Due to Martha's problems with altering emails. Someone here asked if there
is a way to send and email so that the content can not be altered by the
recipient andf then forwarded on
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2
Not that I can think of. Not unless you find some kind of utility that can
destroy a message after it is opened - a la Mission Impossible.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Tony Hlabse
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2003 08:38
To: [EMAIL
I'd think you'll have to solve this one with an attachment of some sort.
All the best,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5. juni 2003 15:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending emails that can not be altered
Due to Martha's
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Due to Martha's problems with altering emails. Someone here
asked if there is a way to send and email so that the content
can not be altered by the recipient andf
Indeed. However, Lotus Notes has a fabulous solution to this problem,
as Notes can prevent messages from being forwarded on, etc. To invoke
this solution, you simply click the 'Enable Bull$hit Security'[1] tick
box.
Neil
[1] To coin an Ed C phrase
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir
That's either name resolution or network related. And just because they can
ping doesn't mean there's enough free network bandwidth to support the
connection, either.
You didn't mention if they are local or not, and how they are connected, but
I'd suggest restarting the MTA service on both
Two questions:
1. Was that talk given by Donald Livingood?
2. If Yes, did he discuss Elvis routing?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL
A company called Authentica makes a product called MailRecall that does
pretty much that. It does indeed work, but it requires a bit of overhead and
an additional client for both sender and recipient.
http://www.authentica.com/products/secure_messaging/mailrecall.asp
You're having a name resolution issue.
I used to have RPCbindback errors in my server logs all the time, only
rarely between the servers in my own site, but all the time between my
bridgehead and the bridgehead in the other site in our org.
I could do a ping via FQDN and an RPC ping, but I
Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once the current one assigned by
DSAccess is unavailable? I heard that you have to restart OL in order to map the
available one. If that the case then it's a big dis-advantage to the clients, because
what if I took down the one of the GC then
We have one of our companies complaining that one of their clients are
having trouble replying to their email. The client is saying when they
hit reply to an email they received from us, it changes the domain name
of their email address to one that is not one of their SMTP addresses.
Lets say
My experience seems to indicate that this is indeed true for OL2002 - I
assume OL2K is the same.
BTW, OL98 seems to not be able to switch GCs even after being restarted.
We recently un-GC'd a DC because we were having problems with it. All of
the OL2K clients that were using it had to be
I wonder if there is a way to force OL2K to use DSAccess at all time. That might
solve the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Catalog and EX2K
My experience seems
*sigh* 2 minutes searching the microsoft website.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;272290
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 16:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
When trying to send mail to an outside school, I see the messages to this
school district are sitting in the Quenever sending out. I have no
problems sending to any other mailservers.
Any ideas? Where can I start to look?
Thanks as always,
Depends on what error you see in the queue. The normal one here is
'network error during host resolution' or something like that. Try
doing an nslookup, and manually connecting via port 25 to the
destination server.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL
Chris,
Thanks for the reply. I did think of that and used the Windows Component
app to undo the IE Enhanced Security Configuration stuff, but it did not
resolve these problems. It would not surprise me to learn that there was
still something leftover that was causing these things.
Jon
The error message on the messages in the Que are [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Host
Unreachable]
I am not sure if it is deaper than Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot send
One side note and don't know if this got anything to do with GC. I have two GCs in my
site, and I have seen this happened yesterday, the client send an email to multiple
recipients one of the recipient bounce back with undelivered message, but when resend
it again, it went through.
I will spare the gory 'political' details as we are in the midst of trying
to consolidate 35 '5.5' Exchange servers in 35 domains to as little servers
as possible. We're looking at an Exchange 2K3 rollout and probably a hybrid
AD using MS's meta directory (maybe). The real question is I am
Is the other mail server having a problem?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot send mailstuck in Que
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
What should they be looking for on their end?
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot send mailstuck in Que
Is the other mail server having a problem?
- Matt
For the rule, replace the From [user] criteria with contains [text] in the message
header and then put the name in the [text] position. This should catch even the sent
on behalf of messages.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes
Wow...that's one messed up mail server.
It's not responding onscreen to any input, while letting you type in
anything you want, in any form you want.
I also couldn't disconnect from it.
However, I didn't find it on any RBL's.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL
Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange...
(Am I sounding a little repetitive here? I seem to say that alot)
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I will spare the gory 'political' details as
You mean you don't believe MS has fixed this in Exchange2K3 ? :) Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Real world experience
Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange...
(Am
which server are you talking about?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot send mailstuck in Que
Wow...that's one messed up mail server.
It's not responding
Unnecessarily adding complexity to something that is complex enough.
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
You mean you don't believe MS has fixed this in Exchange2K3 ? :) Thanks
-Original
Have you checked to see if the reply to address got changed on the users
account?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name.
We have one of our
lc-ps.org
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot send mailstuck in Que
which server are you talking about?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim)
0mail1.lc-ps.org (64.88.11.65) to be more exact.
At least that's what their MX record indicates as their primary mail server.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot send
Yeah, that is all good. It is happening to a handfull of users who send
to this client.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Have you checked to see if the reply to address got changed on
That's odd. I'm having the same problem with my local school district.
Last Friday I moved my Exchange Server outside my firewall and then mail
went through to the school district. I moved it back inside and mail
continued to go through. On Monday when I came in I was getting host
unreachable
I can telnet to it from anywhere accept my Exchange server. Arrrggghhh!
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot send mailstuck in Que
0mail1.lc-ps.org (64.88.11.65)
This is more of a curiousity - I attempted to send mail to several
addresses at unc.edu this morning, and I simply could not get mail there
from my mail server (Exch2K, W2K). This is the error message:
*
Subject: Test
Sent: 6/5/2003 9:27 AM
The following recipient(s) could
Not me. I was press-ganged. Stupid frickin' British Navy.
--
be - MOS
Friends: People who borrow my books and set wet glasses on them.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PGP and many other products will at least sign the email so that the
content cannot be changed without invalidating the signature. But
checking signatures requires a PGP client and is much too complicated
for many users.
- --
be - MOS
On the
Send PDF...
Turn Word documents into PDF format WITHOUT Adobe Acrobat!
Available with E-Mail Integration: 1-Click Convert to PDF Send!
Encryption Security, Watermark, PDF Table of Contents Generation,
Font Xmbedding, Hyperlink Conversion, Web Optimization More!
Download free demo or buy
Use OWA, or bring her in via VPN.
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5
What would be the best option if I had a person at work who works part
time brings in her laptop and wants
I don't think its a case of Fixing anything as much as Exchange server being a
scenario where clustering generally offers a very poor return on the investment in
time and money you spend setting one up and tweaking it. Quite a lot of errors I've
seen with exchange relate to people doing stupid
But when it is out it will be available to the public? I do not need to
get it from Microsoft Consulting Services?
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Microsoft
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/mms/default.asp#
section1
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
But when it is out it will be available to the public? I do not
I'm needing to setup a support type mailbox that when email is sent to
it, it will be delivered to a group of users here. I know I can setup a
Group and have the address sent to those members.
They would also like an auto-response sent to the sender stating that we
have received their request
Just left an HP session at TechEd. Although there were obviously
vendor-specified disclaimers, the speaker's verdict was pretty simple --
Clustering just isn't meant for Exchange.
Like asking a car manufacturer to fix that whole
smashing-when-you-drive-your-car-into-a-brick-wall sorta thing.
That can't stop forwards and printing. The Authentica product can.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I thought the Navy stopped doing that a century or two ago. You must be
older than your .sig looks
Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager
Sanderson Townend Gilbert
22-24 Grey Street
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 6AD
Direct dial: 0191 269 0110
Mobile: 07976 234165
-Original Message-
Ok thanks, seems like the ideology of bringing servers online as mailbox's
increase. I haven't heard any other alternative.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 15:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Real world experience
You could present the various exact scenarios you hoped clustering exchange would help
with and let the group kick around a discussion over if it would actually help and by
how much.
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu
yes - the new version (3.0) will be a 'product' available in two flavours: std allows
connectivity between 2 AD infrastructures; adv allows connectivity between different
directory/database environments.
MCS are no longer required to provide this
I got this info from a TechNet briefing, so
Mutter
Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager
Sanderson Townend Gilbert
22-24 Grey Street
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 6AD
Direct dial: 0191 269 0110
Mobile: 07976 234165
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2003 10:36
To: Exchange
A user got an infected attachment right to her Inbox, which doesn't ever
happen here since we started using ScanMail. I have ScanMail 3.52 (Exch 5.5
SP4) blocking all the attachments on the List of Danger, and yet this
BUGBEAR.B file - QABACKUP.EXE.SCR - got through to the Inbox. A Manual scan
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
W. 202.690.6342
C. 202.359.7159
F. 202.690.7446
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I don't know what the deal is with this latest version of BugBear, but
it's really a problem.
I started having issues with it on the 4th.
The remote access and key logger are the scary parts of this worm.
I have had it get past two A/V scanners. One on mail and one on
workstations. I
You might want to consider upgrading to Scanmail 3.81. I believe it
functions a LOT better.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL
Try http://servername/exchange
James Forbis, MCSE, CNE, CCA, CNS
4BIS.COM, Inc.
11491 Gideon Ln.
Cincinnati, OH 45249
PH (513)469-7887
FAX (513)469-7877
Cell (513)200-4079
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:41 AM
To: Exchange
What have I learned here?
I need a wireless toy
No, not one like that
I want to check mail
While sitting in a session
I want better toys
Drunk geeks aren't pretty
Not enough girls for them all
They need cold showers
Walking around here
All these Exchange Guru shirts
Most cannot spell it
Some
I have 2 W2K DCs and they're both are GC server. Right now there are two RUS, one is
the enterprise point to DC1 and one is the organization also point to DC1.
Technically, I can create another RUS and point it to DC2 so the GAL gets update as
well , but I read somewhere that all I have to do
No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan
attachments blocked by extention blocking - we've had loads of bugbears
quarantined for being .exe's , but it doesn't seem to actually scan them as
well.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024
All RUS's should point to the same DC/GC. Let AD replication carry the
changes around the org. Otherwise you risk writing conflicting data to
2 dif't dc's in your environment. Yeah, not good
Stemy
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday,
Why would it need to?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan
attachments blocked by
I'd check your Scan Engine and make sure you have the latest scan engine
pattern file. I'd also enable AVAPI if you're not yet.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Public Folder:
Exchange
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:40 AM
To:
We had this issue a while back when we first started using ScanMail. We
found out from Trend that when ScanMail runs in MAPI mode, it doesn't scan
the attachments until AFTER the message is in the inbox; which leaves the
possibility if the server is extremely busy scanning, the user could see
and
Sometimes users get sent legitimate executables, they get blocked because of
the extention, so I have to copy it to a share for them to retrieve it - I'm
then reliant on the AV on my desktop, what I'd prefer is for the virus
checker to say is it infected before it looks at whether it should
I have an update on this issue for those of you still following it, and another
question.
First, I am still in the process of getting the latest version of ScanMail (6.1) from
Trend. Apparently 5.1 is no longer supported and they won't talk to me until I get up
to date. Also, the problem has
Digital Signature?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:39 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Sending emails that can not be
I don't quarantine. If it can't be cleaned, its deleted...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June
Admin's don't let users receive EXE's via email. FAQ
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06,
I have to tell you all I have never had a shirt generate so much interaction
for me!! I am curious if anyone else had similar experiences . . .
1. exactly 6 people offered to buy the shirt off of me.
2. exactly 9 different people at the party last night had pictures taken
with my shirt. And I
Have them 'zipped' up...
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks?
Sometimes users get sent legitimate executables, they get blocked because of
the extention, so I
Actually, there are 2 shirts
The one that Chris is talking about is from the MessageOne party at
SpeedZone on Sunday night. It has the TechEd 2003 logo with a nice red
X over TechEd and a handwritten MEC above it. Very nice.
The one I was referring to was from the Aelita booth. It just has
Ever since I did the update on scanmail, our problem went away.
We don't have a metaframe server but almost the same thing happened to 2
of my exchange servers (we have 7). The WWW service would go down
almost at the same time on both servers. I originally thought we were
hit by a virus but I
Hi,
Is MTA is use at all in any way in Exchange 2000 even if we still have 5.5 on the NT
domain with a trust in between them for the migration?
Thnx!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web
Thanks again. Have you been able to confirm what version of ScanMail you are using
with that build number. I'm still wrestling with Trend to get my serial number for
6.1. Apparently we never got notified our maintenance was up and I had to renew again.
Took 3 days to figure that out. Then they
Running Ex2k sp3.. I'am getting these event id's over and over again.
Event 1008, 2002 and 3001 dealing with perflib errors. 1008 dealing
with the appletalk in dll atkctrs. I checked technet and it lists the
events 1008, 2002, and 3001 but, still trying to figure out what I need
to due to stop
Oops. Apparently I was naughty. My apologies to any mail servers I have offended.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow
field.
--Niels Bohr
An expert is someone who knows some
I think you can install it in trial mode for about 30 days then apply
the key later when you get it.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
Tried that. It told me that my server does not support trial version upgrades. When
I told that to the licensing rep at Trend, she did say she would deliver the paperwork
in person and be sure it gets done ASAP. I just don't know if ASAP means today or 47.5
hours instead of 48.
Probably uninstall what you currently have and install the eval. You'll
need to recreate your settings but the good news is you don't have to
uninstall the eval once you have your serial numbers.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06,
No that this solves all problems but, www.eventid.net has been a tremendous resource
for diagnosis event id's.
JP
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID's 1008, 2002 and 3001
Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas
storage migrator for exchange?
We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of
regulations that we need to comply with. We have users who have
mailboxes close to 3GB. On one exchange server that has 180
Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as
distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account?
E2ksp3
Thanks,
Gordon
___NOTICE_
This electronic mail transmission
Sorry for the repost.
It's Friday afternoon and I forgot about the thread topic field being a header field.
For those of you who sort by thread topic.
Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as
distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to
Used KVS Enterprise Vault for just such a solution, works a treat. The
client side integration and features are way ahead of other productss.
http://www.kvsplc.com/
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Got a pix of that shirt you can share with us?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Friday Haiku
I have to tell you all I have never had a shirt generate so
84 matches
Mail list logo
