You have to do a new music spacing:
in db Documents Options 'Music Spacing'
choose 'Manual Positioning': 'Clear'
That should do it.
Greetings
Raimund Lintzen
dc schrieb:
In files I'm revising, I'm finding notes that aren't properly spaced,
and respacing the music them does not correct the
Hi Dennis,
I also stumbled over this phenomenon several times. In my case,
explicitly loading a spacing table with File/Load Library (e.g.
Fibonacci spacing) followed by respacing of the score always solved the
problem.
Martin
Am 21.02.2010 10:48, schrieb dc:
In files I'm revising, I'm
If I remember rightly, I just did a copy and paste. I had already set
up the correct time signatures in the new file. If you import one of
the measures such as you posted into a standard default file with
copy/paste, is the spacing problem still there?
Michael
On 21 Feb 2010, at 16:31, dc
Copy and insert is much more reliable than copy and paste when copying across
documents.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com
On 21 Feb 2010, at 12:58 PM, Florence + Michael wrote:
If I remember rightly, I just did a copy and paste. I had already set up the
correct
Hi Dennis,
I just tried what I think was wrong. My guess is that your guy did
manual spacing with the special tools note mover thing, or he dragged
things while in speedy note (it amounts to the same thing).
In either case, the manual dragging will NOT be fixed by spacing
commands,
Yes, generally copy and insert is preferable. But in this case I
specifically wanted to get rid of the spacing anomalies in the
original document. I don't know if pasting instead of inserting was
what made the essential difference, but in any case I got the result
I wanted: the new
On 21 Feb 2010, at 19:23, David Froom wrote:
Hi Dennis,
I just tried what I think was wrong. My guess is that your guy did
manual spacing with the special tools note mover thing, or he
dragged things while in speedy note (it amounts to the same thing).
But dragging like this does not
On 21 Feb 2010 at 17:38, dc wrote:
Martin Gieseking écrit:
I also stumbled over this phenomenon several times. In my case, explicitly
loading a spacing table with File/Load Library (e.g. Fibonacci spacing)
followed by respacing of the score always solved the problem.
Thanks, Martin. Just
Hi everyone:
About two months ago, a conductor who I have as a friend on Facebook
said he needed a score to a concerto in a hurry ( I assume for a
concert project) and could anyone help him? I wrote to him that I had
the file, and if he was agreeable to the fee of 100.00 USD, I'd send
it to him.
Look, he and you had an agreement. Written (email). Go and post on his
facebook page, and if you don't hear anything, take him to small
claims court.
Just because he is a conductor doesn't mean he can screw you out of payment.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Kim Patrick Clow telem...@gmail.com
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Eric Dannewitz ericd...@jazz-sax.com wrote:
Look, he and you had an agreement. Written (email). Go and post on his
facebook page, and if you don't hear anything, take him to small
claims court.
Just because he is a conductor doesn't mean he can screw you out
On Sun Feb 21, at SundayFeb 21 1:55 PM, Florence + Michael wrote:
On 21 Feb 2010, at 19:23, David Froom wrote:
Hi Dennis,
I just tried what I think was wrong. My guess is that your guy
did manual spacing with the special tools note mover thing, or he
dragged things while in speedy note
On Sun Feb 21, at SundayFeb 21 2:23 PM, dc wrote:
David Froom écrit:
I just tried what I think was wrong. My guess is that your guy did
manual spacing with the special tools note mover thing, or he dragged
things while in speedy note (it amounts to the same thing).
In either case, the
dc wrote:
In files I'm revising, I'm finding notes that aren't properly spaced,
and respacing the music them does not correct the problem (say, 4 16ths
without any accidentals nor anything else going on at the same time that
aren't regularly spaced). How can I get this back to normal?
One
On 21 Feb 2010 at 17:58, dc wrote:
dc écrit:
There are also problems at a larger scale, such as measures with similar
content that end up with very different widths:
www.collins.lautre.net/files/spacing2.jpg
Something else very strange here: the Measure attributes dialog box gives
the
On 21 Feb 2010 at 16:01, Florence + Michael wrote:
I don't think removing changes with special tools will help, since
the beat charts are irregular in the examples Dennis gave.
Is it not the case that beat charts created by tight note spacing are
removed if you use, say, beat spacing?
And
try his agent first, i find using FB for this kind of thing
completely unacceptable and disreputable to the poster.
i very often find that a phone call can sort out in a flash what
dozens of emails sometimes can't.
___
Finale mailing list
On 21 Feb 2010 at 14:15, dc wrote:
I can manually make the two measures of the last example the same width,
but when I respace the music, it reverts to the old spacing.
In page layout view does an update layout adjust things? I've found
that I can make measures narrower than the spacing
I don't know if I would confront him publicly (I'm Canadian too, so
maybe I just have a different view on how to conduct oneself publicly.)
I would definitely try one last time, saying that this is my last
email on the subject. After that, send a registered letter (so he
can't deny having
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
While I fault myself for not requiring a payment in advance
now, should I comment on this conductor's Facebook page and ask why
he's ignoring my Emails and requests for payment? I'd hate to put
anyone on a spot like that in such a public forum, but I want my
money.
No,
Kim,
Assume the best. There may be an issue with his email account, or other things
may have come up (even anti-spam measures).
If it's via Facebook, it has been having some issues lately.
My route would be using postal mail to his professional address with a copy to
the organization's own
See if choosing clear or ignore doesn't remove this issue.
ignore would effectively ignore any manual placements. i think he
has already tried with clear. sounds like document corruption.
david brings up a point that could be worth looking into. although
since the prob seems local i
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
bath...@maltedmedia.com wrote:
Kim,
Assume the best. There may be an issue with his email account, or other things
may have come up (even anti-spam measures).
I always assume the best Dennis, trust me. But I really doubt there's
any issue
i would skip the middle part, that can come across bad, as a threat,
or a promise to make comments that could possibly be seen by him as
slanderous. but do send a hard copy, signed, with specific dates and
mention when you started the work, that you did it on short notice
and would
I had a problem with someone who would not pay.
When I phoned him, he was very friendly and promised the earth but nothing
ever came.
Eventually I spoke to a solicitor friend who, before offering me
professional services, advised me on the wording of a letter which, being in
suitably legal
You need to also look at the spacing in Scroll View in order to get the full
picture.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com
On 21 Feb 2010, at 3:26 PM, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
What about the measures to the left of the left-most measure in your
example? And are
dc wrote:
I did try hitting 5 as you suggested, with no result either.
It's Ctrl+5 (beat spacing) in recent versions of Finale.
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
dc wrote:
Thanks. I'd also tried that following Martin's advice. No luck.
For some reason, at the time I sent my post, I had not yet received
Martin's.
Just curious: have you examined the affected measures in the Frame
editor window?
ns
___
As J D Thomas wrote:
This is what I like about the CoilMac machine. It has an open throat...
This was one of the main reasons I chose to sell the CoilMacM, ie it
provides a solution for larger score formats.
We can also get the ECI version but the electric coil inserter adds
over $200 to the
I had to make thirty 200-page booklets once, and it took almost 2
hours to insert all the coils. I was thinking about the electric coil
insertion device then, but I would have to be doing that every day to
make it worthwhile. I can deal with 2 hours once or twice a year.
Christopher
On
F2010b, OSX.6, TGTools 2.60
anyone successful in using this? it is jamming on me, tobias is
looking at the file i am working on, but i thpouight i'd gather some
info here in case anyone else noticed issues with the plugin.
hoping for some advice / tips from anyone who has used this plugin
Let's say you want to punch holes for the long side of a tabloid (11
x 17) page. How hard is it to realign the page after the first punch
(which appears to be 13 or 14 for the machines you own) so you can
get enough holes to cover most of a 17 page? I can remember Kinko's
screwing that up
does anyone use this plugin at all? i ran it on a one measure,
2-staff score (new doc no libraries) and it came up with errors. are
there any specific settings that are problematic? i tried changing a
number of things but it isn't working.
if i end up doing this manually, does anyone
One thing you have to do (which I found out the hard way) you have to
have ALL staves visible. If you run it on a linked part, or in the
score while a staff set is showing, it won't work.
AFAICT (as far as I can tell) it works very well still, but linked
parts (surprise!) are a problem.
Aligning the paper for punching the remainder of the length is easy. You
flip the pages over and place them on an alignment pin, which assures that
all holes are evenly spaced. Possible glitch: if you forget to pull the
disengagement pin on the 2nd punch, or don't align the end of the paper with
i did run in scroll view with all staves and haven't yet generated
the linked parts, since the parts i want to use haven't been added to
the score, that is what i am trying to do with the plugin!
also ran it on a 1-measure plain vanilla doc (new with no libraries)
and it jammed there too,
how many ledger lines are too much in tenor that warrant a change to
tenor clef? D5 (written) seems feasible with only 3 ledger lines,
then E5 above the 3rd ledger line should be fine... in all cello
literature the change happens (at the latest) as soon as a single C5
is part of the
At 5:40 AM +0100 2/22/10, SN jef chippewa wrote:
how many ledger lines are too much in tenor that warrant a change to
tenor clef? D5 (written) seems feasible with only 3 ledger lines,
then E5 above the 3rd ledger line should be fine... in all cello
literature the change happens (at the
Basses in tenor clef should still be notated an
octave above absolute pitch, so it shouldn't be
higher than cellos. (And I assume that you
meant to write how many ledger lines are too
much in BASS ...)
ah, no i meant tenor *clef*.
yes the question is ledger lines, i know about
I am an amateur choral composer, mostly writing pieces for our local
congregation and choir, and some have been very well received. I am quite
satisfied to remain just a local composer, but I have received several requests
to publish a recent choral work of mine. A local choir director friend
Something that sometimes works for me:
1. Select the offending measures.
2. Apply time signature spacing.
3. Respace the measures.
Apparently, at least in older versions of Finale, time signature spacing was
the equivalent of no spacing applied. Haven't had to do this for a while, so
I don't
Not the Note Mover TOOL - Note Position Tool in the SPECIAL TOOLS
palette
On Feb 21, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Sun Feb 21, at SundayFeb 21 2:23 PM, dc wrote:
David Froom écrit:
I just tried what I think was wrong. My guess is that your guy did
manual spacing with the
42 matches
Mail list logo
