Since I was going to add a section about the problem I had with libgtop,
I can add a section about bad download URLs (I just answered two posts
today on the issue).
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 17:56, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Max Horn wrote:
>
> > []
> > So I'll look into working over it now a bit. I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hey guys. I have a new revision of ncurses 5.2, which should also know
about apple's terminfo entries, as well as termcap stuff, and I a
I'm reinstalling fink due to partition corruption and I got build error
with following package,
- imlib-1.9.10-9
- gnome-applets 1.4.0.5-3
- libgnomeprint2-1.116.0-2
I'm using 10.2 tree and fink-0.11.0.cvs-20021102.0124.
I'm wondering which package, fink or other, should be fixed. Ideas?
imlib
Here's the material that I said I'd add to the FAQ (I don't have commit
access):
[ldx3:~/web/xml/faq] hansen% cvs diff -u faq.xml
Index: faq.xml
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/web/xml/faq/faq.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -r1.46
You seem to imply that LIBRARY_PATH might also be involved...
For imlib, it is not the case, and testing the 2 others is underway..
I have to rush to a seminar_ results afterwards.
Jean-Francois
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCo
I have been having a lot of problems lately with installing the audiofile
package. It appears the sources are out of date. I am running Fink unstable
distribution. I get the following:
Downloading the file "audiofile-0.2.3.tar.gz" failed.
(1) Give up
(2) Retry the same mirror
(3) Retry another
I need your OSX version and the output of fink --version please, though i
know what the problem is I just need to know where to fix it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I have been having a lot of problems lately with installing the audiofile
>package. It appears the sources are out of date. I am runnin
> you need to run fink selfupdate-cvs
>
Actually, I have a script that runs fink selfupdate-cvs and fink update-all
every four hours. But, to humor you I did anyway and attached you'll find a
file created with the script command showing what happens.
--
Jason Deraleau ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
MCSE/MCS
well i haven't looked at the output just yet, i will when i get a chance
but I'm telling you now your script isn't doing something cause I just
tested the files for audiofile in cvs and they are fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Actually, I have a script that runs fink selfupdate-cvs and fink
>upda
LIBRARY_PATH poses no problems here...
Jean-Francois
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
> well i haven't looked at the output just yet, i will when i get a chance
> but I'm telling you now your script isn't doing something cause I just
> tested the files for audiofile in cvs and they are fine.
>
I'd love to see where. If you like, here is the code for the script:
#!/bin/sh
# Must b
Too bad about the symbol changes in 5.3 I can't use it yet, anyway both
built for me without any problems on 10.2.1.
(Nice that 5.3 no longer requires a patch! (:)
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 09:16 am, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
hey guys. I have a new revision of ncurses 5.2, which should als
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327.
My apologies for posting this and promptly going to bed. Thanks
Jean-Francois, Max and Ben for looking into it.
It kind of lea
> non of that matters the fact that it's looking in gnome-pre2 means your
> file it out of date, all those ? at the beginning are files that aren't
> even getting updated. And could be causing cvs to skip it all. Trust me
> your info IS uout of date.
>
> ###
> Source: mirror:gnome:sources/%n/0.2/
> if it is present in the stable tree it'll take it first anyhow, but i
> checked both. infacted i check my personal sandbox and the 10.1 tree
> aswell, and it's only mentioned in the 10.1 tree if you are infact using
> 10.2 then you have a problem and that is that your not upgrading fink
> proper
The output looked odd to me. Can you verify that /sw/fink/dists is a
symlink to /sw/fink/10.2?
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 12:39, Jason Deraleau wrote:
> > if it is present in the stable tree it'll take it first anyhow, but i
> > checked both. infacted i check my personal sandbox and the 10.1 tree
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Too bad about the symbol changes in 5.3 I can't use it yet, anyway
both built for me without any problems on 10.2.1.
(Nice that 5.3 no longer requires a patch! (:)
On Monday, Novembe
I volunteered to help with the FAQ (my English degree has to be good for
something, right?), but just sent an email to Max. He's still "The Man,"
right?
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Max Horn wrote:
>
> > []
> > So I'll look into working over it now a bit. I'd appreciate if you cou
Ok, I just completed installing fink according to the directions at this
site:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jag-bootstrap.php
AH > The output looked odd to me. Can you verify that /sw/fink/dists is a
AH > symlink to /sw/fink/10.2?
[16] musouka@utopia:~$ ls -la /sw/fink/dists
total 8
drwxr-x
Try running the postinst script manually--there have been a couple of
posts about a problem where selfupdate-cvs didn't actually update
anything, due to the lack of /sw/fink/10.2.
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 13:09, Jason Deraleau wrote:
> Ok, I just completed installing fink according to the directions
i know this isn't top of the list, but when rebuilding or building a
splitoff pkg shoulding it say all the splits?
Now:
sudo /sw/bin/fink rebuild libxml2-shlibs
Information about 1744 packages read in 8 seconds.
The following package will be rebuilt:
libxml2-shlibs
After:
sudo /sw/bin/fink re
On my system there's a script called postinstall.pl.in; I boostrapped a
while ago, though, so I can't guarantee that the filename is still the
same.
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 15:26, Jason Deraleau wrote:
> > > > Try running the postinst script manually--there have been a couple of
> > > > posts about
> > > > > Try running the postinst script manually--there have been a couple
of
> > > > > posts about a problem where selfupdate-cvs didn't actually update
> > > > > anything, due to the lack of /sw/fink/10.2.
> > > >
> > > > Where is this script?
> > >
> > > It's in the directory that you unpacked
> So you're telling me to look for a file that you aren't even sure is there?
I just downloaded the fink-0.11 tarball, the script is there.
> Ok, I'm following the directions that are provided on the website for a
> clean install on Mac OS X 10.2. Apparently there is something wrong with the
> i
Has anyone in the XonX team sat down coded up the libGL stuff as a relatively
thin wrapper around Apple's native implementation?
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the Com
Jason Deraleau wrote:
. Since I am doing this using clean
installs following the instructions provided word for word on two
different
Jaguar systems, I have a feeling it's something wrong with the Fink
directions or distribution. How can I help the developers track this
problem
down?
This has
At 3:14 PM -0600 11/4/02, Stephen Hocking wrote:
Has anyone in the XonX team sat down coded up the libGL stuff as a relatively
thin wrapper around Apple's native implementation?
(Probably not the ideal list for this question, but...)
Yes. TOT XFree86 CVS. :-)
--Torrey
---
> > . Since I am doing this using clean
> > installs following the instructions provided word for word on two
> > different
> > Jaguar systems, I have a feeling it's something wrong with the Fink
> > directions or distribution. How can I help the developers track this
> > problem
> > down?
>
> This
Jason,
You are following the instructions on the jag-bootstrap page, and yet one
of your earlier messages showed that you were in a fink-0.4.1-full directory?
Where did that come from? You shouldn't have fink-0.4.1 on your system
at all if you are following those instructions...
-- Dave
> Jason,
>
> You are following the instructions on the jag-bootstrap page, and yet one
> of your earlier messages showed that you were in a fink-0.4.1-full
directory?
> Where did that come from? You shouldn't have fink-0.4.1 on your system
> at all if you are following those instructions...
>
>
> I've tried with both source installers I could find on the Fink page.
Well, one is intended for 10.1 and one for 10.2, so that could be part of
the problem.
If you ran the bootstrap.sh found in the fink-0.4.1-full tarball, then you
installed an old, 10.1, version of fink and you need to do the
> If you ran the bootstrap.sh found in the fink-0.11.0 tarball (as
instructed
> on the jag-bootstrap page) then everything should be fine. If it is not,
> let's try to debug some more.
>
> -- Dave
The problem here is that the original issue I had was with the audiofile
package not being able to
At 23:47 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Masanori Sekino wrote:
I'm reinstalling fink due to partition corruption and I got build
error with following package,
- imlib-1.9.10-9
- gnome-applets 1.4.0.5-3
- libgnomeprint2-1.116.0-2
I'm using 10.2 tree and fink-0.11.0.cvs-20021102.0124.
I'm wondering which
Hisashi T Fujinaka and Alexander Hansen both offered to work on the
FAQ. Guys, can you communicate with each other who wants to work on
it, or if both of you want to do it? Alexander already has CVS commit
rights, BTW.
The FAQ is written using XML and is in the "web" module in CVS
(web/xml/faq
> I don't have
> the directory structure that the others had
This may be a problem for you in the future. I believe that the change
which the maintainer made was to the version of the package in fink's 10.1
tree. If you are still getting the 10.1 tree in your updates, you'll be
forever cutoff fr
At 12:43 Uhr -0500 04.11.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Too bad about the symbol changes in 5.3 I can't use it yet, anyway
both built for me without any problems on 10.2.1.
(Nice that
I can't find Alexander Hansen's email address (the archives strip the
addresses.)
Sorry to post this to the list, but can you email me Alexander? Thanks.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Max Horn wrote:
> Hisashi T Fujinaka and Alexander Hansen both offered to work on the
> FAQ. Guys, can you communicate wit
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:18 PM, Max Horn wrote:
You are using an experimental CVS version of Fink. It's kinda normal
you encounter problems :-) In this case, the -isystem causes a
warning, and the packages specifcy -Werror, thus the warning gets
turned into an error.
The fix tha
At 16:54 Uhr -0800 04.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:18 PM, Max Horn wrote:
You are using an experimental CVS version of Fink. It's kinda
normal you encounter problems :-) In this case, the -isystem causes
a warning, and the packages specifcy -Werror, thus the w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:28 PM, Max Horn wrote:
At 12:43 Uhr -0500 04.11.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Too bad about the symb
At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327.
My apologies for posting this and promptly going to bed. Thanks
Jean-Franc
two things, #1 i have a libxml2 pkg in my exp that conforms to the new env
vars
#2, is the best way for pkgs that the -isystem breaks it to do a
NoSetCPPFLAGS then use a compilescript to set CPPFLAGS? could we not add
a ResetCPPFLAGS?? that would not include defaults options only what I set?
[EM
I am unable to get bochs to work, it dies with a cannot
find font error. Something about xfs is screwy too, trying
to run 'xfs' gives the following output:
xfs notice: listening on port 7100
xfs notice: ignoring font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc
(bad font path descriptor)
xfs noti
At 15:28 Uhr -0700 04.11.2002, Justin Hallett wrote:
two things, #1 i have a libxml2 pkg in my exp that conforms to the new env
vars
Fine, but there is really no need for that. First off, I will convert
the package myself once (or rather: "if" !) there is a release of
Fink with the code in it.
OH I understand this, it's jsut I needed it for testing, and I thought I'd
let you know since i didn't nothingn to the patch it's self just the info
file to save you some time later if need be.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Fine, but there is really no need for that. First off, I will convert
>the p
ahhh perfect thanks Max, i guess we should doc this someplace for others.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>You can, and always could, do this:
>
>SetCPPFLAGS: -I%p/include
>NoSetCPPFLAGS: true
>
>The NoSetCPPFLAGS has only one effect: don't add the default value for
>CPPFLAGS
>
-
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:22 PM, Max Horn wrote:
At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327.
My apologies
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 04:26 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
A simple reproducible case is now appended to the FSF bug, from me.. I
can't find how to link directly to their bugs, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327, scroll to
bottom for my steps.
To clarify, i didn
so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then
CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Anyway, the workaround (disabling isystem) will quite likely be needed
>for any C++ package. I am not saying i object to it.. isystem may
>actually be
This sounds like a great idea.
-Ben
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:00 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then
CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, the workaround (disabling isystem) will
At 16:26 Uhr -0800 04.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:22 PM, Max Horn wrote:
At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/g
At 17:15 Uhr -0800 04.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
This sounds like a great idea.
-Ben
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:00 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then
CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem??
A great idea? Well, it
well I've encontered it once so far on a package not mentioned on the
list, but that is it for me so far.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>haven't encountered a problem I couldn't resolve easily, and not a
>single issue of the above mentioned GCC bug.
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:48 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Note that I already built dozens of dozens packages with current CVS
of Fink, including my existing system, and a fresh bootstrap, and
including such packages as kdebase3-ssl and other things. So far I
haven't encountered a problem I
54 matches
Mail list logo
