[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's interesting how Bright Light Types sometimes > suffer despair before awakening. Buckminster > Fuller and Ekhart Tolle contemplated suicide, > Byron Katie raged, Maharishi was despondent. > And their respo

[FairfieldLife] Kicked out of Communist Party for being TMer

Ovidiu Maitec BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) _ Ovidiu Maitec, one of Romania's top contemporary sculptors, who was considered the successor to legendary sculptor Constantin Brancusi, died Sunday. He was 81. Maitec died in a hospital in Paris, where he was being treated for an unspecified illness, t

[FairfieldLife] Tuesday's Counter Report

covers 24.5 hours from 11:30 PM EDT Monday night to Midnight Tuesday EDT. These are based on arrived emails. If I got em I count em. Amarnath 2 April 1 judy 7 Bhairitu 2 Briganti 1 Card 2 Coshlinx 2 Curtis 1 Doug Hamilton 1 Geezer 2 Hyperbolic 1 Jim Flanigen 5 LLundrub 6 Lurk 2 Marek 2 Matrix 3 M

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Excuse me, I have to go and work on my proctological self-exam > practices. Probably be a good time to install a glass navel.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Re the new Pandit update: Send Money

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter > wrote: > > > > Bunch of f***ing scum bag con artists. Sleazy > > rakshasa's. Lie, distort, manipulate in the name of > > spirituality. A**holes.>> > > I guess you d

[FairfieldLife] Re: Re the new Pandit update: Send Money

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bunch of f***ing scum bag con artists. Sleazy > rakshasa's. Lie, distort, manipulate in the name of > spirituality. A**holes.>> I guess you didn't get the memo on FFL rules Peter. OffWorld > --- dhamiltony2k5 <[EMAIL PR

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re the new Pandit update: Send Money

On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:16 PM, Peter wrote: Bunch of f***ing scum bag con artists. Sleazy rakshasa's. Lie, distort, manipulate in the name of spirituality. A**holes. The 'new' pundit update sounds a heck of a lot like most of the old ones. Sal

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >snip <..what if the only difference between those who > spontaneously realize their always-already-present > enlightenment and those who do not is this feeling > of *needing* something to make it happen? Wouldn't > it be a

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

They were not sent there for that reason. Sensual protections arose within the prescient field. Without that, there could not be a celerity of torment and wonder with which they were propelled into the night. OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

It's interesting how Bright Light Types sometimes suffer despair before awakening. Buckminster Fuller and Ekhart Tolle contemplated suicide, Byron Katie raged, Maharishi was despondent. And their responses were to serve others. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re the new Pandit update: Send Money

Bunch of f***ing scum bag con artists. Sleazy rakshasa's. Lie, distort, manipulate in the name of spirituality. A**holes. --- dhamiltony2k5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Om, wasn't that 100 millionaire's course about this > money? And the > wives course too? Now can there be no money now? > Wh

[FairfieldLife] Re the new Pandit update: Send Money

Om, wasn't that 100 millionaire's course about this money? And the wives course too? Now can there be no money now? What became of that money? "...now is a doubly good time to make a contribution for the Pandit housing. Please go to either Global Country of World Peace or Maharishi Vedic C

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

On Mar 20, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Rick Archer wrote:  On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:48 PM, tertonzeno wrote: ---Vaj, you have your head up your rectum. (and so does Sam Harris). Uh, Rick, does this qualify as an attack? Or polite conversation? :)   It depends on how he means it. It could be an advanced yo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

On Mar 20, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Vaj wrote: This guy has so many aliases it wouldn't matter if you banned just one, he must have at least 6 of them. That's what I figured--all of them pretty much unpronounceable. Sal

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Rick Archer wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vaj Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:20 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim This guy has so many aliase

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Rick Archer wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vaj Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:20 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim This guy has so many aliase

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

Comment below: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "coshlnx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ---There's no contention that all is already "That". The point is to > Realize IT. Are you saying that people are to instantaneously > realize IT simply because you say "Ye are already THAT?". >

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vaj Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:20 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim This guy has so many aliases it wouldn't matter if you banned just one, he must

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:12 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:48 PM, tertonzeno wrote: ---Vaj, you have your

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

If you even knew what the fuck I was talking about your response would be worth more than a fart in the wind. -Original Message- From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hyperbolicgeometry Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:36 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

This guy has so many aliases it wouldn't matter if you banned just one, he must have at least 6 of them. On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:48 PM, tertonzeno wrote: ---Vaj, you have your head up your rectum. (and so does Sam Harris). Uh, Rick, does this

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:48 PM, tertonzeno wrote: ---Vaj, you have your head up your rectum. (and so does Sam Harris). Uh, Rick, does this qualify as an attack? Or polite conversation? :) Sal

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor" > wrote: > > > > ---Yes, Tolle, Ramana, and Papaji are examples of individuals who > > awakened more or less spontaneously without the need of prior > > practices

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

---Vaj, you have your head up your rectum. (and so does Sam Harris). Here's his latest article: http://www.tinyurl.com/2ctd39 In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, I noticed you switch between multiple names to continue posting > numbers low: matrixmoni

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

BTW, I noticed you switch between multiple names to continue posting numbers low: matrixmonitor, coshlnx, hyperbolic geometry, etc. , etc. I feel that should be illegal. It's dishonest. On Mar 20, 2007, at 6:30 PM, coshlnx wrote: > ---We've gone over this before, dead horse. All depends on h

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

-"Seeing into the Buddha fields" is irrelevant, unless you define it (the seeing of something) rather broadly. Did Shankara see into the Buddha fields? Did Ramana Maharshi.?? How about: "seeing into the Ramana Maharshi fields" as a requirement, or "seeing into the SBS fields"?? -- In Fairfie

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

---There's no contention that all is already "That". The point is to Realize IT. Are you saying that people are to instantaneously realize IT simply because you say "Ye are already THAT?". In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Comment below: > > **

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

---We've gone over this before, dead horse. All depends on how you defdefine "Enlightenment". In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Marek Reavis wrote: > > > Here's a couple of my pennies on the above subject (and thanks to > > eve

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

On Mar 20, 2007, at 3:24 PM, llundrub wrote: Did they all see into the Buddha fields? Then they were not awakened, just perhaps not dreaming any longer. So true.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Marek Reavis wrote: Here's a couple of my pennies on the above subject (and thanks to everyone who has weighed in on it). As many others have pointed out before, "Realization" implies that whatever It Is, It *already* Is and at some point It recognizes That. The

[FairfieldLife] Para level of thinking

Transcendental Meditation and the para or transcendental level of thought - Part II by Global Good News staff writer Global Good NewsTranslate This Article 20 March 2007 In the Global Press Conference on 14 March, Dr John Hagelin answered a question from the press about Transcendental Medit

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms

On Mar 20, 2007, at 3:44 PM, matrixmonitor wrote: ---No it's not "blame" that's the impediment. It's "reasons" as in cause and effect. MMY is right!... Stress. Actually the tradition he comes from is much more honest: it's the pranic/bioenergetic body and it's blockages. That kind of str

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --OK, let's try it. Bring up a pic of Ramana or Papaji from the web > and imagine him saying "You are already Enlightened", ; or, you can > get a DVD of Papaji saying this. Play the DVD. (imagine doing thi

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

Comment below: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor" > wrote: > > > > ---Yes, Tolle, Ramana, and Papaji are examples of individuals who > > awakened more or less spontaneously without the need of

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--OK, let's try it. Bring up a pic of Ramana or Papaji from the web and imagine him saying "You are already Enlightened", ; or, you can get a DVD of Papaji saying this. Play the DVD. (imagine doing this right now). Papaji: "You are already Enlightened". OK, now of the unenlightened people a

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ---Yes, Tolle, Ramana, and Papaji are examples of individuals who > awakened more or less spontaneously without the need of prior > practices. In a statistical curve, such persons are in the > 99.9% per

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms

---No it's not "blame" that's the impediment. It's "reasons" as in cause and effect. MMY is right!... Stress. In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 19, 2007, at 5:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > So, over coffee on this bright new morning in FFL > > his

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ---Yes, Tolle, Ramana, and Papaji are examples of individuals who > awakened more or less spontaneously without the need of prior > practices. In a statistical curve, such persons are in the > 99.9% pe

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

Did they all see into the Buddha fields? Then they were not awakened, just perhaps not dreaming any longer. -Original Message- From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of matrixmonitor Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 2:17 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com S

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

---Yes, Tolle, Ramana, and Papaji are examples of individuals who awakened more or less spontaneously without the need of prior practices. In a statistical curve, such persons are in the 99.9% percentile. The rest of us laggards need good "techniques" like TM. FairfieldLife@yahoogr

Re: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours

Rick Archer wrote: > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Bhairitu > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:38 AM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours > > > > Now are these like cellular minutes where they rollove

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

Jimbo say: The sense of I am gets unbelieveably burdensome. The harder I tried to define who I was, the less I liked myself, or the less satisfaction I derived from my attempts to explain myself and life in terms of ownership. Death of the self ultimately was preferable. Big time. No compariso

RE: [FairfieldLife] Goodbye

As most would agree, you're too kind. From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Archer Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:28 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Goodbye From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:35 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours Now are these like cellular minutes where they rollover if you don't use them? IOW,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours

Now are these like cellular minutes where they rollover if you don't use them? IOW, if you only post 2 times on one day do the 3 unused rollover to the next day so you can have 7? :) I've got another good one--if you post something, and it gets removed for being an attack or whatever, then

[FairfieldLife] Re: "The Two Paradigms"

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You don't seem to understand. I don't believe that > there IS any such thing as an "impediment to > enlightenment." Enlightenment is present at all > times. Sometimes I realize that, sometimes I don't. > No big deal ei

RE: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bhairitu Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:38 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours Now are these like cellular minutes where they rollover if you don't use them? IOW, if y

Re: [FairfieldLife] Posts in 23.5 hours

Now are these like cellular minutes where they rollover if you don't use them? IOW, if you only post 2 times on one day do the 3 unused rollover to the next day so you can have 7? :) Rick Archer wrote: > Monday's count and commentary from my official counter: > > I am a little light by 1/2 ho

[FairfieldLife] Re: "The Two Paradigms"

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > wrote: > > I just appreciate the *essential* difference > > between the two intellectual approaches -- one > > says that enlightenment is "other," something >

[FairfieldLife] Re: "The Two Paradigms"

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > wrote: > > > I just appreciate the *essential* difference > > between the two intellectual approaches -- one > > says that enlightenment is "other," something

[FairfieldLife] Re: "The Two Paradigms"

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just appreciate the *essential* difference > between the two intellectual approaches -- one > says that enlightenment is "other," something > that must be "attained," and that there are > things or beings or whatever

RE: [FairfieldLife] Moderator: These are personal attacks

In the first instance Alex is posting a personal opinion about the quality of your posts, not a direct attack on you as a person. If it were a movie review, it wouldn't be considered a personal attack on the director of the movie. He would not be calling the man an asshole or whatever. Therefore I

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "amarnath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Namaste Jim, > > Thanks for a very refreshing account with minimum labels and > conclusions. Simplicity seems to be a good pointer toward reality. > > Especially your last three paragraphs impress me that your aw

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of authfriend Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:26 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours RICK, PLEASE NOTE: In fact, I hereby *request* that Rick put both you and me on moderat

[FairfieldLife] Moderator: These are personal attacks

Moderator: These are personal attacks - I am offended that anyone would post such during the current restrictions. Please remove them from the group. Thank you. Alex Stanley: "...his posts are incoherent gibberish and a complete waste of time." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/m

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:48 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours > Nablus 3 same post three times > Rick moderator 9 > offworld 6 (2 repeat) > Sal 2 >

RE: [FairfieldLife] Goodbye

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of llundrub Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:22 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Goodbye I am using a post to commend the mod's decisions and to say goodbye to all you diarrhea posters. Now you c

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of authfriend Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:07 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours So Rick, what's the story on when an individual poster's "day" begins, for counting pur

[FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" > > wrote: > > > > > > > This is an attempt at humor, right? > > > > > > No. > > > > Oh, that's

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TurquoiseB Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 3:30 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , "authfri

[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sam Harris article, L.A. Times

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "coshlnx" wrote: > > > > > > it's at > > > > > > http://www.tinyurl.com/2z3dum > > > > > > The "

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim

Namaste Jim, Thanks for a very refreshing account with minimum labels and conclusions. Simplicity seems to be a good pointer toward reality. Especially your last three paragraphs impress me that your awakening is in the right direction and genuine from what I understand from Ammachi, Papaji and

[FairfieldLife] TMFree Blog like being on set of "One flew over the Cuckoo's nest"..

The only thing missing is the backround music and people dancing in the hallways. Everyone is so 'nice' there, but then I guess that's what happens when you're in recovery and taking all those meds! Let's see: John Knapp would make a good Nurse Racthet and Of course Paul, the hero, could be

[FairfieldLife] TM-Free Blog is like being on the set of "One flew over the Cuckoo's nest"...

The only thing missing is the backround music and people dancing in the hallways. Everyone is so 'nice' there, but then I guess that's what happens when you're in recovery and taking all those meds! Let's see: John Knapp would make a good Nurse Racthet and Of course Paul, the hero, could be McMurp

[FairfieldLife] No More Tricks, No More Lies, Only Truth

THE TRUTH OF REALITY http://www.freedomnetwork888.com/Truth_Of_Reality/Introduction.htm HOME WITH GOD http://www.freedomnetwork888.com/Home_With_God/Introduction.htm V FOR VALERIE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIoHMty5xXI RELATIONSHIP http://www.bluegemebooks.c

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Number Five (was Re: Posts in 23.5 hours)

On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:12 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: Rick, Since there appear to be a few developmentally challenged individuals ATTACK!!! To the dungeon, Barry. Sal

[FairfieldLife] Goodbye

I am using a post to commend the mod's decisions and to say goodbye to all you diarrhea posters. Now you compulsive no-lifers can take it back home to AMT where the world will be your plastic oyster.

RE: [FairfieldLife] The Two Paradigms

Whoever wrote: You definitely see this in the history of the first nondual teachers in this country. They at first would teach from a radical, nondual POV and transmit that state of presence simply through their own presence. A few got it. Most did not. And thereafter they developed graduate

[FairfieldLife] The Number Five (was Re: Posts in 23.5 hours)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Monday's count and commentary from my official counter: > > I am a little light by 1/2 hour in order to get this done > and out the door. I actually read every post and did not > delete any. It was on the whole qu

[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sam Harris article, L.A. Times

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "coshlnx" wrote: > > > > it's at > > > > http://www.tinyurl.com/2z3dum > > > > The "dum" in the URL must mean something. > > > > FWIW, in Swedish "dum" (~doom) means 'stupid'

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Two Paradigms

On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:12 AM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote: Vaj writes snipped big time: The classic distinction between a "gradual" path and a "sudden" path. Tom T: It seems that I have heard from one of the Advaitans that the path is always gradual until it becomes sudden. Tom Th

[FairfieldLife] The Two Paradigms

Vaj writes snipped big time: The classic distinction between a "gradual" path and a "sudden" path. Tom T: It seems that I have heard from one of the Advaitans that the path is always gradual until it becomes sudden. Tom

[FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Monday's count and commentary from my official counter: > > I am a little light by 1/2 hour in order to get this done and out the door. > I actually read every post and did not delete any. It was on the whole quit

[FairfieldLife] Re: New Sam Harris article, L.A. Times

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "coshlnx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it's at > > http://www.tinyurl.com/2z3dum > > The "dum" in the URL must mean something. > FWIW, in Swedish "dum" (~doom) means 'stupid'...

[FairfieldLife] Re: Posts in 23.5 hours

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" > wrote: > > > > > This is an attempt at humor, right? > > > > No. > > Oh, that's too bad. > > > And this makes 11 for you. Way over the limit. > > Whoops, ther