--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelson" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm more comfortable with allowing round holes
> > > to remain round holes. I don't feel the need to
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelson" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > I'm more comfortable with allowing round holes
> > to remain round holes. I don't feel the need to
> > redefine them as square pegs, or even "under-
> > stand" what makes some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But Nelson - why
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But Nelson - why
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jpgillam" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > one of the reasons
> > I like the "multiple realities" theory is that it
> > helps to explain subjective experiences that I and
> > others have had of "past life flashbacks."
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> one of the reasons
> I like the "multiple realities" theory is that it
> helps to explain subjective experiences that I and
> others have had of "past life flashbacks."
>
> Interestingly, when such flashbacks occur, at least
> to me, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
> > >
> > > But Nelson - why does that add up to "many realities"?
> > > Why not just "multiple perspe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
> > >
> > > But Nelson - why does that add up to "many realities"? Why not
> > > just "multiple perspe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@
Vaj wrote:
> Maybe it's you who needs to get his
> head out of the books?
>
Barry says he's read over 200 books
on the Cathars alone. There's no
telling how many books he's read,
but obviously he didn't get his
knowledge apriori.
Most of the things he knows he got
from either books or someone
Judy wrote:
> And Willytex himself has, of course,
> met Maharishi...
>
Yes, I have met the Maharishi in person
on several occasions. I meditated alone
with Maharishi on two occasions at the
Olson's.
I also attended numerous lectures at
the original SRM on Santa Monica Blvd
where I sat in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nelsonriddle2001"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It should be obv
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > The thing that's been striking me lately, now that
> > the only thing I see of these people is the "Twitter"
> > synopsis of their spew in Yahoo Message View...
>
> I'll fo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> It's fascinating that the ISIS crowd, who tend to
> be "book-larnin' only" in their approach to self
> discovery, would try to accuse me of *their* own
> approach. I mean, some of them are so lightweight
> they never even met Maharishi, a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "compost1uk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > snip
> > > It's very important to Barry that no one reality be
> > > any more valid than any other, because th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> snip
> > It's very important to Barry that no one reality be
> > any more valid than any other, because that way *he
> > can never be wrong, nor can he ever be said to lie*.
> > H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> The thing that's been striking me lately, now that
> the only thing I see of these people is the "Twitter"
> synopsis of their spew in Yahoo Message View...
I'll follow up on this, because part of me
is still EVIL, and I just *love* how
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> Wow, you don't listen very well then. The Barry I've heard post
> is a connoisseur of many paths and many experiences...
More a gourmand than a gourmet, actually... :-)
> ...both conventional and non-conventional...
That's not an overstatem
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > It should be obvious to anyone who has spent some
> > > time here that we do not all live in the sam
On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:52 PM, WillyTex wrote:
Which is really too funny, since almost everything
Barry knows was either obtained from a book or from
listening to someone telling him something.
Apparently Barry has not a single apriori source of
knowledge or gnosis.
Everything he knows comes to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> snip
> > It's very important to Barry that no one reality be
> > any more valid than any other, because that way *he
> > can never be wrong, nor can he ever be said to lie*.
> > H
> > One poster lives in a reality in which many of his
> > fellow posters work for the CIA or the Dalai Lama,
> > and are paid to spread lies about Maharishi, TM,
> > Benny Hill (or Creme...I can never keep those two
> > straight), crop circles and Space Brothers. And we
> > get the feeling that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
snip
> It's very important to Barry that no one reality be
> any more valid than any other, because that way *he
> can never be wrong, nor can he ever be said to lie*.
> He desperately needs this justification for his
> solipsism.
Does th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> The film is about what happens when these different
> realities -- different musical themes or "notes" --
> collide, and the image that is produced when they do.
> It's like a hologram produced from the difference
> tones of multiple reali
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> While I applaud and thank you for following
> up so gently and non-confrontationally, Billy,
> I do have to ask whether you understand that
> what you just did is to follow up on my rap
> about FFL being a place where conflicting
> realit
> TurquoiseB wrote:
> > There is no Reality here...
> >
Bhairitu wrote:
> How, pray tell, would one express "Reality" on a text
> forum? You can't. It can only express "realities"...
>
So, you're thinking there are multiple "realities"? And
you're thinking that "Reality" can't be expressed on a
t
TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > You are terrified of doing certain things that
> > > most people consider their innate right and
> > > a basic part of being human...
> > >
Billy wrote:
> > When you put your finger in fire it burns
> >
John wrote:
> ...you come off like a goofy naive little kid.
>
S
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > snip
> > > > Suggesting that this person's real
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
> > > Suggesting that this person's reality is Reality
> > > is to suggest that there is only *One* Reality.
> > > And sorry, but I'm not buyin' that one...
> > >
> Billy wrote:
> > Whether or not you "buy it" is really secondary to
> > wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > snip
> > > Suggesting that this person's reality is Reality
> > > is to suggest that there is only *One* Reality.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> snip
> > Suggesting that this person's reality is Reality
> > is to suggest that there is only *One* Reality.
> > And sorry, but I'm not buyin' that one...
>
> Whether or not you "b
> > Suggesting that this person's reality is Reality
> > is to suggest that there is only *One* Reality.
> > And sorry, but I'm not buyin' that one...
> >
Billy wrote:
> Whether or not you "buy it" is really secondary to
> whether or not it is true, yes? No one is forcing
> you to buy it! If scri
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
snip
> Suggesting that this person's reality is Reality
> is to suggest that there is only *One* Reality.
> And sorry, but I'm not buyin' that one...
Whether or not you "buy it" is really secondary to whether or not it is true,
yes? No one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> >
> > It should be obvious to anyone who has spent some
> > time here that we do not all live in the same reality.
> > The frequency -- and the *vehemence* -- of the never-
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> This morning I'm still thinking about the film I
> say yesterday, "Franklyn." That film presented a
> fascinating glimpse of multiple realities, and
> what happens when they collide.
>
> It reminded me of holograms. The interesting thin
38 matches
Mail list logo
