Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) > On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:41, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do

Re: Post mortem request for the handling of the Corinthia podling (was Re: FYI, I have subscribed to this list and to your private list)

for committer and/or PMC status and if they were to be granted committer status then the ASF requires they have a ICLA on file Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Milagro into the Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck Rob On 15/12/2015 08:56, "Nick Kew" <n...@apache.org> wrote: >I should like to call a vote to accept Milagro into >the Incubator. The full proposal is available at >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MilagroProposal >as well as below. > &

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

Niall Thanks for digging up the reference I knew INFRA had made the change for a reason but couldn't remember the reasoning Rob On 01/12/2015 16:18, "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@r

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

tc I don't see that the IPMC necessarily needs to continue enforcing the subdomain requirement? Rob On 01/12/2015 07:21, "Sergio Fernández" <sergio.fernan...@redlink.co> wrote: >They used to have a redirects. But you' re right, looks like not >anymore... >So we should ask I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Rob On 24/11/2015 19:32, "Todd Lipcon" <t...@cloudera.com on behalf of t...@apache.org> wrote: >Hi all, > >Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like >to >call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The pro

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) Good luck Rob On 24/11/2015 00:53, "Hyunsik Choi" <hyun...@apache.org> wrote: >Hello folks, > >Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > >I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an >incubation project. > &g

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

outside body like the Incubator mandating one or the other. Clearly during the Incubation phase mentors and interested parties can and will participate in that debate and outline the various arguments as we've been doing here but the ultimate decision should lie with those in the community. Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

the state of the Pull Requests in the project e.g. ./pr-stats apache hadoop Fairly basic tool but should give you enough to gauge where things are Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For addit

Re: IP clearance for properly licensed code

and any external code incorporated into the code base needs to be under Apache compatible licenses and appropriately attributed Rob On 09/11/2015 18:11, "Todd Lipcon" <t...@cloudera.com on behalf of t...@apache.org> wrote: >Hi all, > >Another hopefully simple question: >

Re: CommonsRDF petering out

ng in my Drafts folder on this very note which I really should get around to sending Thanks for reminding me, Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

ake a week or two to get a release approved any day >> >> Now, here's how you can make that dude's life so easy that not voting on >> your release would not make any sense -- automate EVERYTHING that >> can be automated and include the results in your VOTE thread. B

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rya into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 14/09/2015 16:17, "Adam Fuchs" wrote: >Thanks again for the healthy discussion on Rya. With that, I would like to >call a VOTE for accepting Rya as a new incubator project. > >The proposal text is included below, and is posted on the wiki here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Rya Incubator Proposal

at rdf4j.org (though I'll admit to not understanding what I'm supposed to call it anymore either!) Similarly the documentation section mentions papers but doesn't provide links, while both can be found online easily enough it would be nice to add the links in Regards, Rob On 03/09/2015 14:03, "

Re: Shepherd notes for ODF Toolkit

On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > All, > > I'm adding some shepherd notes for ODF Toolkit. I think my main concern is > lack of mentor participation on the project. Rob Weir (I swear every time > I type his name I type the d) ha

Re: ODF Toolkit may need help

eit small) community. They would probably just set up on github and continue with the same pace of activity, with a lighterweight process, outside of Apache. So, personally, I don't think the Attic would be the death of the ODF Toolkit. Regards, -Rob -

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

them that and there are other precedents for that (e.g. Apache Commons) Rob On 11/08/2015 18:03, Chris Nauroth cnaur...@hortonworks.com wrote: One thing to consider is that release version numbers are tied to specific JIRA projects. If the intention is for Apex and Malhar version numbers

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Ignite from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Rob On 28/07/2015 21:03, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Following discussions [1],[2] about its current status, the Ignite community has voted [3] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [4] with 14 (non-binding) +1s: 1. Yakov Zhdanov (PPMC) 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

making a new major release and don't need to provide backwards compatibility we are finally updating package names to be org.apache.jena based Rob On 22/07/2015 15:21, Cédric Champeau cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote: * renaming of packages from brooklyn.* to org.apache.brooklyn

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

repository services then clearly there is a danger of confusion as to the source of the package(s). Rob Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

there on an external hosting service that is widely accessible seems to go against the spirit (and likely the letter) of the policy Rob In today's day and age, producing Docker-like thingys is akin to producing RPMs. I won't go into why I think the centralized Docker Hub is a huge mistake - it's simply how

Re: Serveral legal question about donating project to Apache?

are not necessarily just code), through Clause 2 Grant of Copyright License of the Apache License 2.0 the contributors grant a copyright license to all downstream users of the code: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#copyright Hope this helps, Rob Thanks in advance. Longda

Can we teach brand management/vendor neutrality better?

but I'd love to know if people have any ideas of how we could do this better? Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Question about Apache's voting procedures

terms for this in Clause 2 Essentially in non-lawyer speak: - Contributors retain the copyright to their contribution - Contributors grant a copyright license to all downstream users of their contributions that permits redistribution, modification, sub licensing etc Rob All the best, Stefan

Re: Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

as part of the core? Is this not favouring one vendor over another? If Neo4j provides the implementation they can do so under whatever license terms they prefer and Apache Tinkerpop does not have to worry about this Rob

Re: [VOTE] Accept Geode into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Rob On 19/04/2015 22:46, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/Oxt I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Rob On 19/03/2015 08:20, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: +1 non-binding 2015-03-19 9:07 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 Le 19 mars 2015 09:07, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com a écrit : +1 non-binding On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:25 PM

Re: [VOTE] Accept CommonsRDF into the Apache Incubator

+1 Rob On 27/02/2015 19:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi general@, Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Rob On 22/02/2015 05:34, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

to) and thus would only want to be a mentor. As you said this would probably be a relatively easy mentoring gig with most of the effort being around just keeping an eye on the community to sign off and comment on reports and to review release as and when they come around. Rob On 10/02/2015 20:31

Re: Draft Report February 2015 - please review

as a veto and you need to go back to the drawing board and/or discuss further until their concerns are addressed and the -1 is withdrawn http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification If your community is small then hopefully it should be easy to reach a consensus Rob On 10/02/2015

Re: CCLA's and SGA's

originally developed then in one previous case I've seen it be agreed that an SGA was unnecessary. For example see this legal-discuss thread: http://s.apache.org/YPe Rob On 08/02/2015 18:10, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org

Re: Podling Name Searches

case? Rob On 25/01/2015 06:45, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 25.01.2015 14:08, John D. Ament wrote: All, If a podling had its name and codebase donated from a company, which had already secured rights to the name, The term secured rights is a bit misleading. Even if they have

When is an ICLA needed?

that there are several people who've made considerable sustained contributions which in any other ASF project I've been involved in would have earned them sufficient merit to be offered at least committership (if not PMC membership) by now. Regards, Rob

Re: Incubating with Apache Commons as champion?

module that will remain stable what does it gain (other than brand association) by coming to the ASF? Rob On 20/01/2015 14:28, Stian Soiland-Reyes st...@apache.org wrote: The discussion on dev@commons about coming-to-Apache Commons-RDF (https://github.com/commons-rdf/commons-rdf/) seems

Re: Incubating with Apache Commons as champion?

that the project they are charged with managing does not stagnate. It's worth remembering that the Incubator itself does not provide much in the way of help in terms of growing communities since that is something that really only the incubating projects themselves can do. Rob On 20/01/2015 16:04

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

users to the new infrastructure by giving them plenty of notice and information about what was happening and this didn't require huge amounts of effort on our part. Rob On 18/12/2014 16:36, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote: On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

, and people who know the standards in depth. That sounds about right. I think that attracting more users of the code could help with this as well. Regards, -Rob . . . The project is aware that this is work in progress and there is special

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

to help bootstrap the community? Rob On 15/07/2014 03:16, Selvamohan Neethiraj sneethi...@hortonworks.com wrote: Apache Argus Proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal) == Abstract == Argus is a framework to enable, monitor and manage comprehensive data security across the Hadoop

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria

for and may indeed have legal implications for the ASF Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Wiki Access

able to fill in the Apache ODF Toolkit project podling report? Anyone? Thanks! -Rob Thanks, Svante 1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2014 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

://markmail.org/message/yuentl3tzc3o3i3v Regards, -Rob Only there was a release announcement about 3 weeks ago for 0.6.1-incubating: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201406.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogYbfCPx%2B7cfp6GEM%2BkOXa-xeT3rE6cdqnc7NzNjNmSkQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E Nick

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria

similar to those I listed above. But such exceptions should be rare. Regards, -Rob Upayavira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: No other votes were received so the release is approved. Congratulations, and many thanks to the Apache ODF Toolkit podling for sticking it out

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] IP Clearance for Apache Jena Hadoop RDF Tools donation from Cray

With no objections the vote passes by lazy consensus Thanks, Rob On 22/05/2014 12:12, Rob Vesse rve...@dotnetrdf.org wrote: Cray is proposing to donate a set of libraries called Hadoop RDF Tools to the Apache Jena project - the details of the code base can be viewed at https

[VOTE] IP Clearance for Apache Jena Hadoop RDF Tools donation from Cray

applies. If no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes. Thanks, Rob

[VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

RC4 for the ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~robweir/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating-RC4/

[Proposal] Add me as Mentor for ODF Toolkit Podling

unable to move forward, since that requires Mentor sign off on the release manifest/checklist. I am able and willing to help here. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

[VOTE][RESULTS] Pre-clear ODF Toolkit Podling to use Alternate Release Voting Process

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: The process is described here: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Please vote: [ ] +1 Yes, to pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the Alternate Release Voting Process [ ] -1

[VOTE] Pre-clear ODF Toolkit Podling to use Alternate Release Voting Process

Voting Process This majority vote will run for 72 hours. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Is a Software Grant Agreement always needed for IP Clearance?

sufficient? Thanks, Rob Vesse

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache ODF Release situation

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: I'll upgrade my vote to +1 (binding) That gives us two +1's from the IPMC. Need one more to release. I realize many are busy (including me

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for a Black Duck POC

with it I would be willing to help out with a POC Cheers, Rob On 31/03/2014 01:52, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! a few recent discussions around IP management in the Incubator have lead to an interesting dialogue between the fine folks from Black Duck Software and yours truly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E We're now looking

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

! -Rob Regards, Dave On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rob, the result Vote within PPMC [1] did not indicate mentor Vote. Is there any mentor Vote in favor within ODF dev list Vote thread

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rob, the result Vote within PPMC [1] did not indicate mentor Vote. Is there any mentor Vote in favor within ODF dev list Vote thread? No, there were no votes from mentors. That's one of our problems, lack

[VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E We're now looking for review and approval by the IPMC. Regards, -Rob

Re: Github pull request hooks

personal profile I had to add my Apache email as an email address to my GitHub profile Rob On 10/02/2014 15:03, Sergio Fernández sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote: BTW, where is the mapping file between asf ids and github ones? I've seen some members of the apache organization

Re: Instead of a Bill how about a Booklet? (was Re: [DISCUSS] PodlingBillOfRights)

arrive in the middle of the night for the recipient(s) so be prepared to wait for a response. I think those of us who work in the US or for multi-national companies get used to dealing with timezones and tend to forget that a lot of people come from countries where there is only one timezone. Rob

Incubator Write Access

Could someone please grant me write access to the Incubator wiki My username is RobVesse Thanks, Rob

Re: Instead of a Bill how about a Booklet? (was Re: [DISCUSS] PodlingBillOfRights)

discussing here Rob On 6/20/13 12:22 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: 11. In certain circumstances, there are specific people charged with certain responsibilities. Over time you can expect to learn who they are, and where they hang out. Your mentor should be able to guide you while you do

Re: [PROPOSAL] OData Proposal for Incubator

alternative to the MS/Oasis OData standard. Rob On 6/17/13 8:35 AM, Klevenz, Stephan stephan.klev...@sap.com wrote: Dear ASF members, We would like to propose the OData project to the Incubator. The OData Proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal We welcome your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC5)

-list again but only on the incubator list? Maybe have the votes in parallel, at the same time? -Rob Thanks Florian -- Florian Hopf Freelance Software Developer http://blog.florian-hopf.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC4)

/incubator/odf/tags/0.6-** incubating-rc4/CHANGES.txthttps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.6-incubating-rc4/CHANGES.txt Where is the SVN/GIT tag? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.6-incubating-rc4/ -Rob The source code repo is needed to check provenance

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release

not happen by accident. This was a design goal. In any case, I think it is deserving of more recognition at Apache that ecosystems do not always require compiled code and core code modifications to exist, and there are indeed real users in this ecosystem who thrive on such extensions. Regards, -Rob

Re: Preparing for the October reports

activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new mentors for the project? An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome. Regards, -Rob BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: Preparing for the October reports

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off

Re: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache OpenOffice PMC

their identity, in their iCLA [1]. But the form also allows them (optionally) to indicate an additional public name, essentially a pseudonym they use on the mailing lists, etc. -Rob [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt Regards, Dave Begin forwarded message: From: Andrew Rist

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

websites 4) accompanied by PGP/GPG detached signatures ...what additional liability do we believe comes from the technological change from one signature mechanism to another? Or specifically, what liability is added that is not already explicitly disclaimed by ALv2? -Rob

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:56 AM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 08/27/2012 08:43:35 AM: From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com To: general@incubator.apache.org, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org, Cc: ooo

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

for their success. It must happen with an old, and with a new, community working together. Again, look at the discussions on infra-dev. Your constructive input is most welcome on those threads. Ditto for any one else. -Rob Cheers, -g

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue. On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 26.08.2012 13:15, Tim Williams wrote: Marvin gave the link earlier in this thread. 4th para is the relevant bit. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what The relevant part is in the last paragraph. However, that says

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Aug 26, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: AOO doesn't need to change anything to their current release processes other than to stop pointing source downloads at svn (which is the sole reason I won't vote for AOO

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Or if someone who cared sufficiently about this policy area took ownership and proposed a wording of the policy, either as a Board resolution

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: snip I can give the IPMC a hand here, if my point is too obscure. A policy might look like this: Resolved: An Apache project's release consists

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

opinions. But opinions, even widely held opinions, even Roy opinions, are not the same as policy. -Rob OTOH I don't think anybody said the ASF will never allow projects to distribute binaries - but people who want to do that need to get together (*) and come up with a proposal that's compatible

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Returning to this topic after an intermission... On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

solely in compliance with license policies defined by Apache Legal Affairs. Additionally the non-source artifacts (or the PMC) must and must not _. Fill in the blanks, get approval via normal procedures, and you have something resembling a policy. Regards, -Rob

[VOTE][RESULTS] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

The community vote has passed. Vote reference: http://s.apache.org/5GA +1 RGB-ES Rory O'Farrell Carl Marcum Reizinger Zoltan Keith N. McKenna Kay Schenk Roberto Galoppini Imacat Andrea Pescetti Regina Henschel Graham Lauder Jürgen Lange T.J. Frazier Rob Weir Dave Fisher Peter Junge Christian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

in via the Oracle SGA. We'll fix in the trunk. Regards, -Rob For example: module_name/unxmacxi.pro/... The ant script that package the src release takes care of the output directories and exclude them. In this case the by mistake checked in jars are packed as well. This have to be fixed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

the groups, and across the groups, on which was correct. -Rob Just trying to help here, so no flak my way please :-) BTW, I think AOO is doing an amazing job. I was not optimistic when the project came to Apache, and I'm amazed you are where you are now. Keep up the good work. --Thilo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote: On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote: On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote: I think

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

, if we do this we'll never find pre-existing errors, and it is clear now that they can exist as well. What's the old saying? Every new class of users finds a new class of bugs. Regards, -Rob incompatible with our licensing end up in a distribution, that has the potential to affect _rights_

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our willingness/readiness

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

code because the binary is not open source and cannot be verified to be safe for release (even if it was derived from open source). Again, most would disagree with the assertion that binaries are not open source. Regards, -Rob I thought that was frigging obvious. Why do I need

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the optional

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

. It is a distinction without a difference, or at least not one that has been stated, -Rob There has been disagreement about whether binaries should be official or not. To the best of my knowledge, every time the matter has come up, the debate has been resolved with a compromise: that while binary releases

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

investment into the ecosyste, Regards, -Rob Regards, -Rob Cheers, -g On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

known brand now, it would be hard to believe that if AOO did not release binaries the void would not be filled by others. Indeed. Also, if we didn't release source either then someone else would fill the void, probably Microsoft. -Rob //drew ps - sorry if this double posts

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: ... I would also state that continuing to argue is symptomatic of a failure to understand

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: ... I would also state

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

that their servers were compromised due to a security flaw in the Apache source? In theory source code can be inspected. In practice, stuff happens. Ditto for binaries. -Rob That is the first and hardest issue about having the ASF provide authenticated binaries. Cheers, -g

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

that distinguishes their binaries as different from ours in status? I'm honestly trying to find out what, if anything, we need to change. Or whether we're just arguing semantics rather than code and bits. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

-- Forwarded message -- From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:52 AM Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the optional, but recommended

Re: References to Apache OpenOffice

results for Google+ and other places that do bring the blog title along, ending up with something like 5 Million Downloads of Apache OpenOffice (incubating) : Apache OpenOffice (incubating) which looks sloppy. -Rob //drew

Re: References to Apache OpenOffice

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote: Nor what

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 3.4 Released

The Apache OpenOffice Podling Project Management Committee is pleased to announce the release of Apache OpenOffice 3.4, available on Windows, MacOS and Linux. Downloads are available at: http://download.openoffice.org The full release announcement can be read here:

Re: Legal question about (re)licensing

. In the end, I'll take diligence over negligence any day. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Extraordinary OpenOffice security patch (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of April2012 by robweir)

in the wiki proposal for podlings that expect to take more than 3 or 4 months to get to their first release. Regards, -Rob BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

  1   2   >