-
From: Julie Bonade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for 3rd level messaging engineer
If anyone is looking or knows of anyone that is looking for a
We have the MTA's set for 20 meg. The IMS's set for 20 meg. And we also
have each users profile for a maximum size of 20 meg.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
You're looking at it from a kind of different angle than I've heard it
before. Go back to ignoring the M: drive, please.
You ignoring it? Good.
Now, make certain that all your users have an SMTP address that reflects
the address listed in your default recipient policy. What is that
domain?
Avaliable options I'm aware of:
1. Compaq LDAP Directory Synchronization Utility (LDSU)
2. Microsoft Metadirectory Server
3. SimpleSync
4. MS Mail Dirsync (unsupported by Microsoft, but is supposed to work)
5. InterOrg tool
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
ok i have a question, i have set ours to 5meg. When i go higher its just a
matter of time till my SMTP server freaks out and has to be booted. y?
e-
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange
I answered #1 in your other thread. As to #2, you're probably looking
at Exmerge.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I think your problem has nothing to do with the M: drive. It has to do
with the fact that you must have a recipient policy that matches the
user's SMTP address.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
Try unchecking the Server Side Scripting add-in on that desktop, if it is
checked.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OutlookXP and Exchange 5.5
I've tried
Netstar 9. Netstar 9.
You are breaking up.
Suggest you return to base.
Over.
-Original Message-
From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Managing Server DL
Looking for a way to prevent adding special mailbox
Looking for a way to pevent adding special mailbox to
the DL. Help!
We are trying to use the Code from
www.ExchangeCode.com (Automatic Home Server
Distribution Lists For Exchange Server Scripting
Agent. We did a test in a small test lab environment
and it works great. I like the fact Home Server
So if time-to-recovery of a 1000-person
server is 60% of time-to-recovery of a 2000-person server,
scary math equation snipped
Isn't doing something in 60% of the time *twice* equal to 120%
or 20% more total downtime?
I hate to say it, but the answer to that was in the scary
math
It depends on how high you want to go and what your server configuration is.
If you have only 500MB free space left on your log drive and someone sends
you a 499MB attachment, your server may freak out.
Once again, this limit should be dictated by the business need, not when
your server's
It could be argued that most employees would be MORE productive if
without e-mail for a little while.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't disagree with any of this. Assuming you have the scale, I
completely believe in segregating Exchange functions as much as possible
(this approach always seems to work well in the windows world, even though
it is much less necessary in the unix world). I had assumed the discussion
of
It could be argued that most employees would be MORE
productive if without e-mail for a little while.
I agree. Sadly, it might have a un-productive impact on my bonus.
Peter
_
List posting FAQ:
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
