[Finale] OT: Double harps

2004-01-04 Thread Richard Huggins
There's such a breadth of experience here, I figure someone here will know this answer: I saw two orchestra broadcasts over the holidays where two harps were used. I'm wondering if someone can explain to me how two harps are used, for example: doubling the same part (and if so, why? for greater sou

RE: [Finale] OT: Dual-Monitor Support on the original Radeon (Mac PCI)

2004-01-04 Thread Sarah Bailey
If you're looking for hacked video drivers go to 3dguru.com, they've got every hacked driver for ATI and nVidia. As far as dual monitors, if ATI hasn't put out an updated driver that enables it, it's probably a hardware limitation. Likewise, ATI has always been good about drivers. If they say it

[Finale] OT: Dual-Monitor Support on the original Radeon (Mac PCI)

2004-01-04 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hi all, This is a long shot indeed -- since I was unable to uncover any info on the internet -- but what the hell, eh? Does anyone know of a hack to enable dual-monitor support on the original Radeon graphics card (Mac edition)? When I ordered my second monitor, I (stupidly) assumed that becau

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread David H. Bailey
I agree that the multimeasure rests should make sense with the phrasing of the surrounding music, not some arbitrary grouping of 5 or 10 measures per rest. When I run into long groups of such I pencil in the groupings of the rests that make the most sense musically. John.Howell wrote: At ho

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread David H. Bailey
Ultimately, your own opinion, your eye, and your experience is what matters most. You should do as you feel works best. I was just citing authorities to defend my statement that you said was wrong. It really makes no matter to me -- when I see an empty measure with a whole rest in it, regardl

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread David W. Fenton
On 4 Jan 2004 at 8:51, Harold Owen wrote: > I have to agree with Johannes. The normal "whole rest" can be very > deceiving in 4/2, 3/1, and other signatures larger than 2/2 when used > to indicate a measure rest because it must be available to indicate > exactly 2 half notes' duration in a measure

Re: [Finale] How many verses?

2004-01-04 Thread John.Howell
At 5:25 PM +0100 1/4/04, d. collins wrote: I'm doing some 17th century arias some of which have up to 7 or 8 verses with the same music. How many can one enter under the music without making the whole illegible? Starting with how many would it be preferable to add them separately after the music

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread John.Howell
On 04.01.2004 13:11 Uhr, d. collins wrote Thanks, Johannes. This is indeed what I was wondering about (and, as I said in another message, I made the mistake of quoting Ross from memory and forgetting that he doesn't actually recommend the method he describes). But I'm not sure the solution you

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread YATESLAWRENCE
In a message dated 04/01/2004 23:08:38 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One very bad publishing idea that was popular in about the mid-20th century was to break multimeasure rests every 5 or 10 bars, totally ignoring the phrasing of the music Yes! - it's appalling and offers no help

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread John.Howell
At how many measures should one start to convert to multimeasure rests with numbers? I think Finale's default is 10. That sounds like a lot. The Essential Dictionary of Music Notation says anything over 1 measure. Ted Ross gives a system with symbols for 2 to 8, and uses numbers starting at 9.

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread Johannes Gebauer
That's all very well, but if you look at modern (European) editions of Early music using such long measures you will find that the more authorative ones all use double whole rests in longer measures than 2/2. As I said, I am not entirely sure about 3/2, perhaps a single whole rest is correct here (

Re: [Finale] How many verses?

2004-01-04 Thread Mark D Lew
On Sunday, January 4, 2004, at 12:20 PM, d. collins wrote: Thanks for your thoughtful reply: - How long is the repeated music? Rather short. The more verses, the shorter the music. Each piece is only 3 or 4 systems. - Is space/paper at a premium for you? No. - Do the verses have many scansion

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread David H. Bailey
Gardner Read, in Music Notation -- A Manual of Modern Practice, at the bottom of p. 97, continuing on the top of p. 98: "Although the whole rest literally signifies only the value of a whole note (or of two half-notes combines), it now commonly serves as the symbol for any completely silent mea

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread Harold Owen
From Johannes Gebauer: On 04.01.2004 13:40 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote Actually, you CAN use the default whole rest, since its meaning is two-fold: equal in length to a whole note, or, when the only thing in the measure it represents a whole measure of rest. When it is the only thing present

Re: [Finale] How many verses?

2004-01-04 Thread Mark D Lew
On Sunday, January 4, 2004, at 08:25 AM, d. collins wrote: I'm doing some 17th century arias some of which have up to 7 or 8 verses with the same music. How many can one enter under the music without making the whole illegible? Starting with how many would it be preferable to add them separate

Re: [Finale] How many verses?

2004-01-04 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
> I'm doing some 17th century arias some of which have up to 7 or 8 verses > with the same music. How many can one enter under the music without making > the whole illegible? Starting with how many would it be preferable to The general rule is a maximum of six. Put a little horizontal divider line

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 04.01.2004 13:40 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote > Actually, you CAN use the default whole rest, since its meaning is > two-fold: equal in length to a whole note, or, when the only thing in > the measure it represents a whole measure of rest. When it is the only > thing present in the measure, its

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 04.01.2004 13:11 Uhr, d. collins wrote > Thanks, Johannes. This is indeed what I was wondering about (and, as I said > in another message, I made the mistake of quoting Ross from memory and > forgetting that he doesn't actually recommend the method he describes). But > I'm not sure the solution

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 04:20 AM 1/4/2004, d. collins wrote: >I guess this refers to the parts that don't have the expression. Which >makes sense. Having this box checked for any given measure means that any MM rest which would normally occur would be broken at that measure. Having it unchecked means that MM rests w

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 03:48 AM 1/4/2004, d. collins wrote: >At how many measures should one start to convert to multimeasure rests with >numbers? I think Finale's default is 10. I think you're misunderstanding. Finale will by default put a number over all MM rests. The option "Use symbols for rests less than X measu

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread David H. Bailey
Actually, you CAN use the default whole rest, since its meaning is two-fold: equal in length to a whole note, or, when the only thing in the measure it represents a whole measure of rest. When it is the only thing present in the measure, its meaning is clear to me. d. collins wrote: Johann

Re: [Finale] MIDI latency

2004-01-04 Thread David H. Bailey
Have you investigated the inner workings of the drivers for the sound card? Perhaps there is a latency setting for that. What happens if you don't use the Fin2004 softsynth? Still get the same latency? Sounds like a question to ask the tech support people for the audio card. Wiz-of-Oz wrot

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 04.01.2004 9:48 Uhr, d. collins wrote > At how many measures should one start to convert to multimeasure rests with > numbers? I think Finale's default is 10. That sounds like a lot. The > Essential Dictionary of Music Notation says anything over 1 measure. Ted > Ross gives a system with symbol

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests

2004-01-04 Thread YATESLAWRENCE
I may be misunderstanding what you are asking about multi-measure rests and numbers - If it's more than one bar rest I want a number with it. All the best, Lawrence "þaes ofereode - þisses swa maeg" http://lawrenceyates.co.uk ___ Finale mailing li