Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 03.08.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: It will be interesting to see if the same stubbornness that caused you to refuse to do the Finale tutorials in full will cause you problems learning Sibelius, too. Well, in all fairness, and not really knowing Sibelius much, I do know that a lot of people

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread dhbailey
Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 03.08.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: It will be interesting to see if the same stubbornness that caused you to refuse to do the Finale tutorials in full will cause you problems learning Sibelius, too. Well, in all fairness, and not really knowing Sibelius much, I do kn

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 04.08.2007 dhbailey wrote: I, too, have begun to steer people to Sibelius, if they don't want the notation program to get in the way of working with the music. Finale is the better music engraver's tool, but Sibelius is the better notation program for the 99% of musicians who don't want to

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 07:45 AM 8/4/2007, Johannes Gebauer wrote: >And one more point: I have no experience with the current Sibelius, but >I do find Finale's sheer wealth of bugs almost unbearable these days. I've said for a few years that there is no piece of commercial software I work with regularly which has a

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 04.08.2007 Aaron Sherber wrote: I've said for a few years that there is no piece of commercial software I work with regularly which has as many, and as easily reproducible, bugs as Finale. It's very unfortunate that marketing's perceived need for a parcel of new features every 12 months pre

[Finale] Kanji in Finale Mac

2007-08-04 Thread Robert Patterson
Does anyone know a way to enter Kanji in Mac Finale? I've figured out how to enter kana using fonts, but I can't figure out if there are any easy kanji fonts. I would like to display a coupld of kanji in a text block. -- Robert Patterson http://RobertGPatterson.com ___

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Eric Dannewitz
It almost sounds like we really need a webpage or something that documents all these problems. Perhaps then MakeMusic will get it's act together.. Johannes Gebauer wrote: Well, it is partly the completely absurd situation Makemusic have put themselves into in the last few years. Every

[Finale] multiple time signatures

2007-08-04 Thread bart . orye
Hello, Is it possible to use in Finale multiple time signatures in that way that for example a quarter note stays a quarter note and so for example 3 bars in 4/4 equals 4 bars in 3/4? And how do you do it?  Thanks already for your advice. Bart ___ Fin

[Finale] Re: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Henry E. Howey
Whatever ease of use Sibelius may offer, its lack of power will never make me a convert. Also, I really need SMARTMUSIC, and it only works with 5inale. Henry Howey Professor of Music Sam Houston State University Box 2208 Huntsville, TX 77341 (936) 294-1364 http://www.shsu.edu/music/fa

Re: [Finale] Kanji in Finale Mac

2007-08-04 Thread Bruce K H Kau
I don't know about Mac, but on the PC platform, the limitation is that Finale doesn't support Unicode. If that is the case with Mac, I have found the following site http://www.lillians.de/fonts.html which has many fonts, including Kanji and the "joined" characters (e.g., "kyu") in 8-bit chara

[Finale] page text become group name

2007-08-04 Thread shirling & neueweise
weird... and somewhat disconcerting... F2007c, i added a new text, page-attached, and moved it a little on the page, did nothing else. a little while later i notice that the exact same text appears as the group name on the single staff of an optimized system 4 pages later, in fact the 3rd of

[Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Will Denayer
"It will be interesting to see if the same stubbornness that caused you to refuse to do the Finale tutorials in full will cause you problems learning Sibelius, too." I was sure that I would get a some sour remarks. I thought it was going to be about the manual (so I'm wrong about that) and abo

Re: [Finale] page text become group name

2007-08-04 Thread shirling & neueweise
well, if it helps at all, it isn't limited to a particular font, earlier it was my default text block font, and now it just happened again with engraverfontset as i was placing system separators. F2007c, i added a new text, page-attached, and moved it a little on the page, did nothing else.

[Finale] RE: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Kim Richmond
For a couple of years I too have had a foot in both camps. It was VERY hard for me to learn Sibelius, since in many ways it works oppositely from Finale (Speedy Note entry is one example), so I didn't find anything intuitive about it. But I just wanted to add to the List members comments ab

Re: [Finale] Re: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Does finale 2008 save smartmusic files in a format that smartmusic 10 reads? Sent on the go via my iPhone On Aug 4, 2007, at 10:06 AM, "Henry E. Howey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whatever ease of use Sibelius may offer, its lack of power will never make me a convert. Also, I real

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Bruce Clausen
I've been pondering whether to get the Finale 08 or Sib5. After seeing the remarks of the past few days I believe I will invest in the Sib and see how it goes. I've always used Simple Entry, with mouse and computer keyboard, so the learning curve may not be as steep. I, too, am tired of MM up

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale - now a tunnel-vision Finale 2008 review

2007-08-04 Thread Raymond Horton
In the midst of this I will throw in my naive, tunnel-vision report on WinFinale 2008, if anyone cares. I had experienced two very strange problems with 2007 that almost no one else reported: (1) New files created in 2007 would usually print only postage-sized pages. This was printer inde

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread David W. Fenton
On 4 Aug 2007 at 11:04, Johannes Gebauer wrote: > On 03.08.2007 David W. Fenton wrote: > > It will be interesting to see if the same stubbornness that caused > > you to refuse to do the Finale tutorials in full will cause you > > problems learning Sibelius, too. > > Well, in all fairness, and not

Re: [Finale] multiple time signatures

2007-08-04 Thread dhbailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Is it possible to use in Finale multiple time signatures in that way that for example a quarter note stays a quarter note and so for example 3 bars in 4/4 equals 4 bars in 3/4? And how do you do it? Thanks already for your advice. Bart

Re: [Finale] Re: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread dhbailey
Henry E. Howey wrote: Whatever ease of use Sibelius may offer, its lack of power will never make me a convert. Also, I really need SMARTMUSIC, and it only works with 5inale. What lack of power is it that you need which Sibelius doesn't offer? And is Finale2008 working with SmartMusic yet? Or

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread dhbailey
Aaron Sherber wrote: At 07:45 AM 8/4/2007, Johannes Gebauer wrote: >And one more point: I have no experience with the current Sibelius, but >I do find Finale's sheer wealth of bugs almost unbearable these days. I've said for a few years that there is no piece of commercial software I work wi

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread dhbailey
Bruce Clausen wrote: I've been pondering whether to get the Finale 08 or Sib5. After seeing the remarks of the past few days I believe I will invest in the Sib and see how it goes. I've always used Simple Entry, with mouse and computer keyboard, so the learning curve may not be as steep. I,

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Carl Dershem
Bruce Clausen wrote: I've been pondering whether to get the Finale 08 or Sib5. After seeing the remarks of the past few days I believe I will invest in the Sib and see how it goes. I've always used Simple Entry, with mouse and computer keyboard, so the learning curve may not be as steep. I,

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread David W. Fenton
On 4 Aug 2007 at 17:15, dhbailey wrote: > One thing which I find interesting is the number of Finale users who > are on versions 3 and 4 years old (with some on versions much older) > who have seen no need to upgrade, and with the newly introduced bugs > making it more difficult to work with confi

RE: [Finale] RE: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Richard Yates
> Having said all that, there are a few things that are >favorites of mine that Sib won't do (double bars at the >beginning of a system is one example, >KIM R I spent hours with Sibelius a version or so ago but, even with help from the expert, could not figure a way for Sibelius to do t

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread dhbailey
David W. Fenton wrote: [snip] the long haul, you want ease of use. We may all agree that Sibelius wins on ease of learning (though I don't recall the tutorials being difficult to get through), but it's pretty clear to me that on ease of use, Finale is at the very least somewhat ahead of Sibeli

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale - now a tunnel-vision Finale 2008 review

2007-08-04 Thread Chuck Israels
Hi Ray, Linked parts takes some getting used to, but it does work pretty well for me. I find TG Tools (the full deal) particularly useful in transferring all or part of a part layout from one part to another (TG Tool menu/modify/transfer), and that takes the place of the way I used to wo

RE: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Richard Yates
>I am writing music in 3/4 and I >want to change to 3+2+2/8. So, I am taking my printed version >of the manual. OK. There are several choices. Since I do not >know how many measures I will need in composite time, I click >'Measure to next time change'. I'm writing in 3+2+2/8 (ms. 4) >and now

Re: [Finale] RE: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread dhbailey
Richard Yates wrote: Having said all that, there are a few things that are favorites of mine that Sib won't do (double bars at the beginning of a system is one example, KIM R I spent hours with Sibelius a version or so ago but, even with help from the expert, could not figure a way for Sib

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread David W. Fenton
On 4 Aug 2007 at 17:48, dhbailey wrote: > Berating Will for not putting in the effort to learn Finale is your > right, since he hasn't put in that time. But you haven't put in the > time learning Sibelius either. The Finale tutorials give you *everything* you need to get started. And I did them

[Finale] copy one measure multiple times w/selection tool in 2008

2007-08-04 Thread Chuck Israels
I don't know if this useful behavior is lost in favor of other things in the new selection tool system, but I cannot find how to copy one measure X number of times (horizontally) in 2008. Maybe there's a keyboard command I am missing. Anyone know? TIA, Chuck Chuck Israels 230 North G

Re: [Finale] Kanji in Finale Mac

2007-08-04 Thread Robert Patterson
Bruce K H Kau wrote: I don't know about Mac, but on the PC platform, the limitation is that Finale doesn't support Unicode. Thanks, Bruce. I figured out what to do. My mistake was trying to copy/paste the characters from a Unicode program into Finale. There is a font on my Mac called "Hiragin

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Bruce E. Clausen
Thanks, David. I have indeed tried the list and the demo. Because I use Simple Entry, as I said, Sib5 didn't seem so foreign. Also, call it petty, as a composer, I resent having to work around having to use key signatures. Though my work is tonal, it is highly chromatic and sigs are annoying.

Re: [Finale] copy one measure multiple times w/selection tool in 2008

2007-08-04 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 06:01 PM 8/4/2007, Chuck Israels wrote: >I don't know if this useful behavior is lost in favor of other things >in the new selection tool system, but I cannot find how to copy one >measure X number of times (horizontally) in 2008. Maybe there's a >keyboard command I am missing. Anyone know?

Re: [Finale] copy one measure multiple times w/selection tool in 2008

2007-08-04 Thread Carolyn Bremer
I've been looking, Chuck, and haven't found a solution, yet, For now, I copy once, select both measures, copy again, select all four measures, and copy again -- that's just to get 8 bars. -Carolyn On 8/4/07, Chuck Israels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if this useful behavior is lost

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Carolyn Bremer
Hi Bruce: Could you explain what you mean by having to work around key signatures? I work with a lot of non-tonal music and haven't felt like I needed to work around keys. Is the issue for the transposing instruments? All you need do is choose "chromatic" rather than "key" in the transposition di

Re(2): [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Leigh Daniels
"They're doing a heckuva job!" And that's another problem with Finale support--we are extremely unlikely to see *any* reply from MM on this list. **Leigh On Sat, Aug 4, 2007, Bruce E. Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Simply the >volume of negative remarks on this list should be worrying som

Re(2): [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 08:25 PM 8/4/2007, Leigh Daniels wrote: >And that's another problem with Finale support--we are extremely >unlikely to see *any* reply from MM on this list. This is not an MM list, and MM does not officially monitor it. This has always been true. Aaron. ___

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 08:19 PM 8/4/2007, Bruce E. Clausen wrote: > Also, call it petty, >as a composer, I resent having to work around having to use key signatures. >Though my work is tonal, it is highly chromatic and sigs are annoying. >Further, as a horn player, I find it disconcerting to put things into a C >scor

Re: [Finale] copy one measure multiple times w/selection tool in 2008

2007-08-04 Thread Carolyn Bremer
Thanks, Aaron! That'll save me a lot of time! -Carolyn On 8/4/07, Aaron Sherber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 06:01 PM 8/4/2007, Chuck Israels wrote: > >I don't know if this useful behavior is lost in favor of other things > >in the new selection tool system, but I cannot find how to copy on

Re: [Finale] copy one measure multiple times w/selection tool in 2008

2007-08-04 Thread Chuck Israels
Thanks, I figured this was simply hidden in a new place. Chuck On Aug 4, 2007, at 5:10 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote: At 06:01 PM 8/4/2007, Chuck Israels wrote: >I don't know if this useful behavior is lost in favor of other things >in the new selection tool system, but I cannot find how to copy o

RE: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Steve Schow
> > For people who have grown up with Finale and used it for many versions, > it will remain easier to use until an equal amount of time is put into > learning Sibelius. But for people just starting out with one notation > program or the other, it's what they learn first which will seem easiest

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Darcy James Argue
Yes, but Finale's Chromatic Transposition is seriously flawed compared to Sibelius's, which allows one-click enabling of the option ("Atonal/Open Key" is a key signature, a separate key signature choice from "C major") Finale forces you to choose "Chromatic Transposition" for each instrumen

Re: [Finale] Re: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Richard Smith
Henry E. Howey wrote: Also, I really need SMARTMUSIC, and it only works with 5inale. So does MM. That's why SmartMusic is only compatible with Finale. By the way, why should I pay for a SmartMusic subscription, ostensibly to be able to use licensed content, and not be paid a license fee by

Re: [Finale] Re: Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Yeah, I don't get that either. I also don't get why they can't fix some SIMPLE bugs, like having Custom files display properly on a Mac... Richard Smith wrote: So does MM. That's why SmartMusic is only compatible with Finale. By the way, why should I pay for a SmartMusic subscription, oste

Re: [Finale] Goodbye Finale

2007-08-04 Thread Richard Smith
You can make Sibelius have a Speedy Entry, sort of, but it doesn't work as well as Finale's. But then MM doesn't want you to work in Speedy. They consider it old fashioned. They want you to learn the simple entry tools they copied (none to well) form Sibelius. Sibelius works best with simple e