On 25.08.2004 22:09 Uhr, "Mark D Lew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2004, at 2:34 PM, James Bailey wrote:
>
>> But this is the point. Words have meanings, but if, as you say (and I
>> agree)
>> the English meaning doesn't match the Italian meaning, what is the
>> English
>> meaning?
On Aug 25, 2004, at 3:01 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
I described exactly this scenario more than once. Since you refuse to
actually try it, you probably aren't understanding what people are
describing, which really emphasizes the point several of us have
made: try it yourself -- you may discover you
On Aug 25, 2004, at 3:13 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
In fact, it's something I've mentioned every time we've had this
discussion! I guess I didn't emphasize the "surf around the site for
a while" part enough.
We're talking about different things. Yes, you and David and others
mentioned the wh
On Aug 25, 2004, at 2:34 PM, James Bailey wrote:
But this is the point. Words have meanings, but if, as you say (and I
agree)
the English meaning doesn't match the Italian meaning, what is the
English
meaning? That's the whole point, as far as I'm concerned. We have all
the
musical terms that we
Dear Brad,
No. I just got my copy of 2005, and I'll check to see if it is included there.
Hal
In FinMac2k4c, does FinaleScript have the capability to "Export
Pages..." from the Graphics tool? This would be amazingly productive
if I were able to batch-process a whole score and parts to create EPS
fi
Googling "bandstration" (a common method of judging frequency of usage
that is used in alt.english.usage) turns up only 18 hits. This is a
remarkably low total for a 40 year old term. (for comparison "David W.
Fenton" turns up 4,950)
' "David W. Fenton" -finale' reduces that by 3/4. Clearly hi
On 25 Aug 2004 at 16:55, Richard Yates wrote:
> > > The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use for over 40
> > > years.
> > And you're advocating the use of such a monstrosity?
> > I've never heard it, myself, and think it is ridiculous.
> > --
> > David W. Fenton
>
> Googling "bandstrat
> > The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use for over 40 years.
> And you're advocating the use of such a monstrosity?
> I've never heard it, myself, and think it is ridiculous.
> --
> David W. Fenton
Googling "bandstration" (a common method of judging frequency of usage that
is used in
And while all the debate has been furiously
raging (well, squalling at least) I downloaded Firefox to see what the fuss
was all about.
I've since been having a great time
tabbing. C'est très
frais! Thanks for passing on the
word...
Best,
Les
Les MarsdenFounding Music Director
David Bailey wrote:
> Are there any Windows users with wireless networks on this list who also
> use cordless keyboards and/or mice? I am very interested in it, but not
> if it eats batteries every few hours.
I use an MS Wireless Desktop Elite which includes an Intellimouse Explorer 2.0. I hav
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:30:35 -0400, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2004 at 18:13, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> > On 25 Aug 2004, at 05:51 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> > >
> > >> I actually first started seeing the n
On 25 Aug 2004 at 18:13, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2004, at 05:51 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> >
> >> I actually first started seeing the need for tabs with regard to
> >> Google searches. With tabs, you can open an interesting li
On 25 Aug 2004, at 05:51 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
I actually first started seeing the need for tabs with regard to
Google searches. With tabs, you can open an interesting link from the
results page in a new tab, then surf around the site for a while i
In FinMac2k4c, does FinaleScript have the capability to "Export
Pages..." from the Graphics tool? This would be amazingly productive
if I were able to batch-process a whole score and parts to create EPS
files for a publisher, rather than going through and creating EPS
files for each individual Fina
On 25 Aug 2004 at 14:51, Mark D Lew wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
>
> > I actually first started seeing the need for tabs with regard to
> > Google searches. With tabs, you can open an interesting link from
> > the results page in a new tab, then surf around the site
On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
I actually first started seeing the need for tabs with regard to
Google searches. With tabs, you can open an interesting link from the
results page in a new tab, then surf around the site for a while if
you want, and just close the tab when you're
On Aug 25, 2004, at 11:23 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Are you under the impression that I'm impatient about the delay while
I wait for pages to load?
Isn't everyone? I mean, all other things being equal, you'd prefer
*not* to wait for new pages to load, right?
Well, yeah, but it's not a very st
On 25.08.2004 14:14 Uhr, "Mark D Lew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Walking" isn't a very good translation of "andante". The closest
> English equivalent would be "going", and in the musical context it's
> more like "moving". Perhaps you are getting confused with Spanish,
> where "andar" is a
On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:11 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Surely there are valid reasons, such as comparisons between web sites
when you're buying something online (or just shopping online) or when
selecting a batch of items on, say, Amazon, or doing research and
collecting a group of references.
Sure t
Ouch.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Carlberg Jones
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Finale] Arrangement, Orchestration or Transcription?
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/25/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
>On 25
On Aug 25, 2004, at 1:03 PM, James Bailey wrote:
I don't know, I've always simply seen "transcription". String quartet
transcription, transcribed for piano solo. I don't think that there's
anything against it, just that transcribed is older, and classical
music
tends to prefer older terms.
I think
On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:42 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Someone please tell me WHAT the classical music world has against the
word "arrangement." What's wrong with saying "Arranged for band"?
"Arranged for string quartet"? "Arranged for wind octet"?
The classical music world has nothing against
On Aug 25, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
"Bandstration"?
?
Someone please tell me WHAT the classical music world has against the
word "arrangement." What's wrong with saying "Arranged for band"?
"Arranged for string quartet"? "Arranged for wind octet"?
Well, it's kind of what thi
On Aug 25, 2004, at 3:31 PM, Carlberg Jones wrote:
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/25/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004 at 11:41, Andrew Stiller wrote:
What about piano to concert band? What would you call that (other
than the generic "arrangement"?
--
The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use
Title: Re: [Finale] Arrangement, Orchestration or Transcription?
I don't know, I've always simply seen "transcription". String quartet transcription, transcribed for piano solo. I don't think that there's anything against it, just that transcribed is older, and classical music tends to prefer ol
Carlberg Jones wrote:
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/25/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004 at 11:41, Andrew Stiller wrote:
What about piano to concert band? What would you call that (other
than the generic "arrangement"?
--
The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use for over 40 years.
What woul
> > > One is a Logitech cordless optical mouse
>
>Wait until the batteries start to run out.
>
>Which should be about two hours after you hook it up.
>
>More specifically: none of my clients have kept used a cordless mouse
>for very long, because the batteries run out so quickly, and start
"Bandstration"?
?
Someone please tell me WHAT the classical music world has against the
word "arrangement." What's wrong with saying "Arranged for band"?
"Arranged for string quartet"? "Arranged for wind octet"?
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004 at 11:41, Andrew Stiller wrote:
What about piano to concert band? What would you call that (other
than the generic "arrangement"?
--
David W. Fenton
The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use for over 40 years.
And you're advocating the u
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/25/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
>On 25 Aug 2004 at 11:41, Andrew Stiller wrote:
>> >What about piano to concert band? What would you call that (other
>> >than the generic "arrangement"?
>> >
>> >--
>> The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use for over 40 years.
What woul
On 25 Aug 2004 at 11:41, Andrew Stiller wrote:
> >What about piano to concert band? What would you call that (other
> >than the generic "arrangement"?
> >
> >--
> David W. Fenton
>
> The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use for over 40 years.
And you're advocating the use of such a mon
On 25 Aug 2004 at 1:18, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> But Sibelius has gotten dramatically better with the last two major
> upgrades. They have closed the gap in many areas, and frankly, have
> pulled drmatically ahead in areas where they used to lag, especially
> when it comes to performance.
In o
On 24 Aug 2004 at 21:40, Mark D Lew wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2004, at 10:46 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
> > If you like re-using a single window for every document, and the lag
> > time it takes to re-render when you go back, and if you don't mind
> > the proliferation of multiple windows when you want
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:23:31 -0400, Darcy James Argue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2004, at 03:40 AM, Mark D Lew wrote:
>
> > Anyway, it sounds to me like all you're describing is a system for
> > loading pages in background.
>
> This allows you to cmd-click to open tabs in the backgrou
Actually, the READ ME 2005 files says how to transfer preferences on mac
on page 2...
JD wrote:
Since you're on a Mac, you much Save Special/Save Preferences in order for
changes to take effect. At least on 2004 and earlier. It may be different
on 2005, but it's worth a look.
Finale.i
on 8/25/04 11:24 AM, Eric Dannewitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Um, this was on my Macintosh. I put it in a new Finale 2005 folder.
>
> It's not a huge deal, just kind of annoyingI'll try doing that
> .ini file thing on my Windows machine later..
>
> dhbailey wrote:
>
>> 1) ar
You da man!
Allen Fisher wrote:
Eric--
Mass Edit
Select All
MassEdit-->Change-->Tuplets
The 2k5 defaults are:
Placement: Stem/Beam Side
Enhanced Tuplets: Checked
Avoid Staff: Checked
Never Bracket Beamed Notes on Beam Side
Positioning
Tuplet H: 0 V: 24 EVPU
Shape H: 0 V: 0
Maximum Slope: 10 degrees
Eric--
Mass Edit
Select All
MassEdit-->Change-->Tuplets
The 2k5 defaults are:
Placement: Stem/Beam Side
Enhanced Tuplets: Checked
Avoid Staff: Checked
Never Bracket Beamed Notes on Beam Side
Positioning
Tuplet H: 0 V: 24 EVPU
Shape H: 0 V: 0
Maximum Slope: 10 degrees
Everything else should be u
Um, this was on my Macintosh. I put it in a new Finale 2005 folder.
It's not a huge deal, just kind of annoyingI'll try doing that
.ini file thing on my Windows machine later..
dhbailey wrote:
1) are you on Windows or Mac?
2) did you install over your old Finale2004 installation o
On 25 Aug 2004, at 03:40 AM, Mark D Lew wrote:
Anyway, it sounds to me like all you're describing is a system for
loading pages in background.
That's how I use it, yes.
You asked about "personality types" -- the whole "kitchen cupboards
open" vs. "kitchen cupboards closed" thing -- and there's a
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Is there a way to automatically have Finale 2005 make existing Tuplets,
Enhanced Tuplets?
Couple of other things I noticed is that none of my program settings
were transfered over. Like the location of Saved files, backsups,
etc.
1) are you on Windows or Mac?
2) di
Is there a way to automatically have Finale 2005 make existing Tuplets,
Enhanced Tuplets?
Couple of other things I noticed is that none of my program settings
were transfered over. Like the location of Saved files, backsups,
etc.
___
Finale ma
Hi All:
I guess that I'm a dinosaur - still using Encore to be able
using files created by friends.
I found out that Finale 2004 could not read files created by
Encore 4.5.5, only
files created by the earlier version - Encore
4.5.0.
IS THE NEW FINALE CAPABLE OF READING ENCORE
FILES???
Reading what Dennis W. Manasco wrote (quoted below, in part) leads me to
believe that there are a number of people who did not carefully read the
license agreement upon installation. The fact is, MakeMusic!'s present
policy with respect to software installation, even with the mandatory
regist
On Aug 25, 2004, at 6:08 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Ha ha! That's strange, because I LIKE having all my drawers and
cupboards open (to the distress of my wife) but I don't like tabbed
browsing! Maybe I should give it another look, since it seems to suit
my personality type so well...
Ha ha. Bu
At 08:56 AM 8/25/04 -0700, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:39:55 -0400, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
>
>> now I've got a utility to minimize everything that's typically running into
>> the system tray (mail, browser, audio editor, Finale, etc.).
>
>Out of curiosity, what utility is that
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:39:55 -0400, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
> now I've got a utility to minimize everything that's typically running into
> the system tray (mail, browser, audio editor, Finale, etc.).
Out of curiosity, what utility is that?
> I've never really found much of a use for multipl
What about piano to concert band? What would you call that (other
than the generic "arrangement"?
--
David W. Fenton
The term "bandstration" has been in widespread use for over 40 years.
--
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
At 09:08 AM 8/25/04 -0400, Christopher Smith wrote:
>
>On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:40 AM, Mark D Lew wrote:
>>
>> I rarely have several windows open at once. We went through this with
>> the Exposé discussion as well. I just don't like having more than a
>> couple of windows open anywhere. It feels
On Aug 25, 2004, at 12:40 AM, Mark D Lew wrote:
I rarely have several windows open at once. We went through this with
the Exposé discussion as well. I just don't like having more than a
couple of windows open anywhere. It feels like clutter to me. I'd
rather close them and open them again la
Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
At 6:53 am -0400 8/24/04, dhbailey wrote:
Microsoft has turned Windows into a de facto subscription service: All
versions prior to XP are being deprecated. None will be supported after
3/31/05. Installation of XP, or following releases, will be required to
receive esse
At 6:53 am -0400 8/24/04, dhbailey wrote:
Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
[snip]
Look at other companies that have switched to Copy Protection
Servers: Intuit deprecates older versions as regularly as
clockwork; look at what Microsoft is doing to every version of
Windows prior to (its Copy Protection S
On Aug 24, 2004, at 10:41 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
I know you are incredibly resistant to changing the way you work once
you've found a routine that works for you,
true
and I respect that. It's just that tabbed browsing seems tailor-made
for someone like you, someone who wants to finish read
53 matches
Mail list logo
