Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
case that has been proven not happening in our world. Especially since we were the first (and not even with ruby-ng, the syntax has been the same for years, starting with ruby16). -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
. And the Ruby syntax has been devised to suit the _installed commands_ for the most part: ruby18 and ruby19 are _the commands you run_. We're not going to change it just because. So stop trying to use us as an example. Thank you very much, -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
because. So, once again, please leave us alone. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS

2012-11-26 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
. There are a lot of package names not matching a command name and it's not a problem either. It is a problem if that means having to change hundres of packages, three eclasses, and every developer's configuration. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat

2012-11-26 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass add USE=examples doc

2012-11-27 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass add USE=examples doc

2012-11-27 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
to build. We have INSTALL_MASK and FEATURES=nodoc if you don't want the documentation, after all. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some packages up for grabs

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
This one I'll take care of (I'm already in metadata). -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
-- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
a scenario that you find yourself into often .. you should consider changing habits.. drastically. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
USE=-minimal to USE=-server means that _you're losing your server_. Robin, how would you feel about that? It would also solve the issue of USE=cxx depending on USE=!minimal right now (for not really any good reason). -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
sure it's blank, because people point them at their groin and shoot. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
are a pain for maintainers and users alike. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
sysadmin that thinks he can run Gentoo in production and can't even see what the updates are. So please drop it. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
crashing, and requiring manual intervention to get rid of the new libraries and downgrade? Of course it's not my call, but my suggestion is forget about split packages. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
can repeat it 20 times and waste our time 20 times, or you can get the clue, and see if someone else agrees with your or not. The only thing that bothers me right now is that I'm not allowed to just plonkfile you, but I'm very tempted to. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
it would be a revision bump — and that should still give us time enough for this to hit before LibreOffice. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Proxy maintainers in metadata.xml (was Re: [gentoo-dev] introduce a soft-limit policy for changing other developers ebuilds)

2012-12-04 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
on this it would benefit everyone. Or maybe we can just agree that common sense rules all, and we always set the proxied maintainer as assignee, and the proxy maintainer as CC.. because, you know, that's the only way a proxy maintainer can close/change a bug at all. -- Diego Elio Pettenò

Re: Proxy maintainers in metadata.xml (was Re: [gentoo-dev] introduce a soft-limit policy for changing other developers ebuilds)

2012-12-04 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
is not developer - this would never confuse scripts for automated bug filing Yes if you notice I usually go around changing the order if I find the order not matching the instruction, as the output of Portage, and thus my script, use the first as assignee and the rest as CC. -- Diego Elio Pettenò

Re: [gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

2012-12-07 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
it ;) Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.orgwrote: # Tomáš Chvátal scarabeus@ (04 Nov 2012) # Masked for testing with gcc-4.7 and to verify reverse deps dev-libs/icu-49.9.1 I

Re: [gentoo-dev] borked release media

2012-12-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
are using, right? I wouldn't say we have any problem with that. Fabio already got Sabayon to support the shim. The only problem is that we'd have to provide a shim binary that _is_ signed, rather than building it from source, but I don't see it as a mayor problem myself. -- Diego Elio Pettenò

Re: [gentoo-dev] borked release media

2012-12-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
, this looks like it's going to be a world full of pain. Again I don't think we have to go there. Also the title of the threads is now completely misleading so let's stop here, k? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 12/12/2012 19:07, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: It would be preferred to move that package in tree though. I don't like it. Please use an overlay to test this kind of stuff, thanks. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
uses default cflags? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
there. Although I'm more for /var/cache/portage myself, as both distfiles and tree can be re-generated. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 17/12/2012 11:33, Sven Eden wrote: on my system I have set up everything with splitdebug enabled. My CFLAGS use - march=native, -O2 and -ggdb. That's -ggdb that increases the size. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
cataylist. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
to make USE=debug provide debug information rather than debug codepaths. Also the culprit is again -ggdb rather than -g. Which makes now interesting for somebody to test what webkit-gtk requires, memory-wise, with just -g rather than -ggdb. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
would still think they are cache. I can re-download Oracle's JRE binaries; Portage's copy is a cache because I don't need to back it up. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
it to the user. And yes I also agree that -ggdb makes more sense. I'll write something about it later on I guess. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 17/12/2012 13:42, Ulrich Mueller wrote: If we change the location, can we then move distfiles to some place outside of the tree? Something like: /var/cache/portage /var/cache/distfiles What I do on my systems is /var/cache/portage/tree /var/cache/portage/distfiles -- Diego Elio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
upstreams doesn't distribute them anymore at all. In which case you should keep them somewhere safer anyway, which is what I do for that kind of files. Remember that eclean acts on distfiles as well. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
into the rootfs for the laptops. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
the syncing/handling is done is a nightmare. If we conflate the issue, we can stop discussing as we're never ever going to go anywhere. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
leave it at that. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
... Any other suggestions on where to place it? And please don't say /var/lib because that would usually be backed up. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
just like NIH, seriously. Somebody already proposed /var/db — that probably makes more sense if you want to go that route, although I wouldn't put distfiles or packages there. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-18 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
No /var/gentoo. No /var/repositories. /var/db/gentoo, /var/db/repositories, /var/cache/portage ... as long as Zac is fine with one whatever, but let's not invent any new top-level. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-19 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
properly instead of how it looks cooler. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-19 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 19/12/2012 14:03, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: But, anyway, I think, /var/repositories/gentoo is very very nice idea ;) I'm going to repeat myself until this is shot down entirely. We're not going to create a new top-level directory in /var. Get over it. Stop. -- Diego Elio Pettenò

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-19 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
allocation requirements for the tree compared to distfiles, and I guess that if we put the tree there we could gain something even for /var/db/pkg by splitting it. Tree hierarchies are there to make things more easily organized, not just to look nice. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-19 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
a single rsync source and tar it up from there. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-19 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 19/12/2012 16:54, Brian Dolbec wrote: And YES Diego, it won't be /var/portage or /var/repositories, we heard you. Thanks, it's appreciated :) -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-20 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 20/12/2012 17:16, Michael Mol wrote: /var/cache/portage/distfiles /var/cache/portage/repositories/gentoo /var/cache/portage/repositories/{sunrise,kde,gnome,whatever,layman,grabs} /var/db/portage/repositories/{non-cache,repo,names,go,here} +1 -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping licenses around

2012-12-20 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
in say /var/lib/licenses or similar? Why not in their own /var/db/pkg then? And +1 on this, it's something I was wondering myself some time ago. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Time based retirements

2012-12-21 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
this usually ends up being quite simple. I get to speak about that as somebody who retired, and was then re-instated. Going through the cycles was less bothersome than just growing the motivation to get back to Gentoo, so I can't see the point. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

2012-12-23 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
documentation on where to find the upstream documentation? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories?

2012-12-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 24/12/2012 10:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote: /var/cache/packages/ PKGDIR Maybe /var/spool/binpkgs ? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories?

2012-12-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 24/12/2012 14:32, Ulrich Mueller wrote: This doesn't look right to me. /var/spool contains things like printer queues or outgoing mail that are typically deleted after processing. Not sure how /var/cache fits for binpkgs though, tbh. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is /var/cache the right place for repositories?

2012-12-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
not get on with /srv right now please. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] gen_usr_ldscript --libdir=/lib

2012-12-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 24/12/2012 20:08, Mike Frysinger wrote: i.e. saying we should get rid of gen_usr_ldscript and use --libdir=/lib makes absolutely no sense. it's just begging for people to screw things up constantly and waste developer time for 0 gain. Amen. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin, net-dialup/misdn, net-dialup/misdnuser, net-misc/asterisk-chan_misdn, www-apache/mod_authn_pam, www-apache/mo

2012-12-26 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
with the new API. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: Gentoo and Github (Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...) )

2012-12-29 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
We are. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Brian Dolbec dol

Re: [gentoo-dev] Local bindist descriptions

2012-12-30 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 30/12/2012 04:03, Mike Gilbert wrote: That would be much more effective than a policy that may be (accidentally) ignored. +1 -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.17: nscd is optional

2012-12-30 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
need to know to start it up anyway, so it should be fine with a default-off. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Local bindist descriptions

2012-12-31 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
. It's not patent-encumbered being the keyword, but the license incompatibility. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] What did we achieve in 2012? What are our resolutions for 2013?

2012-12-31 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 31/12/2012 15:17, Ben de Groot wrote: Looking back at 2012, I wonder what we consider our achievements for this past year. What is the state of Gentoo? How have we brought it forward and improved it this past year? Have we? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge --depclean vs missing IUSE in older ebuild.. what exactly is right?

2012-12-31 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
It doesn't — I guess gdm should have used [consolekit?,systemd(-)?]. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Leho Kraav l...@kraav.com wrote: Hi all Just bumped into something I haven't encountered before. Running

Re: [gentoo-dev] What did we achieve in 2012? What are our resolutions for 2013?

2012-12-31 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 31/12/2012 17:22, Roy Bamford wrote: I'm older and more cynical than most on this list. In my mind, improvement means change but change is not always improvement. Thank you. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] [brainstorm] dev-lang internal package managers and portage

2013-01-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
If it was something feasible to do, it would have been done already. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov m...@mva.namewrote: Hi there! Long time ago I discovered that many language

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

2013-01-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
the glibc-2.17 one.) -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [brainstorm] dev-lang internal package managers and portage

2013-01-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Rails into account, as right now it doesn't. I know because it was trying to get an ebuild for Typo that I came to install my own blog (instead of using Gentoo Infra's b2evo) and thus create the monstrosity that you all know nowadays. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2

2013-01-03 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
? :) -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with optional test dependencies

2013-01-06 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Go for a. The widest and more consistent the testing, the better. Otherwise the day after tomorrow you'll get a bug from me that with $foo installed, $bar fails tests. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with optional test dependencies

2013-01-06 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
that you want to add the dependency _after_ the package has been keyworded by half the arches out there. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:50 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: I agree with a. A problem with b

[gentoo-dev] Please guys use checkpath in init scripts

2013-01-06 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
I just gave a quick look at the init scripts installed on the tinderbox, and the amount of them that use mkdir to create the directories in /run and similar is astounding. Please check `man runscript` and use the checkpath helper instead. Thanks, -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
side — why not having it generate a per-package serial number instead? That could probably make more sense for everything... -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
. Is the output from the same exact system? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 09/01/2013 12:39, justin wrote: I assume it is a portage problem, because the log says autoconf is run but configure.in didn't change. What do you mean configure.in didn't change but autoconf is run? Does it cause a maintainer-mode rebuild? Did you use eautoreconf? -- Diego Elio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
to end up discussing back-and-forth about the Git migration, especially when half the people posting have no idea of what's going on, are not involved in the migration, or expect said migration to solve all the issues of the world, poverty included. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
that I have pointed out wy too many times that is unreliable. If mtime(configure) mtime(configure.in) autoconf can bail out unless it's executed with --force (which I don't think it is). -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarify log message?

2013-01-14 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
still refer to /var/run in most places _but_ we use checkpath for it. If /var/run symlink was killed, we'd end up with a ton of services creating a (now permanent) /var/run directory structure, with even more trouble. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarify log message?

2013-01-14 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
think that's going to be a problem for running systems though: the symlink will never be entirely empty. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd/udev split

2013-01-14 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Yes. I don't want systemd and I don't want eudev. And I'm not alone I'm sure.

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-15 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 15/01/2013 20:05, Robin H. Johnson wrote: sys-libs/freeipmi-1.2.3-r1 +0.5 I'd really prefer to see 1.2.2 or 1.2.3 stable first, given the history with FreeIPMI, I don't aim for too many stable candidates... -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
the two, so if it's not ready for one, it can't be ready for the other. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
tested. I just refuted the statement of the tree not being ready for libav putting on record that there is no indication that ffmpeg's situation is much different, as it is not currently being tested by me (and nobody else is doing the testing, so there). -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new qt category

2013-01-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
on. Please don't. Right now we have only one category which is not foo-bar and that's virtual... I'm pretty sure it's going to break some assumption to change that... -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
and most of the times I'm the one catching issues .. I do that for free, which also means you don't get to tell me what to do any more than I get to tell you what to do. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new qt category

2013-01-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
? Especially if you don't want qwt to join there, I assume we're way below 50? If so I would vote nay to any new category at all, to be honest. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-17 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: To be clear I'm not in a position to offer, and I definitely respect and value your volunteer work, but suppose someone /was/ sufficiently interested in something like ffmpeg to be willing to pay for a tinderbox run on it.

[gentoo-dev] On tinderboxing

2013-01-18 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
, I mostly just pour in the time. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new qt category

2013-01-19 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: The thing is you would practically never have to do this. Users install apps that have a number of qt modules as dependencies. These qt modules in turn cannot be updated individually (unless there is an ebuild revision

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new qt category

2013-01-19 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Maybe x11-qt, or dev-qt, or just qt, or qt-qt if we must have a hyphen for its own sake and we're just making senseless stuff up. qt-core just doesn't make sense if it applies to more than just qt-core. I actually love

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)

2013-01-23 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0 none/dev/shmtmpfs defaults 0 0 Are either or both involved ? -- if so, what to do ? None are involved. The second column would read /dev if it was involved. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)

2013-01-23 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
the same is true of /sys and /proc. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)

2013-01-24 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
work better with HPSA. It's the same RAID bus controller there. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)

2013-01-25 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
NOT to re-create the links to the highest library by default for .so files, but I wouldn't bet on it as I've seen other things causing ldconfig to run and overwrite them outside Portage. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to the tree

2013-01-25 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
.: CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to the tree

2013-01-26 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
, relating to users instead and using PAM — but I never got to get it working :( -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to the tree

2013-01-26 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
for a more precise PAM configuration in Gentoo, but no dice there. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to the tree

2013-01-29 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
that it mention file-caps as well? Most likely a good idea. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please stop useless removals

2013-02-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
to pretend that the problem does not exist, that an unmaintained package is just as fine as a maintained one is stupid and shortsighted, and explains why I have 1600 bugs open... -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please stop useless removals

2013-02-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
; last activity by someone else in 2008!), I don't see why it should be kept in tree. Bloody hell, I wonder how many people complaining about removing packages are actually using said packages, rather that complaining on principles! -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please stop useless removals

2013-02-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
, you can step in and save the package. As Alec said Gentoo is not a software archival service. so arguing on the principle that we should never delete any package from our tree is simply preposterous. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply (I am not going to figure out which tread of those all should i reply to)

2013-02-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please stop useless removals

2013-02-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
assuming that all of QA is out to ruin your life, which seems to happen pretty often to you. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?

2013-02-06 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
both? The following guide only mentions /var/run We should be migrating to /run at this point. http://goo.gl/hrWcN -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >