Those are transaction logs. They are a sequential record of everything
that happens in the databases. They are purged with a full online
backup.
Read this whitepaper which explains the logs, why they are there, why
they are best kept on a different drive than the databases, and what
happens
William yes I know, but I has been observed that log files are created every second,
is it normal? And only 10 users are using this for a test purpose.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:48 AM
To:
Mainy mobile companies offer this facility, for WAP enabled phones. Some
even forward them using SMS, so keep the message short!
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 16:07
To: Exchange
Well, it is only normal if a lot of activity is passing through. It
depends on the users. Somebody sending a big email to lots of people?
Or there might be a mail loop of some sort. Anyone's mailbox growing
quickly? Turn up SMTP logging and see what's going out the virtual
server perhaps.
Not at all sloppy. The format of the download filename is:
KB#_O/S_first SP_platform_language.exe
The SP number in this case is 3 which is a post SP2 fix, there have been
post SP3 hotfixes about for a couple of months now (with the tag SP4)
Also the revision date on the copy of the article
very funny!
shaken baby syndrome mailing lists
society for biomolecular screening...
social and behavioural society
not quite the sbs I think he was looking for.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 21:35
To: Exchange
But you would normally need the host name...
number@host - which the mobile operator should provide
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 August 2002 08:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: weird question
Mainy mobile companies offer this
Is the alias of the mailbox the same as the NT userid? I seem to remember in
Exchange 5.5 having problems with POP3 if the alias and NTuserid were not
the same, in which case you had to use the username something like NT
domain\ntuserid\mailbox alias so it was always simpler to just make sure the
IIRC he specifically ruled out Usenet, which is exactly where all of
Microsoft's SBS MVPs hang out and give good info.
Start digging around here:
http://www.sbslinks.com/
http://www.sbs2000.info/
http://www.smallbizserver.com/ (Where you'll find the SBS YahooGroup
link...)
-Original
Hey, if I can get that type of speed out of it, it can be a Persian for
all I care...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
What sort of cat? Domestic
Hello,
I have a problem that seems to be related to the Outlook 2000 client.
When a user sync's his PocketPC (not 2002) with it, it comes up with two
unresolved items. There is an error code:
One appointment cannot be read from Microsoft Outlook due to error 80180b04.
This item will not be
Why not recreate that same appt for that time and date on the Pocket PC
itself and then resync?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sync'ing Outlook with a PPC
Hello,
I have a
Didn't think it would work because the object number would be different and
it would just conflict. Will try it and see though. thanks for the
suggestion.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 August 2002 14:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
the error I am getting:
log onto incoming mail server (POP3): unable to logon to incoming mail
server (POP3) verify settings
I do get an e-mail stating the test is sucessful in my mailbox.
_
List posting FAQ:
Is the user name that you are using the same as the alias that is listed
on the Exchange General tab in ADUC? If not, add it to the alias and
then force replication (if you have more than 1 DC) and then try it
again.
Jeff Beckham
-Original Message-
From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It isn't. This has been happening to me just about every night for the
past two weeks.
Chuck
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
www.Monster.com
www.dice.com
www.hotjobs.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of QuietGraceInLA
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 14:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: any good job boards
might need work
Coughing? Headaches? Nausea? Day0? Whats been happening?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 1:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: *That* list...
It isn't. This has been happening to me just about every night
Whats their provider? Most mobile providers allow wireless email..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: weird question
Hi,
I have a question of one of
It's alive
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange LOGS
Dear List,
I have noticed that logs are getting created very rapidly in MDBDATA folder. I checked
by refreshing and each
Then just fill it with more mail :)
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: eseutil issues with 195Gb DB?
I can't seem to remove about 30Gb of white space.
You all know of any issues
You don't have to enumerate messages to delete them. Just right-click on the queue and
select Delete (without NDR)
-Original Message-
From: Reed OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Accidental Spamming
OK so my
FEs can help the BE with CPU cycles - they perform the initial authentication, SSL,
etc. The back-end then does not get hit with loonies trying to log on.
-Original Message-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange
Sorry, I made this reply from the web site and it does not include the
previous message. See below for the original.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: *That* list...
What's the number?
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: weird question
People email my alphanumeric pager all day long using
number@arch.epage.com. Works great.
No I'm already subscribed to them
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SBS
Sounds like maybe an opportunity for you.
-Original
I have a user who wants his mail sent to him at another location.Is there
a set way of doing this, or do i just attach to his mail box and foward
everything to his new location.
Thank you
_
List posting FAQ:
After a recent introduction of an E2k server into a 5.5 org, there has =
been a small problem with a particular recipient.=A0 The recipient is =
internal and it seems the problem only occurs from accounts located on the
e2k = server.=A0 Every time an E2k user send mail to this recipient they get
I have a public folder with 20 thousand accounts listed (By the way my I
have a dedicated public folder server). When I attempt to update accounts
all was going well until I hit about 20 records that give me the following
error:
The item could not be saved to this folder. The folder has been
Hi,
someone deleted a folder in their inbox and now want it back, how do I recover it?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
The users belong to different groups and the item that needs changing is
their permissions/rights on their mailbox. The environment is Exchange 5.5
running on MS Server 2000. Would like to do this via some program as opposed
to manually doing it. Have not had to do this before. Has anyone had to
Thanks for your help. I didn't realize that most of the MVP's hung out
in the newsgroups. Maybe I'll just pay to renew my subscription for my
news server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 4:14
Hello all,
i have a exchange 2000 server set up with OWA also. i am using SSL and i
want to set up a redirect so my users only need to type in
http://servername.domainname and not https://servername/exchange. i went
under the default web site in IIS 5 and went to the home directory tab and
Hi,
We're using Exchange 5.5, sp4 and Trend Micro virus scanning which shows
no viruses in our system. One of our users received a message from
someone they don't know and they said she sent them a message with a
suspicious attachment. She doesn't know this person or their email
address yet
Connect to msnews.microsoft.com... it's free.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SBS
Thanks for your help. I didn't realize that most of the MVP's hung out
in the
You just need to put the entire address, https://servername/exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 2000 IIS5 redirect question
Hello all,
i have a exchange 2000 server set up
Jeesh Does deleted items give you any clue?
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recover folder
Hi,
someone deleted a folder in their inbox and now want it back,
Many viruses, including Klez, spoof the From address.
You need to look in the headers of the original message to work out where it
really came from.
Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New,
Yea but you miss all the good resources in the alt groupsnot
that I check any of that out or anything. Sometimes I have research to
do :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:04 AM
To:
Does anybody know what the imcdata folder is, and why I keep getting
messages stuck in there, causing my IMS and Information store to crash?
If I delete the file in imcdata\in the services will restart.
Thanks,
John
_
List posting
As a contractor here they said they had to manually change a group of about
300 users back to user as their role under the Permissions tab when you
bring up the mailbox properties. Some how they got changed for reason they
did not explain. The users could not login. They told me they changed each
This works great
How to Force SSL Encryption for an OWA 2000 Client Q279681
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q279681
Jeff Beckham
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:00 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Hi All,
Does anyone know of a tool that could synchronize Exchange Gal's
across multiple forests?
Rich
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm
not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready
to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the night upgrading
(or trying to upgrade) my exchange 5.5 server.
We have a very
Heh... Ok, easiest way I can think of to do it would be to export the
primary NT account info, remove them from the mailbox and then add them
again. It could also be done using ADSI.
Don't have a code sample handy to point you to though.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony
Rich,
There are several tools you could use but the tool that springs to mind
is the Compaq (HP) LDSU tool. It's a command line based synchronisation
toolset. I have used it on previous projects wher I used an Exchange
5.5 org as the directory hub for a number of disparete systems and its
Brent
Can you please tell me more about this problem and do you know the actual Q article
that fixes this problem?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 20:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K SP3, OK for us in
Those are your internet mail ques.
Do you happen to have a file level AV scanner installed on your Exchange
server? If you do, disable scanning of the \exchsrvr folders.
-Original Message-
From: John Bricher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Exchange
Setup a Custom Recipient in Exchange and forward mail to it.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending Inbox
I have a user who wants his mail sent to him at another
Rich,
It will work as a synch tool between any LDAP directory. You will
obviously have to modify the output from one forest for the other so
that they are imported as contacts rather than users, but the
flexibility of LDSU will enable you to do this programatically and you
can even shedule it.
Great story, Tom - good fodder for those yet to make the journey.
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just an informational post, you're
My last ex.5.5 server is at the stage of removing it from the site and going
purely E2K native mode.
Question: Is there any harm in keeping this server in the site - but no
public folders/mailboxes, etc. for a
short period of time. Reasoning, managers feel that we
might have
I don't mean to rub salt into your wounds, but many of the gurus on this
list frequently mention the need for a lab environment, even if it
consist of only a couple of older PCs.
Your situation could have been avoided if you restored your AD and
exchange 5.5 into a 2-PC lab environment, and
I meant to create your own SBS list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SBS
No I'm already subscribed to them
-Original Message-
Or why not install a new server with E2k and join the site. Then move
mailboxes. In place upgrades are plain scary if you can not test before
hand. When you do upgrade in place will all your AV and Backups work the
same way. Too much to chance I agree with Ryan.
-Original Message-
From:
I need to send e-mail through a Web page and the Web page needs to have
the Check Name feature that Microsoft Outlook and OWA have. We are
running our IIS server on Windows 2000 and Exchange 5.5 on a different
Windows 2000 server, but they are in the same domain. Taking into
consideration our
Hello,
I did in-place upgrades from Exchange Betas to E2K over the last 5+ years. They all
worked fine except for 5.5 to E2K.
I spent 3+ months labbing the in-place upgrade and got things seemingly to work just
fine. (I went Native in Win2K before doing any Exchange upgrade). The upgrade
I agree also, we are a 40 person company and don't have the budget for a
test lab of that size no matter how much I scream. I planned an exchange
2000 migration to a new server and joined it to the existing site. Well
I have just finished and am waiting for a full backup to complete and
the work
Actually if we had to do it over again I'd keep us at E5.5, and I'd
fight to stay there until my retirement!
Why?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange
List
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I really like SimpleSync for this.
www.cps-systems.com
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Kane
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GAL Syncing
Rich,
It will work as a synch tool
Although Exchange 2000 is really cool, I can see your point of view. It
is very different from 5.5 from an administrative point of view.
-TOny
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Actually if we had to do it over again I'd keep us at E5.5, and I'd
fight to stay there until my retirement!
Why?
Hello,
I found E5.5 to be very stable, and my little stash of Excel files and formulas made
for administration with Import/Export quick and Easy. From cc:Mail in the late
Well, then we'll just agree to disagree.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange
List
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
Actually if we had to do
Thanks for giving us your take on this, it is always good to hear both
sides of the coin. I agree the value is not high, but easier
administration was my push this.
The OWA issue, being slow and such, I agree and I still am getting
complaints.
Told management that is how it is, and they refuse
There's a benefit if there are any Outlook users still on vacation, or
dialing in from home infrequently, or the like, because their clients
will continue to automatically switch over to the new server. The big
benefit to native mode comes when you have more than one administrative
group.
Ed
It is indeed the directory where Internet mail data is temporarily
stored. However, no data should be in the \imcdata directory, but in
its several subfolders. If Mr. Bricher had stated which folder is
collecting the data he might have gotten a reasonable answer. (If it's
the \imcdata\archive
Everyone should read RFCs 821 and 822, and their successors 2821 and
2822. Anyone with an understanding of SMTP will understand how Spammers
do their damage and can explain same to their users.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and
Is deleted item recovery enabled? If so, search TechNet for
DumpsterAlwaysOn without the quotes. If not, restore from backup to
your recovery server and use Outlook and a PST to transfer the stuff
back.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from
That recipient would be on which server? You don't have a recipient on
both systems with the same SMTP address do you?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been busy at my customer site, that's all.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Benefits to a front-end server include:
- offloading processing of SSL
- makes firewall configuration easier when you have multiple mailbox
servers since a front-end server keeps the HTTP, POP or IMAP session
rather than redirecting it to a mailbox server
- pretty much required for doing load
First prize: Vaguest question of the week award!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles
Marriott
Sent: Thursday,
Of course, you have no idea where the IT security team got its
direction; it could well have been from the lawyers.
Nonetheless, the correct answer is to read the FAQ. Search for the word
disclaimer.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs
But you were invited! And he didn't have a disclaimer telling you not
to!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris
Exchange Out Of Office has never replied to every message, at least not
since 4.0 Beta 2. Now, an OOO rule can, but they're covered by allow
automatic replies rather than allow OOO.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
Thanks for that. Mind posting the link?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Millar, Ken
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002
They're bad, but not because of looping. I've really gotten to hate
them.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris
Enter them in the field separated by commas.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: Thursday, August
From the scant information provided, I'd suspect a misconfigured DNS
entry.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell,
You shoulda hired us.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Swynk Exchange
Support List
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:18
Ask your bosses how to do it. They seem to have a plan.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Couch
Sent: Wednesday,
A private investigator and a lawyer.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Dallas
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:49
Does Anonymous have at least contributor role assigned?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Perkins
Sent: Wednesday,
What made you think that would work?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mustafa Ibrahim
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002
Yikes! Exchange on a filer! Good luck!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mahesh
Bharatsingh
Sent: Wednesday, July 31,
WAG: Is this box pointing to itself for DNS?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vincent Paul
Wilton
Sent: Wednesday, July
I know it's a good practice to have a recovery server for exchange
restores, but is it absolutely necessary to have arecovery server. Is it
hard to restore a mailbox to a live exchange server, is it possible?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday,
87 matches
Mail list logo
