Ok...slight problem here.
O/S - Win2k, SP2
Exch - 5.5, SP4+
Situation: MTS-Out is so clogged with outbound NDR's to spammers, that
when I open the 5.5 Exchange Admin Console and attempt to look at the
Outbound awaiting conversion queue of the IMS connector, the console
just freezes. Had this
Ok...slight problem here.
O/S - Win2k, SP2
Exch - 5.5, SP4+
Situation: MTS-Out is so clogged with outbound NDR's to spammers, that when
I open the 5.5 Exchange Admin Console and attempt to look at the Outbound
awaiting conversion queue of the IMS connector, the console just freezes.
Had this
to the referenced link of ALL ESE error codes)
Are you by chance using Outlook 2003 with Business Contact Manager? When I
searched that category with the error message given, I got a whole slew of
results back.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
Just because he is getting 4000 NDR's an hour still doesn't indicate that he
is an open relay. It simply means that someone spamming his domain name is
trying to brute-force the spam through in mass quantities (probably ~50,000
at a time) by appending every combination they can think of, to the
Just because he is getting 4000 NDR's an hour still doesn't indicate that he
is an open relay. It simply means that someone spamming his domain name is
trying to brute-force the spam through in mass quantities (probably ~50,000
at a time) by appending every combination they can think of, to the
Well,
Aanother view might be that the answer was completely apropriate, but
your questions was not, as you omitted crucial information aout your office
requirements.
Merry Christmas
Only allowed to use my psychic powers for Good in Pittsburgh
Jim H
-Original Message
Gift - Something that is bestowed voluntarily and without compensation
Award - To grant as merited or due
Compensation - Something, such as money, given or received as payment or
reparation, as for a service or loss.
I don't see MVP status as being a gift. Seems to me that it would be an
award
, but none of them apply. There is nothing in
the event logs anywhere indicating a problem. SMTP traffic is moving
smoothly amongst the sites otherwise.
Any suggestions as to what Diagnostics Logging might aid in determining
a problem? Helpful Q articles? Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Jim Becker
Asking someone to demonstrate a negative is a logical impossibility, and a
dishonest debating/argument tactic. You wouldn't win any awards if you
tried to sell me a product with that kind of logic.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
The Lurkers Support Me in E-mail! I knew it was coming, and here it is
at last! Another piece of the kook puzzle falls into place. I am so happy.
We are still a few steps away from the Every who is against me is just as
bad as Hitler gambit, but we are surely circling that drain.
Jim
Thank you for all of the suggestions. I think I am getting close to the
issue. I think it may be related to Symantec Mail Security 4.0.1 for
Exchange.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 5:47
It also works in reverse:
1) spammer sends messages to users in your org from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which doesn't exist.
2) many many many recipients in your domain do not exist.
3) Your mail system spends the next three days trying to send the NDR bounce
to the perceived sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4)
business trip.
This also brings up the question of if product activation is so important,
why doesn't this product include it? But maybe it's better not to think too
deeply about MS's motives.
Jim Helfer
WTW Architects
Pittsburgh PA
[1] Which by the way I beleive wouldn't be running
by the
bad guys? Anyone else seen anything weird like this?
We are running OL 2003, connected to a Exchange 5.5 sp4 server.
Jim Helfer
WTW Architects
Pittsburgh PA
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Ah, of course! It's a Volume license purchase. I've done this before, I'm
not sure why I didn't make the connection.
Thank you all, and Merry Christmas
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:57 AM
He doesn't have a hotmail or I.M. account that I am aware of.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rumour - Spammers control New mail desktop alert
on topic for this list. Funny how life's like that
sometime, isn't it?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Who says? Feel free to ask for your
Well, I'm certainly glad we aren't resorting to any of them thar
unprofessional personal attacks. That would be just terrible.
Jim H
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
, of course.
Jim H
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Truly. I would much rather read off-topic posts, which this list has a
history and culture
,
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
9GB private store on this server. 1.5GB public store.
9.5GB of transaction logs so far today and users are seeing sluggish
performance.
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
No it was about the same size yesterday, give or take a few MB.
Checked them. Thanks for your time.
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent
Internal mail pretty quick, as you might expect on a small server like
this.
Internet mail is also pretty quick.
Thanks,
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Sorry. I should have included that the sluggishness is in the form of
Outlook waiting for data from the server.
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Collins
Excuse me, I have to go yell at the posters over in the IPCop mailing list.
They keep mailing to the list, even though I haven't read it in weeks! Of
all the nerve.
Jim H
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 5:19
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 22:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources of outages
What percentages is due to covert action
I've got just one question...
Is Greg a reincarnation of Drew Nicholson? There's just about about as much
chance of getting substantiated proof from either one of them, they both
tend to drone on incessantly in circular arguments and you'll never win an
argument with either of them. You will
of monster in the basement to exact revenge
on those fools at the Academy are you?
Jim H
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Alright, this is a good
What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret
agendas ?
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources of outages
Apathy - 75%
-Original Message-
This is also a good site to look at if you need to figure out issues with
DNS.
http://www.dnsreport.com/
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server
How much mail can Exchange process? A lot.
If you understand how an e-mail is handled with Exchange SMTP services, you
can design the server (include memory, processor and disk layout) you can
make it fly.
I stress tested the IIS SMTP to see what I could get out of it. I rated the
box at over
to look
at this. My test recovery of Exchange 5.5 has been flawless in each of my
4 tests. I expect the same when we migrate to Exchange 2003 this year.
-Jim
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles.
googling
Dr. receives honorary degree
lawyer receives honorary degree
Just for reference.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange
Some more information on Professional Ethic
http://www.westga.edu/~rlane/professional/lecture_professionsprofessionaliz
ation2.html
For those with any interest.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange
Actually, degree DOES equal title.
One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington State
Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some
mythical contributions I have made to the industry.
My signature would now read:
DR. James Blunt, Computer
Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a
statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and only posted those
(and another link) on professionals and ethics. My statement was not an
attack, only a point of reference. If you remember, I was also the only
person
. Accepting titles FROM VENDORS is bad and unprofessional.
Actually, degree DOES equal title.
One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington
State Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due
to some mythical contributions I have made to the industry.
My
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Didn't know I was talking trash. In terms of wits, you're the one that
couldn't figure out that Migrating from
Eric,
Based on what I have read of your posts in the last few days, I have a
question. It would appear that you have been granted the money you need to
upgrade the infrastucture and Exchange to what is needed. If that is the
case, why would you order Win2000 and Exchange 2000, when you could go
John,
Could I suggest keeping questions related to this topic online, as there are
probably several of us that would be interested in the answers to any
questions you may have, as they may be the same questions someone else has
but is too shy to ask.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From
Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003
12/4/2003
http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO=FPIN
http://tinyurl.com/xsea
Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian
Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian
All together now:
The Enterprise Edition Supports Saucer Separation!
Jim
(Sorry, this was just one of the funniest things I've read in this list :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange
I'll have an Anchor Porter and a Jameson's on the rocks and get the lady
whatever she wants.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
whiskey.
-Original
Can't read it...subscriber only article.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook users
So what don't you understand?
The To: address was spoofed and you were added to the Bcc: section, so
your address won't show up in the headers. If you take a look at the NDRs
in your Admin mailbox, you will see an NDR for the address indicated below.
It's spam, pure and simple...delete it or
to the values for Exchange 2003 OWA
segmentation. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange2003/appendixc.asp
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation
://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/e2k3/e2
k3/_techsel_tech_13.asp
Or just go to msdn.microsoft.com and search for MAPI and Exchange.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Qiang Peng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:53 PM
Posted To: Exchange Technical
Certain types of relay attempts will also show up in this folder, also.
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:11 AM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Conversation: BadMail Folder
Subject: RE: BadMail
Dude...
Quit snipping the conversation...people would like to be able to see what
the heck you are commenting on or replying to, without having to scroll thru
their archives to find your e-mail. We all have full-time jobs as well and
don't have the time to be messing with that kind of nonsense.
/8210408d-9bbc-47c
3-b941-f103ef8f89b4.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/vd8n
Home-To-Cell Phone Number Transfers OK'd - Coming soon:
http://www.comcast.net/News/TECHNOLOGY//XML/1700_High_Tech/87be2f20-ab86-4eb
5-94dc-248053bd0260.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/vd8s
Jim
-Original Message-
From
But you still have to use landline service to have this.
I interpret this as simple call forwarding made simpler.
Maybe I am missing something.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Andy,
Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of
the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself, allowing the
file to be backed up correctly?
Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the
open file handle closes, thereby
Andy,
Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on the part of
the user, that the .pst file file handle will close itself, allowing the
file to be backed up correctly?
Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the
open file handle closes, thereby
the backups run, and it reports it as being corrupt every night.
Thanks Aaron, for initially explaining why this is marked corrupt. I often
wondered why Veritas would back up a corrupt file. Thanks Andy / Andrey for
the additional explanations as well.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov
, but, yea,
something like that. Or I could be completely wrong. Its just something that
I kinda recall from the back of my mind. Theres not much back there.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Exchange
OWA inside or outside the firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Action Cancelled in OWA
Single server environment, Windows Server 2003 running Exchange 2003.
OWA works
And the solution was?
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple Tasks Folders
Well nevermind, I found the solution to this.
K
-Original Message-
From: Adams,
not consider the
connection between a SMTP server and an email client as a relay.
Thanks for the clarification.
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
-Original Message-
From: AliAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 09:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: AOL
Russ,
You're a genius This works like a charm!
I was told that Earthlink would NOT relay, so I didn't even try it.
Many, many thanks.
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
-Original Message-
From: Russ Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 10:11
Jason,
By authenticated client connection. When a client connects to the SMTP
server, it is NOT relay. The client must provide username and PW.
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 00:51
you recommend an EMail host that will accept relay from our
Exchange Server 5.5?
BACKGROUND INFO:
Mail Server is Apollo1.ApolloIS.com
IP is 24.238.172.104
Reverse DNS is: user-0cetb38.cable.mindspring.com
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
Apollo Information Systems, Inc
Hilda,
When you create your DL, you want to add the SMTP addresses under the
E-mail addresses tab. The DL will have no members listed under the
General tab.
Therefore, all those SMTP addresses are in your organization, but there is
no one to deliver them to and there is no mailbox to store them
Why don't you just go with a static IP and make sure you have a valid
reverse ptr record?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
When
I would if I could.
Earthlink does NOT offer a static IP for cable internet accounts.
Earthlink will NOT provide any DNS services, like making a PTR record.
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
Well, I'm hoping to find an EMail Host that will provide outbound relay.
Know of any?
Jim Underwood
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 15:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange
Well, it looks like Internet .com is flipping out again...just received 14
rejection messages from their server, some from messages over a month old.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Tom,
With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same
setup you are and have not experienced this to date.
I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is
causing this.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL
U...because he's spoofing the e-mail address and not really sending from
your e-mail servers?
The RFC's dictate that your mail server accept e-mail from
anyone...regardless of who they are or what naming convention they use.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
There are several threads dealing with the problems caused by using Outlook
2003 with an Exchange 5.5 system, complete with solutions and links to Q
articles...look them up.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:45 AM
When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the
FW in the DMZ?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
You know I had this problem at a
.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the
FW in the DMZ?
-Original Message
Didn't that one girl call you Spanky? ;0)
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
Mighty Hercules will suffice.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
IIRC they've changed their pricing structure from per seat to per proc.
Huge difference. Why don't you call them and find out.
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
So
Dude!!
You're at WSU in Pullman?
I'm in the SE WA State in the Tri-Cities!! Weren't those winds terrible?
Wind like that really plays havoc with our microwave towers.
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:59 AM
To: Exchange
Have you read this part of the MS-047 bulletin yet?
You may get a blank message body when opening a message in OWA after the
patch is installed if you have your Windows directory on the OWA Server set
to read only permissions. To solve this problem, please reference the
following Knowledge Base
Were you running at least IE 5.5 SP2 on the OWA server, BEFORE installing
MS-047? If not, then I would bet your problem is described in the second
issue of the Q314532 link below.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2
It's actually /cleanviews (switch leans the other way)
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Missing Meetings in Outlook 2000
A Couple of suggestions:
1) Clean out the forms cache.
It's actually /cleanviews (switch leans the other way)
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Missing Meetings in Outlook 2000
A Couple of suggestions:
1) Clean out the forms cache.
Martin,
Here is the one for OL2003 causing issues with the Ex5.5 store.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=829418
829418 - XADM: Information Store Intermittently Stops Responding and an
Access Violation Occurs in EcDSDNFromSz
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Do you have Junk E-mail processing turned on and set to Move items to
another folder? If so, anything in the body or subject that might get
snagged according to the filters.txt file
(http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/preview.aspx?AssetID=HA010450051033;
CTT=98)
-Original Message-
Kim,
I use the Blackhole lookup option from www.samspade.org. It will search
by domain name or IP and will query 15 different RBL's for the information
you supply.
Currently, it would appear that intas.be is on the FiveTen RBL.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL
If brute force isn't working for you, chances are, you aren't using enough
of it.
Jim Helfer
WTW Architects
Pittsburgh PA
Go Stillers!
John Matteson wrote:
There is no problem that cannot be solved by the proper application of
sufficient quantities of high explosives.
John Matteson
You don't have a product called Outlook Helpdesk from www.kalmstrom.nu set
up in your PF's by chance, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication Conflicts after applying
Pack 3 Rollup)
The tech guy that was here installed some kind of help desk application. I
don't know what kind it was?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Well, I see that your mainframe is living in EST time (equal to a -0500
offset), while your MS SMTPSVCs are using a -0400 time offset. Can you set
the mainframe to use EDT time instead?
Or wait three more Sundays and the problem will resolve itself, no?
Jim Becker
Manager of LAN Services
to Contacts, that would be a
client-based rule, right?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Jim Becker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messages
.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
LOWER CASE IS A RACIST TOOL OF THE IMPERIALIST AGRESSORS
Ed Crowley wrote:
Why is it that computers in Africa don't have lower case?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From:
I received and read this book (closer to a booklet than a book) Friday. The
author does a fairly good job of translating some basic TQM principles as
they relate to IT. The book is an easy read but could have used more real
world scenarios to emphasize certain points. As far as the philosophy of
Is it the order your rules are firing off in?
Since I don't have OL2003 yet, I'm not sure how this is configured yet, but
can you move the Junk Filters rule to the top of the list, so that it fires
off first?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Don't laugh...some PHB in the UK banned his employees from using e-mail.
Deluged Telecoms Boss Bans Staff E-Mails:
http://tinyurl.com/oif5
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
No...it won't.
If you save an attachment to an e-mail, located in a PF to your HD and
modify it, you are working on a new copy of the document...not the one sent
in the original e-mail. Then once you are done working on the document, you
reply to the original or post a new message, it is adding
Yep...using OfficeXP at least, I get the following options when I do that:
Do you want to merg changes in 'Blah.doc' back into 'c:\user\blah.doc'?
Yes, No and No, don't ask again
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003
be
able to see the tape drive from other servers. Not sure.
I'd just steal the tape drive and put it on your DR server to do the
restore. Apologize later, if necessary.
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48
Forgive me for arguing, but I believe the time alloted for guessing that
third factor is even less than indicated below. Of course, by token, I am
referring to what RSA calls a keyfob. Is that what you are referring to
as well?
Here is what I understand to be the process, from reading the
to test it on E2K.
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=5088
Any ideas?
Thanks much,
Jim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
Forgive me for arguing, but I
I'll kindly ask you to get off of my soapbox.
My favorite one I've heard lately: Well, it uses fiber to attach to the SAN
so it's much faster for Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange
Deal
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List
Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to
engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem
Now THAT is funny.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
Send it on, I'll return it at my own expense once I am done lest one
consider that I took
1 - 100 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo
