--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ben brbenjaminass...@... wrote:
Billy could be in the dictionary under the word red
neck.. right?
Don't insult the rednecks.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@... wrote:
Well do you?
Nancy Pelosi? I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote:
Well do you?
Nancy Pelosi? I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.
Billy could be in the dictionary under the word red neck..
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote:
Well do you?
Nancy Pelosi? I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.
Somebody must as she is still there.N.
Robert wrote:
Funny, how all these macho guys,
were so big, way back when...
Maybe so, but I don't think Nancy Pelosi
thinks it's funny. She has to face the
voters soon and they're not very
impressed that Nancy didn't object to the
enhanced interrogations. She apparently
knew all about them
Well, I can't imagine a professional
public servant employee of the CIA
lying to congressional leaders, in
an Intelligence Committee briefing,
but I can imagine a politician like
Nancy Pelosi lying every single day
in a press conference on TV.
sparaig wrote:
I can easily
authfriend wrote:
CIA has quite a well-established reputation by
now for lying, or at least shading the truth,
to Congress and even to the president.
There's no evidence that the CIA lied to any
members of congress. But there is ample proof
that politicians lie all the time just in the
course
I can easily imagine a CIA representative shading
the facts presented to a member of Congress in a
way commensurate with White House policy.
do.rflex wrote:
Besides, the question of what Pelosi knew or didn't,
or when she did or didn't know, is irrelevant to
how W. and Cheney
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@...
wrote:
authfriend wrote:
CIA has quite a well-established reputation by
now for lying, or at least shading the truth,
to Congress and even to the president.
There's no evidence that the CIA lied to any
members of
Another BINGO moment with our FFL poet leary-ette.
To me, the Dems are running scared that the
dark underbelly of elitism may be exposed and
suddenly the American public will have undeniable
evidence that the Dems and Repugs are identical
twins when it comes to spin, diversion, semantics
and
Duveyoung wrote:
...all of America will see our beloved
leaders calmly cherry picking amongst
the most vile of torture techniques like
they were picking out their favorite
doughnuts at Crispy Creme.
You need to stop with all the exagerations,
Edg. The U.S. doesn't torture people. Maybe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote:
Well do you?
Do you have reason to take the word of one public
servant over
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@...
wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Do you have reason to take the
word of one public servant over
another, given neither is under
oath?
Well, I can't imagine a professional
public servant employee of the CIA
lying to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Do you have reason to take the
word of one public servant over
another, given neither is under
oath?
Well, I can't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Do you have reason to take the
word of one public servant over
another, given neither is under
oath?
Well, I can't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@
wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Do you have reason to take the
word of one public
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@
wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Do you have reason to take the
word of one public
Yes.
However, the issue is NOT Pelosi, it's Rice, Rumsfeld, Bushlite, and Cheney,
the actual instigators of the criminal acts.
And yes, let's get those photos released that the ACLU is suing over.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ultrarishi no_re...@... wrote:
Yes.
However, the issue is NOT Pelosi, it's Rice, Rumsfeld, Bushlite, and Cheney,
the actual instigators of the criminal acts.
And yes, let's get those photos released that the ACLU is suing over.
Funny, how all these
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@... wrote:
Well do you?
Do you have reason to take the word of one public servant over another, given
neither is under oath?
Besides, I can imagine plenty of scenarios where there's enough wiggle room
around the facts for both
--- On Sat, 5/16/09, sparaig lengli...@cox.net wrote:
From: sparaig lengli...@cox.net
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does anybody believe Speaker Pelosi?
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 8:06 AM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Mike Dixon mdixon.6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote:
--- On Sat, 5/16/09, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
From: sparaig lengli...@...
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does anybody believe Speaker Pelosi?
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 8
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote:
Well do you?
Do you have reason to take the word of one public
servant over another, given neither is under oath?
Besides, I can imagine plenty
sparaig wrote:
Do you have reason to take the
word of one public servant over
another, given neither is under
oath?
Well, I can't imagine a professional
public servant employee of the CIA
lying to congressional leaders, in
an Intelligence Committee briefing,
but I can imagine a
Besides, I can imagine plenty of
scenarios where there's enough
wiggle room around the facts for
both sides to cliam they're
telling the whole truth and
nothing but the truth...
Peter wrote:
Politicians of any stripe are
post-modernists in that they
construct reality with
The Speaker's House it is not clean
Moneychangers own it
Sucked dry to bone the common folk
Forced in debt we loan it
The Speaker's House it is not clean
Torture advocating
The truth obscured by blaming game
And prevaricating
The Speaker's House it is not clean
Pelosi on petard
She takes the rap
Mike Dixon wrote:
Does anybody believe Speaker Pelosi?
God forbid, but if President Obama and
Vice President Biden should die or be
incapacitated, Nancy Pelosi would become
our president.
Read other comments:
'She's Losing Her Own'
By Peter Wehner
Commentary Magazine, April 13, 2009
do.rflex wrote:
Some in the CIA are attempting to exonerate
themselves [and by extension, the Cheney/Bush
administration] by claiming that they fulfilled
their legal obligation to inform Congress, and
that Congress *knew about* and *approved*
everything they were doing every step along
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@... wrote:
Well do you?
Some in the CIA are attempting to exonerate themselves [and by extension, the
Cheney/Bush administration] by claiming that they fulfilled their legal
obligation to inform Congress, and that Congress
29 matches
Mail list logo
