irus ever" Don Seglio Batuna
>
>
>
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radi
The preamp on my new SDR1000 seems to be behaving strangely.
As I tune up or down a band the preamp is as per the front panel
setting. Then, at some point as I tune, it switches itself off (there's
a click inside the box when it happens). The setting for the pre-amp on
the display on the cons
David Ackrill wrote:
> I'm using CWL and it happens within the Amateur bands and there doesn't
> seem to be a correlation between the frequency that it happens on. I've
> noticed the effect in 160, 80 and 40 metres. I am tuning using a mouse
> wheel.
>
I've done a bit more experimenting, an
Does this mean that CAT is then not available to be used in conjunction
with digital mode or logging programs? It seems to me that there ought
to be a way to route CAT data to both a virtual serial port and a "real"
serial port, but I can't see how to do it.
John W2FS
Tom Thompson wrote:
>Ed
It's a small matter of programming. At the moment the PowerSDR code only
has support in it for 1 CAT serial port. It would not be all that
difficult to add support for more, just needs a bit of code. I
believe Phil Covington (N8VB) had a TCP->Serial bridge going a while back,
seem to remem
I have seen a rig run multiple devices, but all of then were Icom CI-V
(TTL) using the CT-17 (CI-V bus) and the radio was in "CI-V transceiver"
mode.
I'd REALLY like to see Phil's TCP->Serial Bridge or something analogous
included in the new version of CAT. His source is available @
http://www
It would be pretty easy to integrate this functionality into PowerSDR.
Along with vCOM it will allow you to run CAT to any/multiple of the
virtual or hardware com ports on the system as well as do CAT between
computers over the network. I had a checkbox to allow you to
designate which com ports o
I have noticed some timing changes in the CW behavior
of the radio with the latest few SVN releases.
What I am experiencing is a period between tx going to
rx, the rx has a longer period before it becomes
active that is longer than in older versions. It
seems unrelated to how much delay is set
When and where is the Sunday 20m Flex Radio net?
Are there any other scheduled nets?
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexr
I see that Roland include ferrite cores with the FA66 kit for the firewire
cable. Any early
adopters of the FA-66 noticed any wideband noise similar to that which occurred
with the
Firebox.
The pdf on the Roland site
http://lib.roland.co.jp/manual/en/dl_06-11305/FA-66_leaf_je2.pdf
doesn't me
On updating to SVN 687, on loading of the PowerFlex program, I receive the
error:
"Failed to load resources from resource file. Please check your setup"
Click OK and program stops loading and quits. Returning back to SVN 686
and all works okay. What is the error message about and what
I had the same error and had to go back to 686
Stan
AH6JR
On Saturday 23 September 2006 06:07 am, N3WT wrote:
> On updating to SVN 687, on loading of the PowerFlex program, I receive the
> error:
> "Failed to load resources from resource file. Please check your setup"
> Click OK and program s
A new kit has been introduced by Hendricks QRP Kits that integrates a
single band softrock style SDR receiver with a 2.5w VXO controlled cw
transmitter.
http://www.qrpkits.com/
http://www.qrpkits.com/firefly.html
- Dan, N7VE
___
FlexRadio mailing list
I have the same problem also.
I believe it has to do with the database and the new dual receive
capability.
If you delete your current database it will start up and then
you will have to set up a new one.
Dave - N4DWK
N3WT wrote:
>
>
> On updating to SVN 687, on loading of the PowerFlex prog
That is the fix. Rename your current DB to something else. Start up
SVN 688 and import you database from 687. I had to stop and restart SVN
688 after the import for the Panadapter to work properly, but it works.
-Tim
---
Tim Ellison
Integrated Technical Services
-Original Message-
Fro
I'm sorry, I apologize, I got a lemon of a radio, and the manufacturer
is not interested in fixing it, must be my fault somehow.
Myself and several others must be imagining this problem, funny thing my
other radios don't pick up these moving signals, it's inside my radio.
Can you possibly imagi
John,
The Sunday Net is at 1900 UTC or 2:00 PM CDT here in South Texas. on
14,329 KHz +/- depending on who else is near the frequency.
73, Larry K2LT
John Spangler wrote:
> When and where is the Sunday 20m Flex Radio net?
>
> Are there any other scheduled nets?
>
>
The keyer in PowerSDR is driving me nuts!
1. Is there any way to produce sidetone without transmitting please?
2. I think this is the 'wrong' iambic from the one I'm used to. I
really cannot get the hang of it, and I'm just about ready to send it
back to Waters and Stanton.
I can stand most t
Turn Drive or PWR control to 0
John P. Basilotto
W5GI
Marketing and Product Manager
FlexRadio Systems
Office 512-250-8595
Mobile 512-663-6727
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Ackrill
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:20 PM
To: flexrad
There is something really not right with the keyer system.
I've slowed to a fraction of the speed I use on my FT817, and I still
cannot send reasonable CW with the SDR1000.
There's got to be a better keyer...
This will definitely be a show stopper for me, I really cannot use a
radio with such
I have the SDR1k for more than one year and half now. Since day one, I
indicated many times that we needed the two iambic modes. Some of us, I
know I am not the only one, are very uncomfortable with what we have
now, to say the least. When I want to work CW, I must go back to my old
classic rig
José Dumoulin wrote:
> I have the SDR1k for more than one year and half now. Since day one, I
> indicated many times that we needed the two iambic modes. Some of us,
> I know I am not the only one, are very uncomfortable with what we have
> now, to say the least. When I want to work CW, I must g
Dave
May I suggest using an external keyer. I am more comfortable using an
external keyer with most rigs, including the IC-756PROII and even Ten Tecs.
And now Including the SDR-1000. I did not expect the internal keyer to be
just right for me from the start. I did not like Icom or Ten Tec keye
N3WT wrote:
> Dave
>
> May I suggest using an external keyer. I am more comfortable using an
> external keyer with most rigs, including the IC-756PROII and even Ten Tecs.
> And now Including the SDR-1000. I did not expect the internal keyer to be
> just right for me from the start. I did not li
thats funny.. I hear signals like this on my IC- 746 and on my FT-920
quite often .. likewise I can hear/see then on my sdr-1000..
I do not think this a fault of the radio. or if it is its a common
problem...
Ray J
W9RAY
Cecil Bayona wrote:
>
> Myself and several others must be imagining this
I can hear them very faintly on my TS-930 until I turn off the SDR-1000
then they disappear, in my case the noise is coming from the SDR-1000.
Ray J wrote:
> thats funny.. I hear signals like this on my IC- 746 and on my FT-920
> quite often .. likewise I can hear/see then on my sdr-1000..
>
ily removed with the automatic notch. But, loving to tinker like I do I
>>>> removed the DC1 and soldered a 7 pin header in its place. I used a
>>>> 1" x 2" x 2", +/- 15v linear supply wired to the header.
>>>>
>>>> How's it work? Gr
For many months I used an external electronic
keyer with its own monitor and turned the monitor
on the SDR-1000 off. Worked fine. Then the
software guys improved the Iambic keyer, so I put
the external keyer away. Looks like I will need
to bring it back until the SDR-1000 keyer gets
fixed
> 2. I think this is the 'wrong' iambic from the one I'm used to. I
> really cannot get the hang of it...
Of all the things that should be child's play and totally configurable
in a software defined radio, one would think generating CW, keyer
memories, yada, yada.
As should be configurable tr
Hello Dave,
John beat me to it, but I'll still pass along my comments and a suggestion.
I've been using the SDR-1000 for almost 2 years now on cw. Although I'm
not certain, I believe that the SDR1K keyer is Iambic mode B. I've been
a cw op for over 40 years now, and I have strong opinions abou
Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote:
> I agree with the issue of the complaint, but not the tone.
>
>
> 73, Guy K2AV.
>
I'm sorry if my tone seems abrasive, I admit that I tend to state my
opinions and point of view in few words.
Tha fact is, I want to like the SDR1000 and, whilst I was using what was
s
After the reports of worsened CW keyer response I got on the air and did
some QSO's. I don't see one iota of evidence that the keyer has
degraded in my set up.
It is important to set the latency setting parameters correctly to use
CW. First, if you are using a Firebox make sure that your lat
At 03:15 PM 9/23/2006, Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote:
> > 2. I think this is the 'wrong' iambic from the one I'm used to. I
> > really cannot get the hang of it...
>
>
>Of all the things that should be child's play and totally configurable
>in a software defined radio, one would think generating CW, key
From: "Jim Lux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
" There IS a lot of cool stuff, and to a
certain extent, software radios, in general, are so new that NOBODY
knows how to best control, interface, and use them (some
commercial/govt implementations of SDR are so wonderfully abstract
and generalized that t
I figured out what is going on. I had checked 4096 on
the DSP buffer and only 48K on the soundcard so the
buffer was taking a long time to fill/purge on TX/RX
transition. Setting the buffer back to 2048 resolved
the problem. I mention this so others that may
experience this problem can find a re
At 07:12 PM 9/23/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>From: "Jim Lux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>" There IS a lot of cool stuff, and to a
>certain extent, software radios, in general, are so new that NOBODY
>knows how to best control, interface, and use them (some
>commercial/govt implementations of S
Bob
I did some more work on this and found the issue was
due to setting the DSP buffer to 4096 and having my
DSP bandwidth to 48k. This made the buffer fill
slower and hence the delay and chopiness I was
experiencing. What seemed to be happening was as I
momentarily changed from T to R the buffe
Here's an interesting question.
Today, if you wanted to add a new modulation scheme to PowerSDR, it
would involve recompiling (or at the minimum re-linking) and creating
a new EXE file.
But what should it be in the future?
Consider a concept like "loadable IO drivers" or USB devices. You
plu
I'm getting poor opposite sideband suppression.Another Flex owner,
Jeff, K6JCA, took a snapshot of my spectrum off the air and there is a
significant hump on the opposite sideband. Other listeners have heard
the opposite sideband. It's not DSB. It's maybe 30 dB down. The TX
image align
39 matches
Mail list logo