Gil -
I second Glen's statement here. I personally value the fact that I know
many people from many walks of life with many modes of apprehending and
being in the world. This FriAM/WedTech Crowd is an important part of
that (even though I rarely make a showing at either table in person).
The problem with the piece is that it's treats Trump and Clinton as
equally bad. That's false symmetry.
Au contraire!
There is an *implication* of that, but in fact, the rhetoric used is all
spot on... it is a piece NOT about the candidates, but about the voters
reaction to them. I
Frankly I can't wait until our systems all are as fluxed with
symbiotic-ware (what is the benign form of malware) as our own personal
biomes... maybe we are already on our way down that road?
Does anyone track Stephanie Forrest's computer immune systems?
I'm betting we have some
They aren't describing the actual imaging A/D conversion... it i just a
lense set coupled with a fiber-optic... capture and reduction is a
project left to the student downstream. I'm not clear (and they dont
indicate) how they actually get the opticil fidelity from a 3D printer
since they
it,
_then_ it might be a good thing.
On 06/27/2016 03:09 PM, Steven A Smith wrote:
That said, I'm still holding out for a 4-way debate with Bernie as
Independent and Gary Johnson as Libertarian. I think the Donald
would get shredded on every one of his points by one or all three of
the others. I
With our own election hoopla, I find myself considering the implications
of democracy as we practice it (and perhaps even as we imagine or
idealize it).
While I am observing said hoopla with my usual "morbid fascination", I
am truly disturbed by the possibility that we ARE degenerating to a
Our colleagues, Matt and Janire just skyped me up yesterday and were
quite concerned about the implications for them...
Matt is from the UK, Janire from Spain, and they both attended
University in Wales and have been doing good business throughout
UK/EU/etc without any friction, thanks to the
Glen -
I do believe we *will* and *have been* outdriving our headlights, and it
is part of the "manifest destiny" of being human, maybe
mammal/warm-blooded/vertibrate/fauna/life? It *might be* a necessary
property of evolved life to innovate "grandly"... where "grandly" is a
relative term.
On 6/8/16 12:27 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
`` I'm pretty much a luddite myself, or at least "conservative" in the sense of
believing that we are outdriving our headlights on many fronts.''
Experiments can be risky but sometimes they pay off..
701 - 709 of 709 matches
Mail list logo
