Hi!
I am planning of switching from gnome to gnome-light. How can I unmerge gnome
and in particular remove all packages like games, gnumeric, abiword and so on.
I found that I actually do not use them so I think gnome-light should be enough.
Regards
On Sunday 25 February 2007, JC D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] swiching from gnome to gnome-light':
I am planning of switching from gnome to gnome-light. How can I unmerge
gnome and in particular remove all packages like games, gnumeric,
abiword and so on. I found that I
On 03:14 Sun 25 Feb , Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007, JC D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] swiching from gnome to gnome-light':
I am planning of switching from gnome to gnome-light. How can I unmerge
gnome and in particular remove all packages like
Dale wrote:
I wonder if someone needs to
tell the programmer for portage that kwrite doesn't like those
*** in there at all? Should I file it as a bug?
Of course not. If anything, it's a bug in KWrite. Why are you
using KWrite anyway to look at the emerge log? Why not use
something like
On Sunday 25 February 2007 13:08:34 Benno Schulenberg wrote:
I wonder if someone needs to
tell the programmer for portage that kwrite doesn't like those
*** in there at all? Should I file it as a bug?
Of course not. If anything, it's a bug in KWrite. Why are you
using KWrite anyway to
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 13:08:34 Benno Schulenberg wrote:
I wonder if someone needs to
tell the programmer for portage that kwrite doesn't like those
*** in there at all? Should I file it as a bug?
Of course not. If anything, it's a bug in KWrite.
Hi!
I think I have a serious problem with my partition table. I did all the
partitions with fdisk but may be not right, or somewhen screwed my partition
table up. I want to use a graphical tool like gparted also doing some changes
on my fat32 partition. But when I installed gparted I got an
On Sunday 25 February 2007 14:05, JC D wrote:
Hi!
I think I have a serious problem with my partition table. I did all the
partitions with fdisk but may be not right, or somewhen screwed my
partition table up. I want to use a graphical tool like gparted also doing
some changes on my fat32
Reordered for readability..
On Saturday 24 February 2007 05:40:52 Douglas Linford wrote:
Did you even read the replies up until now?
Kinda testy there Mr. Boyes I did read the replies...
I guess you just didn't understand much of it then...
# emerge -pv
Hello, apparently it's time for me to upgrade like so:
mail-mta/postfix-2.3.6 [2.2.10]
Has anyone else made this upgrade? How did it go? Anything to watch
out for?
- Grant
The upgrade here was OK. I didn't have to change anything - just emerged
and reloaded with /etc/init.d/postfix
Hi,
I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point where all the dependencies
(emerge -DuN and revdep-rebuild) are clean but when I run emerge
--depclean wants remove packages that would break dependencies.
I understand that I could fix
Hi All,
It seems that when Amarok is playing, all system sounds are put on hold. Once
I close Amarok then all system (KDE) notifications suddenly sound at once!
How do I figure out what's wrong and how should I fix it?
--
Regards,
Mick
pgp19wGrVRQwo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 25 February 2007 18:50:47 Mark Knecht wrote:
I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point where all the dependencies
(emerge -DuN and revdep-rebuild) are clean but when I run emerge
--depclean wants remove packages that
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:29:24 -0600
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I think it is not a good idea to call Firefox (for some
branding issue) its development codename. Maybe Gentoo should use
Debian's Iceweasel name.
On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:55 pm, Dan Farrell wrote:
but 'IceWeasel' is ugly. Bon Echo is such a nice name.
I'd prefer firefox_alt or something similar. Something that tells me what it
is
-jm
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 2007-02-25, Joe Menola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:55 pm, Dan Farrell wrote:
but 'IceWeasel' is ugly. Bon Echo is such a nice name.
I'd prefer firefox_alt or something similar. Something that tells me what it
is
Um, if you're not allowed to use the
It occurred to me that if the shorewall firewall on my headless router
doesn't start for whatever reason, I'll be totally exposed. Is there
a way to protect against that?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 2/25/07, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-02-25, Joe Menola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:55 pm, Dan Farrell wrote:
but 'IceWeasel' is ugly. Bon Echo is such a nice name.
I'd prefer firefox_alt or something similar. Something that tells me what it
Hi Bo,
Thanks for the response. Hopefully I'm approaching this correct.
On 2/25/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 18:50:47 Mark Knecht wrote:
I've been cleaning up a machine trying to fix a problem with
Evolution crashing. I'm down to the point
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote
Dear gentoo users,
since a few months I am getting core dumps in / and $HOME/ on my
notebook. I am not aware of having changed anything with my PAM or
similar settings. Has there be any changes to the default policy in
PAM concerning core dumps?
I would like to suppress the generation of core
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific case.
Spam with a valid reply-to address is still spam.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write
on 02/25/2007 11:14 PM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific
case.
Spam with a valid reply-to address is still spam.
You mean an *off-topic*
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
On Sunday 25 February 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xfce4 upgrade':
And please stop top-posting (shamelessly copied from one of Boyd's
posts..):
I shamelessly copied it from someone else [*], so I don't really deserve
the credit. I thought it
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:35:33PM -0700, Penguin Lover Korthrun squawked:
Iceweasel for life.
Getting a bit off topic here...
But IceWeasel to me means something like Distant third cousin with
some contradictory philosophy to FireFox, like, say, Galeon or
Kazehakase.
I prefer something like
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still *off-topic*.
Oh, come on, why can't you have the decency to spam^H post off-topic
from just one e-mail account? It is annoying to have to kill-file
multiple ones.
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it
on 02/26/2007 12:29 AM Agg wrote the following:
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an
on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still *off-topic*.
Oh, come on, why can't you have the decency to spam^H post off-topic
from just one e-mail
On Sunday 25 February 2007 19:58, Grant wrote:
It occurred to me that if the shorewall firewall on my headless router
doesn't start for whatever reason, I'll be totally exposed. Is there
a way to protect against that?
Well, you'll get an error during boot that iptables did not come up. I
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:14 PM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific
case.
Spam with a valid reply-to address is still spam.
You mean an
Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:29 AM Agg wrote the following:
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:15:14PM -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
I prefer something like FlameCanid that more properly expresses the
fact that ours is almost-exactly-but-not-quite-perfectly-the-same.
We use Bon Echo as it's upstreams default unbranded name. Many other
distros are using Bon Echo
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still
*off-topic*.
Oh, come on, why can't you have the
Oh my gosh, why don't you all just STOP and let this post DIE.
--
Samuel (shardz)
Shardz's Igloo:
shardz.homelinux.net
Registered Linux User #410639
amarok.kde.org
defectivebydesign.org
usmc.mil
On Monday 26 February 2007 00:06:55 Christian Marie wrote:
You are allowed to build Firefox with branding, you can't distribute any
binaries you build though. We're currently considering enabling branding
by default with USE=bindist however it's a complicated issue.
I assume you meant when
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote:
If you had the decency to accept off-topic as off-topic, spam as spam,
simple as simple, and hypocrisy as hypocrisy...
You seem to be evidently void of any sense of relevance and proportionality.
This is a 'gentoo-user'
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:12:49 +0100
Christoph Nodes wrote:
Dear gentoo users,
since a few months I am getting core dumps in / and $HOME/ on my
notebook. I am not aware of having changed anything with my PAM or
similar settings. Has there be any changes to the default policy in
PAM
I'm bringing up a new Gentoo box, and last night I successfully merged
xorg-x11, this morning when I tried to merge KDE, I got a circular
dependencies error. As a first troubleshooting step I trimmed my USE flags
down to a minimum and found the error went away. After several rounds of
On Monday 26 February 2007 00:55:04 Bob Young wrote:
I'm bringing up a new Gentoo box, and last night I successfully merged
xorg-x11, this morning when I tried to merge KDE, I got a circular
dependencies error. As a first troubleshooting step I trimmed my USE flags
down to a minimum and found
It occurred to me that if the shorewall firewall on my headless router
doesn't start for whatever reason, I'll be totally exposed. Is there
a way to protect against that?
Well, you'll get an error during boot that iptables did not come up.
The machine is headless though.
I assume that
Dale wrote:
OK then. I'm going to start selling Viagra. I'll just put off-topic in
the subject line and it will be OK. ;-)
What's happening to everyone here!??
CAN'T YOU SEE THE DAMN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REAL SPAM AND SOME POOR SOUL TRYING
TO SAVE LIVES??
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Dale wrote:
OK then. I'm going to start selling Viagra. I'll just put off-topic in
the subject line and it will be OK. ;-)
What's happening to everyone here!??
CAN'T YOU SEE THE DAMN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REAL SPAM AND SOME POOR SOUL TRYING
TO SAVE
Here Here If you really want to save lives join peta or the spca and leave the
rest of us blissfully unaware. In this lists until they start issuing
aquriums with gentoo cds I have no need for help with a dolphin. Also its spam
in the fact it is unsolicited communication to a sibject clearly
on 02/26/2007 12:58 AM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:14 PM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific
case.
Spam with
on 02/26/2007 01:22 AM Mick wrote the following:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still
At Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:02:05 -0500 Allan Gottlieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a stable x86 gentoo system with firefox (bon echo) 2.0.0.1) and
totem 2.16.4. According to about:plugins totem is to handle mp3 files
I would like to temporarily not have totem handle the mp3s, but I was
Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:58 AM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
No - I meant spam...
off-topic in this particular case
At last we agree - your spam is off-topic :-).
On a more serious note, I've added both your email addresses to my
delete immediately filter.
--
Grant Edwards wrote:
If you want it to call itself Firefox add mozbranding to your
USE flags.
Thanks for bringing this up! My mother has been a little confused about
this Bon Echo thing - and (re) emerging with USE=mozbranding got
Firefox back for her, along with its expected icon.
Hi,
Trying to emerge glibc I got error:
configure: error:
*** These critical programs are missing or too old: gcc
*** Check the INSTALL file for required versions.
I upgraded gcc to 4.1.1-r3. apparently I have more versions of gcc
installed.
Questions:
1. What to do to fix glibc
Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 schrieb ext Enrico Weigelt:
But: there's another problem. Every user has to log into coda
by its own. This is bad if all user's homedirs should sit on coda.
AFAIK there are PAM modules for this. Maybe not in portage, though.
Thought about AFS?
Bye...
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 17:15 -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:35:33PM -0700, Penguin Lover Korthrun squawked:
Iceweasel for life.
Getting a bit off topic here...
what is a topic for, if not for getting off?!
But IceWeasel to me means something like Distant third cousin
56 matches
Mail list logo
