--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Judy, above you said:
> > >
> > > "Also, just for the record
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Judy, you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
> > > I can't help but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I can't speak for Judy, but I think all Judy is saying is that there
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > I can't speak for Judy, but I think all Judy is saying is that there
> > is nothing disordered about being sexually attracted to people who
> > have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't speak for Judy, but I think all Judy is saying is that there
> is nothing disordered about being sexually attracted to people who
> have reached sexual maturity. However, there is a major difference
> betwee
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > I wouldn't describe the discussion as yelling, but it
> > was a little bit heated at times, and there were labels
> > being thrown around.
>
> L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't describe the discussion as yelling, but it
> was a little bit heated at times, and there were labels
> being thrown around.
Labels as weapons...like kids throwing insults
on the order of "Poopie pant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
> > > I can't h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
> > I can't help but think you take Barry far more seriously
> > than he takes himself.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
> > > I can't help but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
> > I can't help but think you take Barry far more seriously
> > than he takes himself. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Judy, above you said:
> >
> > "Also, just for the record, pedophilia is considered a sexual
> > disorder, whereas homosexuality is not, at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
> > help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
> > himself.
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:39 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around, breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous hairstyles upon the drab, heterosexual oc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
> I can't help but think you take Barry far more seriously
> than he takes himself. I always assume he's just joking
> around when he posts bullshit just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around,
> breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous
> hairstyles upon the drab, heterosexual occupants.
Remembering the interior photos
Huh. One Scientific American article showed conclusively that the
most popular potrait of Shaekspear was a retouched version of the
most popular portrait of Queen Elisabeth, and suggested that SHE was
the author of a good many plays.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> > >
> > > Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral
> sex.
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around,
> > breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous
> > hairstyles up
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't help
> but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes himself. I
> always assume he's just joking around when he posts bullshit just to
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> > I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
> > I have, so keep up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many
> > of your points. You are r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
> wrote:
> >
> > Even though many of the plays were written after Oxford died?
OK.
> >
> > I imagine in about 3 or 400 years we'll be hearing pretty much
the same
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> > > >
I made the mistake of thinking that your inquiry was a serious one, and I took
some time to deal sincerely with you in a spirit of intellectual inquiry.
Obviously, I was wasting my time. You do not have a clue what you are
talking about and you appear to have no interest in learning.
That's m
On Feb 26, 2006, at 6:34 PM, feste37 wrote:
I'm unconvinced by your Beatles analogy, but it doesn't interest me one way
or another what you choose to believe.
I was just attempting to instill a little humor in the discussion, Feste--a hopeless task, I should have known.
You asked me a questi
The "official" dates of composition of the plays involves large amounts of
guesswork. Many of them cannot be dated with any certainty at all. Oxford
died some years before Shaksper, but the so-called later plays can without
much difficulty be placed earlier than they appear in the "official"
ch
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Even though many of the plays were written after Oxford died? OK.
>
> I imagine in about 3 or 400 years we'll be hearing pretty much the same
> thing about Lennon and MacCartney: "Those guys could *never* have
>
Even though many of the plays were written after Oxford died? OK.
I imagine in about 3 or 400 years we'll be hearing pretty much the same thing about Lennon and MacCartney: "Those guys could *never* have produced all that music. No way! They were from ordinary families, not the elite! They
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 2/24/06 1:42:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > > jstei
Shaksper was an actor. He was quite a convenient front man for Oxford. I
cannot answer all your questions because it is some years since I researched
this and I have forgotten many of the details. But the best book on the subject
was published only last August. It's called Shakespeare by Any Oth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
wrote:
> > >
> > > > W
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > > Were I a fundamentalist christian, I might call it "counter to
> > > nature." Ins
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, but I don't find the acts disgusting. I
> > find homophobia such as yours disgusting.
> >
>
> I don't get off on looking at such acts. ANd any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Wasn't St. Germaine, *as* St. Germaine, active during
> the French Revolution? Or was that a different St.
> Germaine?
same dude. In some ways he's just like Waldo. He keeps popping up in
interesting places.
lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl wrote:
>
> > 2) Anal sex, Do you a man and woman haveing anal anal sex
>
> I'm having a little trouble visualizing this one...
>
double-ended dildo?
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > Were I a fundamentalist christian, I might call it "counter to
> > nature." Instead, I just call it something I'm not into for
various
> > reasons. How
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Were I a fundamentalist christian, I might call it "counter to
> nature." Instead, I just call it something I'm not into for various
> reasons. However, I don't justify my personal distaste by condemning
> other people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 2/24/06 5:19:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > j_alexander_stanley@ writes:
> >
> > Or maybe just a little more in tune
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:54 PM, feste37 wrote:
>
> > But it doesn't mean I have to go
> > along with the homosexual agenda
>
> What is that, Feste? I mean that sincerely. I have heard about the
> "homosexual agen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 2/24/06 1:42:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > jstein@ writes:
> >
> > I was shocked tofind that feste is a creationist --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I don't find the acts disgusting. I
> find homophobia such as yours disgusting.
>
I don't get off on looking at such acts. ANd any physical response is
tainted with a certain level of distaste so I don'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> > Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials
>
> I have no interest in liberal credentials.
>
> > by endorsing the
> > practice of buggery m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by
endorsing the
> practice of buggery might care to consult The Secret Life of Oscar
Wilde
> (2005), by Neil McKenna, which provides many details of the
disg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- sparaig wrote:
> >
> > Why are
> > so many women into giving oral sex?
>
> You mean unreciprocated oral sex? As opposed
> to the serial giving and receiving of pleasure?
>
Yep.
--
Judy writes:
I have to say, though, I'm not as interested in
Shakespeare's identity, incarnational or historical, as
I am in the physical entity who put the words on paper,
if you see the distinction I'm making.
Whoever he was, he was one hell of an incarnation. I'm
inclined to think of him as th
OK, even if that were the case, the profession became respectable and has been so for quite a while since. Wouldn't the Earl's descendants have wanted to set the record straight? Wouldn't they want their own ancestor to be known as the greatest playwright in history? And why would the Earl have pi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> Do you have a Web reference for St. Germaine? I don't
> > know nuttin' about him, or about those speculations.
>
> snip
> >
> >Whoever he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:04 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:The "buzz" about St. Germaine is about as wild as you are likely to find. It makes for a great story whether it's true or not. I am not an expert by a long shot, but one version has St. Germain being the soul who discovered America as C
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Do you have a Web reference for St. Germaine? I don't
> know nuttin' about him, or about those speculations.
snip
>
>Whoever he was, he was one hell of an incarnation. I'm
> inclined to think of him as the most sig
It just wasn't the thing for a nobleman to write plays for the public theaters,
which were considered rather disreputable places. Writing plays was
something lower-class people did. It was closer to a trade than an honorable
profession, hence the word "playwright," as in "shipwright" and "wheel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
Why would the Earl of Oxford not have wanted to take credit for the plays?
Sal
On Feb 26, 2006, at 9:31 AM, feste37 wrote:
Shakespeare's plays were in fact written by the Earl of Oxford. They were
certainly not written by the illiterate Shaksper from Stratford, who could barely
sign his ow
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
>
> > Shakespeare's "Fools" are extraordinary. I've
> > often wondered whether Shakespeare was enlightened,
> > and his Fools seem to me to su
Shakespeare's plays were in fact written by the Earl of Oxford. They were
certainly not written by the illiterate Shaksper from Stratford, who could
barely
sign his own name and appears to have been interested only in the
acquisition of wealth, social status and property.
--- In FairfieldLi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Shakespeare's "Fools" are extraordinary. I've
> often wondered whether Shakespeare was enlightened,
> and his Fools seem to me to suggest that he was.
Are you aware of some of the speculations about Shakespeare i.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Very good, Judy, but actually, Feste is in Twelfth Night, not King
> Lear.
You are absolutely correct. So much for *my* scholarship!
But you
> are right about the wisdom part. Feste is a very non-attached
characte
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:17 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:10 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > Right: "Vaj, isn't your scholarship as thin as a
> > tart's negligee?"
> >
> > We had the answer to that without your assistance,
> > although you thoughtfully provide
Very good, Judy, but actually, Feste is in Twelfth Night, not King Lear. But
you
are right about the wisdom part. Feste is a very non-attached character in that
play; he knows everything that is going on but belongs nowhere and doesn't
care to. He also has the last word in the play -- another r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> > Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking
> French poodle.
>
> While your post brings up some profound points, your language seem
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking
French
> poodle.
Be careful.
I asked him whether he was a poodle a few days ago and he took a
dump right on my carpet.
More recently, I've call
The bottom line is this:
Two women together: good!
Two men together: somewhat yucky.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as
thin as a
> tart's negligee, but the question you ask
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl
wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:17 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:10 PM, authfriend wrote:Right: "Vaj, isn't your scholarship as thin as a tart's negligee?" We had the answer to that without your assistance, although you thoughtfully provide additional evidence in your current post. Since Vaj has carefully snipped both what he had writt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> > Feste is actually a German word meaning "strong" or "mighty," as
> in "Ein'
> > feste Burg ist unser Gott" ("A mighty fortress is our God.")
>
> FWIW
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Feste is actually a German word meaning "strong" or "mighty," as
in "Ein'
> feste Burg ist unser Gott" ("A mighty fortress is our God.")
FWIW, Feste is also the name of Shakespeare's wisest
Fool, the one who attends
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Feste is actually a German word meaning "strong" or "mighty,"
A strong and mighty what?
And foufou is a french word meaning crazy.
And one of us appears less pretentious than the other.
ok then, you delightful festing sore,
So it appears that some acts by homosexuals disgust you --though the
same acts done by hetrosexuals are fine. And some homosexual acts you
are indififfent to -- whether homosexuals do them or hetrosexuals.
And some acts lead to hell, but it depends on who is
Feste is actually a German word meaning "strong" or "mighty," as in "Ein'
feste Burg ist unser Gott" ("A mighty fortress is our God.")
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 4) No, I do not agree that a poster's moniker detracts from the
> content of thei
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >>
> >> Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship
> >> was as thin as a tart's negligee
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:07 PM, feste37 wrote:
>
> > I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a
> > tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical.
> > Nothing is known or will ever be known about the
Actually, foufou, you little French poodle, I don't work hard on any of my
posts.
I don't "have a position" on oral sex, nor do I intend to develop one. It
doesn't
have any relevance to what I was talking about.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking
French poodle.
While your post brings up some profound points, your language seems
gratutious --far more so than other cited posts.
Now to address you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, good answer.
>
> You were sounding like a fundie there for awhile,
> with your ridiculous bit about organs being "designed"
> for one thing and not the other as a reason to oppose
> homosexuality and how homosexu
On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a tart's negligee P.S.: No "detective work" required, BTW, other than a quick Google for the exact
On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:07 PM, feste37 wrote:I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical. Nothing is known or will ever be known about the sexuality of Jesus of Nazareth. If you had a question, you should ask. Judy makes the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship
> was as thin as a tart's negligee
P.S.: No "detective work" required, BTW, other than
a quick Google for the exact quote from Clementine's
letter. The nature
OK, good answer.
You were sounding like a fundie there for awhile,
with your ridiculous bit about organs being "designed"
for one thing and not the other as a reason to oppose
homosexuality and how homosexuals were all going to
hell.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking French
poodle.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> > As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
> th
Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a
tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical. Nothing is
known or will ever be known about the sexuality of Jesus of Nazareth. But just
supposing it were, it wouldn't upset me in the slightest, sinc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
>
> > > wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
the life
> of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I remember
rightly). They
> express different ideological agendas. Whatever "lost" b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
> the life of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I
> remember rightly). They express different ideological agendas.
> Whatever "lost"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37"
wrote:
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I
can't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> > >
> > > Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral
> sex.
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> ...maybe a 25 year old lesbian and I'm on board...
I think it was Lea DeLaria who said, "I like penises. Just not on men."
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
