[Fink-users] Gimp in Fink

2007-10-25 Thread Kevin Bradley
Gimp 2.4 came out this week. The Gimp site mentions that to upgrade I can check MacPorts or Fink. Now, I've been using GimpSHOP, but thought that I should try using the full version of Gimp, especially with the improvements in 2.4. Imagine my surprise, then, when I check Fink to find

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp in Fink

2007-10-25 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Kevin Bradley wrote: Gimp 2.4 came out this week. The Gimp site mentions that to upgrade I can check MacPorts or Fink. Now, I've been using GimpSHOP, but thought that I should try using the full version of Gimp, especially with the improvements in 2.4. Imagine my surprise, then, when I

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.0..6-1002 failes compile on macintel 10.4.5

2006-03-22 Thread Alexander Venzke
Hi Jens, I had during the night no success in compiling gimp2. As you mentioned I did a selfupdate before to test if there are updates towards gimp2 or fink it self. since I did not have seen such I thought it might be macintel related. OK, lesson learned, next time I not just to a selfupdate but

[Fink-users] gimp 2.0..6-1002 failes compile on macintel 10.4.5

2006-03-21 Thread Alexander Venzke
Hi folks, i tried to install gimp2 on macintel 10.4.5 and it failes during compile. If you need further information or testing ... gcc -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include/ -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../app -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp version

2005-08-09 Thread Armin Goralczyk
Am 08.08.2005 um 21:56 schrieb Alexander K. Hansen: On Aug 8, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Am 08.08.2005 um 19:48 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:44:04PM +0200, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Hi Current stable and unstable version of fink is 1.2.5, Not

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp version

2005-08-09 Thread lj Palmer
No, Both can be installed at the same time. To set up gimp2 as the default then install gimp2-default. ..lj On Aug 8, 2005, at 13:32, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Ahh, I didn't have the unstable tree turned on. Now I can see gimp2. Thanks for the help. Do I have to uninstall gimp(1) before

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp version

2005-08-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Aug 8, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Am 08.08.2005 um 19:48 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:44:04PM +0200, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Hi Current stable and unstable version of fink is 1.2.5, Not correct. Fink's gimp package names can be a bit confusing

[Fink-users] Gimp version

2005-08-08 Thread Armin Goralczyk
Hi Current stable and unstable version of fink is 1.2.5, but Gimp has already released 2.2.8 and MacOS X binary installer (``gimp.app'') is at 2.2.6. Does anybody know if fink's gimp will be updated soon? Are there major defferences between 1.2.5 and 2.2.8? Regards Armin --Mail

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp version

2005-08-08 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:44:04PM +0200, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Hi Current stable and unstable version of fink is 1.2.5, Not correct. Fink's gimp package names can be a bit confusing though: gimp is gimp 1.x; gimp2 is gimp 2.x. 'fink list gimp' or http://fink.sf.net/pdb/search.php?summary=gimp

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp version

2005-08-08 Thread Armin Goralczyk
Am 08.08.2005 um 19:48 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:44:04PM +0200, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Hi Current stable and unstable version of fink is 1.2.5, Not correct. Fink's gimp package names can be a bit confusing though: gimp is gimp 1.x; gimp2 is gimp 2.x. 'fink list

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp version

2005-08-08 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:56:09PM +0200, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Am 08.08.2005 um 19:48 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:44:04PM +0200, Armin Goralczyk wrote: Hi Current stable and unstable version of fink is 1.2.5, Not correct. Fink's gimp package names can be a bit

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-2.0 and Tiger now works

2005-06-11 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Jun 10, 2005, at 11:06 PM, Carol Kankelborg wrote: I also had the problem that gimp-2.0 had with Tiger and the lib, whose name I can't remember right now, that was too new (version 5.0.0 when gimp2 wanted 4.3.0 or earlier). I haven't seen anything more about it. I got around it by

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-2.0 and Tiger now works

2005-06-11 Thread Carol Kankelborg
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Jun 10, 2005, at 11:06 PM, Carol Kankelborg wrote: I thought I should report that gimp-2.0 compiles fine now on Tiger. Today I did a fink selfupdate and update-all, then on a whim, tried gimp-2.0. It installed fine. I created a symbolic link in /sw/bin from

[Fink-users] Gimp-2.0 and Tiger now works

2005-06-10 Thread Carol Kankelborg
I also had the problem that gimp-2.0 had with Tiger and the lib, whose name I can't remember right now, that was too new (version 5.0.0 when gimp2 wanted 4.3.0 or earlier). I haven't seen anything more about it. I got around it by installing gimp-1.2 instead. I thought I should report that

[Fink-users] Gimp can't open display

2005-04-28 Thread Daniel Harrison
Hi all, In an attempt to get GIMP through fink I ran 'fink install gimp' which compiled with out any problems but when I run 'gimp' I get the message 'Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:' Any ideas on how to fix this? Dan --- SF.Net email

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp can't open display

2005-04-28 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Apr 27, 2005, at 11:51 PM, Daniel Harrison wrote: Hi all, In an attempt to get GIMP through fink I ran 'fink install gimp' which compiled with out any problems but when I run 'gimp' I get the message 'Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:' Any ideas on how to fix this? Dan Start X11 first.

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp can't open display

2005-04-28 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:51:13PM +1000, Daniel Harrison wrote: In an attempt to get GIMP through fink I ran 'fink install gimp' which compiled with out any problems but when I run 'gimp' I get the message 'Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:' Any ideas on how to fix this? Did the Fink

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-11 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 10 mars 2005, à 22:31, Alexander Strange a écrit : On Mar 10, 2005, at 8:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 10.3.8 installed gimp-print 5 beta installed in /usr/local since my printer's driver is not among Apple's supplied printer drivers. I don't support doing this, because every single little

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-10 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 7 mars 2005, à 23:37, Martin Costabel a écrit : This is definitely a bug in the gimp2 package and needs to be fixed by the maintainer. He needs to make it depend on Fink's freetype219 package instead of the freetype libraries inside /usr/X11. Is it solved now? or is this one another issue?

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-10 Thread Martin Costabel
Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 7 mars 2005, à 23:37, Martin Costabel a écrit : This is definitely a bug in the gimp2 package and needs to be fixed by the maintainer. He needs to make it depend on Fink's freetype219 package instead of the freetype libraries inside /usr/X11. Is it solved now? or is

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-10 Thread Alexander Strange
On Mar 10, 2005, at 8:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 10.3.8 installed gimp-print 5 beta installed in /usr/local since my printer's driver is not among Apple's supplied printer drivers. I don't support doing this, because every single little change in gimp-print seems to change the library

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-10 Thread Laine Lee
I started the thread on the beginners list to which Alexander refers, and my error is slightly different. Gimp complains that 2.1.4 of FreeType is installed, which is corroborated by Fink. I can run Apple's X11 by uncommenting this line in my .xinitrc. exec quartz-wm I can alternative run

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Mar 7, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Ersatz Sophist wrote: Hello everyone, Boy, I really hope there is a quick solution to this. After compiling gimp2.2 for 1.5 hours, I get the following error when I try to execute gimp: Gimp requires FreeType version 2.1.7 or later. Installed version is 0.10. Please

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Conrad Heiney
For me this error occurs with Apple's X11. On Mar 7, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: There's a parallel thread on -beginners about this: gimp2 is set up not to use _any_ fink freetype2 package you install, but rather that which comes with your X11 installation (check in

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Ersatz Sophist
That is the case. I'm using Apple's X11. I have cc'd the maintainer (though I think he's on this list). Thanks. Payam -- ...who search the reason of things Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves. --Euripides, The Medea On Mar 7, 2005, at 10:17 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Laine Lee
I started the thread on the beginners list to which Alexander refers, and my error is slightly different. Gimp complains that 2.1.4 of FreeType is installed, which is corroborated by Fink. I can run Apple's X11 by uncommenting this line in my .xinitrc. exec quartz-wm I can alternative run

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Mar 7, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Laine Lee wrote: I started the thread on the beginners list to which Alexander refers, and my error is slightly different. Gimp complains that 2.1.4 of FreeType is installed, which is corroborated by Fink. I can run Apple's X11 by uncommenting this line in my

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Laine Lee wrote: I started the thread on the beginners list to which Alexander refers, and my error is slightly different. Gimp complains that 2.1.4 of FreeType is installed, which is corroborated by Fink. As Alexander said, gimp2-2.2.4 does not use Fink's freetype packages but takes whatever

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Laine Lee
Sorry, I failed to make it clear in this thread that I was using XFree86 (I think it is clear in my post on the beginners list). I attempted to compile Xorg. I get what I'm assuming is a standard message about what to do to convert from Xfree86 to Xorg. By all appearances it looks like it might be

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread lele
Michele D'Ascanio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first time I run gimp was gimp1.2 with xfree86-4.3.99. After I've tried to run gimp2.2 with XDarwin 1.3b4 with good results. Now I use Photoshop because is better :-) Laine Lee wrote: Sorry, I failed to make it clear in this thread that I was using

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Mar 7, 2005, at 6:12 PM, Laine Lee wrote: Sorry, I failed to make it clear in this thread that I was using XFree86 (I think it is clear in my post on the beginners list). I attempted to compile Xorg. I get what I'm assuming is a standard message about what to do to convert from Xfree86 to

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Laine Lee
Title: Gimp 2.2 On 3/7/05 9:03 PM, "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In general a URL pointing at one of the several message archives would > probably make the answer a little easier--that way people won't have to > look up the message themselves. Here's the

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Laine Lee
Title: Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2 (Sorry about that empty message.) On 3/7/05 9:03 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: In general a URL pointing at one of the several message archives would probably make the answer a little easier--that way people won't have to look up the message themselves

Re: [Fink-users] gimp 2.2

2005-03-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Laine Lee wrote: [] Is there now any reason why I might want to switch back and forth between XFree86 and Xorg? Xorg is not so bleeding edge any more, so there is no compelling reason to switch back and forth. And the freetype2-backward-incompatibility bug that is annoying some people (not the

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-14 Thread Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 01:11:56PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: James Dasher wrote: The package maintainer has emailed suggesting that I rebuild gimp2 and send him the config.log. I'm going to try that, and provide whatever feedback for him that I can. OK, here is some info for the

RE: xorg package solves gimp2 problem (Was Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0)

2004-09-12 Thread Laine Lee
Title: RE: xorg package solves gimp2 problem (Was Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0) -From Original Message- For those who have Apple's X11 installed, here is what you can do: sudo mv /usr/X11R6 /usr/X11R6_Apple sudo mv /etc/X11 /etc/X11_Apple fink

[Fink-users] GIMP disk image (was Re: xorg package solves gimp2 problem)

2004-09-12 Thread James Dasher
On Sep 11, 2004, at 9:51 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: I think I have a workaround for the new gtk+2; I'll test it out tonight. Someone also forwarded a link to http://gimp-app.sourceforge.net/ where you can download and install a GIMP2 disk image. As long as you have X installed, it should

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP disk image (was Re: xorg package solves gimp2 problem)

2004-09-12 Thread Brion Vibber
James Dasher wrote: The gimp-app package will install .gimp-2.0 and .gimp-2.0-etc directories in your home directory. So if you're already using fink's gimp2, this could cause problems. I run Gimp 2 from both Gimp.app and fink (2.0.4-1) routinely, and haven't noticed any problems in particular.

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP disk image (was Re: xorg package solves gimp2 problem)

2004-09-12 Thread James Dasher
On Sep 12, 2004, at 6:44 PM, Brion Vibber wrote: James Dasher wrote: The gimp-app package will install .gimp-2.0 and .gimp-2.0-etc directories in your home directory. So if you're already using fink's gimp2, this could cause problems. I run Gimp 2 from both Gimp.app and fink (2.0.4-1) routinely,

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-11 Thread Martin Costabel
James Dasher wrote: The package maintainer has emailed suggesting that I rebuild gimp2 and send him the config.log. I'm going to try that, and provide whatever feedback for him that I can. OK, here is some info for the package maintainer: I am now getting the same error as James and Evan. The

Re: xorg package solves gimp2 problem (Was Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0)

2004-09-11 Thread Martin Costabel
A caveat... Martin Costabel wrote: [] For those who love bleeding edges, there is now another brand new possibility to get gimp2 working once again: Speaking of bleeding edges: If you do what I suggested, you lose the directory /etc/fonts. To avoid this, it should be saved along with /usr/X11R6

Re: xorg package solves gimp2 problem (Was Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0)

2004-09-11 Thread Alexander Strange
On Sep 11, 2004, at 5:35 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: [] Unless gtk+2 goes back to its old ways, this looks like a pretty hard nut to crack for gimp2 to avoid linking to the libfontconfig.dylib in /usr/X11R6. For those who love bleeding edges, there is now another brand new

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread James Dasher
On Sep 10, 2004, at 3:51 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: James Dasher wrote: I just downloaded and installed fink on my new iBook. Everything's up-to-date (except I'm not using XTools 1.5). Then I downloaded and compiled gimp2 (and the accompanying packages). When I tried to start gimp I got an error

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 06:12:29AM -0400, James Dasher wrote: On Sep 10, 2004, at 3:51 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: James Dasher wrote: I just downloaded and installed fink on my new iBook. Everything's up-to-date (except I'm not using XTools 1.5). I am Then I downloaded and compiled

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread Martin Costabel
James Dasher wrote: I just downloaded and installed fink on my new iBook. Everything's up-to-date (except I'm not using XTools 1.5). Then I downloaded and compiled gimp2 (and the accompanying packages). When I tried to start gimp I got an error window: The Fontconfig version being used is too

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread Martin Costabel
On 10 sept. 2004, at 12:12, James Dasher wrote: [] otool -L /sw/bin/gimp-2.0 do you see any libfontconfig? You shouldn't, because gimp2 tries to link to a static version of libfontconfig. /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) Also, if you

RE: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread Laine Lee
Title: RE: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0 I don't know, perhaps not. You might rebuild the fontconfig2-dev package, make sure no fontconfig stuff is in /usr/local, and eventually write to the gimp2 pacakge maintainer. That didn't work for me, but I didn't find any

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread Martin Costabel
D. Evan Kiefer wrote: Here's a grab of it as it's compiling. If you'd like I'll attach the whole build log when its finished. OK, send it to me, but not to the list please. I wanted to see only the two lines that contain -o gimp-2.0. This is where the executable is actually linked together and

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread James Dasher
The package maintainer has emailed suggesting that I rebuild gimp2 and send him the config.log. I'm going to try that, and provide whatever feedback for him that I can. Thanks for the help. As always, it was above and beyond the proverbial call of duty. Best - James On Sep 10, 2004, at 7:58

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread D. Evan Kiefer
Here's a grab of it as it's compiling. If you'd like I'll attach the whole build log when its finished. /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include/ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/sw/include/gtk-2.0 -I/sw/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread Martin Costabel
D. Evan Kiefer wrote: I have the same problem as Dasher but I'm running Fink's X11. Do you have a gimp2 build log? It would be interesting to see how the link line for the gimp-2.0 executable looks like. In my case, I see /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include/ -g -O2

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-10 Thread Martin Costabel
On 10 sept. 2004, at 14:43, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: [] I'm using Apple's X11 from my Panther disks, which I bought a few I am using fink's because there was some problem with Apple's I do not remember. And gimp2 works for me :) Yes, but it works with Apple's X11 too. At least it does for

[Fink-users] GIMP 2.0 requires fontconfig = 2.2.0

2004-09-09 Thread James Dasher
I just downloaded and installed fink on my new iBook. Everything's up-to-date (except I'm not using XTools 1.5). Then I downloaded and compiled gimp2 (and the accompanying packages). When I tried to start gimp I got an error window: The Fontconfig version being used is too old! The GIMP

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-2.0, gnome-2 and the case of the non-sticky prefs

2004-04-09 Thread Adrian Simmons
Martin Costabel wrote: If you want to change this for all applications that use gtk, here is how: Thanks Martin, I'm sure that's a good workaround for text size. But I'd like to use different themes too, those gnome widgets are kinda ugly :) On further investigation it seems this is related to

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-2.0, gnome-2 and the case of the non-sticky prefs

2004-04-09 Thread Adrian Simmons
Martin Costabel wrote: Create a file ~/.gtkrc-2.0 containing the line gtk-font-name = Monaco 18 Further research tells me this gets the effect I want when combined with an include of the gtk-2.0 part of a gnome theme, thus I now have in my ~/.gtkrc-2.0: include

[Fink-users] Gimp-2.0, gnome-2 and the case of the non-sticky prefs

2004-04-07 Thread Adrian Simmons
Hello, I'm finding the default text size in Menu's etc in gimp-2.0 too small. I've tried cahnging the gnome theme, and gnome font preferences, with success, but those changes don't survive restarting X11. I'm now playing with tweaking the default Gimp Theme, which will hopefully stick better.

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-2.0, gnome-2 and the case of the non-sticky prefs

2004-04-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Adrian Simmons wrote: Hello, I'm finding the default text size in Menu's etc in gimp-2.0 too small. If you want to change this for all applications that use gtk, here is how: Create a file ~/.gtkrc-2.0 containing the line gtk-font-name = Monaco 18 (Actually, this is for showing the

[Fink-users] Gimp update

2004-04-05 Thread Bart Silverstrim
I'm probably overlooking this in the list, but with the latest update-all I'm getting /usr/bin/install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-gimp-default-1.2.5-4/sw/share/man/man1 /bin/mv /sw/src/root-gimp-1.2.5-4/sw/share/man/man1/gimptool.1 /sw/src/root-gimp-default-1.2.5-4/sw/share/man/man1/

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp update

2004-04-05 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Apr 5, 2004, at 11:35 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote: I'm probably overlooking this in the list, but with the latest update-all I'm getting /usr/bin/install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-gimp-default-1.2.5-4/sw/share/man/man1 /bin/mv /sw/src/root-gimp-1.2.5-4/sw/share/man/man1/gimptool.1

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp update

2004-04-05 Thread Martin Costabel
Bart Silverstrim wrote: I'm probably overlooking this in the list, but Yes, I sent this to the list a couple of hours ago, thread [Fink-users] New gimp-1.2 broken. I even CCed the maintainer. But since he has not fixed it yet, I am committing a corrected version to CVS now. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp update

2004-04-05 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: [] The problem is the last line under the third splitoff: SplitOff3: Package: %N-default Depends: %N (= %v-%r) Replaces: %N (= 1.2.5-3), gimp2-default Conflicts: gimp2-default Files: bin/gimp bin/gimp-real bin/gimp-remote bin/gimptool share/man/man5

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp update

2004-04-05 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:04 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: The problem is the last line under the third splitoff: SplitOff3: Package: %N-default Depends: %N (= %v-%r) Replaces: %N (= 1.2.5-3), gimp2-default Conflicts: gimp2-default Files: bin/gimp bin/gimp-real bin/gimp-remote bin/gimptool

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp update

2004-04-05 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Apr 5, 2004, at 12:04 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Apr 5, 2004, at 11:35 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote: snip while trying to install the update to Gimp. Is there a problem with the port? The directory man5 doesn't exist, just as mv says... You are indeed correct--it's a problem with the

[Fink-users] gimp update fails under 10.3

2003-10-26 Thread Fernando Pereira
After updating with the latest package descriptions: The checksum of the file gimp-1.2.5.tar.bz2 of package gimp-1.2.5-1 is incorrect. The most likely cause for this is a corrupted or incomplete download Expected: 63ac650507eaa2748eb28e9ff4801c32 Actual: b83b55d80e6728268d56620ea4d3051a This is

Re: [Fink-users] gimp update fails under 10.3

2003-10-26 Thread Fernando Pereira
On Oct 26, 2003, at 7:41 PM, Fernando Pereira wrote: This is reproducible. No longer. Something seems to have been updated and compilation is now proceeding. -- F --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-Print/Ghostscript

2003-07-31 Thread Adrian Simmons
system-ghostscript would do the trick. A return of the gimp-print plugin for Gimp would also be nice. It was working nicely with the gimp-print/ghostript packages for osx until it disappeared. -- Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] IM ID: perlucida

[Fink-users] Gimp-Print/Ghostscript

2003-07-30 Thread Mothra
Okay I rebuilt my G4 the other night and am beginning to rebuild my Fink installation. I use the OS X Gimp-Print and Ghostscript packages from sourceforge net. I know in the past Ive run into apps in Fink that required these be installed. Sorry if I missed something but is there a placeholder for

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-Print/Ghostscript

2003-07-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
There's neither a Fink gimp-print package nor a placeholder for a manual install yet--the GIMP maintainer mentioned at one point that he planned on working on them. On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 05:39 PM, Mothra wrote: Okay I rebuilt my G4 the other night and am beginning to rebuild my

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-Print/Ghostscript

2003-07-30 Thread Roy Mendelssohn
Fink probably required ghostscript for some packages, not gimp-print. The latest gimp-print I believe comes with ESP-ghostscript, which is ghostscript version 8 I believe, so the place holder would be system-ghostscript8. -Roy M. At 8:19 PM -0400 7/30/03, Alexander Hansen wrote: There's

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-Print/Ghostscript

2003-07-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
Actually, I believe ESP Ghostscript is Ghostscript 7, with no X support. system-ghostscript would do the trick. On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 08:27 PM, Roy Mendelssohn wrote: Fink probably required ghostscript for some packages, not gimp-print. The latest gimp-print I believe comes with

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import SOLVED

2003-07-24 Thread Tom Dove
Alexander, We did it! Removing the files you suggested didn't solve the problem, so I removed GIMP with Fink and then did a Mass Destruction of anything on the system that contained gimp (except the .png files and that sort of thing). Then, I updated my Fink installation and installed GIMP

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import SOLVED

2003-07-24 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Great! I was afraid that you'd wind up having to do something more drastic (e.g. clear all of /sw out). On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 08:53 AM, Tom Dove wrote: Alexander, We did it! Removing the files you suggested didn't solve the problem, so I removed GIMP with Fink and then did a Mass

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import

2003-07-23 Thread Tom Dove
Message- From: Tom Dove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:07 PM To: Alexander Hansen Subject: Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import Alexander, Thanks for the quick reply. It doesn't matter whether I start GIMP from the terminal or the Applications menu; it returns the same error

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import

2003-07-23 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
. Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX -Original Message- From: Tom Dove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:07 PM To: Alexander Hansen Subject: Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import Alexander, Thanks for the quick reply. It doesn't

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import

2003-07-23 Thread Tom Dove
compare with my system to see if anything obvious is lacking. Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX -Original Message- From: Tom Dove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:07 PM To: Alexander Hansen Subject: Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import

2003-07-23 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
/LDX -Original Message- From: Tom Dove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:07 PM To: Alexander Hansen Subject: Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import Alexander, Thanks for the quick reply. It doesn't matter whether I start GIMP from the terminal or the Applications menu

[Fink-users] GIMP image import

2003-07-22 Thread Tom Dove
Hi all, I can't seem to import standard-format (JPEG, TIFF) photos into my Fink-installed GIMP, and their Web site and help files do not cover the problem. I've tried converting iPhoto pictures (JPG) into other formats with Graphic Converter, but GIMP always gives me an Unknown file type

Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import

2003-07-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
You shouldn't need to chmod anything. Are you running gimp from a terminal, or via the Applications menu? If the latter, then read the notes under http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/inst-xfree86.php#apple-binary Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX On

RE: [Fink-users] GIMP image import

2003-07-22 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:07 PM To: Alexander Hansen Subject: Re: [Fink-users] GIMP image import Alexander, Thanks for the quick reply. It doesn't matter whether I start GIMP from the terminal or the Applications menu; it returns the same error. Thanks for the link, but doing that to the Applications

[Fink-users] gimp-print

2003-07-17 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
Hi! I have some trouble with my printer (HL-1250) on MacOS 10.2.6 and Acrobat Reader. It was recommended that I should install gimp-print http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/MacOSX.php3. I have gimp installed via fink, but there is no printing available. Some questions: (1) Does installing

Re: [Fink-users] gimp-print

2003-07-17 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 01:48 AM, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: Hi! I have some trouble with my printer (HL-1250) on MacOS 10.2.6 and Acrobat Reader. It was recommended that I should install gimp-print http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/MacOSX.php3. I have gimp installed via fink, but there is no

RE: [Fink-users] Gimp no print after update

2003-06-05 Thread Adrian Simmons
Apologies for the lack of detail in my original message, it was late... message at one point when I started gimp (1.2.4-1): Same version here too, 1.2.4-1 /sw/lib/gimp/1.2/plug-ins/print executable not found Doesn't exist for me either. I can't see that error, but I do get quite a lot on start.

RE: [Fink-users] Gimp no print after update

2003-06-05 Thread Adrian Simmons
Gimp 1.2.4 requires Gimp-Print for printing support I will make a system-gimpprint and gimp-gimpprint package. Whoops, I should check my inbox before I read my list mail. I did just try re-installing gimp-print for OSX. I guess system-gimpprint should fix me up fine. Thanks for your help. --

[Fink-users] Gimp no print after update

2003-06-05 Thread Adrian Simmons
I've been printing directly from gimp of recent, and now this evening I try to do so again and the 'print' option seems to have disappeared from the menu's. I remember a new release of gimp being built and installed after a selfupdate-cvs, is something not right here? Is there something I

RE: [Fink-users] Gimp no print after update

2003-06-05 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Simmons Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fink-users] Gimp

[Fink-users] gimp

2003-03-31 Thread Claudio Vaccarella
I'm trying to install gimp, but fink asks for a file mpeg_lib-1.3.1.tar.gz, that is not on the ftp server (ftp.gimp.org). Anyone knows a workaround? ciao, --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo

Re: [Fink-users] gimp

2003-03-31 Thread Daniel Wyeth
Le lundi, 31 mars 2003, à 18:54, Claudio Vaccarella a écrit : I'm trying to install gimp, but fink asks for a file mpeg_lib-1.3.1.tar.gz, that is not on the ftp server (ftp.gimp.org). Anyone knows a workaround? ciao, In your browser try : http://starship.python.net/~gward/mpeglib/ or with

Re: [Fink-users] gimp

2003-03-31 Thread David R. Morrison
I'm trying to install gimp, but fink asks for a file mpeg_lib-1.3.1.tar.gz, that is not on the ftp server (ftp.gimp.org). Anyone knows a workaround? This particular problem was fixed some time ago. If you consult the fink FAQ, Q3.17 I'm trying to install a package but fink can't download

[Fink-users] Gimp and no more images in help

2003-02-25 Thread Glanz
Gimp and no more images in help I must respectfully disagree with your rather flippant statement that the problem will just go away.. Believe me, I know you are occupied with other problems, but if you do not fix this one, Fink will become unuseable. I can see it comming. This is a recurring

[Fink-users] Gimp and no more images in help

2003-02-25 Thread Glanz
Another problem is the unwillingness of the Fink developers to admit that they are totally wrong in assuming that the LIBPNG problem will just go away... This is the worst attitude I have seen on any development team. There comes a time when one must admit one's own incomprtence.

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp and no more images in help

2003-02-25 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 12:56, Glanz wrote: Gimp and no more images in help I must respectfully disagree with your rather flippant statement that the problem will just go away.. That wasn't what was said: Quoting MC: This is a problem everybody was having for a while. It is generally

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp and no more images in help

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Michèle Garoche wrote: I've just try to read the internal help in Gimp and discovered that no more images were visible. Then in Console, I got this message: libpng warning: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.2.5 libpng warning: Application is running with png.c from

[Fink-users] Gimp and no more images in help

2003-02-23 Thread Michèle Garoche
I've just try to read the internal help in Gimp and discovered that no more images were visible. Then in Console, I got this message: libpng warning: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.2.5 libpng warning: Application is running with png.c from libpng-1.0.12 So, I'll guess I have

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp on Apple's X11

2003-01-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
You'll need to install the system-xfree86 package, which let's fink know about Apple X11. On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 15:13, Curtis Vaughan wrote: Is there a way to use dselect to install Gimp without installing xfree86? Or do I have to download Gimp and install it myself? Curtis Vaughan

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-1.2.3-9 and undefined _strtok_r

2002-11-14 Thread scmarcos
Thanks Martin! That did the trick. - Koen. Yes yes and yes thank you Martin for going the extra mile for us on this Gimp (gnome?) issue. These fink interdependencies are intricate indeed and you are to be the Fink Man of the Month for having the patience and perseverance for tracking this

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-1.2.3-9 and undefined _strtok_r

2002-11-13 Thread Koen van der Drift
At 3:29 PM +0100 11/11/02, Martin Costabel wrote: On 10.1 (on 10.2, it's in libSystem.dylib), the _strtok_r symbol should be defined in /sw/lib/libgnomesupport.0.0.0.dylib. If it is not found, then either that library has to be recompiled (fink rebuild gnome-libs) or some symlinks between

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-1.2.3-9

2002-11-11 Thread Martin Costabel
scmarcos wrote: At 5:30 PM -0500 11/10/2002, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I just saw your message about gimp failing to compile. I have the exact same error as you described. There was no reply to your post in the archive - did you figure out how to solve it? thanks, - Koen. No, Koen, I

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-1.2.3-9

2002-11-11 Thread Koen van der Drift
At 3:29 PM +0100 11/11/02, Martin Costabel wrote: On 10.1 (on 10.2, it's in libSystem.dylib), the _strtok_r symbol should be defined in /sw/lib/libgnomesupport.0.0.0.dylib. If it is not found, then either that library has to be recompiled (fink rebuild gnome-libs) or some symlinks between

Re: [Fink-users] Gimp-1.2.3-9

2002-11-10 Thread scmarcos
At 5:30 PM -0500 11/10/2002, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I just saw your message about gimp failing to compile. I have the exact same error as you described. There was no reply to your post in the archive - did you figure out how to solve it? thanks, - Koen. No, Koen, I never did get it to

[Fink-users] Gimp-1.2.3-9

2002-10-14 Thread scmarcos
Os 10.1, fink Package manager version: 0.10.0 Distribution version: 0.4.1.cvs April tools Here is the end of the output for gimp, mkdir .libs gcc -no-cpp-precomp -Wall -o .libs/helpbrowser helpbrowser.o queue.o -L/sw/src/gimp-1.2.3-9/gimp-1.2.3/libgimp/.libs

  1   2   >