Hi all
any help would be welcome as I cant find anything related on the forums
I did a emerge sync then emerge -uD world
it wants 160 new packages
so I let it run
it gets to gettext and the following happens during compile
Any ideas on how to fix this?
Many thanks in advance
Paul
PK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
[snip]
EMACS=xemacs /bin/sh ../../config/elisp-comp $@ || exit 1; \
else : ; fi
xemacs: error while loading shared libraries: libXm.so.2: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
re-merge xemacs. xorg-x11 recently moved some things (libXm
Jason Cooper wrote:
PK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
[snip]
EMACS=xemacs /bin/sh ../../config/elisp-comp $@ || exit 1; \
else : ; fi
xemacs: error while loading shared libraries: libXm.so.2: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
re-merge xemacs. xorg-x11 recently moved
PK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
Jason Cooper wrote:
PK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
[snip]
EMACS=xemacs /bin/sh ../../config/elisp-comp $@ || exit 1; \
else : ; fi
xemacs: error while loading shared libraries: libXm.so.2: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Hi Gentoo-User,
I am doing an emerge -uDv world and getting a failure at
kdelibs-3.3.2-r2.
I have checked the forums and not found much, I checked google groups
and found a spanish post but i cant read spanish and nor can google's
translator it would seem.
I searched the Gentoo-User archives and
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:14:22 -, Mal Herring wrote:
I searched the Gentoo-User archives and found a thread with someone
having a similar problem and the fix for that issue was the command :
fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.4
so i thought i would give it a go - however it did not help...
Can
You only want to use nptl or threads,
but not both. Stick with nptl as it should not need the linux-headers.
-Original Message-
From: Sevak Avakians
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005
6:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] compile
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a program called breve. It lists the following as required libraries:
OpenGL
GLUT
ODE
expat
zlib
libpthread
libdl
I have already emerged opengl, glut, ode, and expat. zlib is already on my system, too. I cannot find libpthread or libdl in portage, although
Avakians
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005
6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] compile
error / missing libraries?
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a program called breve. It lists the
following as required libraries:
OpenGL
GLUT
ODE
expat
zlib
libpthread
need the threads or nptl use flags when compiling glibc in order to get libpthread.
-Original Message-
From: Sevak Avakians [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] compile error
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:55 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 00:18, Dennis Robertson wrote:
I got to the second last package installing kde-3.2.0 and got the
following error. There is nothing on bugzilla yet.
There is: http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=24960action=view
Hello List,
I got to the second last package installing kde-3.2.0 and got the following
error. There is nothing on bugzilla yet. Can anyone assist in solving this
please?
In file included from /usr/kde/3.2/include/kaction.h:35,
from ktron.cpp:28:
On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 00:18, Dennis Robertson wrote:
I got to the second last package installing kde-3.2.0 and got the
following error. There is nothing on bugzilla yet.
There is: http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=24960action=view
Too soon to say whether it's fixed it yet. The
Neil Bothwick said,
There is: http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=24960action=view
Too soon to say whether it's fixed it yet. The compile hasn't failed so
far but it's time for bed...
The compile finished while I was sending the mail, and it worked.
Cheers
Neil
--
For every
Thanks to all of you guys.
I have emerged cabextract and now it works fine.
Thanks again,
Francois.
Francois Méan wrote:
Hi,
I got this error when emerging gnome :
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh line 312 cabextract : command not found
Error x11-base/xfree-4.3.0-r3 failed
Function src_unpack, line 312 ,
Hi,
I got this error when emerging gnome :
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh line 312 cabextract : command not found
Error x11-base/xfree-4.3.0-r3 failed
Function src_unpack, line 312 , exit code 127
(no error message)
Can someone helps me ?
Regards,
Francois.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Is cabextract installed on your system?
What does emerge -pv cabextract give you?
Francois Méan wrote:
Hi,
I got this error when emerging gnome :
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh line 312 cabextract : command not found
Error x11-base/xfree-4.3.0-r3 failed
Function src_unpack, line 312 , exit code 127
(no
Francois Méan wrote:
Hi,
I got this error when emerging gnome :
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh line 312 cabextract : command not found
Error x11-base/xfree-4.3.0-r3 failed
Function src_unpack, line 312 , exit code 127
(no error message)
Can someone helps me ?
Regards,
Francois.
My guess would be that you
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:24:38AM +0100, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Francois M???an [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got this error when emerging gnome :
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh line 312 cabextract : command not found
Error x11-base/xfree-4.3.0-r3 failed
Function src_unpack, line 312 , exit code 127
(no
Hallo Francois,
* Francois schrieb am 29.01.2004:
Hi,
I got this error when emerging gnome :
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh line 312 cabextract : command not found
Error x11-base/xfree-4.3.0-r3 failed
Function src_unpack, line 312 , exit code 127
(no error message)
Can someone helps me ?
On Jan 29, 2004, at 11:25 am, Drake Wyrm wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:24:38AM +0100, in
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Francois M???an [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got this error when emerging gnome :
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh line 312 cabextract : command not found
Error x11-base/xfree-4.3.0-r3 failed
Hi,
With all the 2.4.X kernel problems i tried the 2.6.1-mm4 kernel.
I copied my old 2.4.20_r7 config to the 2.6.1-mm4 dir and run
make oldconfig
make menu config
make dep make clean bzImage modules modules_install
after awhile i got this:
...
INSTALL fs/vfat/vfat.ko
INSTALL
On (27/01/04 16:23), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With all the 2.4.X kernel problems i tried the 2.6.1-mm4 kernel.
I copied my old 2.4.20_r7 config to the 2.6.1-mm4 dir and run
make oldconfig
make menu config
make dep make clean bzImage modules modules_install
after awhile i got this:
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 10:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With all the 2.4.X kernel problems i tried the 2.6.1-mm4 kernel.
I copied my old 2.4.20_r7 config to the 2.6.1-mm4 dir and run
make oldconfig
make menu config
make dep make clean bzImage modules modules_install
after awhile i
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:23:23 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With all the 2.4.X kernel problems i tried the 2.6.1-mm4 kernel.
I copied my old 2.4.20_r7 config to the 2.6.1-mm4 dir and run
make oldconfig
make menu config
make dep make clean bzImage modules modules_install
after
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:23:23 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With all the 2.4.X kernel problems i tried the 2.6.1-mm4 kernel.
I copied my old 2.4.20_r7 config to the 2.6.1-mm4 dir and run
make oldconfig
make menu config
make dep make clean bzImage modules modules_install
after
Evening !
Today's emerge world likes to install xine-lib-1_rc2, which can fail
on x86 due to known -mfpmath=sse and xine-lib incompatibility bug ...
(see bugs.gentoo.org)
Solution:
Prevent compile to run with -mfpmath=sse by modifying
xine-lib-1_rc2.ebuild, which is possible in two ways:
1.
begin quote
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 06:21:52 +0200
Adrian Pirciu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could also check out spiders new project
http://chinstrap.alternating.net/ I would guess this would be a god
send for those with a slower machine.
Thanks. Too bad I don't like the compiling
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 19:34, Spider wrote:
(B begin quote
(B On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 06:21:52 +0200
(B
(B Adrian Pirciu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(B You could also check out spiders new project
(B http://chinstrap.alternating.net/ I would guess this would be a god
(B send for
begin quote
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:24:50 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*laughs* I'm actually one to prefer better sane over sazzy in
cases like this. in fact , at home I'm even stricter with
CFLAGS.(-O2 no omit-frame-pointer and no stripping, the other
machines run
Hi
I have a pretty slow computer, p3/700, and i can use a P4 to compile
my packages. Given that on the P4 there's gentoo installed, how can I
compile the packages I need on the P4 then merge them on my gentoo on
P3 ? There must an easy way to do this.
Thank you all.
adi
--
[EMAIL
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:12 pm, Adrian Pirciu wrote:
I have a pretty slow computer, p3/700, and i can use a P4 to compile
my packages. Given that on the P4 there's gentoo installed, how can I
compile the packages I need on the P4 then merge them on my gentoo on
P3 ? There must an easy way to do
-- quoting Adrian Pirciu --
I have a pretty slow computer, p3/700, and i can use a P4 to compile
my packages. Given that on the P4 there's gentoo installed, how can I
compile the packages I need on the P4 then merge them on my gentoo on
P3 ? There must an easy way to do this.
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:46 pm, Adrian Pirciu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks. Now all I need is how to move the files from one computer to
another (that is, what directories should i move). The -B produces a
file or a directory of binaries ? What should I move ? To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks a lot. I really didn't want you to bother too much, I just
thought that somebody would know the answer right away, without
trying. Right now I don't have access to a gentoo system and that's
why I just wanted to know if this thing is
25, 2003 8:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] compile on other computer, emerge on mine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks a lot. I really didn't want you to bother too much, I just
thought that somebody would know the answer right away, without
trying
They already have something like that, it's called GRP.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Pirciu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] compile on other computer, emerge on mine
This is most unexpected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 06:12, Ben wrote:
Adrian Pirciu wrote:
|Hi
|
|I have a pretty slow computer, p3/700, and i can use a P4 to
| compile my packages. Given that on the P4 there's gentoo
| installed, how can I compile the packages I
begin quote
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:51:51 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to NFS the CCACHE datadir across all the DISTCC hosts?
I was just thinking that, if recompiling, there's no guarantee which
code will be compiled where...
and slow down the direct IO from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 14 November 2003 05:18, Spundun Bhatt wrote:
Just curious.
Around how much speedup do people get when they switch from std gcc
setup to distcc with all the fancieness that we talked about in this
thread? Spundun
That's entirely
Spundun Bhatt wrote:
Just curious.
Around how much speedup do people get when they switch from std gcc
setup to distcc with all the fancieness that we talked about in this
thread?
On their home page http://distcc.samba.org/ they describe a
configuration with 3 machines, where compiling went 2.6
On Friday 14 November 2003 17:49, Spider wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:51:51 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to NFS the CCACHE datadir across all the DISTCC hosts?
I was just thinking that, if recompiling, there's no guarantee which
code will be compiled
begin quote
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:01:58 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and slow down the direct IO from fast to its faster to compile,
really ?
Well, depends on the situation but most of the time you're probably
right.
Well, okay. On a machine with PIO disks and gigabit
begin quote
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:01:58 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and slow down the direct IO from fast to its faster to compile,
really ?
Well, depends on the situation but most of the time you're probably
right.
Well, okay. On a machine with PIO disks
begin quote
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:14:53 -0600
Jeffrey Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, that should be the case.
I have openmosix here and all 4 of my machines are compiled the same..
So wouldn't it be faster lets say, I nfs ccache, so all my other
machines technically won't
On Saturday 15 November 2003 00:12, Spider wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:01:58 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and slow down the direct IO from fast to its faster to compile,
really ?
Well, depends on the situation but most of the time you're probably
right.
Well, okay.
begin quote
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:27:11 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and slow down the direct IO from fast to its faster to
compile, really ?
Well, depends on the situation but most of the time you're
probably right.
Well, okay. On a machine with PIO disks
Yep, that should be the case.
I have openmosix here and all 4 of my machines are compiled
the same..
So wouldn't it be faster lets say, I nfs ccache, so all my other
machines technically won't have to compile any code once
the first pc
does it??
Actually, what Id suggest
Spider wrote:
I prefer not to do the unpack/configure/ccache dance unless necessary.
That's a point. I probably won't install ccache at the moment
because it invokes such details i don't want to take care of
right now (still installing my system).
I guess it's only a matter of how large one's
There are a few problems:
cyrix 233 supported by athlon 1.4 and a 2.2P4M
1. using a 10M coax network: definite bottleneck
2. a lot of work is still done on the low power machine which limits
gains
3. many of the apps I would really like to run this wont:
openoffice (comes and goes)
Hello,
Just in case - does anyone know (or wants to write)
an article about the best way how to setup:
gentoo + distcc + ccache + tmpfs
(question of the month ? :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
begin quote
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:39:25 +0100
Oliver Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Just in case - does anyone know (or wants to write)
an article about the best way how to setup:
gentoo + distcc + ccache + tmpfs
(question of the month ? :)
Contact me in priv and I'll
begin quote
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:39:25 +0100
Oliver Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Just in case - does anyone know (or wants to write)
an article about the best way how to setup:
gentoo + distcc + ccache + tmpfs
(question of the month ? :)
Contact me in
On Friday 14 November 2003 00:52, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:39:25 +0100
Oliver Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case - does anyone know (or wants to write)
an article about the best way how to setup:
gentoo + distcc + ccache + tmpfs
Contact me in
gentoo
- your already there!
distcc
- emerge distcc. follow instructions printed at end of ebuild
ccache
- emerge ccache. follow instructions printed at end of ebuild
I get this part
tmpfs
- if you have lots of ram, run mount tmpfs
/var/tmp/portage. if not, don't.
For the
On Friday 14 November 2003 01:22, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
here is the problem with that.. Distcc does work like that in 'theory'..
But your leaving out several things..Big problem with distcc is that it
likes to fail compiles if your using different gcc versions during
compiles.. Things of this
On Friday 14 November 2003 01:22, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
here is the problem with that.. Distcc does work like that
in 'theory'..
But your leaving out several things..Big problem with
distcc is that it
likes to fail compiles if your using different gcc versions during
compiles..
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Here's a quick run-down:
gentoo
- your already there!
distcc
- emerge distcc. follow instructions printed at end of ebuild
ccache
- emerge ccache. follow instructions printed at end of ebuild
tmpfs
- if you have lots of ram, run mount tmpfs /var/tmp/portage. if not, don't.
begin quote
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 01:47:21 +0100
Oliver Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but is this rough installation the perfect way for optimum speed
? For some detail: distcc takes care of the $TMPDIR var, while emerge
bravely puts the large distribution file stuff to /var/tmp,
Spider wrote:
b) var/tmp/portage on tmpfs : do you really have the amount of RAM
necessary for this? I think not, and if you go tmpfsswap , then you
loose whatever performance you gained.
No, as i mentioned, emerge does it right not to use /tmp, of course. :)
But what you wrote brought me a
On Friday 14 November 2003 01:36, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2003 01:22, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
here is the problem with that.. Distcc does work like that
in 'theory'..
But your leaving out several things..Big problem with
distcc is that it
likes to fail
On Friday 14 November 2003 10:41, Spider wrote:
well.
a) put CCACHE datadir on a separate partition, preferrably sized at 3 gb
for a 2 gb cache, make it ext2, noatime,noexec,nosuid,nodev (just as a
precaution)
Is it possible to NFS the CCACHE datadir across all the DISTCC hosts? I was
just
Spider wrote:
Contact me in priv and I'll make a rough draft, which you can formalize
using the Gentoo Documentation Policy. I'll even host it for you. ;)
Well i'm still a bit unfamiliar with the Linux file/dir hierarchy,
env vars, and how everything overrides each other and which security
Just curious.
Around how much speedup do people get when they switch from std gcc
setup to distcc with all the fancieness that we talked about in this thread?
Spundun
Oliver Lange wrote:
Hello,
Just in case - does anyone know (or wants to write)
an article about the best way how to setup:
howdie all
i am busy installing my amd
i have done the chroot and now im trying to get the bootstrap to compile but i keeps
giving me a segmentation fault
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: line 1325: 18355 Segmentation fault ./configure --prefix=/usr
--host=${CHOST} --mandir=/usr/share/man
Ryan wrote:
howdie all
i am busy installing my amd
i have done the chroot and now im trying to get the bootstrap to compile but i keeps giving me a segmentation fault
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: line 1325: 18355 Segmentation fault ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=${CHOST} --mandir=/usr/share/man
Sami Näätänen wrote:
On Saturday 20 September 2003 03:15, Fred Clausen wrote:
Fred Clausen wrote:
Ok, this is turing out to be one major problem. :-/ I ran memtest and
sure enough, one of my sticks of RAM was bad. Ok, no problem, I only
loose 512 mb(only *tear*), and I am down to 768. Oh
Fred Clausen wrote:
Hey all -
I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile
and I am at a wits end trying to figure out what to do.
All of these issues revolve around nmemonics. If I try to compile any
2.4.xx kernel, I get an error, in random places, about an invalid
On Saturday 20 September 2003 03:15, Fred Clausen wrote:
Fred Clausen wrote:
Ok, this is turing out to be one major problem. :-/ I ran memtest and
sure enough, one of my sticks of RAM was bad. Ok, no problem, I only
loose 512 mb(only *tear*), and I am down to 768. Oh well. Start the
Fred Clausen wrote:
I get an error, in random places ...
Maybe it's not your case, but I experienced, that in case
of random errors during compilation there is a HW problem, mostly RAM.
I had to increase CPU supply voltage on **not* *overclocked Athlon XP
about + 0.2V to get compilation to
Norbert Kamenicky wrote:
Fred Clausen wrote:
I get an error, in random places ...
Maybe it's not your case, but I experienced, that in case
of random errors during compilation there is a HW problem, mostly RAM.
I had to increase CPU supply voltage on **not* *overclocked Athlon XP
about + 0.2V
Fred Clausen wrote:
Norbert Kamenicky wrote:
Fred Clausen wrote:
I get an error, in random places ...
Maybe it's not your case, but I experienced, that in case
of random errors during compilation there is a HW problem, mostly RAM.
I had to increase CPU supply voltage on **not* *overclocked
Hey all -
I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile
and I am at a wits end trying to figure out what to do.
All of these issues revolve around nmemonics. If I try to compile any
2.4.xx kernel, I get an error, in random places, about an invalid
nmemonic ';'.
Which version of gcc, glibc, etc are you running?
emerge info is a good place to get everything quickly.
- Mark
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 19:35, Fred Clausen wrote:
Hey all -
I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile
and I am at a wits end trying to figure out
Mark Knecht wrote:
Which version of gcc, glibc, etc are you running?
emerge info is a good place to get everything quickly.
- Mark
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 19:35, Fred Clausen wrote:
Hey all -
I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile
and I am at a wits end
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:11, Fred Clausen wrote:
Hey all -
I am having a couple of issues with things that I am trying to compile
and I am at a wits end trying to figure out what to do.
All of these issues revolve around nmemonics. If I try to compile any
2.4.xx kernel, I get an
I doubt this matters, but emerge info at the top says 2.4.20-gentoo-r6
while you are working on the gaming kernel. That's a bit strange, but
probably not a problem.
I had trouble with the gcc3.3 stuff. One of the main problems was it
gets more strict about bits of code. I turned in two that made
Fred Clausen wrote:
I doubt this matters, but emerge info at the top says 2.4.20-gentoo-r6
while you are working on the gaming kernel. That's a bit strange, but
probably not a problem.
I had trouble with the gcc3.3 stuff. One of the main problems was it
gets more strict about bits of code. I
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 21:16, Fred Clausen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Changing those flags made no difference. The kernel compilation appears
to use the CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf
I am considering downgrading gcc 3.2.x, but I really don't want to do
that
I certainly can
I just tried compiling media-sound/beast . I get the compile erro . The
trailing part is as follows.
---
gcc -DG_ENABLE_DEBUG -g -ggdb3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-cond-mismatch
-ffor-sco pe -Wno-cast-qual -Wall
Hi people! When I try to compile lablgtk, the compilation ends with error...
what's happening?
$emerge lablgtk
Calculating dependencies ...done!
emerge (1 of 1) dev-ml/lablgtk-1.2.5 to /
md5 src_uri ;-) lablgtk-1.2.5.tar.gz
Unpacking source...
Unpacking lablgtk-1.2.5.tar.gz to
81 matches
Mail list logo
