On Thursday 30 Oct 2003 12:21 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
>
> > The problem for me is that the hardware router does not allow
> > GnomeMeeting to have a range of ports open (it uses h.323
> > tunneling), so I'm thinking that I will need, eventually, to set
> > my box dmz and rely on the software one,
>-Original Message-
>From: Anne Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:37 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [expert] Firewall questions
>
>Currently I rely on a hardware firewall, but I would
like to add a
>personal software firew
On Thursday 30 October 2003 07:01 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> So installing iptables will have no 'built-in' rules? That's what I
> want, so that I can build it up a little at a time.
Yes, that is the way that I am running it, to supplement the hardware router
because hardware routers are not real
On Thursday 30 Oct 2003 11:03 am, J.C. Woods wrote:
>
> Just install iptables, and start "rolling your own" rules. There
> are loads of sites that document how to.
So installing iptables will have no 'built-in' rules? That's what I
want, so that I can build it up a little at a time.
> You coul
Anne Wilson wrote:
Currently I rely on a hardware firewall, but I would like to add a
personal software firewall. I know that I will need a slice of time
to do sufficient reading to get the configuration right, so I thought
that I would browse using Webmin to see what I needed to know,
partic
Currently I rely on a hardware firewall, but I would like to add a
personal software firewall. I know that I will need a slice of time
to do sufficient reading to get the configuration right, so I thought
that I would browse using Webmin to see what I needed to know,
particularly since I don't
On Sunday 31 August 2003 11:43 am, Jack Coates wrote:
>On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 09:46, engage wrote:
>> Since setting up Shorewall to discard bad/malformed packets, I've been
>> getting a lot of log entries like this. Why? I know that the displayed
>> destination address is a broadcast address.
>>
>>
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 09:46, engage wrote:
> Since setting up Shorewall to discard bad/malformed packets, I've been getting
> a lot of log entries like this. Why? I know that the displayed destination
> address is a broadcast address.
>
> Aug 31 08:31:18 n0sq kernel: Shorewall:badpkt:DROP:IN=eth
Since setting up Shorewall to discard bad/malformed packets, I've been getting
a lot of log entries like this. Why? I know that the displayed destination
address is a broadcast address.
Aug 31 08:31:18 n0sq kernel: Shorewall:badpkt:DROP:IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:09:e8:b4:c6:c3:08:00
I've been lucky so far -- at the company I work for, I'm in charge of all
technology oriented activities (security, database, systems, helpdesk, and
so forth) so if I make a suggestion there is typically very little
resistance to it (since, after all, I've been right several times before
already --
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 18:24, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> On Sunday 12 January 2003 00:47, Lorne wrote:
> > That is what I think. The reason I want to speak to him. I am not in the
> > security section. I'm trying. I am positive they are in way over their
> > heads and I told him it wasn't a matter if but
As for why against... this network is my home and I can't afford to go
buy another comp and IP just to "protect" the 4 or 5 boxes behind it.
*grin*
James
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 10:24, Lorne wrote:
> On Saturday 11 January 2003 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > Lorne wrote:
> > > On Friday 10 Janu
On Saturday 11 January 2003 07:25 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> On Saturday 11 January 2003 09:17 pm, Lorne scribbled incoherently:
> > Could very well be. Unfortunately the two guys that are in "charge" of it
> > are such buffoons that I would not work with them anyhow. I fully expect
> > them to get f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 11 January 2003 09:17 pm, Lorne scribbled incoherently:
> Could very well be. Unfortunately the two guys that are in "charge" of it
> are such buffoons that I would not work with them anyhow. I fully expect
> them to get fired soon. They ar
On Saturday 11 January 2003 06:04 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> On Saturday 11 January 2003 07:47 pm, Lorne wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 January 2003 02:35 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > That is what I asked the director yesterday. He said the head dude
> > > > is from the "CIA" and he has al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 11 January 2003 07:47 pm, Lorne wrote:
> On Saturday 11 January 2003 02:35 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
>
>
>
> > > That is what I asked the director yesterday. He said the head dude
> > > is from the "CIA" and he has always been against it. ??
On Saturday 11 January 2003 02:35 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > That is what I asked the director yesterday. He said the head dude
> > is from the "CIA" and he has always been against it. WFT!?!?
> > My response was, I need to talk to this guy, because he either
> > doesn't understand them or
On Saturday 11 January 2003 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Lorne wrote:
> > On Friday 10 January 2003 11:13 am, Todd Lyons wrote:
> >>Lorne wrote on Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:15:02AM -0700 :
> >>>I've run coyote-linux for 5 years now and have NEVER been hacked. That
> >>> is until September of 2002.
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:13 am, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Lorne wrote on Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:15:02AM -0700 :
> > I've run coyote-linux for 5 years now and have NEVER been hacked. That is
> > until September of 2002. I spoke with the author and he felt his system
> > was secure and it couldn't hav
On Friday 10 January 2003 01:31 am, Ken Hawkins wrote:
> On Friday 10 January 2003 04:15 pm, Lorne wrote:
> > On Friday 10 January 2003 12:58 am, Ken Hawkins wrote:
>
>
>
> > > I have run this against some online security test sites, and they have
> > > all never been able to get more from my comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorne wrote on Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:15:02AM -0700 :
>
> I've run coyote-linux for 5 years now and have NEVER been hacked. That is
> until September of 2002. I spoke with the author and he felt his system was
> secure and it couldn't have been his
On Friday 10 January 2003 04:15 pm, Lorne wrote:
> On Friday 10 January 2003 12:58 am, Ken Hawkins wrote:
> > I have run this against some online security test sites, and they have
> > all never been able to get more from my computer behind the firewall than
> > my browser version. It leaves a FE
On Friday 10 January 2003 12:58 am, Ken Hawkins wrote:
> On Friday 10 January 2003 02:50 pm, Ken Thompson wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 January 2003 08:14 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > > and I did take a look at gShield. The little bugger liked to drove me
> > > nuts!
> > >
> > > Mark
> >
> > I grabbed an
hi,
here I have the script for my "firewall-masquerade" of
"rc.firewall-2.2.1"
and that's the points, I don't know what to fill in :
+
DNS="" #set to your DNS server(s) that
you get zones from
INTER
Didn't there used to be a firewall config utility in Mandrake? I need
to open 1 port. Anyone know how to do this form the command line if it
can't be done from the control center?
Darren
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Thursday 06 June 2002 22:37, you wrote:
> Yes that's it, pmfirewall. A very handy little program. Does the
> following command allow accepting of SSH if pmfirewall has turned it
> off? -
>
> ipchains -A input -p TCP -d any/0 22 -j ACCEPT
>
> I'm not very familiar with the command line program
Yes that's it, pmfirewall. A very handy little program. Does the
following command allow accepting of SSH if pmfirewall has turned it
off? -
ipchains -A input -p TCP -d any/0 22 -j ACCEPT
I'm not very familiar with the command line program they should run to
figure out if sshd is running. Sho
It was probably pmfirewall (excellent, and deservably popular at the
time) - do a search and you may find it. If not, I may have a copy that
I can look at and see what can be done - email me privately if so.
Alternative is to just email the other office the ipchains command to
open port 22 and ma
Try nmap, or the GUI front end nmapfe;
Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: "Damon Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Firewall / Internet sharing with Mandrake 7.2 - how
totemporarily turn
No it wasn't InteractiveBastille :-) It was something downloaded from
the net. I'll try SSH first of course, but it's not easy trying to sort
these things out when the other machine is on dial-up. I'm pretty sure
I stopped all outside activity. What is the best program I can run on
Mandrake 8.
InteractiveBastile,
but have you tried SSH? you prolly turned off telnet, but might have left SSH?
On Thursday 06 June 2002 06:12 pm, you wrote:
> Hi fellow Mandrake users,
>
> I installed Mandrake 7.2 in my old office in India. I setup a basic
> firewall and Internet sharing using ipchains a
Hi fellow Mandrake users,
I installed Mandrake 7.2 in my old office in India. I setup a basic
firewall and Internet sharing using ipchains as I recall. It was setup
using a simple script that was very likely recommended on MandrakeUser
at the time. Sorry but I don't recall what the script was
Have a look at Mandrake 8.2 -- later versions of IPtables etc.. Then
have a look at Bastille http://www.bastille-linux.org . Just use
Rpmdrake to install it,yes it's on your Mandrake Cds, and configure it
using a command "InteractiveBastille" another excellent solution is have
a look at FireSta
Belkie, Dan wrote:
>Hey Guys!
>I have a simple Mandrake 8.1 box as my router / firewall. I'm looking at
>putting a couple of web servers behind the firewall on my LAN. does anyone
>know of a good way to set up rules so that the FW can know to send port 80
>request to xyz.com to one server and abc
Belkie, Dan wrote:
> Hey Guys!
> I have a simple Mandrake 8.1 box as my router / firewall. I'm looking at
> putting a couple of web servers behind the firewall on my LAN. does anyone
> know of a good way to set up rules so that the FW can know to send port 80
> request to xyz.com to one server and
Hey Guys!
I have a simple Mandrake 8.1 box as my router / firewall. I'm looking at
putting a couple of web servers behind the firewall on my LAN. does anyone
know of a good way to set up rules so that the FW can know to send port 80
request to xyz.com to one server and abc.com to another?
I guess
At 11:18 AM 3/1/2002 +0100, Fedneg wrote:
>I am using bastille-firewall. Scanned my computer in
sygatetech.com as
>you suggest and all UDP ports are closed.
That's my point. sygatetech.com shows them closed instead of
blocked. sygatetech.com showed some UDP ports open when another port
scanner sho
I am using bastille-firewall. Scanned my computer in sygatetech.com as
you suggest and all UDP ports are closed.
I configured it with "InteractiveBastille -x" I don't enter anything for
"UDP service names or port numbers to allow on public interfaces" and let
"UDP services to block" as default (i.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems that the sygatetech.com scanner is broken. I got the AW Security
Port Scanner 4.02 for my windows box and used it to scan my linux box. It
shows all UDP ports to the public interface blocked. I ran the TCP and UDP
port scans on a friends linu
Mike Rambo wrote:
>
> Have you tried pmfirewall? My co-worker used it on his box.
> It was easy to set up and nmap found nothing when I ran it
> against the box afterward.
>
> --
> Mike Rambo
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems his is using iptables, and pmfirewall will only work with
ipchains..
--
Mike Rambo wrote:
> Lee Roberts wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>I've tried tiny firewall, bastille-firewall, and one other (can't remember
>>the name). NONE of them block access to the UDP services no matter what I
>>do. In InteractiveBastille, I don't enter anyt
pmfirewall doesn't use iptables. Besides, I used pmfirewall with Mandrake
7.2 and had the same problem.
At 07:37 AM 3/1/2002 -0500, Mike Rambo wrote:
>Lee Roberts wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I've tried tiny firewall, bastille-firewall, and one other (can
Lee Roberts wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've tried tiny firewall, bastille-firewall, and one other (can't remember
> the name). NONE of them block access to the UDP services no matter what I
> do. In InteractiveBastille, I don't enter anything for "UDP service
sygatetech.com
At 09:34 AM 3/1/2002 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
>How are you checking that they are not being blocked? i.e, outside
>scanner, nmap ...
>
>BillK
>
>
>On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 08:21, Lee Roberts wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I've tried tiny fire
How are you checking that they are not being blocked? i.e, outside
scanner, nmap ...
BillK
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 08:21, Lee Roberts wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've tried tiny firewall, bastille-firewall, and one other (can't remember
> the name). NONE of them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've tried tiny firewall, bastille-firewall, and one other (can't remember
the name). NONE of them block access to the UDP services no matter what I
do. In InteractiveBastille, I don't enter anything for "UDP service names
or port numbers to allow on
Hey Guys!
Can anyone suggest some software that is a firewall / viruswall that also
can email me bandwidth usage reports for the box?
Thanks!
--
=
Dan Belkie
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:41, you wrote:
> on one of the snf mail lists there was a thread where i got told off!:-)
> for not reading advisories on how to update snf with regards to httpd-naat
> and apache, i forget which list but if iirc the procedure is to download
> the update rpms manually and to
on one of the snf mail lists there was a thread where i got told off!:-)
for not reading advisories on how to update snf with regards to httpd-naat
and apache, i forget which list but if iirc the procedure is to download the
update rpms manually and to update apache first manually and then httpd
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 10:56, Civilme wrote:
> SNF is a wonderful product for this--put a box with two NICs between the
> network and the Novell server and add one static IP on the network
> side--there you will need to set up a netmask to enclose your local IPs
> (and you can make them local
Aaron Winters wrote:
> I have 49 Windows PCs (all but 2 are running Win2k and they are 98se),
> 16 Macs one Win2k DC and 1 MDK 8.1 web, ftp, ssh server that I manage.
> They are on a Win2k domain and the DC does all the DNS, the client PCs
> all have static IPs. They all get there gateway out
ehalf Of Aaron WintersSent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:37
AMTo: Mandrake ExpertSubject: [expert] Firewall/Gateway
?
I have 49 Windows PCs (all but 2 are
running Win2k and they are 98se), 16 Macs one Win2k DC and 1 MDK 8.1 web, ftp,
ssh server that I manage. They are on a Win2k domai
I have 49 Windows PCs (all but 2 are running
Win2k and they are 98se), 16 Macs one Win2k DC and 1 MDK 8.1 web, ftp, ssh
server that I manage. They are on a Win2k domain and the DC does all the
DNS, the client PCs all have static IPs. They all get there gateway out from a
Novell server that
t: Re: Re[2]: [expert] Firewall install - smoothwall
On Sat Jan 12, 2002 at 12:53:32PM +, David Stevenson wrote:
> I was thinking about that, but I am put off by the 32mb or ram min quoted on the MDK
>site. The laptop only has 8mb. I have succesfully loaded mdk 6 and 8 on the laptop,
On Sat Jan 12, 2002 at 12:53:32PM +, David Stevenson wrote:
> I was thinking about that, but I am put off by the 32mb or ram min quoted on the MDK
>site. The laptop only has 8mb. I have succesfully loaded mdk 6 and 8 on the laptop,
>although I did not install any WM's or X as I thought it m
On 12 Jan 2002 12:24:41 +0100
Tobias Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was thinking about that, but I am put off by the 32mb or ram min quoted on the MDK
site. The laptop only has 8mb. I have succesfully loaded mdk 6 and 8 on the laptop,
although I did not install any WM's or X as I thought it
>
> On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 09:21, Dave Sherman wrote:
> > On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 21:08, Michael Seymour wrote:
> >
> > I can't speak for Mandrake SNF, but the sysadmins at my local ISP have
> > told me that SmoothWall (www.smoothwall.org) is very powerful and
> > flexible.
> >
Hey, before you
btw, what about mandrake snf (single network firewall)? it's based on
mandrake 7.2 (ala kernel 2.2.19) and should support every hardware the
"standard" mdk 7.2 supports.
on a first glance it seems as if it supports the same features as
smoothwall, too. you'll find it here:
http://www.mandrakesoft.
Originally to: All
This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.
--=_tcob1.net-7235-1008635601-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Have you considered www.astar
On Saturday 05 January 2002 2:34 pm, you wrote:
> At 07:06 PM 1/5/2002 -0500, DStevenson wrote:
> >Is this the document that tells you to install a bloated full OS and then
> >hack it with
> >smoothwall, eemm. On a Laptop with 800Meg, 16Mb Ram and, yes, dx400 100
> > cpu?
> >
> >If not, I would a
At 07:06 PM 1/5/2002 -0500, DStevenson wrote:
>Is this the document that tells you to install a bloated full OS and then
>hack it with
>smoothwall, eemm. On a Laptop with 800Meg, 16Mb Ram and, yes, dx400 100 cpu?
>
>If not, I would appreciate the url.
>
>Thanks for being interested enough to look
On Saturday 05 January 2002 12:21 pm, you wrote:
> At 11:02 AM 1/4/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I did take a look and did notice that there was a problem, as I mentioned
> >in the first email I sent on this thread...however I noticed that the new
> >release 0.9.9 had been released...so
At 11:02 AM 1/4/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I did take a look and did notice that there was a problem, as I mentioned
>in the first email I sent on this thread...however I noticed that the new
>release 0.9.9 had been released...so I was wondering if this version
>supported pcmcia.
>
>
>I did take a look , and since it uses the Linux kernel version, 2.2.19, it
>must be using ipchains. It does look to be very cool but if
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" STFW, he or she will see that there is a
>problem when using Smoothwall with pcmcia hardware..
I did take a look and did notice that
At 11:31 PM 1/4/2002 +1100, ze0 wrote:
>Smoothwall is a light-weight Linux distribution, basically dedicated
>to firewalling. I'm not sure which it uses, iptables or ipchains.
>
>You can read about it here:
>
>http://www.smoothwall.org
>
>I haven't used it myself, but I hear it is VERY good.
Than
Your better off doing it like this:
>Inet<--->Firewall<--->Network Hub<--->all other clients
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [expe
But does anyone know if smoothwall supports pcmcia NIC yet?
I know the old versions did not.
Original Message:
-
From: J. Craig Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 06:32:26 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Firewall install
At 06:38 AM 1/4/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>HI All,
>
>
>Obviously, I will be removing the bastille firewall as this becomes redundant.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Dave.
And, yes, by all means get rid of the Bastille (hell, the French had the
right idea when they stormed it). If this list
Smoothwall is a light-weight Linux distribution, basically dedicated
to firewalling. I'm not sure which it uses, iptables or ipchains.
You can read about it here:
http://www.smoothwall.org
I haven't used it myself, but I hear it is VERY good.
Kindest Regards,
Ashley (aka ze0).
|-
At 06:38 AM 1/4/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>When I install the Smoothwall firewall (an old Laptop), I will be adding a
>second NIC to replace the modem, and connect this NIC to the firewall.
>
>Inet<--->Firewall<--->MDK8.0 Box<--->Network Hub<--->all other clients
>
>Do I still need IPT
Jan 2002 06:38:44 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] Firewall install - smoothwall
HI All,
I will be installing a dedicated firewall box running smoothwall in the near future. I
just want to check some areas that will need to change.
The box on my network connected to the internet
HI All,
I will be installing a dedicated firewall box running smoothwall in the near future. I
just want to check some areas that will need to change.
The box on my network connected to the internet via DUP on serial modem uses IP Tables
and Masquerading and Bastille to act as a gateway/firewa
Have you considered www.astaro.com
Greg
On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 09:21, Dave Sherman wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 21:08, Michael Seymour wrote:
> > I have played around with SNF and found it to be adequate for a small
> > network and I currently use it at home; however, I will be looking for a
>
On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 21:08, Michael Seymour wrote:
> I have played around with SNF and found it to be adequate for a small
> network and I currently use it at home; however, I will be looking for a
> larger firewall over the next few months for my work environment. We
> have 3 e-mail servers and
I have played around with SNF and found it to be adequate
for a small network and I currently use it at home; however, I will be looking
for a larger firewall over the next few months for my work environment. We have 3 e-mail servers and 3 web
servers with unique IP addresses so I will nee
]
|Subject: Re: [expert] Firewall Log Question
|
|
|It's always been my understanding that one of the reasons to
|have 192.168.x.x
|Ip numbers in a internal network is to enable,,, oh say a GOOD
|network (or
|even a really lame) Admin to block those IPs frpom external
|sources. just how
|mu
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:41, eduardo wrote:
> Thanks for your help.
>
> With this I sent a small description about how network has bean
> setting up and the hardware that the we are using.
>
> Network 1 : 10.10.X.X / 255.255.0.0 (The Other Company/Firewall)
>
> Network 2 : 192.168.5.X.X / 255.255.0.
ragon Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Firewall Log Question
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:09, Eduardo Bencomo wrote:
> > We are in a mixed network, which includes a router Cisco, a 3COM swich
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:08, Leif Madsen wrote:
> I have to agree with Tarragon here. It doesn't look to me like any sort of
> hacking attempt as it looks like their firewall is just recieving packets
> to ports which they are blocking and it is dropping them. It very well
> could be a machine on
you :)
Leif Madsen - Project Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.plannettechnologies.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tarragon Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Firewall Log Question
&g
Hiya, well looking at the port numbers 137 & 138 if I remember right
thats netbios ports,
are you running SAMBA ? on your network ?,
anyway if you turn off those two ports on outgoing packets that should
stop the other
company accusing you of hacking.
But if the other co had a real sys admin perso
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:09, Eduardo Bencomo wrote:
> We are in a mixed network, which includes a router Cisco, a 3COM swich
> common to the two networks and a hub where gateway/fire wall linux computer
> is connected.
>
> One of the network is my company network (192.168.X.X / 255.255.0.0. I am
> i
We are in
a mixed network, which includes a router Cisco, a 3COM swich common to the two
networks and a hub where gateway/fire wall linux computer is connected.
One of the network is my company network (192.168.X.X / 255.255.0.0. I am in charge of it) and
the other network belongs to other
We are in a mixed network, which includes a router
Cisco, a 3COM swich common to the two networks and a hub where gateway/fire wall
linux computer is connected.
One of the network is my company network
(192.168.X.X / 255.255.0.0. I am in charge of it) and the other network belongs
to othe
Try /etc/Bastille
On 30 Oct 2001, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> Hi, where are the rules for the tinyfirewall script kept. I want to do
> some minor mods.
>
> BillK
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Arthur H. Johnson II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Linux Box
http://www.linuxbox.nu
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
Starting with Mandrake 7.0 I've now reached Mandrake 8.1 by updating.
I'm very pleased with this version:
Everything works fine: X with hardware acceleration, tv, parallel port
scanner, cups, vmware etc.
But there remains one problem: My second pc (pentium 133 mhz with MDK-8.0)
uses the proxy ww
Hi all!
I was running Mandrake 7.1 and my firewall was in ipchains and everything
worked fine, since then I've installed mandrake 8.0 and now I run iptables
and now my firewall works for about a day or less, then I have to down the
external interface and up again and then it works again for about
base16 math... :P
Pierre
Original Message
Subject: Re: [expert] Firewall / Router Advice
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:58:54 -0400
From: Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martyn Wendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <A1E0FEB3E411D411AD1F0030050124811844CC@NEO
Martyn,
Doesn't it strike as a little weird that both interfaces are on the same
network? Which interface does it send to when it wants to ping 172.18.9.200?
Both? Or one of them, and then which one? You have two topologies going on in
the internal network: star topology on the side of the intern
Martyn Wendon wrote:
> So far I've fitted 2 network cards in the Linux box, eth0 is 172.18.9.100
> and is connected to the router and eth1 is 172.18.9.101 and is connected to
> the hub of the internal network. I've enabled routing in linuxconf, and the
> default gateway is set at 172.18.9.30, at
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Martyn Wendon wrote:
> So far I've fitted 2 network cards in the Linux box, eth0 is 172.18.9.100
> and is connected to the router and eth1 is 172.18.9.101 and is connected to
> the hub of the internal network. I've enabled routing in linuxconf, and the
> default gateway is s
Hello Expert List!
If possible can anybody advise me on the following scenario:
My home network (4 pcs and a laptop of varying Windows / Linux versions)
currently accesses the Internet via a 3Com OfficeConnect ISDN router. The
machines are connected to a hub, which in turn uplinks to the router
Franki wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> Has anyone used Kfirewall here?
>
> I needed on in a hurry, so I setup kfirewall to block all the usual ports,
> and now I am having trouble getting it to keep its settings after reboot...
> is it only supposed to work while x is running? if so thats a bit sad...
I haven't used Kfirewall so I can't help with this problem.
However, like many on this list, I use pmfirewall. It's very easy to
configure, supports IPMASQ, and has a good reputation.
You can find it at:
http://www.pointman.org/PMFirewall/
M.
On Saturday 17 February 2001 09:23, Fran
hi all,
Has anyone used Kfirewall here?
I needed on in a hurry, so I setup kfirewall to block all the usual ports,
and now I am having trouble getting it to keep its settings after reboot...
is it only supposed to work while x is running? if so thats a bit sad...
is there a way to make the IPch
El Domingo 11 Febrero 2001 01:41, escribiste:
> I'll second the suggestion of pmfirewall. It's very easy to set up and does
> exactly what it's supposed to do.
Thanks to all who replied!
--
Saludos desde Sevilla
Try installing pmfirewall to handle ipchains. I used the DrakConf setup
once, and then had to go back and basicly undo the settings and then
installed pmfirewall with my mods. DrakConf probably does a good job if
you have exactly the setup it expects, but if you dont or not if you
want to contr
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 04:41:53PM -0800, Michael O'Henly wrote:
> I'll second the suggestion of pmfirewall. It's very easy to set up and does
> exactly what it's supposed to do.
[snip]
> --
> Michael O'Henly
> TENZO Design
I would suggest using portsentry in addition to something like pmfi
I'll second the suggestion of pmfirewall. It's very easy to set up and does
exactly what it's supposed to do.
M.
On Saturday 10 February 2001 16:28, Dave wrote:
> Jesus,
>
> >I am connecting to the internet via ppp and a modem. As I usually stay
> >connected during most part of the day I want
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo