--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Jim Wilson writes:
Yes, I realize this. That is why I think we should try plugging externally
viewed model branches into the main scene graph.
I've just did that before opening the message -- try the latest CVS
and see if it's OK.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL
rather than big-bang jobs. Any takers?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
fine.
Fixed.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
- and
scenery-management code currently slopped into main.cxx. That would
be a good place to add clip-plane configurability. If you want to
take a shot at it, please go ahead.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel
to the
second part.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
) into
the main scene graph.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
ssgRoots.
It's possible, I searched for all the ssgSetNearFar calls, though, and
couldn't find any hidden ones.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org
pronounced in the first place.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
.
Please send patches/files to Curt or me for most of the FlightGear and
SimGear tree. Send them to Andy Ross for YASim, and to Tony Peden or
Jon Berndt for JSBSim. Curt, John Check, and I can handle patches for
the base package as well, if necessary.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
* the plane first,
and only then to test above in case we're underground.
Thanks, and all the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
updating
to the local plib CVS will give you a translucent propeller disk. You
still need to patch to get smoothing, though.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
is from inside an aircraft, but we'd be more consistent this way.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
and linked with it? Is
anyone else using the newest CVS plib getting an opaque propeller disk?
Thanks,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Frederic Bouvier writes:
You forgot to correct your model to avoid the cutting propeller disc !
What do you mean, exactly, by a cutting disk?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Frederic Bouvier writes:
What do you mean, exactly, by a cutting disk?
We can see the interior of the c172 when viewing the front of the
plane in the external view
Right -- I forgot to edit the ac file. I'll check in the fix right
now.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
for it for external
use???
No, it was working and now its gone. I agree that the aero effects
are there -- there must be a problem in JSBSim.cxx.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
the text stuff anyway. The text
instruments use sprintf, so maybe something has screwed up the library
somehow.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org
the FlightGear binary to force a
relink.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
have been done with the old system using factors and
offsets, but it would have been much more difficult to understand and
maintain; here, it is verbose but nice and explicit.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear
haven't quite decided how that animation should work.
Billboards are 2D objects that rotate towards the viewer -- they're
especially useful for modelling trees.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
we'd fail).
Comments? I realize that this will lead to a split between the 2D and
3D panels, but it seems much more flexible on the 3D side, and many
(or most) of the 2D instrument textures -- which are the hardest part
-- could be reused on the 3D side.
All the best,
David
--
David
.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
to have) switched to XFree86 4.0, which included DRI support for
Voodoo3 and better.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear
, except that you'd use real-world
measurements (meters) rather than idealized screen coordinates.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo
actually
happens, take a look at FGLayeredInstrument::draw in
src/Cockpit/panel.cxx -- the z-position is actually incremented by
0.01 for each successive layer.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
.[ch]xx, globals.[ch]xx, and
fgfs.[ch]xx.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
|network'
(string)) at puFont.cxx:64
64if ( glut_font_handle != (GlutFont) 0 )
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo
Alex Perry writes:
Are you going to do an interior view ?
Do flying saucers have windows?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Here after doing a full cvs update -d of the base package and the fgfs
source, I'm seeing a C172 in the external view with --fdm=ufo
Try --aircraft=ufo
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
will change
controls.cxx to set a default parking brake value in the constructor,
though, just for consistency.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org
Arnt Karlsen writes:
..how about the one that came down in Roswell, NM? ;-)
That's in the Smithsonian now, isn't it?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
average skill. In the end, I think we end up with a bigger
talent pool this way.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
when you switch
on carb heat?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
MS OUTLOOK USERS: Due to serious security problems, please do *not* add
this address to your address book, and please remove
parts.
Any hints? This model is light-weight enough that we could build
fairly large groves, at least near airports.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
(well, there's the Avro Arrow, but that only sounds
similar).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Marcio Shimoda writes:
What function draws the sky and the tile?
The sky is drawn in SimGear -- see simgear/sky/dome.cxx. It's not
integrated with the SSG graph, and that may or may not be part of the
problem.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
by.
That confusion is my fault. For the FDMs use a multiloop with the
number of iterations to run; the general subsystems use a dt for
elapsed time in milliseconds. This needs some architectural repair
and documentation.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
harm in sticking with the integer value, but I
agree that a better name, proper documentation, and some debugging is
essential.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
special dynamic transformation.
2. The billboarded tree has only 4 vertices, but requires a
transformation based on the view matrix.
Norm: which do you think would be more efficient for a forest of, say,
500 trees?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
Erik Hofman writes:
Norm: which do you think would be more efficient for a forest of, say,
500 trees?
I would say, billboarded spherical trees handled as particles.
I don't understand 'particles'.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
transformation? That wouldn't work, because each tree has to turn to
a slightly different angle to face the camera, and each has to rotate
about its own centrepoint.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com
landings just like to real thing. To get
winds from 270 @ 15kt gusting to 25kt, try
fgfs --wind=270@15 --prop:/environment/params/gust-wind-speed-kt=25
To use this, you'll need to configure --with-new-environment.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
. Ouch. Any suggestions?
I'll leave the others to the appropriate coders.
Thanks,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman
. If it works, it should go a long way towards
improving our ability to handle properties. Thanks, Frederic.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
FGSubsystem::suspend ()
void FGSubsystem::resume ()
bool FGSubsystem::is_suspended () const
Subsystems can check in their update() methods whether they are
suspended or not and act accordingly; update() will still be invoked
in either case.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL
to
see how it's done.
The problem didn't show up before because main.cxx always passed '1'
as the value of multiloop.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Christian Mayer writes:
Oh, BTW, EMACS and VI/VIM are no option for me (vim is greqat to change
a file, but not to have a overview over a big project)
What kind of an overview do you need?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com
the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
right through a tree or tower if you try.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
set before when FG_NEW_ENVIRONMENT
was defined. Personally, I wasn't aware that the balloon sim was even
working (it wasn't a year ago), but I'd be happy to patch the file so
that it works with or without FG_WEATHERCM -- what would you suggest?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL
).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
like the ATIS, for icing, and who knows what else.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
weather phenomena) needs to be done for
either weather subsystem.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo
. Ditto for YASim (i.e. I'll add it as soon as
*any* FDM supports turbulence).
By the way, one of my more immediate goals is adding variable winds as
a complement to gusting winds. I might also add variability for
up/down drafts.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
of conversions. I'm sure that there exist
SI aircraft panels somewhere, but I have not yet seen photos of any in
general aviation.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
.
Thanks,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
to have FlightGear figure them
out itself, but it might still be doable.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo
gauge
became U/S, the copilot took a dipstick measurement and used the wrong
calculation.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Alex Perry writes:
Actually storing the data to file is already supported in FGFS, I believe.
Yes, it is. See docs-mini/README.logging in the FlightGear source
distribution.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com
controlled airspace). Making the GPS display into the primary flight
instrument will make it much easier to switch to SI, and ATC
clearances coming digitally over a satellite link can be converted
automatically to any units.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
(between the two knuckles) of each finger for 5-8, and the
bottom third for 9-12. I'm not sure how they combined the second hand
with that, but I think that they used only whole fingers there, giving
the ability to count from 0-60 on their fingers alone.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
,
since it doesn't make sense for multiple cloud layers; ditto for the
--clouds-asl command-line option.
Enjoy,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Alex Perry writes:
4. Which cockpit panel instruments currently support failure simulation ?
This is something we could easily add in the panel config files.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com
2. SCT : scattered
3. BKN : broken
4. OVC : overcast
That's a very good idea, but for now, my goal was just to get the
current SimGear cloud support tied to the property manager. The
SimGear cloud stuff could use some rewriting, if anyone wants to
volunteer.
All the best,
David
--
David
files off the network without explicit
permission from the user is a bad idea, even when it's all in good
fun.
Agreed.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
-- if the type is clear, the layer shouldn't be
drawn at all, at any elevation. Are you still seeing the problem?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Norman Vine writes:
So the way I read it the glider is no-more
It's still there, but it's not used by the C172.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
the glider path. Do we want to do that for *all*
missing models, or just the aircraft?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org
that Models/Buildings/big-apartment.ac would still
be FlightGear's largest model, but I know what you mean.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
missed that).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
started.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
pilots.
Locking the tailwheel should help a lot, but we'll also have to make
sure that the tailwheel has the right amount of authority. By the
time the tailwheel starts to lift, I'd expect that the rudder should
be becoming more effective.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL
completely.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
point it will snap on.
That way, there's no risk of locking the wheel at an oblique angle,
but you can engage the lock early while turning onto the runway. If
that's too fancy, we could just have the lock instantly snap the wheel
to position for now.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
, if there were a pseudo-steering property for the tailwheel.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear
jet runways).
Nice work, Andy. For anyone else who wants to try this, the tailwheel
is now locked by default, and you'll have to use 'l' (small L) to
unlock it for taxiing. I'll have to start work on the 3D interior.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http
and measured.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
altitude, like -
meters -- that's why it reads a maximum climb. We need to find a way
to delay initialization of the steam module until after the FDM is set
up.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com
(altimeter goes U/S at 750ft AGL on final on an NDB
approach, and so on).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman
deflect. :)
I agree -- JSBSim is reporting a positive normalized position for a
negative input (and vice-versa). Obviously, we've made allowances for
that in the model animations, but it's inconsistent with the behaviour
elsewhere. I'll look into fixing it.
All the best,
David
--
David
to the JSBSim core was required -- I just multiplied
FCS-GetDrPos(ofNorm) by -1 before passing the value to the FlightGear
property.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
half full tanks. Just wondering if you're seeing this
as well on your 2.95.2 build.
Roskam's sample data for a 747-200 in cruise at 40,000ft gives these
conditions:
angle of attack: 2.4deg
mach number: 0.9
TAS: 871fps (=516kt)
weight: 636,636lb
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
://bada.eurocontrol.fr/bada/3.3/DH8C__.PTF
Unfortunately, the DC-3 doesn't seem to be included. With 166
different models, you'd think they might have slipped it in...
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com
models shipped with turbojets.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
. When I build new scenery from
scratch, I don't see any holes around the airports.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org
Melchior FRANZ writes:
* David Megginson -- Wednesday 29 May 2002 20:18:
The problem is that the new airport objects (with lighting) don't
always fit exactly into the old holes. When I build new scenery from
scratch, I don't see any holes around the airports.
But if it's just
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
propellers ?
We can do that entirely in the XML -- we just need a cheap-crappy-card
(or wise-economical-card, or perhaps vintage-card) property that
everyone can agree on, then we can make various bindings and
animations conditional on it.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL
-source
aircraft models. What next? We're low on Pipers right now (both aero
data and 3D models). Any favourites?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
501 - 600 of 2319 matches
Mail list logo