Am 07.11.2005 um 22:11 schrieb shenanigans:
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides
a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of
broadband.
Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:32:53 +0100
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am answering in a new thread. It is a pity that you started this
thread inside the one on the fink binary distribution.
apology for that.
Any self-respecting
configure script should use such a construct, or even
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:53:49 +0100
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
self-interest and fun, not importance or general usefulness.
of course that is important. If you look up the internet however you will find
that this is precisely why darwin ports is cited as a professional option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rogue wrote:
| On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:53:49 +0100 Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
|
| ... I don't and never have used binaries, nor the stable tree so the
| above is not a request but I'm having a hard time reconciliating the
| (perceived)
On 11/8/05, Rogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:32:53 +0100
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am answering in a new thread. It is a pity that you started this
thread inside the one on the fink binary distribution.
apology for that.
Any self-respecting
FYI after 24hrs no response from fluxbox maintener. I offer to take over in 4
weeks if no sign of life and package is up-for-grab (have already latest
compiled and running).
Best Regards,
Rogue
--
R-Marechal
Toontrack Music, Head of Support
US: +1 (240) 764 4850
UK: +44 (0)20 8816 7694
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:55:39 -0500
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway the issue in my case was pango1-xft2-dev that wasn't installed. I
have no idea how that could have happened since it's a dependency for gtk+2
but here you go.
It's a _build_ dependency for gtk+2, so
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:01:43 +0900
Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you willing to code a system that will build packages as they are
sumbitted, and as they are committed to cvs?
I am not a coder. I barely get by maintaining a couple of packages. Having said
that I can certainly
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:34:57PM +, Rogue wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:55:39 -0500
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway the issue in my case was pango1-xft2-dev that wasn't
installed. I have no idea how that could have happened since
it's a dependency for gtk+2
On 11/8/05, Rogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI after 24hrs no response from fluxbox maintener. I offer to take over in 4
weeks if no sign of life and package is up-for-grab (have already latest
compiled and running).
Best Regards,
Rogue
--
R-Marechal
Toontrack Music, Head of
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:57:10 -0500
Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will add the dep for good measure but I remain unconvinced.
It didn't work, and then you manually added something and now it
works? What more proof could you possibly want that you need to list
this something as one
On Monday, 07 November 2005 at 08:38, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 11/7/05, Rogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another subject it seems that a tracker week would be a good
idea... it seems weird to me that packages that will essentially
sit in the unstable tree would be held for that long
On Nov 8, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Brendan Cully wrote:
Let me be honest: I have an axe to grind, since I've got a number of
my own packages languishing in the submission queue for months. I'm
grateful for the feedback I've gotten, and eg dmacks has definitely
improved the quality of my packages. But
On 11/8/05, Trevor Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Brendan Cully wrote:
Let me be honest: I have an axe to grind, since I've got a number of
my own packages languishing in the submission queue for months. I'm
grateful for the feedback I've gotten, and eg dmacks
On Tuesday, 08 November 2005 at 14:46, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 11/8/05, Trevor Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we need to review the process of how people are granted
commit access. On the other hand, is there even a process? I'm not
sure what criteria a developer must meet
We currently have pango1, pango1-xft2, and pango1-xft2-ft219 sets. The
plain pango1-{dev,shlibs} packages appears to be a legacy bundle set
from when we had xft1 and xft2 variants. Now we only have xft2; does
the bundle serve a purpose any more? Do we actually expect to have
future new pango1
OK I just uploaded a new package libetpan into the tracker.
This is intended to provide IMAP4 support to sylpheed-claws which I have
working locally but won't upload until libetpan makes it into CVS to avoid
claws beating it to it (the current version uploaded is marked as a preview and
has no
On Nov 8, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Brendan Cully wrote:
It's a nice idea, but maybe it just recapitulates the submission queue
problem in miniature? I signed up on that page two days after it was
posted. Apparently senior developers are a scarce resource...
I agree; a mentoring system seems much
On Tuesday, 08 November 2005 at 14:46, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 11/8/05, Trevor Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we need to review the process of how people are granted
commit access. On the other hand, is there even a process? I'm not
sure what criteria a developer must meet
On 11/8/05, Neil Tiffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:19 AM -0800 11/8/05, Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Nov 8, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Brendan Cully wrote:
Let me be honest: I have an axe to grind, since I've got a number of
my own packages languishing in the submission queue for months. I'm
grateful
On Tuesday, 08 November 2005 at 18:21, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker. Anybody reading this thread who's got a package sitting
around, please email me (better yet, fink-devel) the tracker ID
number. If the package
On Nov 8, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
The primary question isn't Do you know how to commit to CVS? (though
that's definitely an asset!), but rather Do you know enough about
Fink and how it works so that the packages you commit will generally
be reliable?
Agreed. But how do I
At 6:21 PM -0500 11/8/05, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
The primary question isn't Do you know how to commit to CVS? (though
that's definitely an asset!), but rather Do you know enough about
Fink and how it works so that the packages you commit will generally
be reliable?
--
Agreed, but as a
On Nov 8, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker. Anybody reading this thread who's got a package sitting
around, please email me (better yet, fink-devel) the tracker ID
number. If the package looks OK to me
a couple of things I observed in the tracker was that fink validate ignores
revision set to 0... I've seen Daniel in particular wasting his time pointing
out the policy to a number of submitters. Is there any reason for fink validate
not to pick that up?
Best Regards,
Rogue
--
On 8-Nov-05, at 18:21 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker. Anybody reading this thread who's got a package sitting
around, please email me (better yet, fink-devel) the tracker ID
number. If the package looks OK to me
On 11/8/05, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, Kevin Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8-Nov-05, at 18:21 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker. Anybody reading this thread who's got a package
At 6:21 PM -0500 11/8/05, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker. Anybody reading this thread who's got a package sitting
around, please email me (better yet, fink-devel) the tracker ID
number. If the package looks OK to me
Do we have an implicit epoch for distributions, so that a package built under
10.3 will be implicitly a lower version than the same package version and
revision number under 10.4-t?
This would be handy, as we wouldn't have to deal with having different revision
numbers for the same package in
On 11/8/05, Kevin Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8-Nov-05, at 18:21 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Speaking for myself, I can now try to expedite some packages out of
the tracker. Anybody reading this thread who's got a package sitting
around, please email me (better yet, fink-devel)
30 matches
Mail list logo
