Assentor did not provide a seamless integration with Outlook for the
end-users. It allowed reviewers to use a web interface to look at
archived messages. I don't know about the new stuff though.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
Was his AD account deleted or was his mailbox deleted?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lost mailbox
Hi there
I have an urgent question.
I came in this morning and found the AD
Could be a DNS problem. Is your AD DNS server using root hints or
forwarders? I had an issue a while ago where my SMTP servers stopped
sending mail. It started happening soon after we changed our AD DNS
servers from using forwarders to using root hints. It turned out that MS
AD DNS was not fully
, but for some reason or another the admin account does
not have sufficient rights to restore the mailbox.
Kind regards,
Kim ==
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 January 2004 17:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lost mailbox
Was his
: Lost mailbox
No, he's gone completely, but I have brick level backups
Kind regards,
Kim
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 January 2004 17:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lost mailbox
When you look at the list of mailboxes
If it were an open relay, it would let you send mail from any From
address regardless of whether or not you have a valid account.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL
You can try to move RUS to another server and see what happens. In the
RUS config, you have two knobs to twist - the RUS home server and domain
controller. Try different combos and see what happens. This is a part of
my scientific jiggle method.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems
In the really early releases of Exchange 2000, there were some issues
with RUS. If there was an address conflict, RUS would stop stamping
addresses. But those issues were taken care of by the service packs.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
There used to be a FE/BE document on http://www.microsoft.com/ISN
I don't know if it is still there.
Based on my own experience at the previous place, we ran two OWA/SMTP
FEs configured with MS Windows Load Balancing. Each machine had 512MB
RAM, dual 800MHz CPUs, and one 18GB RAID1 volume (I
Actually, in a pinch, if one of those FEs was down, the other one was
able to handle things by itself fine. More RAM would have helped.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday
Route it to an iMail server that has a Nobody alias (catch-all alias)
Well, you would have to buy iMail for that. But there are some similar
e-mail server programs out there that are free that allow Nobody
aliases. For example MailEnable (although it is a POS).
Oh, Mercury Pegasus Mail comes to
explanation
You are correct. Some cut and paste to achieve a signature type effect.
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:23:53
Boot-from-SAN thingie kind of spooked me, but maybe because I have never been in an
environment that used it.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Location of Transaction Logs
XP Machines? Outlook 2003? Cached mode on?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: After
I had a project some time ago where I had to validate all our custom
recipients (thousands of them) and clean out those that don't exist
anymore. I used Arclab MailList Controller and it worked quite well. It
does not feed directly off Exchange but has a lot of export/import
capabilities. And it
Just hit Google or MS Support site and search for IPM.Post. They explain
it better than I could.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: CC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:54
It is still heavier than OWA, in terms of bandwidth consumption.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 10:01 AM
To: Exchange
Is his Outlook profile configured to use cached mode?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Could be caused by some kind of DNS issue.
Or maybe it encounters a message that is so corrupted that it can't pass
it?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I never had problems with Sybari.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp
I wouldn't recommend it. It is great for mirroring normal files, but I
would not let it near my Exchange servers.
Do you have Doubletake literature? They should have a pretty good
explanation as to what it can do for you.
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dogs vs Bulls :)
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail
server
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
I would first make sure that I am comfortable with backup/restore speeds
and base the DB size on that.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2k3 store configs
I am
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs
I would first make sure that I am comfortable with backup/restore speeds
and base the DB size on that.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff
configs
AM I missing something here. Are you saying you want to limit your DB's
to a certain size. Maybe I am crazy but you can only limit indvidual
mailboxes sizes via property settings or policies, right?
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
or nothing?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 - Active Directory
When you go native, what are you going to need 5.5 OWA for?
Besides, you can dumb down
There is a hotfix for that.
Search MS support site for IPM.Post
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: CC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are they NDRs going to places like Yahoo? Someone could be using you to
generate a reverse relay. Basically they deliberately stuff the
messages with From addresses of the actual victims and send those
messages to the bogus addresses at your domain. This generates the NDRs
that then bounce back to
You mean Office B will never come back online?
-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: site connector question.
Happy New Year All.
Just a quick question for the new year. I am running exchange
You have to grant the admin account explicit permissions on the
mailboxes or on the information store that contains those mailboxes.
There are KB articles about this.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From:
of that group. I can not however
open
the mailbox via OWA or outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 mailbox permissions
You have to grant the admin account explicit
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 mailbox permissions
Can't someone just go and look this up on Google? You can explicitly
override the denies to domain admins if you
When you go native, what are you going to need 5.5 OWA for?
Besides, you can dumb down 2000 OWA to make it feel like 5.5 OWA (that's
what Netscape browsers see when they connect to 2000 OWA)
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06,
Replaying logs is not THAT time consuming. But you have to restore the
entire information store and all the logs for the storage group.
No you can't replay logs just for one user.
Have you explored the possibility that your boss was using a POP3 client
from home (or wherever he may have been)
I guess my help was not needed anymore. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: replay log files for one user?
Replaying logs is not THAT time consuming. But you have to restore the
entire
I have a very strange issue. All of our users use OWA 2000 without
problems, except one. He is at a third-party location (customer site)
which apparently has a firewall (no one knows what kind). When this user
sends mail from OWA, Symantec Antivirus for Exchange detects that the
message has an
: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Is his version of IE the same as yours?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Does the user have a signature they use? If so maybe something in it
causes
it to trip.
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL
Wait... OWA 2000 doesn't have an option for automatic signature.
But most of his sent messages end with the same exact words.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Nice
Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: Hosting Multiple Domains in Exchange 2003 Was: Upgrade from
2003 RC1
Go to http://www.microsoft.com/isn, there are a few whitepapers there on
Exchange
Must be NTFS permissions.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 10:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Sometimes IIS metabase gets screwed up.
It's just an IIS SMTP server, so it should be relatively easy to remove
and re-install IIS.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL
You could delegate someone necessary rights on the OU where the user
accounts are going to be created.
Plus Exchange View Only Admin rights on the administrative group, as Ed
pointed out.
-Original Message-
From: becky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:38 AM
Domain User rights are definitely not sufficient.
-Original Message-
From: becky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange mailbox setup
What specific rights does a person need to have to set up a mailbox for
a
user?
I was just about to say that :)
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox Sizes
Go to http://www.microsoft.com/isn, there are a few whitepapers there on
Exchange 2000 hosting.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 29,
What do the users see in the GAL from Outlook? - just nothing or a bunch
of empty lines that can be highlighted?
-Original Message-
From: Guy Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: GAL not showing up after 5.5 to 2003
I believe there is a registry hack for this. There was a KB article
describing how to make Outlook check for new mail more often, even when
Outlook is running online. Yes, online. This is a special case when
Outlook is running behind a firewall that blocks inbound UDP frames (or
behind NAT) and
I have been running a back-end with two NLB-ed front-ends for more than
3 years. Never had any problems. NLB does not really interfere with any
Exchange stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange
Was it the Outlook alert or Hotmail alert?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rumour - Spammers control New mail desktop alert ?
OK, this is a bit of a weird one, but this is from a
I think that depends on the response code that your server receives from
the target SMTP server. It could be misleading your server into thinking
that it can try again. I think I have seen something like this happen in
the past.
Also, have you checked the remote domain's MX records and tried to
alert ?
You mean MSN Messenger alert? That sounds like a MSN popup.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19
I think there are better tools out there for LN to Exchange migration. I
have not been in that scene for a while, can't remember right off the
top of my head.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Greg
The Outlook 2003 pop-up contains a portion of the message. If you hover
the mouse pointer over it, it all gets underlined (becomes a clickable
link), plus a yellow balloon pops up that says Open item.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
Are you only interested in keeping the public folders?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Marty Mushrush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
: RE: Exchange 2003 name change
We would like to keep as much as possible.
Thanks,
Marty :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 name
You can use the digital signature to capture the sender's public key.
Then if you want to send encrypted mail to that person, you have his/her
public key to do so.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From:
Could it be a permissions issue (NTFS permissions on the file)?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange
The problem with a newsletter is that it is one-way. You need to start a
mailing list instead.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
OK,
That probably was the case because someone guessed a username/password
combination and they were able to successfully authenticate and relay
mail.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike
Usually something simple like a Webmaster account with password
password is a target of spammers.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18,
I think Anonymous Access (not Anonymous Authentication Allowed) and
Allow computers which successfully authenticate to relay settings
belong in different contexts. One context is about *simply being able to
connect to the SMTP virtual server*, the other context is about being
able to relay.
I
I don't see how just accessing mailboxes would cause transactions that
need to be written to logs. Unless antivirus finds and deletes a lot of
messages.
I can see how when messages are added or deleted to mailboxes that will
generate logs.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems
Mail merge with Microsoft Word maybe?
Or use a third-party mailing list program - some of those allow to
combine generic text with some personalized stuff. That's what a lot of
spammers use.
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17,
After Outlook 200 SP2, it became quite painful to use Microsoft Word
mail merge for e-mail - Outlook detects that a macro is being run and
pops up a question whether you want to allow the macro to continue, with
mandatory 10 second wait before you can click Yes. If you have 150
recipients, I
Hm... SMTP in 5.5 was not that great though. It was not native and
messages had to be translated from native (X.400-like) format to SMTP
and back. Depending on the volume of mail, it might not be pleasant.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Has something changed on the network? For example, something that would make domain
controllers, expecially GCs invisible to the clients (like port 389 or port 3268
closure)? My thinking is that they can't correctly authenticate, or Outlook can't
confirm that the user is a valid user because it
Make sure to read this:
XCCC: How Outlook 2000 Accesses Active Directory
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=302914
And this:
XCLN: How MAPI Clients Access Active Directory
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;256976
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Mailbox container for that server? You mean when you drill into the
storage group and then into the store, and then click on Mailboxes?
When you create a new mailbox, nothing will appear there until the user
actually logs onto the mailbox or someone sends a message to the new
mailbox.
Sincerely,
Could it be because you are using the local store cache mode with your
Outlook 2003 profile? The cache does not know anything about the limit,
but when it starts synchronizing things, it bumps into the online limit
and then generates an NDR... Just a guess.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange
Not sure, but my guestimate is that this is how it would work with any
version of Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Kuske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 5:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 5.5 Strange Behavior
Yes
SRS uses X.400, in its own way, right?
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
Yes, it is lot more resilient and robust than other connectors.
More ethical discussions?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What is SPAM - Please comment
Dear All
I would be interested in any comments about the following ethical
problem.
Has anyone heard anything about this company called CITCO (not the oil
and gas Citgo), but CITCO Group - http://www.citco.com/
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is SPAM - Please comment
Any email with MVP in the signature is spam.=20
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is SPAM
Something rings a bell... I think we had a discussion about this a few
weeks ago. I believe it is supposed to work across stores but there may
be a bug. Maybe there is even a fix, I just can't remember yet.
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Dude, I don't know who you are but you are wrong.
All SMTP servers must accept anonymous connections, otherwise no one on the Internet
would be able to send mail to each other.
Also Exchange perfectly understands the difference between inbound mail and a relay
situation. When you restrict
I have seen this many times - Outlook XP freaks out and starts asking
for password all of a sudden. Sometimes it seems to coincide with the
company's change password policy (even if the specific user is set to
never expire). Just change the user's password, log out, log back in and
see if it
:(
I was the first one to mention it :(
I am gonna go cry now :(
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server
Cool site. Thanks for posting, Don.
Hey there always will be people that don't like POP3.
I perfectly understand how Exchange works by the way. I also perfectly
understand SMTP. Believe me, most SMTP servers out there (Exchange,
iMAIL, SendMail, etc.) accept Anonymous connections. It does not meant
that they relay mail for
I won't have any need to cry. My relays are tight.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
. Even if it isn't
turned on, spammers will STILL try when their scan shows your SMTP host
is Exchange, eating up your bandwidth.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well, a server-based rule will work even when Outlook is not running.
However it will present a great danger of starting a mail loop.
Another way to do this would be to write some more intelligent code and
create an event sink.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging
Just call me Russki.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Yes, you were lucky. I have seen this exact scenario happen a couple
times
now.
I wonder if any Linux people like the WTO :)
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Oh, let me tell you, he hates Bill, Microcrap comes out of
, use something like ISA
server to
publish the FE OWA server. There are some servers that belong on a
DMZ.
A FE OWA server is not one of them.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
I concur. We have TSM here at Spherion and I am growing to like it. The
back-end of TSM is taken care of by *nix guys, so I don't know how easy
it is to configure and maintain it there. But on the Exchange server
side it is very straightforward and works very well.
Our Exchange servers are on a
I think Netbackup allows tape multiplexing which greatly increases
backup speeds, but could be a pain during restores - data would need to
be de-multiplexed.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Jason
He should change the direction of his scope. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange
We are very happy with Commvault Galaxy, but your
Start doing various Telnet tests on port 25 (from outside to your
firewall, from firewall to the Exchange server).
You can go to http://www.network-tools.com and from there you could do a
variety of tests too.
For example, you could stick your e-mail address there, then select
E-mail Validation,
Hello everyone.
We have Dell PowerEdge 6650 servers attached to the SAN via Emulex
LightPulse cards. It's working great.
Now we are setting everything up for a SAN backup using TSM LanFree.
We don't have additional Emulex cards and the management does not want
to pay extra money for them. But
250 Reset OK
QUIT
221 relay-1.mail.demon.net closing connection
[Connection closed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: 11 December 2003 18:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
Start
closed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: 11 December 2003 18:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
Start doing various Telnet tests on port 25 (from outside to your
firewall,
from
Fuggetaboutmailboxbackup.
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Best backup software for Exchange
We are looking at Networker and NetBackup for
enterprise backup solutions. We would
You might want to take a look at Commvault Galaxy:
Restores single messages. Finds lost message, note, contact and more on
key parameters via wildcards. Backs up and restores with single instance
store.
http://www.commvault.com/products.asp?pid=1
-Original Message-
From: Tigue
As you read the headers, you will see that each SMTP server that handled
the message puts its timestamp there. The timestamp is followed by a
number, for example (-0500) or (-0400) --- this number indicates what
timezone that particular SMTP server is in. For example (-0500) means
EST.
Turn on OPTION EXPLICIT :)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a
brain
5.0 was not the beginning of beginnings. 4.0 ruled!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL
Have FE and BE on separate VLANs and set up access lists on the routers
allowing just the back-end VLAN to only accept traffic from the
front-end VLAN if it is coming from the FE server, and only the
specified ports.
How does that sound?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz
-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:36 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA and SMTP
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP
Have FE and BE on separate VLANs and set up access lists on the routers
allowing just the back-end VLAN to only accept
1 - 100 of 525 matches
Mail list logo
