Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Tim Collier
How about twice the storage capacity and a 1.33 gig processor as opposed to a 1.2? On 12/31/04 8:30 PM, MTH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You won't gain any screen real-estate by getting a 14 iBook, it has the same 1024 x 768 resolution that the 12 iBooks have. unless your eyesight is failing

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread MTH
On Jan 1, 2005, at 5:35 AM, Tim Collier wrote: How about twice the storage capacity and a 1.33 gig processor as opposed to a 1.2? You can order a 12 with a larger hard drive and I don't think that I would notice any difference between 1.2GHz and 1.33Ghz.

screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread VicNaz1
OK, I had a person give me a hard time about a 12 inch LCD screen size and I want to know, do people genuinely have serious complaints about 12 inch screens? I have two units with 12 inch screens, on with a 15 inch, one with a 9.5 inch (my PowerPC PB540c) and even an old black and white PB 170

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Anne Judge
On Jan 1, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Andrew F. wrote: But a 4lb laptop is lighter still. Those who claim it makes no difference, just haven't tried it yet. Thye argument isn't whether there's a difference, but whether it's worth it *to you* - how much you move it around, how much you do with the screen

Ram in a Wallstreet/300 MHz

2005-01-01 Thread PETE
I have 384 built-in-memory in my wallstreet; 128 MB bottom slot and 256 MB top slot. Can I put a 256 MB stick on the bottom slot without problems? TIA, PETE. __ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.

Re: screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread Marcin Wichary
Back to my original question, do people have genuine issues with 12 inch screen size? Of course they do, but people will have issues with basically everything, because computers are used for so many things. If you're an average graphic designer, 12 inches is just too small. The 1024x768

Re: screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread larry Zasitko
I have and still use a 366 graphite iBook and I bought a new PowerBook around 8 months ago 12 with a superdrive and 768meg of ram. I like the size of the PowerBook and really don't have any issues with the smaller screen over the 15. I have used a 17 PowerBook from time to time (brother in

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet/300 MHz

2005-01-01 Thread Seth Austen
On Jan 1, 2005, at 10:22 AM, PETE wrote: I have 384 built-in-memory in my wallstreet; 128 MB bottom slot and 256 MB top slot. Can I put a 256 MB stick on the bottom slot without problems? Yes. Before I parted with mine a couple of years ago I'd installed a total of 512 in it, and it worked quite

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet/300 MHz

2005-01-01 Thread Ken
My Reply follows quote. On 01/01/2005 07:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have 384 built-in-memory in my wallstreet; 128 MB bottom slot and 256 MB top slot. Can I put a 256 MB stick on the bottom slot without problems? TIA, PETE. - Maybe yes, maybe no. I have heard some grumbles with some

Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread James Sanderson
I can second this comment from personal experience. OS X is picky about memory; it doesn't matter the size. I haven't had any issues with OWC memory. On 1 Jan 2005, at 09:47, Ken wrote: Maybe yes, maybe no. I have heard some grumbles with some brands of 256MB DIMMs. Just be sure to get a

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
Bigger hard drive is always easy, and 1.33 vs 1.22GHz should be unnooticeable. My 12 Powerbook 1GHz has 2 2/3 the storage and more speed from the upgrade to an 80GB 5400RPM TravelStar, in an even smaller and lighter package. On 1/1/05 3:35 AM, Tim Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread PETE
How about memory from RamDirect? They're about ten bucks cheaper than OWC. --- James Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can second this comment from personal experience. OS X is picky about memory; it doesn't matter the size. I haven't had any issues with OWC memory. On 1 Jan 2005,

Re: screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
12 was the big-size in 1997, and remains a comfortable size for a laptop screen. 14 or larger is great for extended viewing or poor eyesight. What really matters is resolution, with 1024X768 being the minimum useful resolution today as many websites are simply wider than 800 pixels and

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread James Sanderson
I bought from them for my first BW and had to take out the memory in order to install Panther. Later I purchased a second BW and moved the RamDirect memory to that comp. I tried upgrading and had nothing but difficulty. After two months, I decided to try to upgrade a second time and did it

Re: screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread Clark Martin
At 10:11 AM -0500 1/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I had a person give me a hard time about a 12 inch LCD screen size and I want to know, do people genuinely have serious complaints about 12 inch screens? I have two units with 12 inch screens, on with a 15 inch, one with a 9.5 inch (my

Re: screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread Tim Collier
I'm using a 12 inch iBook (G4) and I love it. I have no difficulty with reading ANYTHING. I use Word and Photoshop on it and it's just fine. Now, some people will complain.but this iBook is fast and very portable. I use it more than my desktop. My wife just replace her old 12 inch

Video problems on WS I

2005-01-01 Thread James Sanderson
I have received a first generation 233 WS and have already begun mapping out the needed improvements to make it worthy of the Wallstreet name. However, I need to know what might be the cause of the video occasionally going blank. It looks like someone just upped the brightness to the extreme

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Bryan Kattwinkel
on 1/1/05 12:46 AM, MTH wrote: unless your eyesight is failing there isn't much advantage to the 14. If you have large or even medium size hands, you might find the 14 more comfortable for typing. -- G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and... Small Dog Electronics

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread PETE
Ha! You do get what you pay for! I guese when I'm ready to buy I'll go with macsales. Pete. --- James Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bought from them for my first BW and had to take out the memory in order to install Panther. Later I purchased a second BW and moved the RamDirect

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
Why would that be, they have THE EXACT SAME KEYBOARD, the 14 just has more wasted space on each side of it. Andrew On 1/1/05 11:25 AM, Bryan Kattwinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 1/1/05 12:46 AM, MTH wrote: unless your eyesight is failing there isn't much advantage to the 14. If you

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Marcin Wichary
Why would that be, they have THE EXACT SAME KEYBOARD, the 14 just has more wasted space on each side of it. From the standpoint of ergonomics, this space is far from being wasted... Marcin Wichary e:\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] w:\ www.aci.com.pl/mwichary Attached w:\ www.aci.com.pl/mwichary/gui

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread Jason Long
Will a 256 RAM Stick out of a BW G3 work in a Wallstreet?? I have one coming in which has 64 MB RAM needing to upgrade it as soon as it gets in. Jason On 1/1/05 1:28 PM, PETE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ha! You do get what you pay for! I guese when I'm ready to buy I'll go with macsales. Pete.

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
How could a one inch slab of plastic alongside the keys be useful. My Pismo and 12 PowerBook have the same keybaord size, and the only ergonomic advantages to the Pismo are that the screen is higher and the text is larger. For touch typing, the 12 PowerBook is actually a far more comfortable

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread John
Jason Long wrote: Will a 256 RAM Stick out of a BW G3 work in a Wallstreet?? I have one coming in which has 64 MB RAM needing to upgrade it as soon as it gets in. Jason Nope. The Wallstreet uses SO-DIMM's, as do the early (Rev A-D) iMacs. They take one low-profile, and one standard (or both

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Marcin Wichary
Hands never rest on the 3/4 strip of plastic on the sides of the keyboard, and that space has no ergonomic benefit. The deeper palmrest may have some benefit, but the difference is very minor. That space has no ergonomic benefit indeed, but the corresponding space on the palmrest has. When you

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Saturday, January 1, 2005, at 06:33 AM, Jason Long wrote: Will a 256 RAM Stick out of a BW G3 work in a Wallstreet?? I have one coming in which has 64 MB RAM needing to upgrade it as soon as it gets in. No. Different kinds of memory entirely. -- Wherever you go, there you are. - B. Banzai,

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Saturday, January 1, 2005, at 10:32 AM, PETE wrote: How about memory from RamDirect? They're about ten bucks cheaper than OWC. --- James Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can second this comment from personal experience. OS X is picky about memory; it doesn't matter the size. I haven't had

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread Ken
My Reply follows quote. On 01/01/2005 05:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Will a 256 RAM Stick out of a BW G3 work in a Wallstreet?? I have one coming in which has 64 MB RAM needing to upgrade it as soon as it gets in. Jason Nope. The Wallstreet takes PC-100 144 pin SO DIMMs while the BW

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
The 15 and 17 PowerBooks are much wider machines than the 12, but the 14 iBook and older 14 PowerBooks are not wide enough to get any benefit. Of course, to be wide enough to give some benefit (15 and 17 PB) makes the machine too wide to be used well as a portable, making it really a portable

Re: screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread Al Poulin
It seems that many of the answers flowing here on this New Year's Day are missing the point of the question. The original poster's father's wife is apparently a middle-aged to older person. But we do not know whether her corrected eyesight is 20/20 or 20/100. Yes, a 12 inch screen may be a

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Marcin Wichary
Speaking of RSI, by the way, your hands shouldn't be touching the palmrest AT ALL, making a wider one of dubious benefit. Well, speaking of RSI, you shouldn't be typing at all, especially on a notebook. :) I have yet to see anyone who actually types WITHOUT their palms touching the palmrest, by

screen sizes vs. reality

2005-01-01 Thread Gary Goldberg
I have a 13.3 Wall Street. Perhaps I'm spoiled by the external 17 monitor I've used the past few years to made surfing and working easier, but when I travel I find the smaller screen size confining and some smaller print on websites harder to read. Best reason for using an external monitor at

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Anne Judge
On Jan 1, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Andrew F. wrote: Hands never rest on the 3/4 strip of plastic on the sides of the keyboard, Not true - I looked as I was reading your post, and that's EXACTLY where my hands were - the weight on the outsides of the palms along the pinky fingers, poised to move

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Kyle Hansen
On 1/1/05 9:29 AM, Andrew F. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spew into the Cybertrough: Bigger hard drive is always easy, and 1.33 vs 1.22GHz should be unnooticeable. My 12 Powerbook 1GHz has 2 2/3 the storage and more speed from the upgrade to an 80GB 5400RPM TravelStar, in an even smaller and lighter

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Brian Rule
I've used laptops larger an more bulky than my 14 on airplanes with no issues, although, airplane use doesn't matter much to me since I don't really travel like that these days. My 14, like i've said, goes nearly everywhere with me, and with no effort. I often hear people complain about how

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Brian Rule
Aren't there apple authorize tech out there that will do it for considerably cheaper? Brian On Jan 1, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote: But if you didn't pay a premium and have Apple do it your warranty is now void. Kyle Hansen -- G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and... Small

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Kyle Hansen
On 1/1/05 1:15 PM, Brian Rule [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spew into the Cybertrough: Aren't there apple authorize tech out there that will do it for considerably cheaper? Nope. All Apple laptop repair that is *in* warranty has to be done at one of 2 service centers. Dallas and Memphis. Memphis

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Brian Rule
That seems a little excessive, don't you think? Brian On Jan 1, 2005, at 3:22 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote: On 1/1/05 1:15 PM, Brian Rule [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spew into the Cybertrough: Aren't there apple authorize tech out there that will do it for considerably cheaper? Nope. All Apple laptop repair that

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Kyle Hansen
On 1/1/05 1:46 PM, Brian Rule [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spew into the Cybertrough: That seems a little excessive, don't you think? Brian I never said that I agreed with their policy... Kyle Hansen -- The best way out is always through. -- Robert Frost -- G-Books is sponsored by

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
My warranty expired three days before I did the upgrade, which I did myself, though it was far from an easy job (as it is on older G3 PowerBooks). Andrew On 1/1/05 1:06 PM, Kyle Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/1/05 9:29 AM, Andrew F. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spew into the Cybertrough:

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Kyle Hansen
On 1/1/05 3:12 PM, Andrew F. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spew into the Cybertrough: My warranty expired three days before I did the upgrade, which I did myself, though it was far from an easy job (as it is on older G3 PowerBooks). Yeah. The 12 books still take me about 20 minutes where a Pismo takes 3.

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
12 PowerBook fits great on my lap. By the way, I am neither lazy nor out of shape, and the extra pound or more of a large laptop DOES make a difference when carried all day. My 12 PB weighs a bit under 2lbs less than my Pismo, and for carrying around town as I go from place to place, in and out

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
Yes, Di-No in Pasadena wanted $80 for the job and are fully Apple authorized. I used to be a tech support trainer (in the PowerBook 5300 days) and am used to taking laptops apart, so I decided to try it myself. As a guy with lots of experience inside modern laptops, the 12 PB was still VERY

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
The flip-up screen on the Pismo is wonderful for tinkering, but the rigid mount keyboard on the aluminum books are just delightful. I don't get why the 12 and even 14 iBooks are so difficult to swap hard drives on though, as they have flip-up KBs like the Pismo and Lombard, I call that poor

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Claire Hart
Personally, I bought my 12 to use as a true portable, a decision I have never regretted, especially when I see people trying to use bigger laptops such as Titanium PowerBooks in crowded airplanes. I actually saw some poor idiot's 17 PowreBook get pushed by a passing flight attendant, the

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Andrew F.
He probably had his drink in the little cup indentation and balanced his PowerBook on the rest of the tray. By the way, I didn't call 17 owners idiots, only one particular guy I saw who made a real mess out of a 2-hour flight. I actually do see rational reasons for buying such machines, graphic

Re: Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread Bob
I have a ton of backlogged list messages to read, I hope I'm not repeating something someone else has already said. The National Enquirer reports at 10:27 PM -0800 12/29/04, Ken wrote: My Reply follows quote. On 29/12/2004 20:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Was wondering about swapping CD and

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread CR
I have 288 installed, though I don't know how it is configured. Is there a way to tell without opening it up. I presume its 256 and 32. Though that seems a little odd. ??? Cliff -- G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread PETE
apple system profiler under apple menu, top left corner on your desktop. --- CR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 288 installed, though I don't know how it is configured. Is there a way to tell without opening it up. I presume its 256 and 32. Though that seems a little odd. ??? Cliff

Re: Video problems on WS I

2005-01-01 Thread Mikael Byström
James Sanderson said: However, I need to know what might be the cause of the video occasionally going blank. It looks like someone just upped the brightness to the extreme and I can't reset it unless I restart. Might it be the PMU? an inverter going out? If it's a 13 and the problem kind

Re: Ram in a Wallstreet/300 MHz

2005-01-01 Thread Mikael Byström
PETE said: I have 384 built-in-memory in my wallstreet; 128 MB bottom slot and 256 MB top slot. Can I put a 256 MB stick on the bottom slot without problems? Yes, but watch out for chip density. Here's a clip from an earlier discussion in the thread Adding RAM to WS II: Nils Said: On Fri, May

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Mikael Byström
Andrew F. said: Of course, to be wide enough to give some benefit (15 and 17 PB) makes the machine too wide to be used well as a portable, making it really a portable desktop. Unless you think portable means moving around while in use I strongly disagree, at least for 15, which I feel is a good

Re: Less is more or Bigger is better

2005-01-01 Thread Mikael Byström
Andrew F. said: By the way, I am neither lazy nor out of shape, and the extra pound or more of a large laptop DOES make a difference when carried all day. Not in a backpack, it doesn't. This is definitively one of the best ways to carry a portable computer around. I don't notice a pound more

Re: Wallstreet

2005-01-01 Thread Ken
My Reply follows quote. On 01/01/2005 18:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Just checked the User Manual. No mention of turning off for Printers. Shut down of sleep for modems. WARNING When connecting SCSI equipment, always turn off power to all devices in the chain, including your computer. If you