conditions.
73, Pete N3EVL
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Edwin Marzan
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 3:08 PM
> To: FireBrick; FlexRadio List
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch (SVN 1879) - K6JCA Console
&g
I wrote here a few months ago concerning the fact that I was unable to drive
the audio hard enough on my SDR1000 to see the meters kick up on my power
supply and watt meter. Using Comp & Cpdr settings at 2 made a considerable
difference. I also noticed John (W5GI)mention the DX button on the co
Marketing and Product Manager
> FlexRadio Systems
> 512-535-5266
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stig Rasmussen
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:28 PM
> To: Ahti Aintila; Dale Boresz
> Cc: flexradio@flex-ra
Aintila; Dale Boresz
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
Hello, please stop this. :-)
I dont want any discussion around ESSB / and or DX-pileups modulation. Whats
best etc.
My point is only to state the fact that SDR-1000 handle bass-less modulation
much
less punchy than
used. Thats it! If there is an explanation I would like to
hear...
Stig
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Ahti Aintila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. juni 2007 10:26
Til: Dale Boresz
Kopi: Jim McLester; flexradio@flex-radio.biz; Stig Rasmussen
Emne: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
Stig and Jim
Stig and Jim,
Dale is telling the plain truth, if your main interest is getting your
signal through in noisy conditions and DX pileups. The basses convey
very little speach information, but eat up the limited power of your
transmitter. Unless you want to broadcast a Hi-Fi music program on ham
band
r-driven signal.
73, Dale
WA8SRA
Jim McLester wrote:
> Same here, recording studio guy / ham op down the street sees the same on my
> rig.
>
> Jim - W4YXU
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stig Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent:
Same here, recording studio guy / ham op down the street sees the same on my
rig.
Jim - W4YXU
- Original Message -
From: "Stig Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
>
> I tried much d
I tried much different settings with external audio processing.
I mostly run ESSB with much bass. Then the talk power is really good. My
watt-meter (Daiwa CN-101L)peaks around 50-60W on normal speaking, with
external audio gear.
If i try to get a squeeky (thin) dx-modulation, all power dissappear.
Edwin Marzan wrote:
> I'm thinking that any type of external processing will eventually be
> matched wth a software version. It is just a matter of time before we
> will all have these capabilites built in. It would be interesting to
> know the make and model of the unit you are using to enhance
d on SSB. Eventually...
Edwin Marzan
AB2VW
>From: Chris Maukonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
>Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:46:00 -0400
>
>Interesting thread. I currently use a small
Great job. Audio punch is much improved!
Farnk, WA3JBT
- Original Message -
From: "Robert McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave & Nancy Ridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
Two years ago before we redid the transmitter from the ground up to
produce a larger punch audio chain, and have all of the stages metered,
the compander was being overdriven by stages in front of it. There was
an ad hoc scaling added by me to keep it from overdriving the stages
beyond it, in
I use another receiver with headphones...mostly a 746Pro
and when I wanna hear what my other radios sound like...I use the flex
with headphones as the receiver
as someone said earlier today Good is Subjective ...
Its chevys and fords man
steve
kw5tx
Ken N9VV wrote:
> I would like to jump
I would like to jump in and ask about real-world measurements. From
what I hear on the air, most guys rely on the *totally subjective*
assessment of another Ham to tell them about their audio. This is
great if the Receiving Ham is a talented audiophile but what about
his *hearing*, his *speaker
Right on, Ray. Lets hope it works its way up to the top of the list
soon. Has anyone added it to the enhancement list?
Chas
At 07:35 AM 5/31/2007, Ray Andrews wrote:
>Chas,
>
>Of course the Flex Radio programmers can do it. But, I am certain
>that just like software projects at my soon-to-be
Interesting thread. I currently use a small mixer for my mic preamp with
a nano compressor
set to be a brick-wall limiting only. Works very well. By the way that
is what they used to
do on am broadcast stations. No compression, just limiting.
Chris
WA4CM
--
If you have not looked at VE3NEA Vshaper, you should !
It is instructive to just play with it outside of the SDR. It includes
a build in recorder loop that lets you listen to the result as you
adjust the setting ( both with and without QRN & QRM ).
With the SDR, you can select the Vshaper inpu
At 08:28 AM 5/31/2007, Frank Mayer wrote:
>I guess Yaesu was one of the pioneers of RF speech processing way back in
>the early 70's with the Ft-101 series of transceivers. The way that these
>RF Processors work is they convert the audio from the mic input to RF with a
>SSB generator. They use cl
"Ahti Aintila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Greg - ZL3IX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
>
>
> > Hi Greg et al,
> >
> > FINALLY! Ihave been waiting for 4 years that
I am not familiar with the voice shaper. Is this supposed to be
incorporated into the SDR?
- Original Message -
From: "Ahti Aintila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg - ZL3IX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradi
-1000 series,
Kenwood TS-870, Icom ProIII)
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Lux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Frank Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg - ZL3IX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Audio Pun
At 01:33 AM 5/31/2007, Frank Mayer wrote:
>I am in agreement with you Greg as far as the clipper goes. Some of the
>other posts so far are saying to use external gear. That's ok for the
>"audio" boys but an RF Clipper is a different animal. I don't believe
>anyone is manufacturing an external un
Larry W8ER wrote:
> Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
> Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
> inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
> performance of a simple external hardware preamp and compresso
: Re: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
At 07:12 PM 5/30/2007, Larry W8ER wrote:
>Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
>Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
>inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
>perform
Thank God ...I thought I was the only one that thought Comp/Compndr was
way lacking! (as well as the ANF).
I know alota folks don't need or want anything other than Communication
Audio...and after talking with 100's of hams on the air...I see their
point.
It's usually wasted on people listening
Chas,
Of course the Flex Radio programmers can do it. But, I am certain that just
like software projects at my soon-to-be former job, there is a very large list
of things they want to do & a list of things that MUST be done 1st to meet a
deadline, such as getting the code ready for the Flex-50
Hi,
Well, it seems to me that if VE3NEA can do it, then the FlexRadio
software engineers can too. I do have a FireBox. so I will try it per below.
73, Chas W1CG
At 04:30 AM 5/31/2007, Giuseppe Campana wrote:
>Hi
>
>for all interested increase the audio performance in his SDR1K,
>please look a
Hi Greg et al,
FINALLY! Ihave been waiting for 4 years that other flexers start get
interested. As an old hardware man I have been talking about RF
clipping alot. I want to admit that the time of this method is over
already during this SDR era, but that function in the more
sophisticated software
Frank Mayer wrote:
> I wonder if this type of circuit CAN be written in
> software.
>
Hi Frank,
Indeed it can. In my previous employment we used one that was written
in DSP assembler for the 56002 (not by me unfortunately, although I did
give the algorithm inputs). It was very effective.
lieve that a good
RF Clipper/Processor is an essential feature that must be included IN a rig.
Just like RIT, etc. I wonder if this type of circuit CAN be written in
software.
- Original Message -
From: "Greg - ZL3IX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 3:41 AM
Hi
for all interested increase the audio performance in his SDR1K,
please look at this VE3NEA software: http://www.dxatlas.com/vshaper/
I use it with the on board audio of my P4, placing the out to input of
my FA66, with outstanding performance: EQ/RFclipper/Gate.
If you have Firebox, you can us
My experience of listening to the SDR1000 on the air is also that there
is no audio punch. I keep a sked with a ZS every Friday over quite a
difficult polar path. He has two radios, one an old analogue rig with
an RF clipper, and the other an SDR1000. When the path is especially
difficult, o
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070531/fef9cc03/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradi
At 07:12 PM 5/30/2007, Larry W8ER wrote:
>Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
>Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
>inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
>performance of a simple external hardware prea
Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
performance of a simple external hardware preamp and compressor with the
built in softw
36 matches
Mail list logo
