On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi Kevan,
Responses below:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the license for the file: doc/thrift.tex?
This was contributed by Facebook, and thus falls under the
+1
...ant
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-beta2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable,
A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1]
Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended
to graduate to Apache Commons and replace the existing Validator 1.x
component as a new 2.0 codebase, from the discussion on commons-dev
everyone seems fine
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org wrote:
The log4php PPMC vote was opened on log4php-dev at Nov 27, 2009 and closed at
Dec 4, 2009. Binding +1 votes were received from Christian Grobmeier,
Christian Hammers and Curt Arnold. No other votes were received.
The
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually
I'm not sure I've ever seen PPMC members listed anywhere, the only way
i've found them is from the subscribers to the poddlings private list.
...ant
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
ping? anyone know the answer?
I can't find the file referenced, nor can I
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in
+1
...ant
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
reto.bachm...@trialox.org wrote:
Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache
Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and
as a wiki page at
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 07:16 +, ant elder wrote:
so about 6 months ago to try to help with problems they were having,
and since then 99% of the commits have been made by only two people.
I assume you're referring
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
So about 40% of the committed code is coming from others and reviewed
by others - great - why not make some of those others committers?
It's a long
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and how
they use RTC.
This appears to be where it came from:
http://markmail.org/message/d45dmasuwnda25wd
so about 6 months ago to try to help with
I agree with that. And before graduation I think it might be worth
trying to get CTR used more, they do seem open this -
http://markmail.org/message/i255ekzxpuesow44
...ant
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Not a strong opinion, but I think that RTC hampers
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello IPMC,
The Subversion podling would like a waiver of the requirement to make
a release before graduation.
As we understand this requirement, it is present in order to
demonstrate to the podling how releases are made at
Looks good to me +1
...ant
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo nlgal...@us.ibm.comwrote:
Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated.
In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink
community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just
WebSphere - REST WebServices Development
nlgal...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
[image: Inactive hide details for ant elder ---11/09/2009 08:43:50
AM---Looks good to me +1]ant elder ---11/09/2009 08:43:50 AM---Looks good
to me +1
*ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
+1, sounds really interesting, I'd be happy to be a mentor too if you
need another.
...ant
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
This looks interesting, I'd be happy to help Mentor and have already put my
name down.
Gav...
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk bryant@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Leo,
Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
+1. Congrats on 1.0.
Note the key used to sign the artifacts is not published to a public
key server so you may want to do that before the artifacts go live.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#public-key-not-found
...ant
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
+1
...ant
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:33 AM, George Aroush geo...@aroush.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
On behalf of Lucene.Net mentor, committers and community, this is a vote
call to graduate the Lucene.Net project
(http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/) as a sub-project under Apache
Lucene.
+1
...ant
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jukka! Can someone else please have a look? -- we're still one vote
shy.
-T
Is this still waiting for a vote? If so i can go take a look.
...ant
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:26 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/09/2009, Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de wrote:
Hi,
The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of PDFBox.
The release
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:41 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jukka! Can someone else please have a look? -- we're still one vote
shy.
-T
Is this still waiting for a vote? If so i can go take a look
+1
...ant
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Leo Simonsm...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Todd Volkerttvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The LICENSE file does not contain the full CCA LICENSE for the Silk
icons; see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode for
the full
As you're respining there is still a problem with missing DISCLAIMER
files that should be fixed too. There is now a DISCLAIMER file in the
distributions but it needs to be included in the maven artifacts as
well - ie all the jars in the staging repository.
...ant
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:00
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:32 AM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Niall
Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
If there are improvements that can be made to policy/docs then great,
but complaining about feedback rather than appreciating that someone
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Noel J. Bergmann...@devtech.com wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
ant elder wrote:
- make complying with best practices a graduation requirement not a
release requirement
This sounds silly as complying with best practices is neither a graduation
requirement
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Marcel
Offermansmarcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:12 , ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I agree with Bill that it's a good thing for the Incubator to clarify
best
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Niall
Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ted Leungtwle...@sauria.com
What do people think about changing the poddling release voting
process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the
poddlings dev list instead of the dual voting we have now with a
poddling dev list vote followed by an general@ vote? This would be
similar to the changes done recently
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:40 AM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri 21 Aug 2009 14:58, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people think about changing the poddling release voting
process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the
poddlings dev list instead
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:40 PM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri 21 Aug 2009 14:58, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people think about changing the poddling release voting
process so
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
AIUI, all proposed releases must be voted on by the IPMC, not just by
the podlings.
And they still would be as the only binding votes are from IPMC
members, and thats just the same as the situation with the poddling
new
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Rainer Döbeledoeb...@esteam.de wrote:
I agree with Martijn's view on the first release of a podling which is much
more critical than subsequent releases.
But for subsequent releases the voting process should be simplified in one
way or the other. At the
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:02 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org wrote:
My concern is more that of 'complacent mentors'... How many people
vote +1 even if they have not scrutinized the release requirements?
IMHO, too
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Snitkovsky,
Martinmartin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1
The voting mail thread can be viewed at: http://tiny.cc/es4Zu
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 2:32:39 AM
Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
Several improvements have been
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ted Leung twle...@sauria.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:34:50 PM
Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
On Aug 19, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Joe
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ted Leungtwle...@sauria.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2009, at 10:01 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Exactly. The incubator enforces Best Practices even when these are poorly
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Ralph Goersralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:00:00 PM
Subject: Re:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The vote is now closed with the following results:
* +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
* 0 votes: 0
* -1 votes: 0
The vote passes.
I wish
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The vote is now closed with the following results
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 18, 2009, at 8:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
For the recent LICENSE and NOTICE file issues the current policy
allows for the different approaches, different TLPs use different
approaches, there's not been
: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
- Original Message
From: ant elder
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
You can put all the licenses or references to the licences in the
LICENSE file.
AIUI this is only best practice, not normative. every third party
library MUST have a license but including them next to
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all 3rd party code
included in the propose release.
no - just require 3rd party attribution notices and relocated
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Evanseev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the Thrift release
legal issues thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
I disagree. It must be possible to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com
wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com
wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009
+1
...ant
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
[X ] +1, go ahead and mothball/pause Lokahi,
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Snitkovsky,
Martinmartin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community has started the voting to release Wink 0.1.
The voting mail thread can be viewed at
For the record, I'm -1, i'd like to see a bit more diversity of the
active committers to show this is operating as an Apache project
should.
...ant
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Niclas Hedhmannic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Gang,
Apache Pivot is one of the fastest moving codebases at Apache,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
I would suggest that anyone wishing to vote -1 on the graduation of a
podling on grounds of diversity of code commits needs to back it up
with documented evidence that either a) the committers are not
listening to the
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Martijn
Dashorstmartijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
2009/8/3 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
[x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
I'm not seeing sufficient
All poddling committers should have write access to the
people.apache.org repository at
/x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository, so just copy
the release artifacts there. These days though Incubator poddlings can
also use the Maven central repository instead of the Incubator
+1
...ant
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Eric Evanseev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.3.0 RC3 as 0.3.0-final.
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
The Cassandra Project is
Ok Torsten I can take your place as i've already been helping out there a bit.
...ant
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Torsten Curdttcu...@apache.org wrote:
No reaction at all?
Someone free to step up?
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:49, Torsten Curdttcu...@apache.org wrote:
Hey folks,
I
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The Cassandra developers have approved the release of 0.3.0-rc3 as
0.3.0-final.
Proposal:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Vinayak Borkarvbo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache VXQuery,
a Java based XQuery processor, for a vote
The full proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/VXQueryProposal
+1 to release. I've just had a look and this looks ok to me, even with
those few generated files getting included in the distro i think its
ok to release this as-is. One comment inline below...
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Ian Bostoni...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
This vote has been in progress
+1
...ant
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
I think the vote is still up...
@Incubator folks: please review the bit. Kevan and I already voted +1 ...
-M
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Now,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Additional concern, it does not appear that the mentors are planning to
be on the PMC. Why not?
Why is this a concern? Mentors volunteer to do mentoring to ensure the
project is viable and understands the Apache
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, putting a file in a publicly accessible SVN
repository is considered as distribution too.
No, I am very positive that this is not the
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:59 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
As far
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, it occurs to me that since the distribution archives don't
have the offending code, we should be able to release 1.1 as packaged
(pending the vote), and if legal-discuss says that we need to remove
that stuff
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
The following podlings should report today on their status, but have
yet to write up their report [1]:
Bluesky
Cassandra
Empire-db
Imperius
JSPWiki
Kato
Ki
Lucene.Net
Olio
RCF
Stonehenge
Tashi
+1
...ant
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:54 PM, James Dixson dixs...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are new package versions for apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating. A
DISCLAIMER.txt is now included...
From the original vote request...
Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:54 AM, James Dixson dixs...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating.
With this release we have updated all of the licensing/headers for the
project to meet Apache standards, fixed a few
, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:06 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:54 AM, James Dixson dixs...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating.
With this release we have updated all of the licensing
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Steve Poole spoole...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
Since KATO was accepted into Incubator in November, there were some of
the
usual requests for stuff to be set up by INFRA.
On 3rd
+1
...ant
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt
that the
Qpid project should increase its
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose Stonehenge as an incubator proposal.
Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
Architecture that spans languages and platforms and demonstrates best
practise and
This vote has been open for a week now so I'm going to call it PASSED with
19 +1s and no other votes.
Votes from the following, binding ones marked with a *:
Carmine Cristallo
Konstantin Bobrovsky
*Ant Elder
*Geir Magnusson Jr.
*Niclas Hedhman
Niklas Gustavsson
*Matthias Wessendorf
Christian
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
The Kato proposal has been out for discussion for a few weeks now,
please vote on accepting the Kato project
to be a mentor.
Ant Elder
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Steve Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A couple of weeks ago I posted the existence of a draft proposal for a new
project.
(For those of you who missed it it's here -
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KatoProposal)
I've only had one comment so far, so I'm
+1
...ant
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
The Tika community has voted [1] to request and the Lucene PMC has
accepted [2] graduating Apache Tika to a Lucene subproject. As
described in in the graduation guide [3], I now ask the Incubator PMC
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Steve Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A couple of weeks ago I posted the existence of a draft proposal for a new
project.
(For those of you who missed it it's here -
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KatoProposal)
I've only had one comment so far, so I'm
+1
...ant
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation.
The proposal can be found at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal
The text of the proposal
= Droids, an intelligent standalone robot
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Jörg Reiher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
the community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating
and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like
to request the
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:23 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
+1
though i do think for the next release all those separate licenses in the
top level folder should be merged into the single LICENSE
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The current tally is extremely close (9 +1 vs. 8 -1 binding)
I don't want to close an issue with such a small margin.
I suggest that we should not change policy
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Aidan Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for checking these.
There should be a KEYS file high up in your directory structure. I didn't
look too hard for it elsewhere, but just
+1
...ant
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since wiki pages can change, the full text of the proposal needs to be
in the vote thread.
Here is the text of the proposal:
== Abstract ==
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
CouchDB's current notice file looks like:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE
This matches Apache httpd's NOTICE file:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE
So
Looks good to me now, +1.
One more suggestion for next time is it would be nice to add a sentence to
the top of the release notes saying what Pig does and to include the release
notes within the distribution.
...ant
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes.
...ant
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:25:55AM +0100, ant elder wrote:
The rest of the release looks fine to me too, so +1.
Binding?
--
Noah Slater,
http://people.apache.org/~nslater/http://people.apache.org
Replies inline.
...ant
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now
like to
request the approval of the Incubator PMC to make the release.
+1
the entire process?
Thanks,
Olga
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *ant
elder
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:32 PM
*To:* Olga Natkovich
*Cc:* general@incubator.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig 0.1.0-incubating. We had 4
+1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes. (Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
.
The artifacts are available at
+1 to apply the patch.
...ant
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
broken links.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
Please vote on
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jörn Kottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but i've noticed another potential issue in
CasEditor-linux.gtk.x86-2.2.2-incubating.zip which i'll mention in case
others object - there are some licenses in the top level LICENSE file and
some other licenses in the
+1
A few comments for next time:
- Would be good to have a RELEASE_NOTES file in the distributions as there
is nothing included which says what Sanselan does or whats new in this
release
- The Apache licence header is missing from the assembly bin.xml and src.xml
in the src distribution
- Its
+1,
but i've noticed another potential issue in
CasEditor-linux.gtk.x86-2.2.2-incubating.zip which i'll mention in case
others object - there are some licenses in the top level LICENSE file and
some other licenses in the about_files folder that are not mentioned in the
top LICENSE file. I guess
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Assaf Arkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:18 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks ok to me so +1.
Would be helpful to include a RAT report with the request, but I ran it
myself and it didn't highlight any issues
301 - 400 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
